Jump to content

Munich Car Ramming: 24 Year old Afghan Asylum Seeker. 28 Injured Some Critical


Recommended Posts

Posted
14 hours ago, proton said:

Not all of them, but it's always them, Islam is not our friend

and IMHO will never be.  I lived in a Muslim fundamentalist city for 2 years.  Some truley horrible stories but most wouldn't believe them if wrote them.  Had co-workers (male and female) shot by a known terrorist and I and my wife should have been in the vehicle that was attacked and stopped at a red light while going to work.  Within 25 meters was a pickup full of local police who did absolutely nothing except after the attack and the light turned green they left.  Had to escort the bodies and their families back to the US for burial. Having to tell next of kin of the death by terrorist.  Not a pleasant task.  I volunteered for that assignment because I wanted to find out for myself if Muslims were really anti-Westerners.  I did make some friends possibly who told me that male chilldren begin the indoctrination of hating westerners upon reaching 4 years old.  One of those possible friends kept trying to get me to adopt his 3 young teenage daughters so that they would not have to grow up and marry in that faith in that area.  Just a tad on my experiences in that region.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I personally want to know if the driver has a religious reason for mowing people down, and which Masjid he attended. 

Posted
10 hours ago, hotsun said:

Europe Australia and canada should just keep on letting more muslims into their countries. All the smart people will immigrate to the US. Then it will just be muslim loving leftists in those countries, its a win win for everyone

There are more than enough Muslims in Australia.

Fortunately they hate each other more than the locals , which brings out late night gun play.

The upside is they are thinning out their own fanatical garbage

Posted
3 hours ago, Eloquent pilgrim said:

 

And hundreds of others I have not listed that were Islamic terrorism; however, it seems that you are happy to completely ignore all those, as you try your default left wing ploy of deflection from any criticism of Islam.

 

The comment of yours that I replied to was “You didn’t read about the shooting incident in Sweden last week ?”  This is whataboutery, nothing to do with the topic, just trying to deflect, and draw attention away from this appalling Islamic atrocity … shame on you.

 

 

I'm certainly not left wing. 

 

I'm pointing out the incorrect use of words such as "everytime", "all", "always" when referring to incidents and Islam.

 

I have not deflected anything. I've pointed out I correct use of words. Simple. No shame on me.

Posted
26 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

I'm certainly not left wing. 

 

I'm pointing out the incorrect use of words such as "everytime", "all", "always" when referring to incidents and Islam.

 

I have not deflected anything. I've pointed out I correct use of words. Simple. No shame on me.

 

 

Nonsense; you distill the very essence of left wing apologists. You have not said one single word of condemnation about this terrorist attack, not one.

 

This vile muslim scrote ploughed his car into a crowd of innocent citizens, leaving more than 30 injured, some children, and some in life threatening condition; and all you have done is try and deflect attention away by citing a totally unrelated atrocity in Sweden, or claim a pathetic disclaimer that you were just being pedantic. I see you.

 

Take a look at the 21st century history of Islamic terrorism, because you are batting for the wrong team; every shame on you.

 

 

Posted
3 hours ago, Eloquent pilgrim said:

 

 

Nonsense; you distill the very essence of left wing apologists. You have not said one single word of condemnation about this terrorist attack, not one.

 

This vile muslim scrote ploughed his car into a crowd of innocent citizens, leaving more than 30 injured, some children, and some in life threatening condition; and all you have done is try and deflect attention away by citing a totally unrelated atrocity in Sweden, or claim a pathetic disclaimer that you were just being pedantic. I see you.

 

Take a look at the 21st century history of Islamic terrorism, because you are batting for the wrong team; every shame on you.

 

 

You are wrong. You also imply I've lied. Wrong again.

 

Batting for the wrong team? I don't know what you mean by that. I've not backed anyone. Wrong again.

 

Let me ask you a question. Simple Yes or No answer is all that is required....

 

Is saying "always them", referring to attacks on the public and Muslims being attackers, correct?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Topics

  • Popular Contributors

  • Latest posts...

    1. 4

      Thailand Live Saturday 15 February 2025

    2. 0

      Airport Smoking Room Debate: Health Minister Holds Off on Decision

    3. 440

      USAID - Dems in full delusional mode as usual

    4. 0

      Promising Student Dies in Collision with Cement Truck

    5. 2

      Is It Just Me, Or Are Thai Staff Getting Ruder By The Day?

  • Popular in The Pub


×
×
  • Create New...