35 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Please cite the statute or be caught out lying again.

Grok:
 

Conclusion: By law, members of Congress are allowed to access detention facilities operated by or for DHS, including ICE facilities, for oversight purposes, often without prior notice, as codified in appropriations language and supported by bills like the POD

 

Pod https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/10274/text

 

But there are restrictions and the bill

appears to be only introduced and not signed into law.

 

google ai

 

No, H.R. 10274 is not currently law. It is a bill introduced in the 118th Congress, known as the Public Oversight of Detention Centers Act of 2024, but it has not been enacted into law. Congress.govprovides detailed information about the bill's status and actions taken on it. 
 

And than the old law talks about restrictions:48 hour notice.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/2842/text

On 5/10/2025 at 12:13 PM, riclag said:

The New US District Court Atty in New

Jersey and ex Lawyer for Trump calls out the activists Dems for storming

the detention facilities where illegal criminal migrants are held.As a result, 

The activist mayor was arrested .

 

“Members of Congress storming into a detention facility goes beyond a bizarre political stunt and puts the safety of our law enforcement agents and detainees at risk,” DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement”.

 

 

 

https://nypost.com/2025/05/09/us-news/newark-mayor-ras-baraka-arrested-while-protesting-ice-detention-facility/

story is based on a NYP report 

Nothing surprises me anymore about the bizarre left wing Democrats. You observe their socialist behavior and you think, OK, now they have maxed out on their insanity and the needle is pegged on the absurd. But then something even more demented comes along and the insanity meter needs to be re-calibrated. 

36 minutes ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

With proper notification and approval.

 

Not to barge in like a herd of elephants when they choose.

 

Private citizens can’t do this.  Neither can members of Congress.

 

After all.  No one is above the law.

Homeland Security brings the receipts :

These SJW activist  who represent the dems & illegal non citizens are gonna lose this narrative too.

 

 

2 hours ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

With proper notification and approval.

 

Members of Congress don't need notifications or approvals to visit detention facilities.

15 hours ago, riclag said:

Grok:
 

Conclusion: By law, members of Congress are allowed to access detention facilities operated by or for DHS, including ICE facilities, for oversight purposes, often without prior notice, as codified in appropriations language and supported by bills like the POD

 

Pod https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/10274/text

 

But there are restrictions and the bill

appears to be only introduced and not signed into law.

 

google ai

 

No, H.R. 10274 is not currently law. It is a bill introduced in the 118th Congress, known as the Public Oversight of Detention Centers Act of 2024, but it has not been enacted into law. Congress.govprovides detailed information about the bill's status and actions taken on it. 
 

And than the old law talks about restrictions:48 hour notice.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/2842/text

Well thats fine, ask your Grok what provision of the United States Code apply. Have you seen the video yet of the fat Congresswoman trying to shove through?

3 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Well thats fine, ask your Grok what provision of the United States Code apply. Have you seen the video yet of the fat Congresswoman trying to shove through?

Should they be arrested ?

whats your thoughts ?

1 hour ago, riclag said:

Should they be arrested ?

whats your thoughts ?

If I shoved the federal agent I'd get arrested. So should she.

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

If I shoved the federal agent I'd get arrested. So should she.

So in general you would support arresting persons shoving law enforcement officers, and those who did so should face the consequences of their actions and, if convicted, serve their time?

18 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

So in general you would support arresting persons shoving law enforcement officers, and those who did so should face the consequences of their actions and, if convicted, serve their time?

Of course. No one is above the law.