Jump to content

The COVID Scamdemic and its link to 'Scientism'


Recommended Posts

Posted
21 minutes ago, johng said:

Ahh the not fit to stand trial defense  like Biden used ?

No he knew full well what he was doing including trying to cover up the origins.

🤣🤣🤣...and YOU KNOW the origin??🤗🤗🤗

Posted
3 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

🤣🤣🤣🤣 Geez, 🤣🤣🤣🤣 ok, sure

Head of the NIH that was doing gain of function research in Wuhan....the lab it leaked from...or are you still going with a bat at the wet market?

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
40 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Created COVID 19

 

In fairness, he just approved the funding.  And signed off on the project(s).  Then lied about it.

 

  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Head of the NIH that was doing gain of function research in Wuhan....the lab it leaked from...or are you still going with a bat at the wet market?

At present we don't have a proof for your assumption of a leak in Wuhan.

Nor we have a proof for the wet market.

Posted
30 minutes ago, johng said:

 

Not long enough  to forget yet  80 years  since VE day and they haven't forgotten  nor should we on this subject..the criminals need to be brought to justice and at the vey least admit to their crimes.

I'm all for jail time for the culprits, but how likely is that? It's not just COVID. It's deeper than that. COVID was just part of a larger agenda.  Think depopulation.  There are people who actually think that the world needs to lose seven billion people or more. It's no big secret.  They've been around for decades, but they finally put a plan into action.  

  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, dinsdale said:

This is true. No evidence has been found of zoonotic transfer from the wet market and any evidence that may have existed that it leaked from the lab was destroyed by the CCP. Let's add to that that gain of function research on bat viruses was being done in the lab and there is nothing like the Sars-Cov-19 virus in nature. Hmmmm? Wonder which one makes more sense when drawing a conclusion as to the origin.

Assumptions, no conclusions

  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
2 hours ago, johng said:

 

There is no way of knowing if you would have any different symptoms not being jabbed.

Also as pointed out the tests for "Covid" are highly suspect.

IMO the evidence I have, based on the personal experience another poster on here is fond of touting, is sufficient to convince me the vaccinations worked.

 

The test for COVID work as well. Post evidence otherwise.

 

Hypothetical question: In terms of mortality rates, the worst diseases are small pox, measles, diphtheria and polio.

 

If anti-vaxxers were given freedom of choice, even as children, would they (a) Roll the dice with Mother Nature? (b) Choose vaccinations where the science indicating they were effective was evident?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted
19 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

At present we don't have a proof for your assumption of a leak in Wuhan.

Nor we have a proof for the wet market.

Pretty sure the CIA and FBI have confirmed it no?

You sound like you're not bothered, you don't think someone should hold accountability?

You didn't question anything regarding covid, and did what you were told ?

Let me guess, you have all the jabs you were told to get?

I didn't write vaccination, because they weren't, a treatment would be more accurate.

Edit, at present... its been 5 years...the first pandemic in100yrs, that shut the entire world down for nearly 2 years  and America, who claims to have the best intell in the world cannot find the origins.... BULL, they know they full well it was Fauci, as does anyone with half a brain that isn't a stupid sheep.

  • Like 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

In fairness, he just approved the funding.  And signed off on the project(s).  Then lied about it.

 

He was head of NIH, where does the Buck stop? Who is accountable ?

Posted
15 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Pretty sure the CIA and FBI have confirmed it no?

You sound like you're not bothered, you don't think someone should hold accountability?

You didn't question anything regarding covid, and did what you were told ?

Let me guess, you have all the jabs you were told to get?

I didn't write vaccination, because they weren't, a treatment would be more accurate.

Edit, at present... its been 5 years...the first pandemic in100yrs, that shut the entire world down for nearly 2 years  and America, who claims to have the best intell in the world cannot find the origins.... BULL, they know they full well it was Fauci, as does anyone with half a brain that isn't a stupid sheep.

A confirmation by CIA or FBI is not a proof. 

You can believe conspiracy theories. As I said, it doesn't hurt you or anyone else.

 

Posted
10 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Maybe you'll grow up one day. On the way to achieving this great leap in your life you should read this. Never know you might actually learn some things. 

https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/12.04.2024-SSCP-FINAL-REPORT.pdf

 

image.png.c534b622689294afc226ca7ed90f11ce.png

 

 

10 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Maybe you'll grow up one day. On the way to achieving this great leap in your life you should read this. Never know you might actually learn some things. 

https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/12.04.2024-SSCP-FINAL-REPORT.pdf

 

image.png.c534b622689294afc226ca7ed90f11ce.png

 

Oh, I see. Your Bible 🤣🤣🤣. Enjoy🤗

  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
3 hours ago, newbee2022 said:

Obviously this is a conspiracy thread and meeting occasion of Alu-Hats.

Have fun.

It doesn't harm anyone. 🤗

 

Others here disagree with you and think we are a danger to society (a problem to which a final solution should ideally be implemented)…

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Lacessit said:

IMO the evidence I have, based on the personal experience another poster on here is fond of touting, is sufficient to convince me the vaccinations worked.

 

The test for COVID work as well. Post evidence otherwise.

 

Hypothetical question: In terms of mortality rates, the worst diseases are small pox, measles, diphtheria and polio.

 

If anti-vaxxers were given freedom of choice, even as children, would they (a) Roll the dice with Mother Nature? (b) Choose vaccinations where the science indicating they were effective was evident?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Point b) is erroneous, c.f. Suzanne Humphries and the demonstration that pesticides = "polio" symptoms.

  • Like 2
Posted
15 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

WTF is wrong with people like you, you are a classic example of a brainwashed sheep.

The FBI & CIA have both confirmed that a lab leak is most likely, the NIH under fauci were doing gain of function research in the Wuhan lab, but all you can say is 'truth social' in order to make it some left - right anti vaxx conspiacy.

Do you not question anything you've been told? Do You go through life just doing what the TV & papers tell you to do

With all the info known who exactly are you waiting for for confirmation... Rachel maddow? The BBC, CNN. Pfizer?

I can imagine you are someone that turned on their neighbour and believed it was a pandemic of the unvaccinated, even though the jab was to protect you.

What are you opinions on the whole thing? Do you actually have one? or do you not care that people worldwide lost their livelihoods, the world was shut down and people couldnt see their loved one final hours.

One question; how many lives saved by vaccination? Go to excess mortality in this connection.

Being a medical doctor I was involved to administer the Biontech/Pfizer vaccine to elderly and old people in nursing homes and Health Centers. With a very good feeling.

Enjoy your day.

  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
10 hours ago, dinsdale said:

Once again the usual demonizing and completely incorrect conflation to say that those who did not want to be jabbed with mRNA juice must be anti-vaxxers. This is complete rubbish and simply parrots the get jabbed narrative and those that refuse are anti-vaxxers.

Heaven forbid you should answer the question.

 

There is no evidence mRNA vaccinations present more risk than any other form of vaccination. The 19 nuns who died in Italy is a fiction dreamed up by the anti-vax brigade.

 

 

  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
16 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

Being a medical doctor I was involved to administer the Biontech/Pfizer vaccine to elderly and old people in nursing homes and Health Centers. With a very good feeling.

Enjoy your day.

Thanks for your confession...enjoy your days in court.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 hour ago, newbee2022 said:

And what would that be ? And what do you know about it?

I know more about it than you would possibly believe. 

Posted
21 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Heaven forbid you should answer the question.

 

There is no evidence mRNA vaccinations present more risk than any other form of vaccination. The 19 nuns who died in Italy is a fiction dreamed up by the anti-vax brigade.

 

 

But there has been a sharp increase in heart attacks especially in younger people... what could have caused that?

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

Our Overlords and their minions, the zealots of Scientism (aka born again Materialists - "nothing exists beyond the 5 senses") wanted you masked because it's a symbol of obsequiousness, a gag order on dissenting opinion really, nothing more nothing less.

 

Rituals and symbols folks.

  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
10 hours ago, newbee2022 said:

Assumptions, no conclusions

As a medical doctor who "happily" administered the COVID-19 jabs to patients, was this before or after it was found that there was a genetic sequence in the SARS-CoV-2 virus that exactly matched a a 3,300-nucleotide genetic segment patented by Moderna in February of 2016?  The sequence in question is a 19-nucleotide RNA sequence found in the virus’s furin cleavage site (FCS). This feature of the virus enhances its ability to infect human cells.

 

So, before we even reach the issue of whether a "lab leak" was involved or not, perhaps you should consider the very real possibility of a genetically engineered virus? And just maybe, the possibility that  this virus was released accidentally on purpose?

 

An international team of researchers estimated the probability of this viral sequence arising by natural evolution as something on the order of 1 in 3 trillion, although some  argue that this could be just a coincidence. That would be quite the coincidence, I think. 

 

So, what do we have, really?

 

Behind door A, a genetically engineered virus containing a sequence patented by Moderna in 2016 that would occur naturally in only one of every three trillion rolls of the dice. Or, behind Door B, we have a mere fluke. A mere coincidence.  Moderna patents a viral sequence in 2016, and yet, through a very very lucky roll of the cosmic dice, that same sequence shows up in the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Nothing to see here. Move along. 

 

I think I'll go with what's behind Door A.  

 

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, newbee2022 said:

Being a medical doctor

So you're a "medical doctor" are you? Love to see your qualifications. Your posts certainly do not read as someone that is highly educated.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...