Jump to content

Srinagarind Hospital overwhelmed by 830% rise in cancer patients


Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, UWEB said:

The numbers raised in a period of three years since the program was started and not within some days. Before people were restricted to the Hospital where they are registered, under the program started in 2021 they can use any Hospital. And off course they flog to the most specialized ones.

No.  People aren’t restricted to the hospital where they are registered if their hospital does not offer what is needed.  Referrals can be made.  You should educate yourself on how the healthcare here works.

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 12/18/2024 at 10:47 AM, phetphet said:

The cancer cases must already have been there. The program has just brought them to the fore.

 

I wonder what the main causes are here in Thailand. Smoking? Excessive use of chemicals in farming? Pollution? Additives in food? Deep frying everything?

A lack of amulets as well maybe?

Posted

I'm thankful that the Cult of the Wormheads has come here to solve this mystery. I have no doubt that the next volcanic eruption or solar eclipse will also be attributable to "The Jab". I'm a little surprised how many expat PhD biochemists have settled in Thailand and joined AN. We're just lucky, I guess.

 

I'm one of those Luddites who do not believe that correlation equals causation, nor do I believe everything on the internet is Gospel truth. That's just the natural skeptic in me. I see that data and consider things like:

 

---Awareness among the area population that that particular hospital has developed a comprehensive cancer treatment program and broadcast it, so folks turn toward it for treatment ?

 

---The prevalence of the area consumption of Koi Pla, which has been linked to liver cancer ?

 

---Rising levels of pollution countrywide, but cancer patients not congregating at one specific hospital in other areas ?

 

---Some particular cancer causing substance in some factory or farms in that area ?

 

---Better reporting and data keeping re cancer numbers ?

 

---Better detection methods ?

 

---Tattoos ?

 

---An alien bio weapon being tested first in Khon Kaen ? /sarc

 

The skeptic in me also questions the credibility of a proponent of odd conspiracies who takes exception to FDA-approved vaccines, but is perfectly comfortable injecting himself with heroin sourced from rural Myanmar or Afghanistan.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
On 12/18/2024 at 5:47 AM, phetphet said:

The cancer cases must already have been there. The program has just brought them to the fore.

 

I wonder what the main causes are here in Thailand. Smoking? Excessive use of chemicals in farming? Pollution? Additives in food? Deep frying everything?

The increase is from people coming from other areas of Thailand for treatment.  Before they had no choice but to get care at the designated hospital, now they can go where they want, which people will go to the place with the best reputation.  

Posted
15 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

 

 

... and as usual on this Forum only 1 poster dared hinting to the elephant's name. 

Let's not beat around the bush, it's Jabby, also known as the '100% safe and effective' Protector of your Health...

 

And as usual the top covid conspiracy adherent shows up.

I read your link yesterday.

 

I got the tubo cancer from the clot shot says one, well sir I heard my sister's nephew got the turbo leukemia, cuz it done altered his DNA don't ya know.

 

So many experts 

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Posted
17 hours ago, zepplin said:

Guess you forgot the stupid “health” minister Anutin promoting vaccines…

This is the same around the world with “ turbo” cancers, and doctors have never seen anything like it! Meanwhile stupid Biden pardons Phizer ect from prosecution until 2029 ,.. the death ratio for kids was 30:1 due to the supposedly  safe vaccines, 30 died to save 1 ! 

30 kids died to save 1?? Where do you get this?

that would mean that out of 100,000 kids only about 3,400 would live.  

 

There is no such thing as turbo cancer, there are some aggressive cancers (lung, Prostate). 

Here are some quotes from doctors

 

John Schiller, an NIH researcher who pioneered research in cancer-causing viruses, said that pathogens known to cause cancer can remain in the body long-term. However, respiratory viruses, such as COVID or influenza, are not believed to cause cancer and typically do not linger in the body.

"You can never say never, but that sort of … virus does not suggest being implicated in cancers," Schiller said.

 

Xuesong Han, scientific director of health services research at the American Cancer Society, said that an increase in late-stage cancers during the pandemic was likely due to patient delaying or skipping care — either for COVID-19 concerns or economic reasons. Cultural factors, language barriers, and discrimination may have also played a role.

However, Han also acknowledged that the biological mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, could be affecting cancer risk.

 

https://www.advisory.com/daily-briefing/2024/06/12/covid-cancer

 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2024/01/09/cdc-hasnt-linked-covid-19-vaccine-to-cancer-surge-fact-check/72085906007/

 

https://www.factcheck.org/2024/05/still-no-evidence-covid-19-vaccination-increases-cancer-risk-despite-posts/

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Airalee said:

Ok….explain the 800%+ rise now.   Has there been an 800% increase in PET scan machines? 
 

I didn’t think so.
 

Your quoted figures show a rise of less than 200% from 1997 until 2017.  

 

Don’t forget to get your recommended Covid booster. 😘 

 

the 8-fold rise could be due to a number of factors.

 

a. different screening techniques

b. many more people getting screened

 

What you really need to look at is mortality rate.

And NOT the rate at which people are being diagnosed and treated.

So, this 800-percent figure is meaningless.

Not enough information to make any sense out of it.

 

Also, actual numbers need to be reported, and not just a percentage.

 

If the number goes from one diagnosed patient to 8 patients per year, then its an 800 percent rise.

 

This is garbage reporting, because the necessary info to make sense of it is not been included.

 

Has the hospital changed its policies, for example, to attract more cancer patients?  This is unknown....etc....

 

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said:

 

the 8-fold rise could be due to a number of factors.

 

a. different screening techniques

b. many more people getting screened

 

What you really need to look at is mortality rate.

And NOT the rate at which people are being diagnosed and treated.

So, this 800-percent figure is meaningless.

Not enough information to make any sense out of it.

 

Also, actual numbers need to be reported, and not just a percentage.

 

If the number goes from one diagnosed patient to 8 patients per year, then its an 800 percent rise.

 

This is garbage reporting, because the necessary info to make sense of it is not been included.

 

Has the hospital changed its policies, for example, to attract more cancer patients?  This is unknown....etc....

 

 

Ummmm….the quoted material you gave me did give numbers so your claim of going from one patient to eight is quite disingenuous.

 

Carry on.  Nothing to see here.

  • Confused 1
Posted
19 hours ago, KhunBENQ said:

That's what I read.

It's not a steep increase of cancer cases but some "program" allowing people to freely choose the hospital.

And as Srinagarid is the top place up here it's no wonder they flock there.

 

As I understood they normally have to to visit their "assigned"/"registered" hospital first and only if needed they will be transferred to a higher up hospital.

All that does not apply to the wealthy class that will visit private hospitals.

It is this. Chulalongkorn and other tertiary Bangkok hospitals are having the same problem due to people choosing to go there because they now can.

Posted
4 hours ago, Gobbler said:
9 hours ago, Airalee said:

Don’t forget to get your recommended Covid booster. 😘 

 

If one is good, two must be better.

The wet dream of Big Pharma > vaccination as a subscription service

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
11 hours ago, Airalee said:

Ummmm….the quoted material you gave me did give numbers so your claim of going from one patient to eight is quite disingenuous.

 

Carry on.  Nothing to see here.

 

I was referring to the linked article in this Topic.

This article does not inform the reader concerning the number of patients...but only gives the percentage increase.

One can only see if one opens one's eyes before stating that there is nothing to see without first having had a careful look.

 

Posted
On 12/19/2024 at 7:51 AM, KhunBENQ said:

It's not a steep increase of cancer cases but some "program" allowing people to freely choose the hospital.

 

Yes.

This is what I have been trying to tell one other member here.

 

But, he just says:  Nothing to see here.

 

You are correct that it would be highly unlikely that, in any given group, under natural conditions, that cancer rates would rise by 8-fold.

 

Still, some here have no concept of probability, and have never studied either statistics or probability.

 

These are the same who play the lottery.

 

It is possible to increase the cancer rates in a test group by 8-fold, but one must introduce some wild card, such as a thermonuclear bomb.

 

The article is extremely misleading, and seemingly is intent on causing FUD.

 

 

Posted
On 12/19/2024 at 4:14 PM, The Fugitive said:

Certainly a lack of preventative medicine. Breast cancer screening is apparently shortly to be offered by Thai National Health Service. However, it will be limited to women aged between 40 and 59 who also have immediate family history. My Thai wife wouldn't qualify. She has two friends with breast cancer. This prompted her to book a special promotional screening at Bangkok Hospital. They found invasive ductal carcinoma cancer stage between two and three. She's now had surgery, two sessions of chemo and CT scans of chest and abdomen. Tomorrow we're off for a bone scan to..........Srinagarind.  

Pleased to report excellent service at Srinagarind. Gamma Bone Scan completed with printed report and images interpreted by a doctor immediately afterwards and handed to us.

Posted
On 12/19/2024 at 2:46 PM, PETERTHEEATER said:

Cancer of the liver is high on the list. My wife's brother-in-law was a lifelong non-smoker and teetotal yet died from this form. Another family member is a life-long smoker and an alcoholic, has been hospitalised three times with multiple broken bones from high-speed car crashes and, a month ago, was expected to die. According to his medical report he has no underlying medical conditions other than one leg a little shorter than the other. He's driving around today like a lunatic! 🙄

 

Assuming his liver failure was not genetic the most likely answer is the overuse of prescription medicines, most of which are freely available to buy over the counter or a poor diet causing NAFLD which can often lead to cancer

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...