thaibeachlovers Posted March 27 Posted March 27 On 3/26/2025 at 7:41 PM, MadAtMatrix said: It wasn’t him planning it, was his team. Why should the USA be protecting anyone but itself. Let the barking chihuahuas in Europe go get slapped around on their own dime. While I want the US military to pack their bags and leave the Euros to pay for their own military defense, this use of a hackable media to discuss an attack on another country exposes their incompetence. For all the so called security on it, they might as well have included the Russians and Chinese on the chat. 1 1 1
Popular Post SiSePuede419 Posted March 27 Popular Post Posted March 27 Here Are the Attack Plans That Trump’s Advisers Shared on Signal The administration has downplayed the importance of the text messages inadvertently sent to The Atlantic’s editor in chief. By Jeffrey Goldberg and Shane Harris Well, Trump keeps claiming they're not classified. Release it all. Suckers. 🫡 "Attack plans" are even more "highly classified" than "war plans" since they contain specifics, like type of attack, location, times. You might call this a Moron dump: things really, really stupid people do, then try and lie about when they get caught red handed. 😂 1 1 1 1
Popular Post SiSePuede419 Posted March 27 Popular Post Posted March 27 Don't worry. The criminals will investigate themselves. I'm sure the Trump Administration will step forward if they find any wrongdoing. 😃 1 2 3
Popular Post MadAtMatrix Posted March 28 Popular Post Posted March 28 6 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said: While I want the US military to pack their bags and leave the Euros to pay for their own military defense, this use of a hackable media to discuss an attack on another country exposes their incompetence. For all the so called security on it, they might as well have included the Russians and Chinese on the chat. They weren’t planning the invasion of china or Russia. They were attacking a bunch of 37 IQ idiots playing around with RPG’s shooting at ships. They have TWO aircraft, and a bunch of old Iranian garbage tanks. The us could wipe the whole arsenal out in 48 hours. Tell me what “competence” your country has when it comes to military equipment, tactics, and training. Six slingshots and two bow and arrow sets? This was deliberate by Waltz to show that the US is sick and tired of taking care of the problems of Europe. Go read the entire chat in the Atlantic and “read between the lines”. Who would discuss actual tactical operations inserting their scorn for other nations if it wasn’t deliberate? Do you think when artillery men are on the battlefield radioing for air strikes to come in, they chatter to the co-ordination center “I am sick and tired of having to be out here fighting these wars that are nowhere near our homeland because the UK, France and Germany don’t have a pot to piss in or a window to throw it out of because they spend all their money on migrants rather than training their military and providing them with weapons” Tell me how many aircraft carriers with carrier capable aircraft are in NATO EXCEPT for the US equipment. “ Excluding the United States, NATO member countries currently operate the following aircraft carriers capable of carrying fixed-wing aircraft (as opposed to solely helicopters): • United Kingdom: 2 carriers • HMS Queen Elizabeth (R08) • HMS Prince of Wales (R09)Both are Queen Elizabeth-class carriers capable of operating F-35B Lightning II short takeoff and vertical landing (STOVL) aircraft. • France: 1 carrier • FS Charles de Gaulle (R91)This nuclear-powered carrier operates Rafale M fighters and other fixed-wing aircraft like the E-2C Hawkeye, using a catapult-assisted takeoff but arrested recovery (CATOBAR) system. • Italy: 2 carriers • ITS Giuseppe Garibaldi (C 551) • ITS Cavour (C 550)Both can operate AV-8B Harrier II or F-35B STOVL aircraft, with Cavour being the more modern and capable of the two. • Spain: 1 carrier • ESPS Juan Carlos I (L61)This is a multi-purpose amphibious assault ship that can function as a light aircraft carrier, operating AV-8B Harrier II or F-35B STOVL aircraft. Total Count Adding these together: • UK: 2 • France: 1 • Italy: 2 • Spain: 1 Total: 6 aircraft carriers with carrier-capability aircraft (fixed-wing) among NATO members excluding the USA, as of March 27, 2025. This count focuses on ships designed or currently equipped to operate fixed-wing aircraft, aligning with the typical understanding of “aircraft carriers with carrier capability aircraft.” Note that operational status may vary (e.g., maintenance or refit schedules), but these are the active or potentially active carriers in NATO’s non-US fleet.” The Houthi rebels, also known as Ansar Allah, are a Zaydi Shia Islamist political and military organization that emerged in Yemen in the 1990s. Originating from the northern Saada province, the group is named after its founding leader, Hussein Badreddin al-Houthi, who led it until his death in 2004. The Houthis began as a revivalist movement opposing foreign influence and the marginalization of the Zaydi Shia community under Yemen’s government, particularly during the presidency of Ali Abdullah Saleh. Their conflict with the Yemeni government escalated into an insurgency in 2004, which later transformed into a full-scale civil war by 2014 when they seized the capital, Sanaa. Today, they control significant portions of northwestern Yemen, including Sanaa and the strategic Red Sea port of Hudaydah, positioning them as a major player in Yemen’s ongoing conflict and a regional security concern. The Houthis’ military capabilities have evolved dramatically since their early days of guerrilla warfare. Initially reliant on small arms and ambushes in their mountainous strongholds, they have since developed a sophisticated arsenal and organizational structure, bolstered by captured Yemeni military assets and external support, notably from Iran. Estimates of their fighting force vary widely, ranging from 100,000 to 350,000 personnel, reflecting a mix of tribal militias, former Yemeni soldiers loyal to Saleh (who allied with the Houthis in 2014), and new recruits, including coerced youths and child soldiers. Their capabilities span several domains: Missiles and Rockets: The Houthis possess an array of ballistic and cruise missiles, many linked to Iranian designs or components. Their arsenal includes the Burkan series (medium-range ballistic missiles capable of striking up to 1,000 kilometers, used against Saudi Arabia), the Qaher series (repurposed surface-to-air missiles turned into surface-to-surface rockets with a range of about 250 kilometers), and the Quds cruise missiles (with ranges up to 1,650 kilometers, demonstrated in attacks on the UAE and Saudi Arabia). They’ve also showcased hypersonic missile claims in 2024, though evidence of operational use remains unverified. Drones: The group employs advanced unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), such as the Samad-3 (range up to 1,600 kilometers, carrying 18 kilograms of explosives) and the Iranian Shahed-136 (used by Russia in Ukraine, with a range of about 2,000 kilometers). These GPS-guided drones have been used in swarm attacks on Saudi infrastructure and Red Sea shipping. Anti-Ship Weapons: Since 2023, the Houthis have disrupted global trade by targeting vessels in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden with anti-ship cruise missiles (like the C-802 variants) and explosive-laden drone boats. These attacks, often in support of Hamas during the Israel-Hamas war, have sunk ships and killed mariners, showcasing their maritime threat. Air Forces: Their air capabilities are limited but include a single Northrop F-5 fighter jet and a Soviet-era MiG-29, both seized from Yemen’s military and displayed in parades (e.g., September 2023 in Sanaa). They lack a robust air force or modern air defenses, relying instead on portable systems and converted Soviet-era missiles (e.g., R-27 copies) as surface-to-air munitions. Ground Forces: The Houthis field a hybrid force with tanks, technical vehicles, and anti-tank guided missiles, honed through years of combat. Their tactics emphasize resilience, mobility, and defense-in-depth, integrating small warbands into a coordinated effort. Iran’s role is pivotal, providing training, components, and technical assistance, though the Houthis also leverage local engineering to assemble smuggled parts (e.g., Burkan missiles show non-factory welds). This support, combined with captured Yemeni stockpiles from 2014, has enabled rapid capability growth without a steep learning curve, suggesting external mentoring. Strategically, they use these assets to project power—striking Riyadh, threatening the Bab al-Mandeb Strait, and targeting Israel—while their propaganda amplifies their regional influence. Despite their strengths, the Houthis face limitations: they lack the industrial base to produce complex systems independently, their air defenses are rudimentary, and their navy is negligible beyond speed 1 2 2
Popular Post johnnybangkok Posted March 28 Popular Post Posted March 28 6 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said: While I want the US military to pack their bags and leave the Euros to pay for their own military defense, this use of a hackable media to discuss an attack on another country exposes their incompetence. For all the so called security on it, they might as well have included the Russians and Chinese on the chat. “Hold up, Hegseth is typing again” 1 3
SiSePuede419 Posted March 28 Posted March 28 Trump executive order on Smithsonian targets funding for programs with ‘improper ideology’ Why you WrongThink© Supreme Leader Words Say. 😄 1 1
MadAtMatrix Posted March 28 Posted March 28 18 hours ago, LosLobo said: I initially joked that your frustration stemmed from not being offered the red pill like in The Matrix trilogy, but now I see it’s a real estate issue. Seriously though—I’m sorry to hear about that. I imagine it’s had a real impact on your life. That said, I can’t help but wonder—how do you feel knowing that my world is now poorer and less safe because of the misguided supporters of the cult leader? Actually they were legally obligated to purchase my two properties back as they had missed their deadline (that even had a six month extension on it) and due to the change in currency rates from when I made the purchase to when I got the refund, I made 20% off of a 3,200,000 investment. I don’t care about “your” world whatsoever. Your “world” could be your collection of teletubbies dolls or your collection of nose boogers. “Your world” means nothing to me, the same as your opinion does. 2
Popular Post Presnock Posted March 28 Popular Post Posted March 28 19 hours ago, Presnock said: Well, the originating military about the actual strike would know exactly what it was stamped and sure it is highly classified. In addition, if you noticed in their chat besides plan for the attack with what weaponry, the report mentioned that "the target individual had just been seen entering his girlfriends house!" now that could threaten the source as the HUTI now know about that too and they intel/police/military folks will do everything possible to id how the US was able to get that specific person targetted! To then blatantly lie to the Congress under that oath too shows that even afterwards they do not accept any responsibility for their disclosures! I wished they alll were fired and then charged under the espianage law and fined big time and spend a bit of time in jail. I don't think the Republicans or Trump will allow an IG investigation but think it would be fruitless anyway. 3 1
Popular Post stevenl Posted March 28 Popular Post Posted March 28 2 hours ago, MadAtMatrix said: They weren’t planning the invasion of china or Russia. They were attacking a bunch of 37 IQ idiots playing around with RPG’s shooting at ships. They have TWO aircraft, and a bunch of old Iranian garbage tanks. The us could wipe the whole arsenal out in 48 hours. Tell me what “competence” your country has when it comes to military equipment, tactics, and training. Six slingshots and two bow and arrow sets? This was deliberate by Waltz to show that the US is sick and tired of taking care of the problems of Europe. Go read the entire chat in the Atlantic and “read between the lines”. Who would discuss actual tactical operations inserting their scorn for other nations if it wasn’t deliberate? Do you think when artillery men are on the battlefield radioing for air strikes to come in, they chatter to the co-ordination center “I am sick and tired of having to be out here fighting these wars that are nowhere near our homeland because the UK, France and Germany don’t have a pot to piss in or a window to throw it out of because they spend all their money on migrants rather than training their military and providing them with weapons” Tell me how many aircraft carriers with carrier capable aircraft are in NATO EXCEPT for the US equipment. “ Excluding the United States, NATO member countries currently operate the following aircraft carriers capable of carrying fixed-wing aircraft (as opposed to solely helicopters): • United Kingdom: 2 carriers • HMS Queen Elizabeth (R08) • HMS Prince of Wales (R09)Both are Queen Elizabeth-class carriers capable of operating F-35B Lightning II short takeoff and vertical landing (STOVL) aircraft. • France: 1 carrier • FS Charles de Gaulle (R91)This nuclear-powered carrier operates Rafale M fighters and other fixed-wing aircraft like the E-2C Hawkeye, using a catapult-assisted takeoff but arrested recovery (CATOBAR) system. • Italy: 2 carriers • ITS Giuseppe Garibaldi (C 551) • ITS Cavour (C 550)Both can operate AV-8B Harrier II or F-35B STOVL aircraft, with Cavour being the more modern and capable of the two. • Spain: 1 carrier • ESPS Juan Carlos I (L61)This is a multi-purpose amphibious assault ship that can function as a light aircraft carrier, operating AV-8B Harrier II or F-35B STOVL aircraft. Total Count Adding these together: • UK: 2 • France: 1 • Italy: 2 • Spain: 1 Total: 6 aircraft carriers with carrier-capability aircraft (fixed-wing) among NATO members excluding the USA, as of March 27, 2025. This count focuses on ships designed or currently equipped to operate fixed-wing aircraft, aligning with the typical understanding of “aircraft carriers with carrier capability aircraft.” Note that operational status may vary (e.g., maintenance or refit schedules), but these are the active or potentially active carriers in NATO’s non-US fleet.” The Houthi rebels, also known as Ansar Allah, are a Zaydi Shia Islamist political and military organization that emerged in Yemen in the 1990s. Originating from the northern Saada province, the group is named after its founding leader, Hussein Badreddin al-Houthi, who led it until his death in 2004. The Houthis began as a revivalist movement opposing foreign influence and the marginalization of the Zaydi Shia community under Yemen’s government, particularly during the presidency of Ali Abdullah Saleh. Their conflict with the Yemeni government escalated into an insurgency in 2004, which later transformed into a full-scale civil war by 2014 when they seized the capital, Sanaa. Today, they control significant portions of northwestern Yemen, including Sanaa and the strategic Red Sea port of Hudaydah, positioning them as a major player in Yemen’s ongoing conflict and a regional security concern. The Houthis’ military capabilities have evolved dramatically since their early days of guerrilla warfare. Initially reliant on small arms and ambushes in their mountainous strongholds, they have since developed a sophisticated arsenal and organizational structure, bolstered by captured Yemeni military assets and external support, notably from Iran. Estimates of their fighting force vary widely, ranging from 100,000 to 350,000 personnel, reflecting a mix of tribal militias, former Yemeni soldiers loyal to Saleh (who allied with the Houthis in 2014), and new recruits, including coerced youths and child soldiers. Their capabilities span several domains: Missiles and Rockets: The Houthis possess an array of ballistic and cruise missiles, many linked to Iranian designs or components. Their arsenal includes the Burkan series (medium-range ballistic missiles capable of striking up to 1,000 kilometers, used against Saudi Arabia), the Qaher series (repurposed surface-to-air missiles turned into surface-to-surface rockets with a range of about 250 kilometers), and the Quds cruise missiles (with ranges up to 1,650 kilometers, demonstrated in attacks on the UAE and Saudi Arabia). They’ve also showcased hypersonic missile claims in 2024, though evidence of operational use remains unverified. Drones: The group employs advanced unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), such as the Samad-3 (range up to 1,600 kilometers, carrying 18 kilograms of explosives) and the Iranian Shahed-136 (used by Russia in Ukraine, with a range of about 2,000 kilometers). These GPS-guided drones have been used in swarm attacks on Saudi infrastructure and Red Sea shipping. Anti-Ship Weapons: Since 2023, the Houthis have disrupted global trade by targeting vessels in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden with anti-ship cruise missiles (like the C-802 variants) and explosive-laden drone boats. These attacks, often in support of Hamas during the Israel-Hamas war, have sunk ships and killed mariners, showcasing their maritime threat. Air Forces: Their air capabilities are limited but include a single Northrop F-5 fighter jet and a Soviet-era MiG-29, both seized from Yemen’s military and displayed in parades (e.g., September 2023 in Sanaa). They lack a robust air force or modern air defenses, relying instead on portable systems and converted Soviet-era missiles (e.g., R-27 copies) as surface-to-air munitions. Ground Forces: The Houthis field a hybrid force with tanks, technical vehicles, and anti-tank guided missiles, honed through years of combat. Their tactics emphasize resilience, mobility, and defense-in-depth, integrating small warbands into a coordinated effort. Iran’s role is pivotal, providing training, components, and technical assistance, though the Houthis also leverage local engineering to assemble smuggled parts (e.g., Burkan missiles show non-factory welds). This support, combined with captured Yemeni stockpiles from 2014, has enabled rapid capability growth without a steep learning curve, suggesting external mentoring. Strategically, they use these assets to project power—striking Riyadh, threatening the Bab al-Mandeb Strait, and targeting Israel—while their propaganda amplifies their regional influence. Despite their strengths, the Houthis face limitations: they lack the industrial base to produce complex systems independently, their air defenses are rudimentary, and their navy is negligible beyond speed Again someone calling utter incompetence a brilliant strategy. 1 2 1
Popular Post Walker88 Posted March 28 Popular Post Posted March 28 The New York Times ran an editorial which pretty much sums up this fiasco. "…this is an Administration that actively, proudly, rejects expertise. It casts those who have it as the corrupt old guard, the real enemy, the “Deep State”, and it touts its own refusal to heed them as proof of its legitimacy and righteousness……This is an Administration that makes a weekend Fox News host the leader of the world’s largest military, puts a conspiracy-minded podcaster in charge of the FBI, and has at its pinnacle a reality star turned President. Blunders like this are an inevitable consequence. If you’re running the security directorate of a hostile nation, savor this moment. It’s never been easier to steal secrets from the United States government. Can you even call it stealing when it’s this simple? The Administration has unlocked the vault doors, fired half of the security guards, and asked the rest to roll pennies. Walk right in. Take what you want. This is the golden age." 1 2
Popular Post Walker88 Posted March 28 Popular Post Posted March 28 3 hours ago, MadAtMatrix said: They weren’t planning the invasion of china or Russia. They were attacking a bunch of 37 IQ idiots playing around with RPG’s shooting at ships. They have TWO aircraft, and a bunch of old Iranian garbage tanks. The us could wipe the whole arsenal out in 48 hours. Tell me what “competence” your country has when it comes to military equipment, tactics, and training. Six slingshots and two bow and arrow sets? This was deliberate by Waltz to show that the US is sick and tired of taking care of the problems of Europe. Go read the entire chat in the Atlantic and “read between the lines”. Who would discuss actual tactical operations inserting their scorn for other nations if it wasn’t deliberate? Do you think when artillery men are on the battlefield radioing for air strikes to come in, they chatter to the co-ordination center “I am sick and tired of having to be out here fighting these wars that are nowhere near our homeland because the UK, France and Germany don’t have a pot to piss in or a window to throw it out of because they spend all their money on migrants rather than training their military and providing them with weapons” Tell me how many aircraft carriers with carrier capable aircraft are in NATO EXCEPT for the US equipment. “ Excluding the United States, NATO member countries currently operate the following aircraft carriers capable of carrying fixed-wing aircraft (as opposed to solely helicopters): • United Kingdom: 2 carriers • HMS Queen Elizabeth (R08) • HMS Prince of Wales (R09)Both are Queen Elizabeth-class carriers capable of operating F-35B Lightning II short takeoff and vertical landing (STOVL) aircraft. • France: 1 carrier • FS Charles de Gaulle (R91)This nuclear-powered carrier operates Rafale M fighters and other fixed-wing aircraft like the E-2C Hawkeye, using a catapult-assisted takeoff but arrested recovery (CATOBAR) system. • Italy: 2 carriers • ITS Giuseppe Garibaldi (C 551) • ITS Cavour (C 550)Both can operate AV-8B Harrier II or F-35B STOVL aircraft, with Cavour being the more modern and capable of the two. • Spain: 1 carrier • ESPS Juan Carlos I (L61)This is a multi-purpose amphibious assault ship that can function as a light aircraft carrier, operating AV-8B Harrier II or F-35B STOVL aircraft. Total Count Adding these together: • UK: 2 • France: 1 • Italy: 2 • Spain: 1 Total: 6 aircraft carriers with carrier-capability aircraft (fixed-wing) among NATO members excluding the USA, as of March 27, 2025. This count focuses on ships designed or currently equipped to operate fixed-wing aircraft, aligning with the typical understanding of “aircraft carriers with carrier capability aircraft.” Note that operational status may vary (e.g., maintenance or refit schedules), but these are the active or potentially active carriers in NATO’s non-US fleet.” The Houthi rebels, also known as Ansar Allah, are a Zaydi Shia Islamist political and military organization that emerged in Yemen in the 1990s. Originating from the northern Saada province, the group is named after its founding leader, Hussein Badreddin al-Houthi, who led it until his death in 2004. The Houthis began as a revivalist movement opposing foreign influence and the marginalization of the Zaydi Shia community under Yemen’s government, particularly during the presidency of Ali Abdullah Saleh. Their conflict with the Yemeni government escalated into an insurgency in 2004, which later transformed into a full-scale civil war by 2014 when they seized the capital, Sanaa. Today, they control significant portions of northwestern Yemen, including Sanaa and the strategic Red Sea port of Hudaydah, positioning them as a major player in Yemen’s ongoing conflict and a regional security concern. The Houthis’ military capabilities have evolved dramatically since their early days of guerrilla warfare. Initially reliant on small arms and ambushes in their mountainous strongholds, they have since developed a sophisticated arsenal and organizational structure, bolstered by captured Yemeni military assets and external support, notably from Iran. Estimates of their fighting force vary widely, ranging from 100,000 to 350,000 personnel, reflecting a mix of tribal militias, former Yemeni soldiers loyal to Saleh (who allied with the Houthis in 2014), and new recruits, including coerced youths and child soldiers. Their capabilities span several domains: Missiles and Rockets: The Houthis possess an array of ballistic and cruise missiles, many linked to Iranian designs or components. Their arsenal includes the Burkan series (medium-range ballistic missiles capable of striking up to 1,000 kilometers, used against Saudi Arabia), the Qaher series (repurposed surface-to-air missiles turned into surface-to-surface rockets with a range of about 250 kilometers), and the Quds cruise missiles (with ranges up to 1,650 kilometers, demonstrated in attacks on the UAE and Saudi Arabia). They’ve also showcased hypersonic missile claims in 2024, though evidence of operational use remains unverified. Drones: The group employs advanced unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), such as the Samad-3 (range up to 1,600 kilometers, carrying 18 kilograms of explosives) and the Iranian Shahed-136 (used by Russia in Ukraine, with a range of about 2,000 kilometers). These GPS-guided drones have been used in swarm attacks on Saudi infrastructure and Red Sea shipping. Anti-Ship Weapons: Since 2023, the Houthis have disrupted global trade by targeting vessels in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden with anti-ship cruise missiles (like the C-802 variants) and explosive-laden drone boats. These attacks, often in support of Hamas during the Israel-Hamas war, have sunk ships and killed mariners, showcasing their maritime threat. Air Forces: Their air capabilities are limited but include a single Northrop F-5 fighter jet and a Soviet-era MiG-29, both seized from Yemen’s military and displayed in parades (e.g., September 2023 in Sanaa). They lack a robust air force or modern air defenses, relying instead on portable systems and converted Soviet-era missiles (e.g., R-27 copies) as surface-to-air munitions. Ground Forces: The Houthis field a hybrid force with tanks, technical vehicles, and anti-tank guided missiles, honed through years of combat. Their tactics emphasize resilience, mobility, and defense-in-depth, integrating small warbands into a coordinated effort. Iran’s role is pivotal, providing training, components, and technical assistance, though the Houthis also leverage local engineering to assemble smuggled parts (e.g., Burkan missiles show non-factory welds). This support, combined with captured Yemeni stockpiles from 2014, has enabled rapid capability growth without a steep learning curve, suggesting external mentoring. Strategically, they use these assets to project power—striking Riyadh, threatening the Bab al-Mandeb Strait, and targeting Israel—while their propaganda amplifies their regional influence. Despite their strengths, the Houthis face limitations: they lack the industrial base to produce complex systems independently, their air defenses are rudimentary, and their navy is negligible beyond speed You miss the point. Let me point it out: The Houtis would know what ships are within range. Had they had SIGNAL access, or been alerted by Iran (who can hack SIGNAL), they would have known the exact time of F-18 launch, as Hegseth posted it real time. The Houstis know where they themselves are, so they would also know the targets of the F-18. Knowing the source (aircraft carrier), speed of F-18s, and the likely targets, they could have intercepted the incoming jets with anti-aircraft or heat-seeking missiles. Hegseth's incompetence put US forces at risk. If you're an F-18 fighter pilot, and you see what your "boss" did on a non-secure social media app, you say WTF! He is unqualified to run a lemonade stand, much less the US Military. 1 1 1
Popular Post LosLobo Posted March 28 Popular Post Posted March 28 2 hours ago, MadAtMatrix said: Actually they were legally obligated to purchase my two properties back as they had missed their deadline (that even had a six month extension on it) and due to the change in currency rates from when I made the purchase to when I got the refund, I made 20% off of a 3,200,000 investment. I don’t care about “your” world whatsoever. Your “world” could be your collection of teletubbies dolls or your collection of nose boogers. “Your world” means nothing to me, the same as your opinion does. Maybe the real reason for your anger is classic cognitive dissonance. You criticize the real estate company Matrix while profiting from its mistakes—how does that add up? Your leader is still a real estate salesman and will eventually let you down like Matrix, with no obligation to keep contractual promises, ultimately leaving your world poorer and less safe. It’s baffling how you can support something that contradicts your interests. Insanity is doing the same thing repeatedly and expecting different results. 1 2
xylophone Posted March 28 Posted March 28 1 hour ago, stevenl said: Again someone calling utter incompetence a brilliant strategy. 2
MadAtMatrix Posted March 28 Posted March 28 17 minutes ago, LosLobo said: Maybe the real reason for your anger is classic cognitive dissonance. You criticize the real estate company Matrix while profiting from its mistakes—how does that add up? Your leader is still a real estate salesman and will eventually let you down like Matrix, with no obligation to keep contractual promises, ultimately leaving your world poorer and less safe. It’s baffling how you can support something that contradicts your interests. Insanity is doing the same thing repeatedly and expecting different results. You’ve made an assumption that I am American. I can tell you that you are 100% wrong. 2
Popular Post LosLobo Posted March 28 Popular Post Posted March 28 32 minutes ago, MadAtMatrix said: You’ve made an assumption that I am American. I can tell you that you are 100% wrong. Wrong! Seems you are projecting — you know the saying about assumptions — making them makes an ass of you, not me. I never considered your nationality. What I did see is that you're parroting Trump's policies and rhetoric, as they seem to lead your posts —being part of his cult crosses many borders. Now, you're pulling the classic 'red herring' fallacy by redirecting to a nationality debate instead of addressing the contradictions in your position. It's a typical tactic to avoid confronting your own logical inconsistencies. 2 1
Peabody Posted March 28 Posted March 28 I would like to see some brave, low-level servicemen post details of an operation similar to what Hegsmess posted and see what the reaction would be. His defense would be to use the same language that the morons are using. 1 1
Popular Post johnnybangkok Posted March 28 Popular Post Posted March 28 2 hours ago, xylophone said: 1 1 2
SiSePuede419 Posted March 28 Posted March 28 https://x.com/HillaryClinton/status/1904263639605084512?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1904263639605084512|twgr^c28be448d3f196bcd69378d5745131a503425a32|twcon^s1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fd-3413202340587755700.ampproject.net%2F2502242315000%2Fframe.html Hillary Clinton: 🔒 her up! Pete Hegseth, JD Vance, Mike Waltz, and Marco Rubio: 🦗 🦗🦗 Isn't it nice and quiet when the loudmouth morons shut up for a minute? 😀 1
metisdead Posted March 29 Posted March 29 Posts using derogatory and toxic nicknames or intentional misspelling of people’s names will be removed. If you don’t want your post to be removed, spell people’s names correctly, this applies to both sides of the political debate.
SiSePuede419 Posted March 29 Posted March 29 Trump at an October 2016 campaign rally said, "Hillary is the one who sent and received classified information on an insecure server, putting the safety of the American people under threat." But, but, but, but... The rules don't apply to Pete Hegseth, JD Vance, Mike Waltz, and Marco Rubio!!!1!1! Their 💩 don't stink. Thanks Jeffrey Goldberg! It's all your fault. 😄 1 1
MadAtMatrix Posted March 29 Posted March 29 21 hours ago, LosLobo said: Wrong! Seems you are projecting — you know the saying about assumptions — making them makes an ass of you, not me. I never considered your nationality. What I did see is that you're parroting Trump's policies and rhetoric, as they seem to lead your posts —being part of his cult crosses many borders. Now, you're pulling the classic 'red herring' fallacy by redirecting to a nationality debate instead of addressing the contradictions in your position. It's a typical tactic to avoid confronting your own logical inconsistencies. I truly don’t give a flying fork about what you think. Go find some other kids in the sandbox to spew your nonsense at Welcome to my “list” 1
Popular Post LosLobo Posted March 29 Popular Post Posted March 29 21 minutes ago, MadAtMatrix said: I truly don’t give a flying fork about what you think. Go find some other kids in the sandbox to spew your nonsense at Welcome to my “list” Ah yes, the classic "I don't care"—right before storming off in a huff, just like my 10-year daughter—grow up! 1 1 1 1
Eric Loh Posted March 29 Posted March 29 On 3/27/2025 at 7:24 PM, Walker88 said: Perhaps I should write Pete Hegseth's resignation letter for him: "I have decided to resign my position as Defense Secretary, in order to spend more time with my family, including Jack Daniels, Johnny Walker, Bud Weiser and Glen Morangie. He did the next cowardly thing and ran away from the epicentre of the controversy. Fled to Hawaii and then proceeded to Iwo Jima. Meanwhile Vance and Waltz fled the scene to Greenland. 1
MadAtMatrix Posted March 29 Posted March 29 24 minutes ago, LosLobo said: Ah yes, the classic "I don't care"—right before storming off in a huff, just like my 10-year daughter—grow up! I don’t owe you anything. Did you forget my comment that I don’t care what happens in “your world”. Now get back to your Lego set and making zooming noises with your hot wheels across the top of the sofa and drinking your apple juice from your sippy cup. 1
LosLobo Posted March 29 Posted March 29 21 minutes ago, MadAtMatrix said: I don’t owe you anything. Did you forget my comment that I don’t care what happens in “your world”. Now get back to your Lego set and making zooming noises with your hot wheels across the top of the sofa and drinking your apple juice from your sippy cup. Ah, the irony—someone who "doesn't care" sure is putting in a lot of effort. I didn’t forget your "Welcome to my list"—sounds like a block list, yet here you are, still posting. If you need help figuring that out, my 10-year-old could assist. 1
Mavideol Posted March 29 Posted March 29 On 3/27/2025 at 8:07 PM, Walker88 said: Since it seems this Administration has decided nothing is classified anymore, would anyone like to know what Putin has on POTUS? I guess I don't need to keep it secret anymore. my guess ??? money, maybe a bailout money on top of that maybe a video of a young russian underage girl sitting on his lap
radiochaser Posted March 29 Posted March 29 On 3/24/2025 at 6:21 PM, flyingtlger said: This was the first clown 1
MadAtMatrix Posted March 29 Posted March 29 7 hours ago, LosLobo said: Ah, the irony—someone who "doesn't care" sure is putting in a lot of effort. I didn’t forget your "Welcome to my list"—sounds like a block list, yet here you are, still posting. If you need help figuring that out, my 10-year-old could assist. Got it sorted. I had better things to do with my time, unlike you that sits on here all day pounding away at the keyboard. Your 10 year old could likely use some attention from you, or maybe you just Can't Understand Normal Thinking. 1
sharot724 Posted March 30 Posted March 30 latest Behind the scenes: Trump considered firing Waltz https://www.axios.com/2025/03/29/trump-considered-firing-mike-waltz 1 1
Presnock Posted March 30 Posted March 30 On 3/27/2025 at 8:07 PM, Walker88 said: Since it seems this Administration has decided nothing is classified anymore, would anyone like to know what Putin has on POTUS? I guess I don't need to keep it secret anymore. yeah called project golden flow I think so wifie really would like to know for sure if he lied to her you know with her pre-nup plus the addition for new 1st lady again. Imo of course a I don't have any proof, just the rumor. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now