Jump to content

Democrats Face Backlash for Supporting Arrested Palestinian Activist Mahmoud Khalil


Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png

 

Republican Senator Tom Cotton has strongly criticized his Democratic colleagues after they publicly called for the release of Mahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian activist arrested by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The backlash intensified after the Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats posted an image on social media with the caption "Free Mahmoud Khalil."  

 

Pro-Palestine protesters holding signs during a march in New York City, calling for the release of activist Mahmoud Khalil

 

Khalil, a graduate student and permanent U.S. resident, was at the center of anti-Israel protests at Columbia University last year. His arrest took place on Saturday night at his university-owned apartment, where ICE agents took him into custody. The situation has sparked heated political debate, with Republicans condemning Democratic support for Khalil.  

 

Columbia anti-Israel agitator Mahmoud Khalil being deported over ‘pro-Hamas propaganda flyers,’ White House says

 

"Let me get this right: Senator Dick Durbin and the Judiciary Committee Democrats are fighting for a pro-Hamas foreigner who has made life hell for Jews on campus?" Senator Cotton wrote, expressing his disbelief. He further criticized Durbin, reminding the public that the senator had previously voted to cut off military aid to Israel. "Even for Dick Durbin, this is remarkable," Cotton added.  

 

"If you tell us: I am a big supporter of Hamas, a murderous, barbaric group...and if you tell us, and by the way I intend to come to your country as a student and rile up all kinds of antisemitic activities, I intend to shut down your universities - we would deny your visa"

 

The issue has also drawn the attention of Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who announced on Sunday that his department would be revoking visas and green cards of individuals in the U.S. who support Hamas, aiming to deport them. The Trump administration has taken a firm stance, with President Donald Trump stating on Monday that Khalil’s arrest was "the first of many" as the government cracks down on what he described as "pro-terrorist, anti-Semitic, anti-American activity."  

 

Senator Josh Hawley also weighed in, calling the Democrats’ immediate response to Khalil’s arrest "bizarre." He stated, "If these folks commit crimes, if they commit unlawful acts of any kind, they assault students, they threaten people on campus... I'm all for deporting them."  

 

Image

 

During a White House press briefing on Tuesday, press secretary Karoline Leavitt was asked whether the Trump administration believes a green card holder must be charged with a crime to face deportation. She responded by emphasizing that Secretary Rubio has the authority to revoke Khalil’s visa.

 

According to Leavitt, the Secretary of State can take action against individuals deemed "adversarial to the foreign policy and national security interests" of the United States. She further accused Khalil of distributing "pro-Hamas propaganda" on campus, making it clear that the administration would not allow foreign students to promote ideologies linked to terrorist organizations responsible for American deaths.  

 

As tensions escalated, protests erupted in New York City in support of Khalil. On Tuesday afternoon, demonstrators clashed with the NYPD, resulting in about a dozen arrests. Protesters blocked a downtown Manhattan street, defying repeated police warnings to disperse. The scene grew chaotic as demonstrators chanted, "Move cops, get out the way, we know you’re Israeli trained," while others hurled insults at officers. Video footage captured protesters taunting law enforcement with phrases like "Oink, oink, piggy, piggy. We’re gonna make your lives s–tty."  

 

The protests, which swelled to around 500 people, saw demonstrators chanting slogans like, "There is only one solution, intifada revolution." The controversy has drawn mixed reactions from bystanders, including a tourist from Texas who questioned why many protesters covered their faces with masks and Palestinian headdresses.  

 

With political tensions running high, Khalil’s case has become a flashpoint in the ongoing national debate over free speech, immigration policies, and the limits of activism on college campuses. The Trump administration appears determined to continue its crackdown, while Democrats face mounting criticism for their vocal support of Khalil.  

 

Related Topics:

Trump’s Bold Stand Against Campus Antisemitism Sends a Clear Message

Trump Border Czar: ICE Will ‘Absolutely’ Deport Legal Immigrants

Trump Threatens to Cut Federal Funding Over Campus Protests

U.S. State Dept to Use AI to Revoke Visas of Foreign Students with Alleged Ties to Hamas

 

Based on a report by NYP  2025-03-14

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

 

image.png

Posted

Has Mr. Khalil been charged with a crime?

 

 

A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security, Tricia McLaughlin, confirmed Khalil’s arrest in a statement Sunday, describing it as being “in support of President Trump’s executive orders prohibiting anti-Semitism.

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
  • Love It 1
Posted
Just now, Eloquent pilgrim said:

 

 

Not charged as of yet; however, Mahmoud Khalil is a pro-Hamas activist, and as such, is a serious threat to the national security of the US; if you don’t think that is a good enough reason for him to be deported, then you are part of the problem.

 

Supporting and enabling terrorist sympathisers and antisemites is the reason that the Democrats were flushed down the gurgler at the recent election, something it seems you have failed to grasp.

 

 

 

And yet no charges laid, which begs the question what are your claims based upon? Allegations in the rightwing press and on social media?

 

 

 

  • Agree 1
Posted

The Democrats have lost the plot; with their move to the right, it is not surprising that many big donors are holding back of more funding.

  • Confused 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, Eloquent pilgrim said:

Not charged as of yet; however, Mahmoud Khalil is a pro-Hamas activist, and as such, is a serious threat to the national security of the US

 

Not charged? Check.

 

Activist = "Serious" threat to national security. 

 

 

That's your "opinion"? Right?

 

 

Maybe better to try invoking the Alien and Sedition Act of 1798 ( and the Alien Enemies Act )?

 

Last used, to great shame, to incarcerate Japanese-American citizens (among others) during WW2.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Love It 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

And yet no charges laid, which begs the question what are your claims based upon? Allegations in the rightwing press and on social media?

 

 

 

 

 

As an American, I thought you would have adequate knowledge about the activities of Mahmoud Khalil, so I assume you are just playing your favourite “contrarian” card again.

 

However, no surprise to find you supporting a terrorist sympathiser and antisemite, despite your repeated, disingenuous, and tiresome claims of impartiality.

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, bamnutsak said:

 

Not charged? Check.

 

Activist = "Serious" threat to national security. 

 

 

That's your "opinion"? Right?

 

 

Maybe better to try invoking the Alien and Sedition Act of 1798 ( and the Alien Enemies Act )?

 

Last used, to great shame, to incarcerate Japanese-American citizens (among others) during WW2.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thanks FDR (D)

  • Love It 1
Posted
Just now, bamnutsak said:

 

Not charged? Check.

 

Activist = "Serious" threat to national security. 

 

 

That's your "opinion"? Right?

 

 

Maybe better to try invoking the Alien and Sedition Act of 1798 ( and the Alien Enemies Act )?

 

Last used, to great shame, to incarcerate Japanese-American citizens (among others) during WW2.

 

No fact:

Check US immigration Law

 8 USC 1182 and 8 USC 1227

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Bkk Brian said:

No fact:

Check US immigration Law

 8 USC 1182 and 8 USC 1227

 

Which section are you saying is applicable?

 

4.

 

(B) Terrorist activities
Any alien who is described in subparagraph (B) or (F) of section 1182(a)(3) of this title is deportable.

 

(C) Foreign policy
(i) In general
An alien whose presence or activities in the United States the Secretary of State has reasonable ground to believe would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States is deportable.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

 

What happened to FREE SPEECH ?

 

Didn't JD Vance go to Europe and lecture everyone about allowing free speech?

 

Or is free speech (usually an opportunity to be racist) only the kind of speech YOU want to hear. 

 

Hypocrisy is unbelievable. 

  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...