Jump to content

Thailand Plans 10-Year Tourist Visa and 99-Year Land Lease to Boost Economy


Recommended Posts

Posted
9 hours ago, redwood1 said:

What?.....Yet another new visa........With a boatload of requirements no doubt...

They have introduced so many new visa in the last 5-6-7 years is honestly hard to keep track of them....

 

I presume same to the men/women in uniform as well LOL.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Kerryd said:

But keep dreaming that they are doing all those regulation changes with a couple thousand white haired pensioners from Western countries in mind. I'm sure they'll get a laugh out of that.
 

 

  Snipped your long-ish post a bit but....yeah.  You nailed it.

Posted
25 minutes ago, Kerryd said:

But keep dreaming that they are doing all those regulation changes with a couple thousand white haired pensioners from Western countries in mind.

 

Oh great whats next? Gonna tell us there is no Santa? 🙄😅

Posted

10 year tourist visa.... And catch anyone who tries to work in those 10 years? On a tourist visa, work is not allowed.... 

 

If it's ok, then I get rid of my work visa, get my 10 year tourist visa, work and don't have to do the yearly extension for the coming 10 years... 

Posted

Let me guess; for the 10-year visa, if it ever happened, you would need to show a bank balance of 10 million baht over the past 12 months, your rental agreement, the utility bills for the past 5 years, and a salary of 1 million baht... Application fee 50,000 baht, and no refunds if declined. 😆 

Posted
2 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Is it even possible for this Dino Administration to implement anything progressive and beneficial? We remain sceptical. 

 

The terms would probably not be acceptable for most who want to retire here. Just like me, they probably just heard about Vietnam planning such a visa, and are just copying the idea...

Posted
14 hours ago, webfact said:

The proposed 10-year visa scheme intends to facilitate longer stays for foreigners, potentially transforming Thailand into a preferred hub for work and lifestyle.

It'll never happen.

Posted
8 hours ago, ronster said:

Agreed. After 10 years of doing marriage visa they should extend it to 2-5 year gap before having to do it again.

Every year doing the same mind numbing paperwork and photos etc for what 🙄🙈

I get the joy of doing mine tomorrow 😩

If you're a woman married to a Thai guy, after three years your eligible for citizenship.

  • Like 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, StayinThailand2much said:

 

The terms would probably not be acceptable for most who want to retire here. Just like me, they probably just heard about Vietnam planning such a visa, and are just copying the idea...

 

14 minutes ago, StayinThailand2much said:

 

The terms would probably not be acceptable for most who want to retire here. Just like me, they probably just heard about Vietnam planning such a visa, and are just copying the idea...

Thailand seems to be the copycat hub of Asia. Likely more dribble. It makes the PM feel productive, without actually doing anything. 

  • Like 2
Posted

Why is the word "tourist" mentioned in connection with a 10 year visa?  Those on merely 1 year extensions are classed as non immigrant, 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

How about KISS...keep it simple stupid

 

1.  First 60 days visa free for most nations

 

2.  Extensions are $1 usd per day up to one year payable in advance online or at immigration. 

 

3.  Any problems like arrests/convictions/overstays visa is canceled ,offender deported, $ forfeited.  Quick appeals to legal panel permitted but no dragging it out forever.

 

4.  Depending on severity of crime etc blacklist for one year to life.

 

Cleans up a lot of the current mess and also perhaps sends a message that crimes/violence /overstays will not be tolerated.

 

Not perfect but neither is having more and more complicated schemes that require jumping through hoop after hoop, paying agents, visa runs, etc. 

 

Of course it would also put a lot of the immigration folks and agents  out of jobs which might mean fewer rolex watches or villas in france for those who want it more complicated not less.

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted

Here's a novel idea. Introduce a longstay visa visa that's affordable, hassle free, doesn't involve reporting every 90 days and doesn't require the applicant to put the equivalent of a small countries annual GDP in the bank.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted
14 hours ago, Guderian said:

Is anyone really interested in a 99-year lease? Why not just allow foreigners to own up to 2 rai of land for residential purposes?

Only in a Moo-Baan

Posted
16 hours ago, Guderian said:

Is anyone really interested in a 99-year lease? Why not just allow foreigners to own up to 2 rai of land for residential purposes?

that will just make it easier for the chinese to aquire land

Posted
7 hours ago, connda said:

If you're a woman married to a Thai guy, after three years your eligible for citizenship.

And the financial requirements are basically nothing as far as I remember for applying for a visa.

Posted
12 hours ago, Quentin Zen said:

https://www.samuiforsale.com/real-rights/usufruct-property-rights.html

 

I think this is related.    I know a guy who is now 80s, nearing death, broke, miserable, and lost it all in LOS.  He had one of these.   Got an inheritance, got married, built some homes, did this usufruct, and......

 

10 years or so later, she kicked him out, and he went to court for years.  years. A  very long time.  He lost.  lost it all.   had to leave Thailand, and well,l it only went downhill from there.

 

I don't have all the facts, sorry.  But when I see this 99-year lease thing, I think of my friend's usufruct, and I saw him lose it all.......

 

I hope his case is super rare, there are facts he didn't tell me that are very relevant, and this is a safe thing....But I have my questions.  

 

I suppose for the farangs who could subsequently get a 99% year lease, it may introduce a lot more danger to their lives.

 

It seems there are a vast number of farangs whole marry Thai women a lot younger than themselves, in many cases for the women it seem the aim is to be married for a few years, let the old farang die off and then take all his assets.

 

If a farang was able to extend his 30 year lease to a 99 year least there might be a lot more fatal  "accidents' happening to the farangs who have such properties, now that would be funny. 

 

I am quite happy with a year by year 'old bloke' visa extension, put 800k baht in a Thai bank, if things look like they are turning sour in Thailand then spend the 800k and sod off somewhere else, after all we visa extenders are only here on temporary year by year extensions, there are no guarantees. 

Posted
5 hours ago, Chelseafan said:

Here's a novel idea. Introduce a longstay visa visa that's affordable, hassle free, doesn't involve reporting every 90 days and doesn't require the applicant to put the equivalent of a small countries annual GDP in the bank.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

sorta sounds like the LTR already in place, no 90-day reports, in and out of country no stamps, no money in the bank , 4 different categories, with one even being able to get a work permit.

Posted

So the 99 year lease means all the property must be sold to the govenrment at govenrment rates so they can lease it to foreigners?

 

I thought Trump was a joke but this a is bigger one!

 

Posted
22 hours ago, Sqoop said:

Will this visa and land lease be introduced this year then revoked a few years from now ? 

It will be a quicker u-turn than that.  within 12 months like the 60 days waiver.  clowns 

Posted
13 hours ago, connda said:

If you're a woman married to a Thai guy, after three years your eligible for citizenship.

It's not quite that simple, the guy has to be working and paying tax/SS..any break and your back to square one. Also as it's on his financials, it would be over 3 years befor you could apply as they go on previous years payments

Posted
20 hours ago, markeewan said:

 

Well thats how leases work, you don't own the land.

what are you on about, I'm talking about the original owner does not receive the land back it gets gobbled up by the state

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...