Trudeau to Address Trump’s Annexation Threats in Meeting with King Charles

[Social Media]

 

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is set to meet with King Charles III on Monday, where he plans to bring up U.S. President Donald Trump’s recent threats to make Canada the 51st state. The discussion will center on the growing concerns among Canadians regarding their nation’s sovereignty and the perceived silence of the monarchy on the issue.  

 

Speaking in London on Sunday, Trudeau emphasized the importance of defending Canada's independence. “Nothing seems more important to Canadians right now than standing up for our sovereignty and our independence as a nation,” he stated. The meeting with King Charles is expected to touch on the role of the monarchy in addressing matters that impact Canada, a member of the British Commonwealth.  

 

King Charles has faced criticism for his lack of response to Trump’s remarks, with some questioning whether the monarch should be more vocal in defending Canada’s sovereignty. Former Alberta Premier Jason Kenney weighed in on the issue, noting that Charles can only act on the advice of the Canadian government. “The Government of Canada should ask the Head of State to underscore Canadian sovereignty,” Kenney wrote on X.  

 

Although the monarchy remains a fixture in Canadian governance, the institution has struggled to maintain the level of public affection once enjoyed by the late Queen Elizabeth II. The Queen, whose silhouette still appears on Canadian currency, was widely admired and visited the country 22 times during her reign. In contrast, King Charles’ visits have drawn significantly smaller crowds, reflecting a more indifferent attitude toward his role as Canada’s head of state.  

 

The growing debate over the monarchy’s relevance in Canada has been reignited by Trump’s annexation threats. Some argue that if the King cannot speak out on such a fundamental issue, his position as Canada’s head of state should be reconsidered. “Canadians will need to decide what purpose King Charles III serves as King of Canada if he can’t even speak up for our sovereignty,” former Canadian public servant Artur Wilczynski wrote on X.  

 

Abolishing the monarchy would be no small feat, as it would require a constitutional amendment—a challenging process in a nation as diverse as Canada. With a population of 41 million people, including English- and French-speaking citizens, Indigenous communities, and a steady influx of immigrants, any attempt to overhaul the constitutional structure carries significant risks.  

 

As Trudeau prepares for his meeting with King Charles, many Canadians will be watching closely to see whether the monarchy will take a stand on the country’s sovereignty or remain silent in the face of Trump’s controversial remarks.

 

Based on a report by The Independent  2025-03-04

 

 

[Harrisfan]

More talk about nothing while unemployment is bad. Typical lefty. Distract and deflect from the real issues.

[JonnyF]

1 hour ago, Social Media said:

Some argue that if the King cannot speak out on such a fundamental issue, his position as Canada’s head of state should be reconsidered. “Canadians will need to decide what purpose King Charles III serves as King of Canada if he can’t even speak up for our sovereignty,” former Canadian public servant Artur Wilczynski wrote on X.  

 

Funny how they don't want the King to interfere in their country, until they need to find a pair and stand up to Trump. "Daddy Daddy the nasty boy hit me". Pathetic lefties. 

 

I hope Trudeau didn't come in blackface. Although given the 2 tier system so prevalent in the UK, that might have actually brought better results.

 

 

[Woke to Sounds]

Many Canadians are more angry at what happened to Canada since 2015 when Trudes and the Libs (and Cultural Marxism) took power than what Trumpy is threatening.

[bangadang]

It's a negotiation tactic and there is no way Trudeau and the king will discuss such things. MSM bs again.

[Taboo2]

Trump is trolling Canadians...and it is working....Hey Canadians....you have an immigration problem, terrible healthcare, high rents, criminals all over Vancouver, BC and Toronto, and a control freak name Trudeau.  Stop worrying about Trump!

[Harrisfan]

6 minutes ago, Taboo2 said:

Trump is trolling Canadians...and it is working....Hey Canadians....you have an immigration problem, terrible healthcare, high rents, criminals all over Vancouver, BC and Toronto, and a control freak name Trudeau.  Stop worrying about Trump!

Lefties everywhere use Trump as an excuse.

[Photoguy21]

6 hours ago, Harrisfan said:

More talk about nothing while unemployment is bad. Typical lefty. Distract and deflect from the real issues.

You want politicians to tackle the real problems? Thinking that must be a hate crime at the very least.

[Watawattana]

I doubt the King would want to wade into the ongoing political discussions, it's not normal practice for the monarch to do so.  Best Trudeau fixes his own issues before bothering about the 51st state hairbrained idea from below his southern border.

[SOTIRIOS]

...Sounds Like A Great Idea/Solution...

...Exactly, As Someone Said, 'After What Canadians Have Been Through These Past 10 Years'...

 

[transam]

8 hours ago, Harrisfan said:

More talk about nothing while unemployment is bad. Typical lefty. Distract and deflect from the real issues.

Don't be silly,.............🙄

[rough diamond]

1 hour ago, transam said:

Don't be silly,.............🙄

You do know who you have just replied to with that " Don't be silly,.............🙄" comment don't you?

How superfluous it is once you realise!

🤣!

[rough diamond]

10 hours ago, Harrisfan said:

More talk about nothing while unemployment is bad. Typical lefty. Distract and deflect from the real issues.

Isn't that what your post is doing as it adds nothing, as usual, to the discussion?

[Purdey]

Charles is in a tricky position. His government has already agreed he should meet Trump, but should he meet and upset his subjects in Canada?

The Queen would have been sick on that day.

[JAG]

As King of Canada, (a constitutional monarchy) he will act and speak as advised by his Prime Minister (Mr Trudeau).

 

He is, as a constitutional monarch, constrained by a number of guidelines and "guard rails". Now I understand that the current US administration are enthusiastically ignoring guidelines and jettisoning "guardrails", but Canada still has and follows them.

[BadBouy]

Meow meow meow!

[thaibeachlovers]

11 hours ago, rough diamond said:

Isn't that what your post is doing as it adds nothing, as usual, to the discussion?

Pot kettle black etc.

[thaibeachlovers]

Is Trudeau not aware that the king is not able to actually do anything about it, and does he think that if Charles makes a statement that Trump will back down?

[JAG]

16 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Is Trudeau not aware that the king is not able to actually do anything about it, and does he think that if Charles makes a statement that Trump will back down?

The King is the head of state (for Canada). Trudeau is his Prime Minister. Trudeau has a constitutional duty to consult with him. As King of Canada Charles has an absolute duty to make his views (as advised by his government ) known on the constant and very real intentions expressed by the current US Government, to annex Canada. That absolute duty extends to supporting and expressing the view of the Canadian government and people.

 

It is complicated by the political uncertainty in Canada. That uncertainty will be settled when the new government is elected and installed.

 

It is further complicated by the UK government attempts to curry favour with Trump by arranging a state visit. Starmer will have to be aware that such a state visit would be unwise if not impossible if Trump, as he likely will, turns his vitriol on King Charles as King of Canada.

 

Interesting times!

[rough diamond]

16 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

does he think that if Charles makes a statement that Trump will back down?

He will if he wants the the first ever 2nd state visit in history to go ahead!

It is probably more important to him and his ego than anything else inside his tiny little brain.

[thaibeachlovers]

8 hours ago, JAG said:

As King of Canada Charles has an absolute duty to make his views (as advised by his government ) known on the constant and very real intentions expressed by the current US Government, to annex Canada.

I'm amazed that anyone thinks the US could actually annex Canada. It's just Trump spouting BS as usual to confuse the easily bewildered. IMO.

He probably says things like that so he can laugh when the opposition melts down in rage at it.

[gargamon]

24 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I'm amazed that anyone thinks the US could actually annex Canada. It's just Trump spouting BS as usual to confuse the easily bewildered. IMO.

He probably says things like that so he can laugh when the opposition melts down in rage at it.

I'm amazed that the Trump minions always try to explain away his idiocies as being something intelligent. Whats your spin on the 70,000 VA workers being fired? Sure hope you don't need anything from the VA.

[Cryingdick]

Not sure what a resigned PM con accomplish with a King that is symbolic in nature?

[JAG]

6 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

Not sure what a resigned PM con accomplish with a King that is symbolic in nature?

A resigning Prime Minister, very little. A newly elected Prime Minister, rather more. He or she will, as the Canadian Constitution requires, consult with the King of Canada. If the threats continue, and are deemed to be real, and damaging to Canada, then as King of Canada (on the advice of his Prime Minister) he may will feel he needs to speak. What will it accomplish? Well it will no doubt bring down a Trumpian tirade. This will certainly put a stop to the planned State Visit to the UK; President Trump may not care about that, although I suspect he will! Such a tirade will not go unnoticed world wide, and will bring his Presidency into disrepute - although again he may not care.

 

You may be certain that any "takeover" which is opposed by the people and government of Canada will be opposed by the King, and resisted by Canadians if attempted.

 

I would not be surprised that if a date is announced on which the USA intends to incorporate Canada, we would discover that the King will be in Canada at that same time!

 

If nothing else, it would spark the biggest international incident since 1939, with repercussions for the USA, diplomatic and economic which will not fade for a very long time, not to mention a significant resistance movement. USA has a very large army, but you would need it to occupy, tie down and subdue a rebellious Canada.

[RuamRudy]

8 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I'm amazed that anyone thinks the US could actually annex Canada.

 

I am amazed that we have even got to this point where a sitting US president is threatening to overthrow peaceful neighbouring countries. I would caution against taking it with too large a pinch of salt. He may be thicker than mince, but he is being driven by more cunning forces; they will know the buttons to push and how to foment the reasons for aggressive action. 

 

8 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

It's just Trump spouting BS as usual to confuse the easily bewildered. IMO.

This is the man who thought injecting bleach might cure covid, and that Spain was a BRICS nation - just two of his many public displays of incompetence. I am not sure that strategic thinking is his strongest suit. 

 

8 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

He probably says things like that so he can laugh when the opposition melts down in rage at it.

 

So neither a serious nor intellectual man. 

[Purdey]

There are still people in the world who follow procedure and respect for office, like the King. Fat babies just scream, threaten and shout.

[JAG]

3 hours ago, Purdey said:

There are still people in the world who follow procedure and respect for office, like the King. Fat babies just scream, threaten and shout.

I am sure that the King has the greatest respect for the Office of President of The United States. I rather doubt wether he has any respect for the current incumbent, or the collection of characters who surround him.