Jump to content

Here's what happens when the world's richest man buys the presidency


Recommended Posts

Posted

Social Security will likely be the last thing they cut, and if they do, those cuts will likely be phased in over a number of years.  The easier cuts will come from Medicare and Medicaid.  Those are easier targets. 

Posted

A link showing how much the left lies about "tax cuts for the rich". 

 

"Beyond what the Trump tax cuts did for economic growth and federal revenues, it provided major benefits to working families. The officially reported poverty level fell to its lowest rate in 50 years and unemployment rates for minorities and those without a college degree hit all-time lows. Real median household income rose by $5,000, and wages went up by nearly 5 percent. Americans earning under $100,000 saw an average tax cut of 16 percent. And while the tax burden on low-income families went down, the top one percent saw their share of federal taxes go up."

 

Despite CBO’s Predictions, Trump Tax Cuts Were a Boon for America’s Economy and Working Families | The U.S. House Committee on the Budget - House Budget Committee

Posted
3 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

 

You are talking about the future again, about what MAY happen. You have a crystal ball.

 

FACT is the liberals realized they had been conned for 4 years before the election, and to give voting for the fraud that was put up for election a wide berth.

That she was a fraud, and was conning possible voters with her campaign and polling results, became even more clear when the details were published after she lost the election.

I am merely basing my predictions on what happened last time under Trump. Perhaps you have forgotten how his trade war with China screwed American farmers, so badly they needed massive subsidies to placate them.

 

IMO it will be even worse this time around, because the people Trump appoints to various positions will need only one qualification - absolute loyalty. Competence and nous are not even on the radar.

 

As far as Harris is concerned, Americans will probably never be adult enough to elect a female leader. The Democrats failed to learn that lesson with Clinton.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
3 hours ago, impulse said:

Here's what happens when the world's richest man buys the presidency

 

ScreamingLefty.jpg.75d08c72047015ae549a39febda08221.jpg

 

Should'a picked a better candidate.  The 2024 election was the Dems' to lose.  And boy, did they lose.

 

 

That picture is every anti trumper on AN

 

  • Love It 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, simple1 said:

 

Not going to plough through that. Also I don't believe in coincidences 

We were literally forced to accept for 4 years that it was pure coincidence that money came gushing into the biden families bank accounts from dodgy countries the then VP biden held significant power in. Ukraine, China, Russia and Romania for ex. You were notably at the forefront of the pure coincidence movement(even though every participant knew full well it was corruption with s capital C) and no reason whatsoever these millions were flowing .

Bit rich to reincarnate as a non believer in coincidence.

  • Like 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

A link showing how much the left lies about "tax cuts for the rich". 

 

"Beyond what the Trump tax cuts did for economic growth and federal revenues, it provided major benefits to working families. The officially reported poverty level fell to its lowest rate in 50 years and unemployment rates for minorities and those without a college degree hit all-time lows. Real median household income rose by $5,000, and wages went up by nearly 5 percent. Americans earning under $100,000 saw an average tax cut of 16 percent. And while the tax burden on low-income families went down, the top one percent saw their share of federal taxes go up."

 

Despite CBO’s Predictions, Trump Tax Cuts Were a Boon for America’s Economy and Working Families | The U.S. House Committee on the Budget - House Budget Committee

 

Although Dems on the Board, a Republican partisan report. No mention of the increase to the national debt created by trump's tax cuts, which were also used to enrich corporates by share buy back schemes, not reinvested as proposed.

  • Confused 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

We were literally forced to accept for 4 years that it was pure coincidence that money came gushing into the biden families bank accounts from dodgy countries the then VP biden held significant power in. Ukraine, China, Russia and Romania for ex. You were notably at the forefront of the pure coincidence movement(even though every participant knew full well it was corruption with s capital C) and no reason whatsoever these millions were flowing .

Bit rich to reincarnate as a non believer in coincidence.

you've got the wrong member.  Biden corruption has never been proven in a court of law, just allegations by trump world.

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, simple1 said:

you've got the wrong member.  Biden corruption has never been proven in a court of law, just allegations by trump world.

The laptop has now been verified as authentic by hunter himself and every news outlet that falsely called it a Russian plant and conspiracy theory. 

He was the most corrupt President ever and the coverup has destroyed all alphabet agencies, media and intel chiefs. Nobody is still claiming the millions were flowing for no reason as we were previously FORCED to accept.

  • Confused 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, simple1 said:

you've got the wrong member.  Biden corruption has never been proven in a court of law, just allegations by trump world.

 

They can't take it to court as long as he's the sitting president and the Senate won't vote to impeach.

 

But if you read the Hur Report and the House Report on the Biden Crime Family, you'll see evidence out the wazoo.

 

I think they'll let the harmless, senile old guy off when he's out of office.  But the new DOJ may pleasantly surprise me and make an example of him, that if the Dems can do it, so can the Repubs.

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
2 hours ago, KhunLA said:

Being the 1% pay 40% , and top 10% pay 76%, of the income tax, that does make sense.

 

image.png.ad4cc1130ec8c53478a36226dc79b676.png

 

image.png.2f46977cc7cee17e2c29b8a1b6bf41dc.png

 

You can hardly expect those on skid row to pay taxes.

Anyway, it is really not necessary for the bottom half of the population to pay income tax.

The productivity of the USA is already so high that income tax for the bottom half can be abolished.

 

 

Posted
5 hours ago, simple1 said:

Interesting opinion piece...

 

GOP legislators are toying with reducing payouts under the system, including raising the retirement age and other benefit cuts. As one GOP representative recently told Fox Business Network, “we're going to have to have some hard decisions” on Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare.

 

Trump’s GOP will be making “hard” choices, meaning they will be cutting benefits, in order to fund tax cuts for wealthy donors.

 

Here's what happens when the world's richest man buys the presidency | Opinion

Another thread about American domestic affairs posted by an Australian, why TF do you care about American  retirement ages and benefit payments? What on earth does it have to do with you?

You are off the chart derangement  sufferer,I think someone should call Guinness to log this as a world record

  • Agree 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said:

 

You can hardly expect those on skid row to pay taxes.

Anyway, it is really not necessary for the bottom half of the population to pay income tax.

The productivity of the USA is already so high that income tax for the bottom half can be abolished.

 

 

 

I always thought anybody making $15 an hour or less shouldn't pay income tax. Then we can stop talking about raising wages which gives the government more money. This will never happen because while they talk about the poor they suck every last dollar out they can. The people in government believe every dollar made belongs to them and what you keep is their magnanimity.

 

As far as social security we should try to get rid of it as quickly as is reasonable.  

Posted
1 minute ago, frank83628 said:

Another thread about American domestic affairs posted by an Australian, why TF do you care about American  retirement ages and benefit payments? What on earth does it have to do with you?

You are off the chart derangement  sufferer,I think someone should call Guinness to log this as a world record

 

Even the American expats are obsessed. They claim they are so happy in Thailand but everyday here they are ranting about stuff that shouldn't concern them. I live in the USA or wouldn't post in these threads. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...