Navigating the World’s Most Dangerous Countries in 2025

[Social Media]

 

In a sobering revelation by International SOS, no country has seen an improvement in its security risk over the past year. The organization’s latest risk map, assessing security, health, and climate change threats, identifies the most perilous countries to visit in 2025.

 

Somalia, Sudan, South Sudan, and the Central African Republic stand out as some of the most hazardous nations, categorized under "extreme" security risk. The list also includes Yemen, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, and Ukraine, reflecting ongoing conflicts and instability.

 

Countries deemed to have a "high" security risk, just below the "extreme" category, include Mali, Ethiopia, Nigeria, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Pakistan, Myanmar, Papua New Guinea, Venezuela, Haiti, and Honduras. These ratings are based on a comprehensive analysis of factors like conflict, health risks, and climate change impacts, guiding travelers and businesses in navigating potential dangers globally.

 

The risk map uses a five-level scale to grade countries, ranging from "low" to "very high" for medical risks and from "insignificant" to "extreme" for security concerns. This tool helps organizations and individuals assess and prepare for various threats, including infectious diseases and extreme weather events.

 

While most regions have experienced escalating risks, the UK maintains a "low" rating in security, medical, and climate risks, although its mental health statistics indicate a notable proportion of the population dealing with mental health issues.

 

Conflicts have significantly influenced risk evaluations in 2024, particularly in Sudan, Lebanon, Israel, Iraq, and Myanmar, where escalating violence has necessitated repeated risk reassessments. New Caledonia, too, has seen its security risk elevate from "low" to "medium," attributed to long-term social unrest and economic challenges.

 

In contrast, some countries remain relatively safe from a security perspective. Nations like Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, Spain, France, Morocco, and Vietnam are considered among the safest, offering a stark contrast to the high-risk regions.

 

As 2025 approaches, understanding these risks is crucial for those planning international travel or business operations, ensuring informed decisions in an increasingly volatile world.

 

Based on a report by The Independent 2024-01-18

 

 

[klauskunkel]

The Greenland portion of Denmark seems to be a viable alternative, once climate change has turned it into a tropical paradise...

[KhunLA]

Judging from AN, this statement is obviously spot on ... 

 

... "While most regions have experienced escalating risks, the UK maintains a "low" rating in security, medical, and climate risks, although its mental health statistics indicate a notable proportion of the population dealing with mental health issues." ...

 

Contrary to that unstable mental thinking, 'how unsafe the gun toting Yanks are' ...

 

... "In contrast, some countries remain relatively safe from a security perspective. Nations like Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, Spain, France, Morocco, and Vietnam are considered among the safest, offering a stark contrast to the high-risk regions." ...  

 

Certainly won't be going to Africa anytime soon.

 

List for those seeking retirement locations, though don't think some were in anyone's top 10.

[Andre0720]

4 hours ago, Social Media said:

 

In a sobering revelation by International SOS, no country has seen an improvement in its security risk over the past year. The organization’s latest risk map, assessing security, health, and climate change threats, identifies the most perilous countries to visit in 2025.

 

Somalia, Sudan, South Sudan, and the Central African Republic stand out as some of the most hazardous nations, categorized under "extreme" security risk. The list also includes Yemen, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, and Ukraine, reflecting ongoing conflicts and instability.

 

 

Countries deemed to have a "high" security risk, just below the "extreme" category, include Mali, Ethiopia, Nigeria, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Pakistan, Myanmar, Papua New Guinea, Venezuela, Haiti, and Honduras. These ratings are based on a comprehensive analysis of factors like conflict, health risks, and climate change impacts, guiding travelers and businesses in navigating potential dangers globally.

 

The risk map uses a five-level scale to grade countries, ranging from "low" to "very high" for medical risks and from "insignificant" to "extreme" for security concerns. This tool helps organizations and individuals assess and prepare for various threats, including infectious diseases and extreme weather events.

 

While most regions have experienced escalating risks, the UK maintains a "low" rating in security, medical, and climate risks, although its mental health statistics indicate a notable proportion of the population dealing with mental health issues.

 

Conflicts have significantly influenced risk evaluations in 2024, particularly in Sudan, Lebanon, Israel, Iraq, and Myanmar, where escalating violence has necessitated repeated risk reassessments. New Caledonia, too, has seen its security risk elevate from "low" to "medium," attributed to long-term social unrest and economic challenges.

 

In contrast, some countries remain relatively safe from a security perspective. Nations like Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, Spain, France, Morocco, and Vietnam are considered among the safest, offering a stark contrast to the high-risk regions.

 

As 2025 approaches, understanding these risks is crucial for those planning international travel or business operations, ensuring informed decisions in an increasingly volatile world.

 

Based on a report by The Independent 2024-01-18

 

 

This summarizes very well what 'mankind' is........

[spidermike007]

Though this could be interpreted as racist, Africa is truly the forsaken continent. 20 of the nations with the highest birthrates in the world are there, amidst grinding poverty. Many nations are plagued with a strict interpretation of Islam, which has zero connection to anything of a spiritual nature. Disease, famine, wars, warlords, deliberate female genital mutilation, and the list goes on. Yikes! 

[oustaristocrats]

5 hours ago, klauskunkel said:

The Greenland portion of Denmark seems to be a viable alternative, once climate change has turned it into a tropical paradise...

 

Now I understand Trump wants to buy it

[Woke to Sounds of Horking]

On 1/17/2025 at 2:03 PM, Social Media said:

the UK maintains a "low" rating in security, medical, and climate risks, although its mental health statistics indicate a notable proportion of the population dealing with mental health issues.

 

The Woke mind virus?

 

And why is Cambodia deemed risky?

[Phillip9]

On 1/18/2025 at 11:06 AM, oustaristocrats said:

 

Now I understand Trump wants to buy it

 

Not buy.  He wants to take it.

[Captain Flack]

I have removed a post and replies, at the request of the poster.

[Will B Good]

19 minutes ago, Phillip9 said:

 

Not buy.  He wants to take it.

 

 

Just read somewhere he's going to make the Mexicans pay for it.