Jump to content

US Deports Hundreds of Alleged Venezuelan Gang Members Despite Court Order


Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, Eloquent pilgrim said:

 

 

Where are the forums usual left-wing suspects squealing about their human rights ¯\_()_/¯

 

 

There are a couple on this thread. I wonder if they have any illegals hiding in their house- I suspect not.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 3/17/2025 at 4:53 AM, Social Media said:

Terrorism Confinement Center (Ce

 

How do humans get like this, in the first place?

 

No matter, because, this prison is really a wonderful place for them:

 

image.png.4764997e43e74db706e5d6dc725ef6bd.png

 

Metal bunks without mattress or sheets is a very nice touch, too.

 

And, for a FEE, this prison, and maybe new and yet to be built prisons, can house American prisoners.

 

Sure, Good Idea, because this can be a good moneymaker for that country.

 

Having lost faith in humanity, I really no longer care about what happens to scum like this.

 

Psychopaths and misfits make up only a small fraction of the world's population.

They need to be housed apart from the majority, in cages, so that they have no access to human beings, and we who do not appreciate being terrorized.

 

Why didn't they just choose to become lawyers and doctors and Physicists, instead of choosing a life of crime?

 

THIS IS A PLAN...!

image.png.fca94b2999c26b8535855c92d0627ce7.png

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said:

 

How do humans get like this, in the first place?

 

No matter, because, this prison is really a wonderful place for them:

 

image.png.4764997e43e74db706e5d6dc725ef6bd.png

 

Metal bunks without mattress or sheets is a very nice touch, too.

 

And, for a FEE, this prison, and maybe new and yet to be built prisons, can house American prisoners.

 

Sure, Good Idea, because this can be a good moneymaker for that country.

 

Having lost faith in humanity, I really no longer care about what happens to scum like this.

 

Psychopaths and misfits make up only a small fraction of the world's population.

They need to be housed apart from the majority, in cages, so that they have no access to human beings, and we who do not appreciate being terrorized.

 

Why didn't they just choose to become lawyers and doctors and Physicists, instead of choosing a life of crime?

 

THIS IS A PLAN...!

image.png.fca94b2999c26b8535855c92d0627ce7.png

 

 

Psychopathy and misfits you say.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Or maybe people who criticize Trump.

 

Too few of those types.

Therefore, no need to bother with them.

 

  • Love It 1
Posted

When people cry out for, even demand, actions to be taken that are illegal, what can you say when you become the victim? That you know your rights? That you will sue the government? That "it ain't fair"?

Once started, that train is hard to stop.

 

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Eloquent pilgrim said:

 

 

Where are the forums usual left-wing suspects squealing about their human rights ¯\_()_/¯

 

 

 

6 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

There are a couple on this thread. I wonder if they have any illegals hiding in their house- I suspect not.

I have, as you both know, posted in opposition to the movement of these people for the purpose of incarceration by a third party.

 

I posted as I believe it is wrong, because they were assembled, rounded up, whatever the phrase used, under a 240 year old law, intended to be used in wartime, and which has been thoroughly discredited.

 

If these people were convicted criminals they should be serving the sentences handed down by the courts which convicted them, and or deported to their country of origin as ordered by the courts. If they are accused of crimes then they should be tried, and if convicted, be imprisoned and or deported. If they are illegally in the USA then they should be brought before the appropriate courts and deported to their country of origin. Those are their human rights. 

 

Instead they have been arbitrarily transported, to another country, which will incarcerate them (under pretty savage conditions) for a year or possibly longer, paid for by the US. No court has authorised that arbitrary detention. There appears to have been no judicial involvement, purely an executive order. That order and the process it initiated, when challenged by a court, continued in effect. The judge who intervened said that transporting them was not to happen, and that the flights should return to US. That the flights were in "international airspace" when the order was issued is a particularly feeble excuse to flout the judges order. So their "human rights" have been severely infringed. Human rights are often an inconvenience, and with good reason, they prevent miscarriages of justice.

 

A very dangerous precedent has been set. Presidential fiat is being used to short circuit the law, and ignore the law when it responds.

 

I am not surprised at @thaibeachlovers response, I rather thought that @Eloquent pilgrimwould have had rather more respect for the rule of law - obviously not.

 

I received one other reply, one of the more regularly vituperative posters snarled that I should have been put in the prison with them. That post was removed in short order.

 

It has been a very bad couple of days for the rule of law in the USA.

 

 

  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, JAG said:

 

I have, as you both know, posted in opposition to the movement of these people for the purpose of incarceration by a third party.

 

I posted as I believe it is wrong, because they were assembled, rounded up, whatever the phrase used, under a 240 year old law, intended to be used in wartime, and which has been thoroughly discredited.

 

If these people were convicted criminals they should be serving the sentences handed down by the courts which convicted them, and or deported to their country of origin as ordered by the courts. If they are accused of crimes then they should be tried, and if convicted, be imprisoned and or deported. If they are illegally in the USA then they should be brought before the appropriate courts and deported to their country of origin. Those are their human rights. 

 

Instead they have been arbitrarily transported, to another country, which will incarcerate them (under pretty savage conditions) for a year or possibly longer, paid for by the US. No court has authorised that arbitrary detention. There appears to have been no judicial involvement, purely an executive order. That order and the process it initiated, when challenged by a court, continued in effect. The judge who intervened said that transporting them was not to happen, and that the flights should return to US. That the flights were in "international airspace" when the order was issued is a particularly feeble excuse to flout the judges order. So their "human rights" have been severely infringed. Human rights are often an inconvenience, and with good reason, they prevent miscarriages of justice.

 

A very dangerous precedent has been set. Presidential fiat is being used to short circuit the law, and ignore the law when it responds.

 

I am not surprised at @thaibeachlovers response, I rather thought that @Eloquent pilgrimwould have had rather more respect for the rule of law - obviously not.

 

I received one other reply, one of the more regularly vituperative posters snarled that I should have been put in the prison with them. That post was removed in short order.

 

It has been a very bad couple of days for the rule of law in the USA.

 

 

And the members here jeering in support of this ignore the historical precedent of what putting a political leader above the rule of law leads to.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...