Jump to content

Judge Denies AP’s Request to Restore White House Access Amid ‘Gulf of America’ Dispute


Recommended Posts

Posted
21 minutes ago, gargamon said:

Yes, renaming the gulf of Mexico was petty beyond understanding.

But renamed it was, so AP needs to suck it up. 

 

They have no issue with other cr*p being renamed.

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
58 minutes ago, Wrwest said:

Right over the head of some. The legal point here is not access per se, it is a pointed retribution for not bending to Trump unilaterally renaming an internationally, long recognized body of water and demanding all of us follow his dictate. My geography study will remain ... Gulf of Mexico. Trump again over reached ... he will soon be gone and the name will remain the Gulf of Mexico. His action here with the name unimportant. If, however he can ban the press for not conforming, a long term precedent.

AP have not been banned from the WH press briefings!

Posted
1 minute ago, Purdey said:

AP banned from the White House?

 

Munich 2025

J.D. Vance "accused European leaders of suppressing free speech and censorship."

"In Britain, and across Europe, free speech, I fear, is in retreat."

 

Hypocrisy much?

No, just the left lying. 

 

Meanwhile, Germany is arresting people for posting memes, and the UK wants Apple to provide a back-door into every iPhone in the world.

 

Did Zelensky not actually shut down some news outlets? 

 

Nothing to see here fellas, orange man still bad. 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

Well would you like to compare the bona fides and judicial temperament of this Judge and, hmmm...how about that NY judge, you know, the one with the daughter who was a Dem operative? So tell me about how this Judge is corrupt, other than he was appointed by Trump. Hes the only one I recall other than the DC District blatant partisans.

 

You arent contending  that only Trump appointed judges are corrupt, right? Nobody is that stupid.

You have rather confirmed the point I made. Thank you.

Posted
5 minutes ago, mikeymike100 said:

AP have not been banned from the WH press briefings!

The left has to lie. Banned from the oval and AF1, though things may have changed. 

 

The White House Correspondents Dinner should be interesting. Trump should say he’s going, and send J. D. Vance and Megyn Kelly to take gis place at the last minute.

Posted

A troll post has been removed.

 

@Yagoda yet again unable to follow forum rules. Any more and you can have a posting holiday!

 

Rule 9. You will not post disruptive or inflammatory messages. You will respect other members and post in a civil manner. Personal attacks, insults or hate speech posted on the  forum or sent by private message are not allowed.

Posted
2 hours ago, mogandave said:

The mainstream press has credibility? Hilarious. They shot that wad long ago. 

Quite so , even though Biden was obviously in mental decline CNN commentators and contributors used the phrase "sharp as a tack" to describe Joe Biden at various points.  During a June 2024 segment on CNN News Central, former Republican strategist Ana Navarro, a Biden supporter, described him as "sharp as a tack" while defending his mental acuity ahead of the presidential debate. Similarly, in an April 2024 interview on Fareed Zakaria GPS, actor Michael Douglas, prompted by Zakaria, said he’d heard from people that Biden was "sharp as a tack," a claim Zakaria did not challenge. Earlier, in February 2024, Democratic strategist Paul Begala told Anderson Cooper that people who’d worked with Biden found him "totally focused" and "very sharp," aligning with the narrative CNN often platformed.

Posted
22 minutes ago, mogandave said:

Which just proves you a liar. 

 

Which part? That he accused European leaders of suppressing free speech?

Or that he said, "In Britain, and across Europe, free speech, I fear, is in retreat."?

 

Did you actually read the speech or watch the video?

 

Posted
35 minutes ago, Purdey said:

Which part? That he accused European leaders of suppressing free speech?

Or that he said, "In Britain, and across Europe, free speech, I fear, is in retreat."?

 

Did you actually read the speech or watch the video?

 

Nothing about the AP being banned from the White House

Posted
5 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Im reading the AP lie feed right now. No one is restricting them.

Yes they are: a Trump appointed judge and the White House.

That’s what I call restriction.

But you knew that didn’t you? You rascal.

Posted
4 hours ago, mogandave said:

The left did not care that Obama and Biden judges bent the law to try to put Trump in jail, and are now trying to stop Trump from implementing legal policies. 

 

The left was silent when Biden fired EVERY one of the Joint Chiefs, AND the chairman, and replaced them with sycophants.

 

Lying, know-nothing, hypocritical, critically thinking high IQ leftists. 

 

 

Oh please give evidence of “ Obama and Biden judges bent the law to try to put Trump in jail”.

This should be good.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Red Forever said:

Oh please give evidence of “ Obama and Biden judges bent the law to try to put Trump in jail”.

This should be good.

They changed the statute of limitation.

 

Was that good? I was for me.

Posted
3 hours ago, mikeymike100 said:

AP reporters can still attend press briefings in the White House briefing room, their exclusion is only from key presidential events, like the Oval Office or on board AF1. There is still freedom of the press!

No Mikey. 
Your contradiction shows in your use of the word “exclusion “.

This is a spiteful response to AP (rightly) refusing to change the name of the Gulf of Mexico.

Don’t the warmongering MAGAs have more pressing problems e.g. price of eggs, gas, people eating the dogs etc?

Posted
11 minutes ago, Red Forever said:

No Mikey. 
Your contradiction shows in your use of the word “exclusion “.

This is a spiteful response to AP (rightly) refusing to change the name of the Gulf of Mexico.

Don’t the warmongering MAGAs have more pressing problems e.g. price of eggs, gas, people eating the dogs etc?

I don’t have access to the Oval Office, are my free speech rights being infringed on?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...