Jump to content
This Topic

DOGE Makes Its Latest Errors Harder to Find

placeholder

By placeholder
in Political Soapbox

 Share

Recommended Posts

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Posted
Posted
  On 3/14/2025 at 2:06 PM, rough diamond said:

Nope, it's exactly the kind of thievery DOGE is claiming it is rooting out with no verifiable facts to back up their/his claims.

Expand  

Yep. It's only Trump-obsessed haters and leftists that pretend there are no "verifiable facts to back up their/his claims." It's pretty clear to the rest of us. 

  • Sad 1
  • Replies 126
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

mogandave
mogandave

So DOGE has figured out how to make it more difficult for the Times and other Trump hating media outlets to sabotage the Administration’s efforts to cut waste and fraud.    Kudos to Musk and

placeholder
placeholder

You mean they've made it impossible to fact check their claims. Are you actually unaware of how error-ridden Doge's claims are? Exposing falsehoods is sabotage? If Doge has to repeatedly make massive

placeholder
placeholder

There's another topic running in this  forum about CNN falsely correcting an assertion by Trump. Conservative media was all over them about their mistake. What that should tell you, and apparently doe

Posted Images

Dan O Platinum Member

Dan O

Posted
Posted
  On 3/14/2025 at 10:21 AM, Yellowtail said:

Musk only had to correct a few of them, the media lied about most of them. 

 

Any Obama, Biden and Harris are still lying and have refused to go back and correct anything. 

Expand  

Post a link to show what you claim so we can see

  • Like 1
rough diamond Silver Member

rough diamond

Posted
Posted
  On 3/14/2025 at 2:06 PM, Yellowtail said:

Given the opportunity, would you have voted for Ted Cruz, or Rond DeSantis over Harris? 

 

Come on now, don't be shy...

Expand  

I have already answered that question and the answer is still I don't care who got in as long as it was not this idiot TRUMP.

As I have said time and time again, it is nothing to do with political parties or right/left ideology, TRUMP is a dangerous  megalomaniac who is causing unwarranted chaos around the world.

You and the majority of the US  may have voted for HIM but the rest of the world did not.

  • Like 1
Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Posted
Posted
  On 3/14/2025 at 2:08 PM, Dan O said:

That is true for a lot of republicans, me being one of them. But you trumpettes can't seem to understand what a POS he is and the damage he's doing. When it affects you, youll be crying like babies.

 

Maybe the lack of moral character or compass runs thru all the trumpettes and thats why there is no ability to discern fact from fiction.

Expand  

Oh, name calling, how clever,

 

Would have voted for Ted Cruz, or Rond DeSantis over Harris? 

 

Come on now, don't be shy

  • Sad 1
steven100 Star Member

steven100

Posted
Posted
  On 3/14/2025 at 2:08 PM, Dan O said:

That is true for a lot of republicans, me being one of them. But you trumpettes can't seem to understand what a POS he is and the damage he's doing. When it affects you, youll be crying like babies.

 

Maybe the lack of moral character or compass runs thru all the trumpettes and thats why there is no ability to discern fact from fiction.

Expand  

 

I tend to agree with this.   So all those workers who are sacked will go onto social security benefits so the government will end up paying millions upon millions more every month instead of each separate departments budget. 

Some may lose there house and/or cars as they cannot pay the mortgage,   I expect crime will increase and more families will be under stress.  

 

  • Haha 1
jerrymahoney Ruby Member

jerrymahoney

Posted
Posted
March 13 NY Times headline:

DOGE Makes Its Latest Errors Harder to Find
Elon Musk’s group obscured the details of some new claims on its website, despite promises of transparency. But The Times was still able to detect another batch of mistakes.
  • Popular Post
Dan O Platinum Member

Dan O

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
  On 3/14/2025 at 9:54 PM, steven100 said:

 

I tend to agree with this.   So all those workers who are sacked will go onto social security benefits so the government will end up paying millions upon millions more every month instead of each separate departments budget. 

Some may lose there house and/or cars as they cannot pay the mortgage,   I expect crime will increase and more families will be under stress.  

 

Expand  

You don't get social security if you're fired you can apply for unemployment which you pay into on your paycheck. That is for a limited time for collection of reduced payments.

 

I agree it is a stupid action for trump to take. Is there waste, overspend and expansive govt, sure and it came from both parties over decades.

The more appropriate action would be to systematically inspect and deal with each agency with some type of plan.  Not slash and burn everything and then put tariffs on every country we deal with.

 

Many of the mass firings are being halted and reversed due to a court case last week where a  judge is reversing trumps exec order. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
steven100 Star Member

steven100

Posted
Posted
  On 3/15/2025 at 4:58 AM, Dan O said:

You don't get social security if you're fired you can apply for unemployment which you pay into on your paycheck. That is for a limited time for collection of reduced payments.

 

I agree it is a stupid action for trump to take. Is there waste, overspend and expansive govt, sure and it came from both parties over decades.

The more appropriate action would be to systematically inspect and deal with each agency with some type of plan.  Not slash and burn everything and then put tariffs on every country we deal with.

 

Many of the mass firings are being halted and reversed due to a court case last week where a  judge is reversing trumps exec order. 

Expand  

Thank you Dan  :burp:

  • Haha 1
Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Posted
Posted

Apparently, we all agree there it waste, overspending, and that it came from both parties over decades.

 

But one side it trying to reduce/eliminate it, while the other side is nitpicking the accuracy of the reporting. 

 

What cuts have been made that you do not agree with? 

 

 

  • Confused 1
Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Posted
Posted
  On 3/15/2025 at 11:32 AM, steven100 said:

what a stupid question as expected. 

Expand  

So you have no idea. I thought not. 

  On 3/15/2025 at 11:32 AM, steven100 said:

Tell your question to the family that will be on the street because the banks taken back their house. 

Expand  

So, you are against anyone working in the government being fired, correct? 

 

Why limit it to the government. Do you think that everyone that gets a job should have that job for life? 

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Posted
Posted
  On 3/15/2025 at 11:56 AM, JumpingJim said:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/03/13/judge-orders-trump-reinstate-fired-workers/82368616007/

 

I think the thousands of cuts that were against the law were wrong.  I don't think a president should be able to openly break the law.

Expand  

None of the cuts have been adjudicated illegal. 

 

Just tell me one you disagree with. 

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Posted
Posted
  On 3/15/2025 at 12:14 PM, JumpingJim said:

 

I guess like Trump, you have no respect for federal judges.  You radical MAGAs no longer believe you need to follow the law.

 

https://www.voanews.com/a/judges-rule-mass-firings-of-agency-employees-to-be-illegal-/8011510.html

 

Expand  

Again, not one of the cuts have been adjudicated illegal. 

 

Just tell me one you disagree with. 

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Posted
Posted
  On 3/15/2025 at 12:37 PM, JumpingJim said:

Two federal judges openly said they are illegal.

Expand  

They can say anything they like, it does not mean anything until the cases are resolved. 

 

Do you have a link to a case that has been resolved? No, you don't. 

  On 3/15/2025 at 12:37 PM, JumpingJim said:

What do you think adjudicated means?

Expand  

Read your link. It does not mean that if a judge, or if two judges, or if a hundred says something was illegal, it has been adjudicated illegal. If that were true nothing would ever have to go to court. 

 

 

placeholder Star Member

placeholder

Posted
  • Author
Posted
  On 3/15/2025 at 1:06 PM, Yellowtail said:

They can say anything they like, it does not mean anything until the cases are resolved. 

 

Do you have a link to a case that has been resolved? No, you don't. 

Read your link. It does not mean that if a judge, or if two judges, or if a hundred says something was illegal, it has been adjudicated illegal. If that were true nothing would ever have to go to court. 

 

 

Expand  

How ignorant can you be? The case went to court. The judge didn't just say something, They used their authority as judges to make a ruling in the case.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Posted
Posted
  12 hours ago, placeholder said:

How ignorant can you be? The case went to court. The judge didn't just say something, They used their authority as judges to make a ruling in the case.

Expand  

Not as ignorant as you na na na. 

 

Lower court rulings mean nothing in cases like this. 

 

None of the cases have been concluded with a determination that the Administration has acted illegally. 

  • Sad 1
harada Gold Member

harada

Posted
Posted

What these Doge butt kissers don’t understand is that THEY have not been deemed untouchable by the Supreme Court, so when the excrement hits the fan Comrade Trump will throw them under the bus as he did to others in his first administration, good luck. :hit-the-fan:

  • Thumbs Up 1
xylophone Diamond Member

xylophone

Posted
Posted
  On 3/15/2025 at 11:56 AM, JumpingJim said:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/03/13/judge-orders-trump-reinstate-fired-workers/82368616007/

 

I think the thousands of cuts that were against the law were wrong.  I don't think a president should be able to openly break the law.

Expand  

WASHINGTON ― Tens of thousands of federal government probationary workers fired in recent weeks as part of President Donald Trump's sweeping cuts to the federal workforce must be reinstated immediately, federal judges in California and Maryland ordered Thursday.

Just love it!!!!!!!!

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



ASEANNOW

ASEANNOW (formerly Thai Visa) Thailand's oldest and most popular forum for expats and foreigners.

Sign up today and have your say

MORE INFO

POPULAR AREAS

CONTACT US

219/59 Asoke Towers, 15th Floor, Soi Sukhumvit 21, Watthana, Bangkok 10110
(+66) 99 196 1100
support@aseannow.com

×
×
  • Create New...
↑