Debate over dual pricing in Thailand’s tourism sector is resurfacing, with recent discussions highlighting ongoing frustration among expats and travellers. Dual pricing, where foreigners are charged higher fees than Thai nationals at attractions and services, has long been a feature of the local tourism landscape. While widely known, the issue continues to generate strong reactions. In recent weeks, discussions on ASEAN Now have brought the topic back into focus, with users sharing mixed views on fairness, value and transparency. Some argue that higher prices for foreign visitors reflect economic realities and help support local infrastructure. Others see the practice as inconsistent and confusing, particularly when pricing is not clearly displayed. The issue tends to surface during peak travel periods, when more visitors encounter pricing differences at national parks, attractions and transport services. While dual pricing is not unique to Thailand, the lack of standardisation continues to draw criticism, especially among long-term residents who feel the distinction is not always applied consistently. Despite this, the system remains in place across many parts of the tourism sector, and there are no clear signs of widespread changes. For a full discussion and user experiences, see the original thread: 👉 Dual pricing in Thai tourism: economic necessity or hidden bias? The issue has also been highlighted in recent reporting, including a March 1 article examining the wider impact of dual pricing on Thailand’s tourism outlook. 👉 Dual pricing debate clouds Thai tourism outlook
