Prof Ian Brightrope > mRNA vaccines hailed as the future!

[Red Phoenix]

mRNA vaccines hailed as the future!

And the politicians and corporations ride on the back of this farcical disease causing deadly technology.

Source: https://ianbrighthope.substack.com/p/mrna-vaccines-hailed-as-the-future

= = =

Imminent Australian Prof Ian BRIGHTROPE just posted this interesting 'wake-up call' article on his Substack.

The article starts with all the Hallelujah statements by politicians and corporations claiming that Australia has significantly ‘advanced’ its biotechnology sector by establishing mRNA vaccine manufacturing facilities, ensuring local production capabilities and bolstering pandemic preparedness. 

Brightrope then looks at reality and the actual truth.

And his fact-based conclusion is devastating for that bio-tech pipe-dream

> mRNA is a dangerous technology and should be outlawed.

 

[Moonlover]

He's an imminent professor is he? Perhaps he'd better hold fire until he's qualified!

[Red Phoenix]

5 minutes ago, Moonlover said:

He's an imminent professor is he? Perhaps he'd better hold fire until he's qualified!

 

You can read Prof Ian Brightrope's impressive curriculum here.

> https://wchaustralia.substack.com/p/introducing-world-council-for-health-54c

 

Re him 'not being qualified' in medical matters  > In 1969 he entered medical school at the University of New South Wales and following three pre-clinical years, completed his clinical studies at Monash University in Victoria, graduating with a Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery in 1974.

[Moonlover]

1 minute ago, Red Phoenix said:

 

You can read Prof Ian Brightrope's impressive curriculum here.

> https://wchaustralia.substack.com/p/introducing-world-council-for-health-54c

 

Re him 'not being qualified' in medical matters  > In 1969 he entered medical school at the University of New South Wales and following three pre-clinical years, completed his clinical studies at Monash University in Victoria, graduating with a Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery in 1974.

So he's not an imminent professor then, he's an eminent professor. 😉

[Stiddle Mump]

Another great post from Red. Keping us informed on the medical scene.

 

My take is simple. The body can self-heal. It has to be equipped to do that though. Nutritious diet. Clean water (not heavy water or fluorinated). Fresh air also is a must. There are other things; like love, being free from fear and EMF avoidance (ASAP).

 

Does the body need extra help from Big Pharma to perform its housekeeping? A splash of aluminum? A shot or two of mRNA? Of course not!! Far better to make sure it can look after itself. For when the undesirables arrive, as they inevitably will, the body can effectively deal with them. And keep us in good order.

 

Get with nature. Get with life.

[xylophone]

2 hours ago, Moonlover said:

So he's not an imminent professor then, he's an eminent professor. 😉

You have to remember with whom you are dealing here......one of trump's "favourite people" no less!

[hotandsticky]

5 minutes ago, xylophone said:

You have to remember with whom you are dealing here......one of trump's "favourite people" no less!

 

 

Surely that is a good thing?

[xylophone]

5 minutes ago, hotandsticky said:

 

 

Surely that is a good thing?

???? trump said he "liked the poorly educated" and the OP's description of the professor falls into that category!!!!

[TallGuyJohninBKK]

Another typical whack job post and Substack article from the OP, this time, from another guy who makes his money hawking supposed nutritional cures for things like AIDS and diabetes, among others... (There's a nutritional cure for AIDS? That's going to come as some surprise to the world....)

 

Absolutely no credentials whatsoever relating to COVID or COVID vaccines, except being an ardent anti-vaxer.  But then again, that's about what you can expect in this "Off the Beaten Track" nonsense subforum.

 

 

 

https://nutritioncare.com.au/our-story/

 

Re Brightrope:

 

"He graduated in Agricultural Science in 1965 and then in 1974 graduated with a Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery."

 

The Brighthope Clinics and Biocentres were developed in the 1970’s.  They specialised in Nutritional Medicine, Environmental Medicine, intravenous therapies including chelation therapy and herbal medicine.

 

https://isom.ca/profile/ian-brighthope/

 

Looks like he's an Australian version of prolific American COVID misinformation spreader Peter McCullough, who at least was a practicing medical doctor before he lost his board certifications, and went into the nutritional "cures" business.

 

[TallGuyJohninBKK]

Anti-vax claims flood Senate inquiry. Officials say they’re wrong

May 27, 2024

 

...

 

"Professor Ian Brighthope, on behalf of World of Wellness, said “fake vaccines and passports” were a factor in higher death rates."

 

vs.

 

"The TGA [Australian Therapeutics Goods Administration] says deaths from vaccines are extremely rare and in most cases deaths after vaccination were not caused by the vaccine.”

...

The Health Department said vaccines had saved millions of lives and their safety and effectiveness had been “validated by both post-market surveillance and real-world data collected on millions of people globally”.

 

https://www.afr.com/policy/health-and-education/anti-vax-claims-flood-senate-inquiry-officials-say-they-re-wrong-20240526-p5jgq6

 

[TallGuyJohninBKK]

Anti-vaxxers are promoting mythical ‘vaccine detoxes’ to keep their movement alive

Anti-vax groups are pushing vitamin supplements and snake-oil sprays to ‘detox’ COVID-19 vaccines from the body. The issue goes beyond making a quick buck.

 

November 11, 2021

...

 

"This week, anti-vax and anti-lockdown journalist Morgan C Jonas featured an online interview with Professor Ian Brighthope, which was promoted as a “C-19 injection detox protocol” by Australian anti-vaxxer group Reignite Democracy Australia."

 

vs.

 

"Vaccines are safe and effective. Even if they weren’t, the concept of a vaccine detox is a myth. Professor Allen Cheng, who co-chairs the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI), told Crikey that there’s no scientific basis for a vaccine detox: “‘Detoxing’ isn’t a concept that means much to me from a medical viewpoint — vaccines, like many exogenous substances, are metabolised and eliminated naturally by the body.”

...

A key part of the argument for a detox is based on a popular fabrication that COVID-19 vaccines contain graphene oxide, a type of material used in batteries and electronics. Graphene oxide isn’t present in any approved vaccine COVID-19, and even if it was, there’s no way to detox from it. "

 

https://www.crikey.com.au/2021/11/11/anti-vaxxers-are-promoting-mythical-vaccine-detox-to-keep-their-movement-alive/

 

[Stiddle Mump]

3 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

The Health Department said vaccines had saved millions of lives and their safety and effectiveness had been “validated by both post-market surveillance and real-world data collected on millions of people globally”.

",,,,saved millions of lives,,,."

 

First thought is; where are they getting their dosh. What monumental hogwash. The health department (in question) should hang their heads in shame.

 

Dear me! The vaccines have not saved any lives what-so-ever. Not one; anywhere. Can't say yet how many have died, and been injured, from the jabs. There will be a tally-up in the years to come.

 

Dr Cahill, reckons anyone having a proper jab will experience serious problems within 5 years.

 

Dr Coleman says covid was/is the rebranded flu. I'll go with that. Although I don't believe the flu is any sort of contagious virus. Why do I say that? Because the flu is a general term for a group of symptoms.

 

 

[TallGuyJohninBKK]

You're too "imminent" for me!!! 

[TallGuyJohninBKK]

7 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Dr Cahill, reckons anyone having a proper jab will experience serious problems within 5 years.

 

Ahh, this infamous Dr. Cahill?

 

The Strange Case of Dr. Cahill and Ms. Hyde

 

Professor Dolores Cahill’s scientific résumé can legitimize her false claims about COVID-19. Her crusade of misinformation raises the question of how far academic freedom goes.

 

13 Aug 2021

 

...

"Cahill, who until recently was teaching a class for first-year medical students called “Science, Medicine and Society,” has been making a number of staggeringly erroneous claims about COVID-19 and its associated vaccines since the beginning of the pandemic, never correcting her mistakes and always doubling down. She has said, falsely, that COVID-19 can be prevented by taking vitamin C, vitamin D and zinc, and that the most efficient treatment is in the form of hydroxychloroquine, a cheap medication against malaria and autoimmune diseases that turned into an object of worship for some individuals, even as the evidence clearly showed it did not work against COVID-19."

 

...

Bolstered by Cahill’s academic and scientific credentials, her misinformed and hazardous claims have grown to the point where students at her university wrote a 33-page scientific rebuttal of these claims, a document that was signed by 133 students from the university’s own School of Medicine and sent to its administrators. One of the claims these students had to debunk: that once you get COVID-19, you are immune for life. This brazen assertion’s confidence is in contradiction with actual knowledge in the field, which is that we do not clearly know how long immunity does last. But this is the upside-down world at University College Dublin right now, where students are teaching their own professor basic facts about a topic she should be familiar with."

 

McGill University, Office for Science and Society

Separating Sense from Nonsense

 

https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-health/strange-case-dr-cahill-and-ms-hyde

 

 

 

 

[Stiddle Mump]

1 hour ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

She has said, falsely, that COVID-19 can be prevented by taking vitamin C, vitamin D and zinc, and that the most efficient treatment is in the form of hydroxychloroquine, a cheap medication against malaria and autoimmune diseases that turned into an object of worship for some individuals, even as the evidence clearly showed it did not work against COVID-19.

OK!

 

Let's look at this. Many people that have severe symptoms, of both the flu, and covid (the same - as Dr Coleman has explained) are deficient in vitamins 'C', 'D' and zinc. I would also add Magnesium to that little list. They are all needed for the smooth and effective maintenance of the body.

 

As I have often explained on AN; there are two major components to good health. They are; keeping the body in really good order to fight of infections and toxins. The other is staying away from toxic stuff in the first place.

 

As for the mentioned hydroxychloroquine. I don't agree with her that it is good to take, and have voiced this many times. This is why. Droxy is a symptom depressant. It does this by limiting the natural actions of the body.  Restricting the enzymes and microflora, that inhabit the body and want the best for it. Especially in the upper respiratory tract and mucus membranes. The symptoms that droxy inhibits are the evidence of the body cleaning itself. True, it can make one feel better, but in the long run it's generally not advantageous.

 

 

[save the frogs]

6 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

There are other things; like love,

too bad they can't inject vaccines with "love". 

 

 

[save the frogs]

According to AI, mRNA is instructing the body to create antibodies.

 

[Lacessit]

15 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

too bad they can't inject vaccines with "love". 

 

 

Too bad they can't inject vaccines that make people smarter.

 

There are posters on ASEAN in desperate need of them.

[Stiddle Mump]

19 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

too bad they can't inject vaccines with "love". 

 

 

The Don is trying to do his best for the world.

[Stiddle Mump]

3 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

According to AI, mRNA is instructing the body to create antibodies.

 

I do not agree with the contents of this post.

 

What the white-coats say**, and what actually happens is poles apart. The mRNA jabs are simply toxic junk. They can, and do, nothing but harm.

 

As for 'other diseases', what might they be? There are only a few different diseases. And given the right tools the body can fight them off.

 

** AI has it completely wrong. But it's nothing to do with AI. It can only act on the data base of info that has been made available.

[save the frogs]

30 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

The mRNA jabs are simply toxic junk. They can, and do, nothing but harm.

this is from cancer.gov

you think it's all bs and they're just making all this stuff up? 

I don't think so. It's been tested for over a decade and it's showing some positive results. 

they are using mRNA in conjunction with other modalities. 

not to mention they are investing a lot of money into this research. 

 

https://www.cancer.gov/news-events/cancer-currents-blog/2022/mrna-vaccines-to-treat-cancer

 

For more than a decade, cancer researchers have been developing a type of treatment known as a personalized cancer vaccine using various technologies, including mRNA 

 

For patients with head and neck cancer, however, the early results were positive. Among the first 10 participants, 2 patients had all signs of their tumors disappear following treatment, known as a complete response, and another 5 had their tumors shrink. 

[Lacessit]

18 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

I do not agree with the contents of this post.

 

What the white-coats say**, and what actually happens is poles apart. The mRNA jabs are simply toxic junk. They can, and do, nothing but harm.

 

As for 'other diseases', what might they be? There are only a few different diseases. And given the right tools the body can fight them off.

 

** AI has it completely wrong. But it's nothing to do with AI. It can only act on the data base of info that has been made available.

Yes, we understand.

 

You are smarter than AI, and the thousands of immunologists, virologists and epidemiologists who have contributed their knowledge to it.

 

You discount the mountains of evidence for the existence of viruses.

 

Instead, we are supposed to believe you have the answers, despite you advancing no evidence, only assertions.

 

"What is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence". Hitchin's Razor.

 

Please found a town of followers in Guyana, you are wasted here.

[hotandsticky]

1 minute ago, Lacessit said:

Yes, we understand.

 

You are smarter than AI, and the thousands of immunologists, virologists and epidemiologists who have contributed their knowledge to it.

 

You discount the mountains of evidence for the existence of viruses.

 

Instead, we are supposed to believe you have the answers, despite you advancing no evidence, only assertions.

 

"What is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence". Hitchin's Razor.

 

Please found a town of followers in Guyana, you are wasted here.

 

 

How don't know how you find the patience to reply...............................I gave up ages ago.

[Stiddle Mump]

3 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

this is from cancer.gov

you think it's all bs and they're just making all this stuff up? 

I don't think so. It's been tested for over a decade and it's showing some positive results. 

 

https://www.cancer.gov/news-events/cancer-currents-blog/2022/mrna-vaccines-to-treat-cancer

 

For more than a decade, cancer researchers have been developing a type of treatment known as a personalized cancer vaccine using various technologies, including mRNA 

 

For patients with head and neck cancer, however, the early results were positive. Among the first 10 participants, 2 patients had all signs of their tumors disappear following treatment, known as a complete response, and another 5 had their tumors shrink. 

I wonder who funds cancer.gov? Nothing to do with Big Pharma and the big money donating lads are they?

 

For the vast majority of instances, cancer, is a preventable complaint. Can't even call it a disease. And if cancer.org is promoting mRNA jabs as a possible help to those afflicted in the future; shame on them.

 

Cancer is one of the most misunderstood things around. This topic is far too complex to be discussed here, but injecting toxic filth into yer body cannot help anything. Except perhaps the investors and the undertakers.

 

 

[save the frogs]

5 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Can't even call it a disease.

Cancer is not a disease?

Actually, there might be an "emotional" component?

Maybe if a person is depressed for years and years, maybe it can contribute to cancer?

I don't think it's fully understood by the scientific community all the things that may cause cancer. 

 

[Stiddle Mump]

9 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Yes, we understand.

 

You are smarter than AI, and the thousands of immunologists, virologists and epidemiologists who have contributed their knowledge to it.

 

You discount the mountains of evidence for the existence of viruses.

 

Instead, we are supposed to believe you have the answers, despite you advancing no evidence, only assertions.

 

"What is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence". Hitchin's Razor.

 

Please found a town of followers in Guyana, you are wasted here.

What evidence do you need Sir?

 

If you think AI is smart, then you are deluded. AI are programmes that access a huge data-base. The algorithms surt through it and turn it into a thing that we humans are more familiar with; rather than zeroes and ones. That's it. The contents for this particular subject have been put up, over the years by the very people The Don is trying to bring into line.

 

Is it no wonder that those with eyes to see, and a brain to think, reject Big Pharma and their pimp's musings. Whether it comes from the mouth of a compromised white-coat, or the new kid on the block; AI.

[scottiejohn]

1 hour ago, Stiddle Mump said:

The Don is trying to do his best for the world.

By killing off all the humans I assume?

[scottiejohn]

59 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

What the white-coats say**, and what actually happens is poles apart. The mRNA jabs are simply toxic junk. They can, and do, nothing but harm.

Who are you trying to convince with all this dangerous claptrap mumbo jumbo you keep spouting forth?

I suspect that the only  reason for you continuing the postings is to increase your post count and your Sad/Confused emoji count!

I suggest you give it a rest!

 

[Stiddle Mump]

18 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

Who are you trying to convince with all this dangerous claptrap mumbo jumbo you keep spouting forth?

I suspect that the only  reason for you continuing the postings is to increase your post count and your Sad/Confused emoji count!

I suggest you give it a rest!

 

I'm quite able, and willing, to discuss anything you want Scottie; under the umbrella of Red's OP.

 

However, I don't see much content from yourself. Just silly one-liners and derogatory posts. So come on; let's debate.

 

What say you?

[Lacessit]

7 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

Cancer is not a disease?

Actually, there might be an "emotional" component?

Maybe if a person is depressed for years and years, maybe it can contribute to cancer?

I don't think it's fully understood by the scientific community all the things that may cause cancer. 

 

Cancer can be genetically inherited.

 

It can also be caused by environmental factors, such as smoking, alcohol and obesity. IIRC Sir Percival Pott was the first to link cancer to an occupation, that of London chimney sweeps.

 

The treatment of cancer has advanced in leaps and bounds. I would not be posting if it had not.