Jump to content

Thailand’s Earthquake Damage: 34 Buildings Deemed Unsafe After National Checks


Recommended Posts

Posted

 

Is it me or they conspicuously avoiding mentioning the private schools in Bangkok.

There are many that were built prior to 2000, 2 story and 3 story buildings as part of the amenities.

 

One school close to use, it's private but not overly "fancy", the owner is very much dragging the chain to have the place inspected.

This is after she has been sent the links to the volunteer inspection services the Gov is offering by parents.

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, fondue zoo said:

 

Is it me or they conspicuously avoiding mentioning the private schools in Bangkok.

There are many that were built prior to 2000, 2 story and 3 story buildings as part of the amenities.

 

One school close to use, it's private but not overly "fancy", the owner is very much dragging the chain to have the place inspected.

This is after she has been sent the links to the volunteer inspection services the Gov is offering by parents.

 

 

My daughters private school was inspected over the weekend and reopened on Tuesday, though there was very little structural damage (visual or otherwise) in my area.

Posted
5 hours ago, webfact said:

Meanwhile, the private sector’s towering high-rises, hotels, condos, and bustling shopping malls fell into the second group, each independently required to run their own post-quake checks.

 

Residences, commercial spaces, and other general buildings in Bangkok comprised the third category under direct oversight by the BMA. In the provinces affected by the temblor, the DPT marshaled local engineers and volunteer inspectors to assess the situations. With 2,600 certified inspectors registered online, public consultation was urged to ensure thorough safety checks.

I wonder what the standard of inspections were?  International standard using appropriate detection devices?  Or just a visual check?  Or no check at all?  Not very inspiring.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
5 hours ago, whiteman said:

ONLY 34    

 

4 minutes ago, connda said:

Where's the list?

 

4 minutes ago, connda said:

Where's the list?

And are these buildings shut down , emergency signage barriers around themetc, etc

Posted
57 minutes ago, Watawattana said:

I wonder what the standard of inspections were?  International standard using appropriate detection devices?  Or just a visual check?  Or no check at all?  Not very inspiring.

Online surveys?!

Posted
1 hour ago, newbee2022 said:

34 detected. And how many undetected? Hundreds?

From the article:

The BMA has proactively reached out to 11,000 private proprietors, urging them to follow through—112 have completed these checks so far.

Posted
Just now, Travel Dude said:

From the article:

The BMA has proactively reached out to 11,000 private proprietors, urging them to follow through—112 have completed these checks so far.

Thanks, I hope they will not stop with the checks

Posted

Admitting 1% of checked buildings are unsafe and could collapse is huge.

 

I wonder how many of the 200 they've deemed at amber risk are actually red and how many of 31'000 safe actually have no structural damage.

 

Private companies would supress disclosing the real state of their buildings.

Posted
7 hours ago, webfact said:

Meanwhile, the private sector’s towering high-rises, hotels, condos, and bustling shopping malls fell into the second group, each independently required to run their own post-quake checks.

that is alarming, maybe lost in translation - should have read

 

each required to run their own independent expert post-quake checks. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

Meanwhile, the private sector’s towering high-rises, hotels, condos, and bustling shopping malls fell into the second group, each independently required to run their own post-quake checks.

I’m sorry, but I certainly wouldn’t trust this at all. Independent, by who and by when? Only 112 have done it so far doesn’t seem like they are really concerned about getting the buildings checked. I hope that they follow up, because we all know too well how things work here. Maybe most are fine, but it only takes one and the story changes. 

Posted
9 hours ago, whiteman said:

ONLY 34    

The rest they could not see, as their eyes were covered.. with THB-notes.

In the tower my lady friend lives in many crackes in tiles, on floors etc.

  • Confused 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...