Popular Post webfact Posted 12 hours ago Popular Post Posted 12 hours ago File photo courtesy of Thairath In a recent twist within Thailand's political arena, House Speaker Wan Muhamad Noor Matha has requested that the opposition omit former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra's name from a no-confidence motion aimed at Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra, Thaksin’s daughter. The decision to seek Thaksin’s removal stems from parliamentary regulation No 176, which prohibits mentioning outsiders in debates without substantial reason. Mr. Wan emphasised that including Thaksin, who does not hold a position in the current administration, would breach these guidelines and risk defamation lawsuits, as Thaksin is unable to defend himself in parliament. Yet, the opposition, led by the People's Party, remains unwavering. Parit Wacharasindhu, an opposition spokesman, argues that regulation No 176 does not compel them to revise a motion unless procedural errors are identified. According to Mr. Parit, such amendments are also time-barred, given that the motion was lodged over a week ago, after which changes aren't permitted. Mr. Parit further contends that parliamentary rules allow third-party references when relevant to national governance issues. He maintains that Thaksin’s public acknowledgments of his influence over government affairs make his inclusion reasonable. The no-confidence motion accuses Thaksin of wielding undue influence over his daughter’s administration, an allegation the opposition considers essential to the debate. The government, seeking to limit the debate to a single day — a stance opposed by the opposition, which is calling for five days — is preparing for the upcoming parliamentary showdown. The opposition warns that confining the debate risks glossing over serious governance concerns. Prime Minister's Office Minister Chousak Sirinil voiced apprehensions that the focus could shift from the premier to include attacks on cabinet ministers. In contrast, PP deputy leader Sirikanya Tansakul insists the opposition has adhered to legislative privileges, arguing that Thaksin’s influence on national matters is pertinent to discussions. As tensions simmer, the stakes remain high. With accusations flying and legislative interpretations challenged, the political landscape stands on the brink of a heated debate set to commence at month-end. Opposition figures encourage the government to remain composed, while they brace for potential legal repercussions from mentioning a third party. The debate promises to be a critical test for parliamentary decorum and political accountability in Thailand, reported Bangkok Post. -- 2025-03-10 1 2 1
Popular Post Geoffggi Posted 11 hours ago Popular Post Posted 11 hours ago As slippery as ever, it is about time his wings were clipped as he is making a mockery of the whole government sense of diplomacy 1 1 3
Popular Post ikke1959 Posted 11 hours ago Popular Post Posted 11 hours ago THis man is the cause of all problems simce he came back from Dubai.. Why should he be dropped from the debate.. He is not even an MP so why is he acting as the PM... 1 2
watchcat Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 23 minutes ago, MikeandDow said: The man should be in Jail He will not go voluntarily , a straitjacket will be needed. 1
Popular Post JoePai Posted 9 hours ago Popular Post Posted 9 hours ago Thaksin should be dropped from a great height - head first 3
dinsdale Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago You're the opposition but I'm going to tell you what to do. The sheer arrogance of it is amazing being that they're the true opposition which is what the voting public of Thailand voted for. The democratically elected government is in opposition because of corruption and will most definitely not drop Thaksin's name. Well I hope not. 1
ikke1959 Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago Again an example that old dinosaurs are not helping the country, don't want change and are so conservative and under influence of the army and elite.....This man is incapable of doing his job... remove him too
hotchilli Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 6 hours ago, ikke1959 said: THis man is the cause of all problems simce he came back from Dubai.. Why should he be dropped from the debate.. He is not even an MP so why is he acting as the PM... 1
kingstonkid Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 7 hours ago, Geoffggi said: As slippery as ever, it is about time his wings were clipped as he is making a mockery of the whole government sense of diplomacy Why would the opposition not be able to address the name of teh real pM and man that creates teh policies.
klauskunkel Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 9 hours ago, webfact said: The opposition warns that confining the debate risks glossing over serious governance concerns. It is obvious that without the gloss there will be tarnish...
digger70 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 7 hours ago, watchcat said: He will not go voluntarily , a straitjacket will be needed. And for all the corrupt people that keep him out of jail. 😇
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now