Elon Musk Advocates for Tommy Robinson’s Release Amid Criticism of UK Leadership

[Neeranam]

8 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

I'd like to give you a "Thumbs up" or a "+1" but for some reason the emoji facility does not appear on your posts for me.

I see, thanks for telling me. I thought everyone was ignoring me! 

[JonnyF]

1 hour ago, Liverpool Lou said:

I agree, but that is not something that I have done, I have just asked you a question about a case that you are making assertions about and that you will not answer.  That is not a good look, Jonny.

 

She was 13. 

 

https://www.meforum.org/islamist-watch/muslim-abuser-who-didnt-know-that-sex-with-a-girl

 

[JonnyF]

54 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

I asked him a question too that he is avoiding, after inferring many Muslims were raping children and not being jailed for it, just because of their religion. He can't support this absurd accusation with links. Spreading religious hate is not a good look. 

 

What on earth are you talking about? 😆 Spreading hate? 😆

 

I already provided the link. If you didn't want an example why did you ask for one?

 

Spared by the judge because he went to an Islamic school. 

 

Now, continue defending the statutory rape of a 13 year old child. 

 

https://www.meforum.org/islamist-watch/muslim-abuser-who-didnt-know-that-sex-with-a-girl

 

 

[proton]

2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I’be provided a link to the CPS records of the actual reason for his imprisonment.

 

We know the reason, political persecution dressed up in a legal excuse, just like China or Russia.

[proton]

1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

 

Again Chomper, deflecting and dodging the question.

 

Why do you support self identification in some cases but refuse to in others.

 

It's a simple question. Just answer it.  

 

I'm sure he still calls Muhammad Ali Cassius clay, or Englebert Humperdinck Jerry Dorsey, Carry Grant, Marilyn Monroe etc etc

[Chivas]

Seriously who the hell does this clown Musk think he is

 

Stick to blowing up your own rockets and plummetting Tesla sales you roaster

[JonnyF]

8 minutes ago, proton said:

 

We know the reason, political persecution dressed up in a legal excuse, just like China or Russia.

 

He always uses the same circular argument. 

 

"The sentence is just and fair, because I have a link which shows that is the sentence that the court imposed." 😆

[The Cyclist]

Why is Musk on the warpath

 

These are just some of the gangs convicted, not the full list.

 

 

 

Under the current Taskforce, a further 500 individuals have been arrested.

 

The current Government will not allow a National Inquiry into this sick scandal, as Labour are neck deep in the cover up.

 

 

 

Any right minded individual should be going nuts at what has happened here.

[Chomper Higgot]

10 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

He always uses the same circular argument. 

 

"The sentence is just and fair, because I have a link which shows that is the sentence that the court imposed." 😆

That’s not the argument I have made.

 

Like when you repeatedly misrepresent factual records of convictions I have corrected you, and now others, with the actual judicial record.

 

No amount of self grievance stroking is going to change the factual records.

 

[Chomper Higgot]

5 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

Why is Musk on the warpath

 

These are just some of the gangs convicted, not the full list.

 

 

 

Under the current Taskforce, a further 500 individuals have been arrested.

 

The current Government will not allow a National Inquiry into this sick scandal, as Labour are neck deep in the cover up.

 

 

 

Any right minded individual should be going nuts at what has happened here.

In the same post you tell us scores have been convicted and 500 arrested, then claim a cover up.

 

All these convictions were handed down in open courts of law and reported in the press.

 

There is no ‘cover up’.

 

 

 

 

[Neeranam]

37 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

What on earth are you talking about? 😆 Spreading hate? 😆

 

I already provided the link. If you didn't want an example why did you ask for one?

 

Spared by the judge because he went to an Islamic school. 

 

Now, continue defending the statutory rape of a 13 year old child. 

 

https://www.meforum.org/islamist-watch/muslim-abuser-who-didnt-know-that-sex-with-a-girl

 

 

Quote

but much worse cases involving child rapists getting suspended sentences if they are from the "correct" Demographic. 

You said the above, when in fact it seems there is only one case, which wasn't even reported by any British newspaper. The reason for escaping jail was not because of his demographic.

 

I am in no way defending  the statutory rape of a 13 year old child. I've seen other cases of teenage males being spared jail for having sex with another teenager(under age of consent), and they weren't Muslim. 

 

There is a lot more to the case than you are telling. 

I'm surprised you're allowed links from Middle East Forum. 

 

But the judge said that because Rashid was ‘passive’ and ‘lacking assertiveness’, sending him to jail might cause him ‘more damage than good’.

 

He told police he knew the girl was 13 but said he was initially reluctant to have sex before relenting after being seduced.

 

 

[JonnyF]

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

That’s not the argument I have made.

 

Like when you repeatedly misrepresent factual records of convictions I have corrected you, and now others, with the actual judicial record.

 

No amount of self grievance stroking is going to change the factual records.

 

 

I do not misrepresent factual records. I show how the sentences are totally inconsistent with the sentences handed out to other people for often more serious, violent crimes, often sexual in nature or involving children. I provide links to such more serious crimes where no jail term was imposed to highlight the 2 tier system.  

 

In response, you re-post a link back to the court records. 😆

 

Your argument is essentially to ignore the points being made and repeat ad nauseam "It's fair and just, because this is what happened in court and I have a link to prove it". Communist era stuff. 

 

[JonnyF]

3 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

You said the above, when in fact it seems there is only one case, which wasn't even reported by any British newspaper.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2268395/Adil-Rashid-Paedophile-claimed-Muslim-upbringing-meant-didnt-know-illegal-sex-girl-13.html

 

[proton]

9 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

In the same post you tell us scores have been convicted and 500 arrested, then claim a cover up.

 

All these convictions were handed down in open courts of law and reported in the press.

 

There is no ‘cover up’.

 

 

 

 

 

There WAS a cover up for years, which is why they continued doing it for so long and getting away with raping up to 1500 children in one town alone. Many more should have been arrested and charged

[JonnyF]

5 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

You said the above, when in fact it seems there is only one case

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5919415/One-14-rapists-spared-prison-past-decade.html

 

[Flyguy330]

Sky TV UK Report

 

The full extent of the rapes and grooming has been covered up. So says the leader of the UK Conservative party. Read the link.

 

Funny thing is - her party were part of the cover up when they were in power. Now she's back pedalling to make herself look good.

 

On another note - the 4 Pakistani men who beat up the Police in Manchester Airport last summer - including breaking the Policewomans nose - are still walking around free.

Meanwhile some white guy who shouted at a Police dog during the Southport riots was expeditiously jailed for it.

The UK is fkd.

[Neeranam]

3 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5919415/One-14-rapists-spared-prison-past-decade.html

 

Thanks for the link, but this one doesn't say it was because they were Muslim. 

 

Strange that the daily Mail seems to be the only main newspaper that reported this, are they anti-Muslim?

[Chomper Higgot]

10 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

I do not misrepresent factual records. I show how the sentences are totally inconsistent with the sentences handed out to other people for often more serious, violent crimes, often sexual in nature or involving children. I provide links to such more serious crimes where no jail term was imposed to highlight the 2 tier system.  

 

In response, you re-post a link back to the court records. 😆

 

Your argument is essentially to ignore the points being made and repeat ad nauseam "It's fair and just, because this is what happened in court and I have a link to prove it". Communist era stuff. 

 

You don’t make points Jonny, you misrepresent facts.

 

I’ll remind you the next time you do it.

[Chomper Higgot]

3 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

Thanks for the link, but this one doesn't say it was because they were Muslim. 

 

Strange that the daily Mail seems to be the only main newspaper that reported this, are they anti-Muslim?

The Mail has a history that’s worth looking into. 

[The Cyclist]

22 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

In the same post you tell us scores have been convicted and 500 arrested, then claim a cover up.

 

It  was covered up in the 90''s

 

The current taskforce was set up only 2 years ago, and have arrested over 500.

 

That you are trying to put forward deflection and obfuscation over this National Shame. Speaks volumes about you.

 

Are you going to come charging out the blocks and say that this is fake news ?
 

 

Or are you going to revert to type, and claim that it is a personal attack on you ?

[The Cyclist]

18 minutes ago, proton said:

 

There WAS a cover up for years, which is why they continued doing it for so long and getting away with raping up to 1500 children in one town alone. Many more should have been arrested and charged

 

Including every single person from the bottom of the pile right up to Politicians should also be arrested, charged and a rather large jail sentence rammed up their hoop.

[JonnyF]

25 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The Mail has a history that’s worth looking into. 

 

Ah, when all else fails, attack the source.

 

Talking of history, maybe check out your beloved Guardian's links to the slave trade?

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-manchester-65113058

 

[mikeymike100]

3 hours ago, proton said:

 

Chomper Higgot is your real name then?

Good one!!!!

[blaze master]

3 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Ah, when all else fails, attack the source.

 

Talking of history, maybe check out your beloved Guardian's links to the slave trade?

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-manchester-65113058

 

 

Sunny hostin....hold my beer. That one was priceless. Watching  her smug face after finding out she herself came from slave trader lineage. 

 

Classic.

[SunnyinBangrak]

5 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

 

No. Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon, the multiple convicted criminal  is in jail for contempt of court and for violating a court injunction. It was not an isolated event. He violated the injunction 10X, each time being warned to stop. Actions have consequences and a multiple convicted  violent criminal cannot expect to thumb his nose at a court and get away with it. 

 

 In 2021, he was  bullying a 15 year old child and was found guilty of libel in that case with a £100,000 judgement plus legal costs.  He was ordered. to stop his libel and chose not to. 

 

Yaxley Lennon forced the court to act. When jailing Yaxley-Lennon for 18 months, Mr Justice Johnson said: “In a democratic society underpinned by the rule of law, court orders must be obeyed.“Nobody is above the law. Nobody can pick or choose which laws or which injunctions they obey, or which they do not.“Even if they believe that an injunction is... contrary to their views they must comply with the injunction. “They are not entitled to set themselves up as the judge in their own court. Otherwise the administration of justice and rule of law would break down.”

He was guilty of factually accurate journalism. That the story involved a 15 year old is irrelevant. Nobody should be scared of or imprisoned for telling the truth the msm is too corrupted to cover.

[Red Forever]

6 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Let me guess: Tommy Robinson has been deemed a racist and hatemonger by the Left and is thus in jail. Guess I need to look this one up.

You really should read the truth (yeah I know it’ll be difficult for you to swallow) but, apart from your correct point about the wife beating fraudster Yaxley-Lennon being a racist and hate monger, the reason that the little man is banged up is because he is guilty of contempt of court and is thus in jail.

[Yagoda]

53 minutes ago, Red Forever said:

You really should read the truth (yeah I know it’ll be difficult for you to swallow) but, apart from your correct point about the wife beating fraudster Yaxley-Lennon being a racist and hate monger, the reason that the little man is banged up is because he is guilty of contempt of court and is thus in jail.

Projection? Ill research when I get a chance. No one is above the law.

[Hamus Yaigh]

7 hours ago, JonnyF said:

Curious that you refuse to use the name he identifies by but believe men who wear dresses should be referred to as "she" and be allowed to compete in women's sports, including beating up women in a boxing ring. 

 

Double standards much?

It must be tormenting waking up each day trolling for conspiracy theories to spout off ad infinitum? Like a never-ending rabbit hole of suspicion and paranoia, where every event is viewed through a lens of conspiracy and hidden agendas. For a conspiracy theorist, it's not just a hobby or something they do occasionally—it's a worldview that colors everything they encounter. They spend their days scouring the internet, combing through obscure sources, and connecting seemingly unrelated events to construct a narrative that fits their preconceived notions.

[proton]

1 hour ago, Red Forever said:

You really should read the truth (yeah I know it’ll be difficult for you to swallow) but, apart from your correct point about the wife beating fraudster Yaxley-Lennon being a racist and hate monger, the reason that the little man is banged up is because he is guilty of contempt of court and is thus in jail.

 

Evidence of him being a racist and hate monger? there is none, guilty of telling inconvenient truths. 

[SunnyinBangrak]

1 hour ago, Red Forever said:

You really should read the truth (yeah I know it’ll be difficult for you to swallow) but, apart from your correct point about the wife beating fraudster Yaxley-Lennon being a racist and hate monger, the reason that the little man is banged up is because he is guilty of contempt of court and is thus in jail.

In the age of woke, surely it is a "hate crime" to misname Tommy as Yaxley-Lennon when you know he wants to be called Tommy Robinson? Your rules, time to start playing by them, no matter how much Tommys truth bombs trigger establishment toadys