Popular Post Jingthing Posted Saturday at 01:20 PM Popular Post Posted Saturday at 01:20 PM The poll questions speak for themselves. 2 1 2
Popular Post stevenl Posted Saturday at 01:25 PM Popular Post Posted Saturday at 01:25 PM It's worse than implied in the poll with his wife present at confidential discussions. 1 1 2
Popular Post Cameroni Posted Saturday at 01:30 PM Popular Post Posted Saturday at 01:30 PM No, neither, he should continue to do the excellent job he is doing. He was not responsible for the Singal Messenger mishap in the slightest. 1 2 6 1 15 3
Popular Post worgeordie Posted Saturday at 01:34 PM Popular Post Posted Saturday at 01:34 PM He won't resign , he will just keep lying ,and Trump is going to do nothing to him ", because he's a good guy ",but i am confident he will make a bigger mistake ,that he won't be able to wriggle out of. making an acholic chief of defence , a great idea ...NOT regards Worgeordie 2 1 1 3 8
Popular Post BLMFem Posted Saturday at 01:37 PM Popular Post Posted Saturday at 01:37 PM 8 minutes ago, Cameroni said: No, neither, he should continue to do the excellent job he is doing. He was not responsible for the Singal Messenger mishap in the slightest. Sure, he probably can't even remember posting, the p**s-head. "Mishap"???😆 Here's Fox News' Chief National Security Correspondent take on it: https://x.com/JenGriffinFNC/status/1905034953865212260 5 2 1 3
Popular Post Jingthing Posted Saturday at 01:46 PM Author Popular Post Posted Saturday at 01:46 PM Agreed that he won't be fired or resign. Trump's Department of "Justice" wouldn't prosecute a maga official for anything no matter how heinous. This is how banana republic dictatorships are run. Zero accountability for dear leader and his loyalists. DISGUSTING! 1 1 12
Popular Post Tug Posted Saturday at 01:49 PM Popular Post Posted Saturday at 01:49 PM FIRED!!with extreme prejudice not for re hire in any job requiring any security clearance or contract with the public in a position of authority.period all stop 🛑 1 1 2 8
Popular Post Cameroni Posted Saturday at 01:54 PM Popular Post Posted Saturday at 01:54 PM 7 minutes ago, Jingthing said: Trump's Department of "Justice" wouldn't prosecute a maga official for anything no matter how heinous. For what? He did not do anything "heinous". The Signal chat was not organised by him, ergo it was not his faux pas. 1 5 1 3 1
Popular Post Tug Posted Saturday at 01:56 PM Popular Post Posted Saturday at 01:56 PM Btw Hillary Clinton did NOT do the same thing.Can anyone show me were she shared real time before an air strike timing weapons targets?was she in charge of the military?not the same thing by a long stretch 2 1 1 5
Popular Post ronnie50 Posted Saturday at 02:14 PM Popular Post Posted Saturday at 02:14 PM 43 minutes ago, Cameroni said: No, neither, he should continue to do the excellent job he is doing. He was not responsible for the Singal Messenger mishap in the slightest. Sure. He should just order another round - 'on the house' - the White House 2 1
Popular Post Dan O Posted Saturday at 02:18 PM Popular Post Posted Saturday at 02:18 PM 22 minutes ago, Cameroni said: For what? He did not do anything "heinous". The Signal chat was not organised by him, ergo it was not his faux pas. And what position does he hold and what is he responsible to do in his position? 1 2
Popular Post Etaoin Shrdlu Posted Saturday at 02:20 PM Popular Post Posted Saturday at 02:20 PM Every single government official included in that chat should be fired and criminally charged. Not one of them said "hey, this is an insecure channel and we aren't supposed to be discussing this kind of thing". They were all negligent. 2 2 1
Cameroni Posted Saturday at 02:25 PM Posted Saturday at 02:25 PM 2 minutes ago, Etaoin Shrdlu said: Every single government official included in that chat should be fired and criminally charged. Not one of them said "hey, this is an insecure channel and we aren't supposed to be discussing this kind of thing". They were all negligent. That is just ludicrous. Neither Hegseth nor 99% of the others bear any responsibility for inviting the snitch journalist. They did not even know he was on the call. Anybody who has been on Whatsapp conf calls knows you just trust the organizer to have invited all the correct participants. No mere participant would ever say "let us cancel the call this app is not safe". That is just ludicrous. 2 1 1
Popular Post Etaoin Shrdlu Posted Saturday at 02:27 PM Popular Post Posted Saturday at 02:27 PM Just now, Cameroni said: That is just ludicrous. Neither Hegseth nor 99% of the others bear any responsibility for inviting the snitch journalist. They did not even know he was on the call. Anybody who has been on Whatsapp conf calls knows you just trust the organizer to have invited all the correct participants. No mere participant would ever say "let us cancel the call this app is not safe". That is just ludicrous. It isn't about inviting the journalist. It's about using an insecure channel to discuss classified information. Signal isn't approved for discussing classified material. 4 1
Popular Post Dan O Posted Saturday at 02:31 PM Popular Post Posted Saturday at 02:31 PM 6 minutes ago, Cameroni said: That is just ludicrous. Neither Hegseth nor 99% of the others bear any responsibility for inviting the snitch journalist. They did not even know he was on the call. Anybody who has been on Whatsapp conf calls knows you just trust the organizer to have invited all the correct participants. No mere participant would ever say "let us cancel the call this app is not safe". That is just ludicrous. You are clueless or stupid arent you. Its not just about inviting someone accidently to the email chain. They were having a discussion on a non secure, unauthorized service discussing classified strategic information about an upcoming air strike devulging dates and times. 2 4
Etaoin Shrdlu Posted Saturday at 02:37 PM Posted Saturday at 02:37 PM Here's a good analysis: https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/5218181-signal-chat-violates-espionage-act/ 2
Popular Post Jingthing Posted Saturday at 02:42 PM Author Popular Post Posted Saturday at 02:42 PM 55 minutes ago, Tug said: Btw Hillary Clinton did NOT do the same thing.Can anyone show me were she shared real time before an air strike timing weapons targets?was she in charge of the military?not the same thing by a long stretch I didn't say that she did. I was just posing a hypothetical. It obvious that maga cultist love the no accountability for maga officials (unless they show any disloyalty to dear leader) are the same people who would want Hillary fired for sneezing loudly. Correction -- they would want her jailed and many would want her hanged for treason. 1 1 1 1
Popular Post placeholder Posted Saturday at 02:42 PM Popular Post Posted Saturday at 02:42 PM 26 minutes ago, Cameroni said: That is just ludicrous. Neither Hegseth nor 99% of the others bear any responsibility for inviting the snitch journalist. They did not even know he was on the call. Anybody who has been on Whatsapp conf calls knows you just trust the organizer to have invited all the correct participants. No mere participant would ever say "let us cancel the call this app is not safe". That is just ludicrous. And was it Mike Waltz;s fault that Hegseth took his wife to highly confidential meetings? 2 1 2
Cameroni Posted Saturday at 02:57 PM Posted Saturday at 02:57 PM 24 minutes ago, Dan O said: You are clueless or stupid arent you. Its not just about inviting someone accidently to the email chain. They were having a discussion on a non secure, unauthorized service discussing classified strategic information about an upcoming air strike devulging dates and times. You are a nasty piece of work, but you spout nonsense. The information was not classified. You seem a bit clueless about the news yourself. 1 3 1 1
Dan O Posted Saturday at 02:58 PM Posted Saturday at 02:58 PM Just now, Cameroni said: You are a nasty piece of work, but you spout nonsense. The information was not classified. You seem a bit clueless about the news yourself. You care to show how you think it wasn't classified?
Cameroni Posted Saturday at 03:02 PM Posted Saturday at 03:02 PM 3 minutes ago, Dan O said: You care to show how you think it wasn't classified? The decision on determining whether the information is classified ultimately lies with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth https://apnews.com/article/trump-signal-classified-information-308e7a81d70d6233c06a1f7330ae3004 1 1
Dan O Posted Saturday at 03:05 PM Posted Saturday at 03:05 PM 2 minutes ago, Cameroni said: The decision on determining whether the information is classified ultimately lies with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth https://apnews.com/article/trump-signal-classified-information-308e7a81d70d6233c06a1f7330ae3004 Nice try but go back and try again. 2
Walker88 Posted Saturday at 04:04 PM Posted Saturday at 04:04 PM 1 hour ago, Cameroni said: You are a nasty piece of work, but you spout nonsense. The information was not classified. You seem a bit clueless about the news yourself. Goodness. A turnip would know one does not discuss weapons and issue launch order via a commercial app. Lucky it was Goldberg on the chat, as someone else might have published it real time, alerting Iran. F-18s could have been shot down and their pilots lost. Hegseth should commit seppuku, as would any samurai who was so reckless. And the fist pump and bicep emojis are pure elementary school. I really do not understand the veil of wilful ignorance that takes over MAGA minds....and I am generous with the use of the term "minds". 1 1
Walker88 Posted Saturday at 04:07 PM Posted Saturday at 04:07 PM 1 hour ago, Cameroni said: The decision on determining whether the information is classified ultimately lies with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth https://apnews.com/article/trump-signal-classified-information-308e7a81d70d6233c06a1f7330ae3004 LOL! After the fact, you think Hegseth has the integrity to admit the truth? He's other playing CYA, or he's an idiot who doesn't know he put the lives of pilots in danger. Either way, he should be fired. Of course he won't, because MAGAs are incapable of being anything buy "the best evah!". 1
Popular Post Jim Blue Posted Saturday at 04:41 PM Popular Post Posted Saturday at 04:41 PM Do you mean fired in the Russian sense ? 1 2 1
Hawaiian Posted Saturday at 05:54 PM Posted Saturday at 05:54 PM 4 hours ago, Cameroni said: No, neither, he should continue to do the excellent job he is doing. He was not responsible for the Singal Messenger mishap in the slightest. It happened on his watch. 1 1
Hawaiian Posted Saturday at 05:57 PM Posted Saturday at 05:57 PM 2 hours ago, Cameroni said: The decision on determining whether the information is classified ultimately lies with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth https://apnews.com/article/trump-signal-classified-information-308e7a81d70d6233c06a1f7330ae3004 Anyone with an ounce of intelligence knows that it SHOULD HAVE been classified. 1 1
Hawaiian Posted Saturday at 06:03 PM Posted Saturday at 06:03 PM 3 hours ago, Etaoin Shrdlu said: It isn't about inviting the journalist. It's about using an insecure channel to discuss classified information. Signal isn't approved for discussing classified material. Exactly. Official business has no business being discussed on private networks, classified or not. 1
Popular Post Elkski Posted Saturday at 06:27 PM Popular Post Posted Saturday at 06:27 PM When are we going to go back to honor and the buck stops here. Did you see the hearing with Tulsi. All if them no we haven't read that security protocol. What worthless air breathers 1 1 1
jerrymahoney Posted Saturday at 10:19 PM Posted Saturday at 10:19 PM Pete Hegseth -- the "Joe Isuzu" Sec of Defense: 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now