Trump deporting migrants to 3rd World countries contrary to Court orders

[jerrymahoney]

NY Times headline today:

 

Official Pushed to Rewrite Intelligence So It Could Not Be ‘Used Against’ Trump
An assessment contradicted a presidential proclamation. A political appointee demanded a redo, then pushed for changes to the new analysis, too.

__________

 

Simple explanation:

 

Some of Mr. Trump's immigration orders require the declaration of an invasion on behest of the Venezuelan government.

 

Analysts said that there was no such invasion.

 

Analysts are fired.

[NorthernRyland]

If anyone can cross the border illegally then have their deportation blocked by some judge then that's the end of country. American voters have no recourse either. Vote all you want but the final say of whether you get invaded or comes down a single judge. 

[hotsun]

5 minutes ago, NorthernRyland said:

If anyone can cross the border illegally then have their deportation blocked by some judge then that's the end of country. American voters have no recourse either. Vote all you want but the final say of whether you get invaded or comes down a single judge. 

Nowhere else is better in that respect

[ThreeCardMonte]

7 hours ago, bubblegum said:

Magaman don't give a toss about the constitution except art. 2 guns, guns, guns. They're all little scared boys playing cowboys and Indians.

I’m so impressed with the “highly educated “ left I’ve been reading about.

[ThreeCardMonte]

5 hours ago, bubblegum said:

All these Magaman on AN are little Trump clones. Shouting incoherent meme frases and saying nothing of substance.

The leftists who claim they are “highly educated” compared to the Trump supporters need a serious internal audit.

[ThreeCardMonte]

Can always squeeze in a few more on “CON AIR”

 

The more the merrier.

 

 

[Magictoad]

10 hours ago, lordgrinz said:

Keep up the good work Mr. President! 👍

The last one was too senile to do it!

[illisdean]

Nice lads, loved by bidenites....

 

 

[Dan O]

9 hours ago, lordgrinz said:

 

Voters said they wanted illegal immigrants deported, and that's what's happening....so, yes!

voters wanting something changed or fixed does not equate to allowing the president to break the law. there are legal channels to follow to accomplish that same outcome but trump is a buffoon masquerading as a person. if you think intentionally breaking the law when directed directly not to do what he did rather than using current laws or passing new laws is appropriate you are also part of the problem not part of the solution. 

[ThreeCardMonte]

2 minutes ago, Dan O said:

voters wanting something changed or fixed does not equate to allowing the president to break the law. there are legal channels to follow to accomplish that same outcome but trump is a buffoon masquerading as a person. if you think intentionally breaking the law when directed directly not to do what he did rather than using current laws or passing new laws is appropriate you are also part of the problem not part of the solution. 

“but Trump is a baffoon masquerading as a person “

 

But he is the POTUS living in the White House on Pennsylvania Avenue.

 

And your not.

 

He has the power and authority .  You don’t.

 

2032, if that soon is a long time to live in turmoil.

[Dan O]

4 minutes ago, Dan O said:

voters wanting something changed or fixed does not equate to allowing the president to break the law. there are legal channels to follow to accomplish that same outcome but trump is a buffoon masquerading as a person. if you think intentionally breaking the law when directed directly not to do what he did rather than using current laws or passing new laws is appropriate you are also part of the problem not part of the solution. 

to mr thumbs down  explain why when a law is on the books and the court directs you to give due process first before deporting their is no reason not to as the person can be deported if they fail to present valid evidence on why they should be allowed to stay.

 

To ignore a direct ruling and just deport without due process is breaking the law and thats what trumps cultist appointees are doing.  now explain how they are not breaking the law and why they cant provide due process? Im betting you cant and wont give an answer

[Dan O]

2 minutes ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

“but Trump is a baffoon masquerading as a person “

 

But he is the POTUS living in the White House on Pennsylvania Avenue.

 

And your not.

 

He has the power and authority .  You don’t.

 

2032, if that soon is a long time to live in turmoil.

He is the president and took an oath to uphold the constitution of the United States correct? He spoke those words in his oath at his swearing in.

 

 He is not doing that by breaking the law and ignoring direct rulings by the courts is he?

 

Electing someone to that position does not give them ANY authority to break the law , ignore court rulings or ignore the constitution.

 

you seem to be as ignorant about facts as your buffoon idol now arent you.

 

Show us where is given the authority to ignore the constitution or legal rulings by the courts. it will be good reading. Im thinking your trump univ legal degree expired or you missed class that day. 

[lordgrinz]

3 hours ago, simple1 said:

 

According to MAGA world it's fine for the President to breach his Office of Office to uphold the law? Hopefully it will not happen, but only yourselves, cowardly GOP  and the Supreme Court id you end up in a dictatorship / autocracy  in the coming three years. You already have a full on unshackled Trump family kleptocracy, so not too far to go.

 

It's going be a long 3 and a half years, buckle up buttercup.

[still kicking]

47 minutes ago, illisdean said:

Nice lads, loved by bidenites....

 

 

Post one of you if you dare 

[Dan O]

41 minutes ago, lordgrinz said:

 

It's going be a long 3 and a half years, buckle up buttercup.

Yeah it is gonna be a long 3.5 years for you and your buddies to see how many loses he has in court and eventually shut down by congress if he doesnt get impeached first. hang in there and we'll keep you updated when he F's up, in case you miss it.

[Dan O]

1 hour ago, still kicking said:

Post one of you if you dare 

Interestingly there are no public records available of many of these convictions available other than the claims presented by trumps minions. They also forget to included key information like the sentences were overturned or vacated or sentencing was completed.  Perhaps you can fill in the blanks of where and when these convictions occurred and the other details for us? 

[frank83628]

10 hours ago, connda said:

Again.  I'm always amazed at those who will defend Thailand immigration laws and refer to themselves a nothing but guests who need to obey those Thai immigrations laws to the letter, but when it comes to people crossing the border into their home country illegally and then getting deported to wherever their home country chooses to dump them, they suddenly bristle with indignation and concern over "the rights of illegal border breakers." 

Freaking amazing.

Neither simple 1 or bubblegum are American

[ThreeCardMonte]

1 hour ago, Dan O said:

He is the president and took an oath to uphold the constitution of the United States correct? He spoke those words in his oath at his swearing in.

 

 He is not doing that by breaking the law and ignoring direct rulings by the courts is he?

 

Electing someone to that position does not give them ANY authority to break the law , ignore court rulings or ignore the constitution.

 

you seem to be as ignorant about facts as your buffoon idol now arent you.

 

Show us where is given the authority to ignore the constitution or legal rulings by the courts. it will be good reading. Im thinking your trump univ legal degree expired or you missed class that day. 

He is doing exactly what “we the people” elected him to do.

 

A plus on his report card for his first four months 

[ThreeCardMonte]

1 hour ago, Dan O said:

to mr thumbs down  explain why when a law is on the books and the court directs you to give due process first before deporting their is no reason not to as the person can be deported if they fail to present valid evidence on why they should be allowed to stay.

 

To ignore a direct ruling and just deport without due process is breaking the law and thats what trumps cultist appointees are doing.  now explain how they are not breaking the law and why they cant provide due process? Im betting you cant and wont give an answer

Did the victims of the illegal alien murderers, rapists get their due process?

 

Was due process followed the legal way to apply for entry into the USA when they illegally entered the country?  Did Biden follow due process when he flew them at taxpayer expense directly into the USA?

 

Of course not.  So Fuc/ them

 

Get off high horse “follow the law” BS.

[Dan O]

1 minute ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

He is doing exactly what “we the people” elected him to do.

 

A plus on his report card for his first four months 

Seems you cant answer the question asked can you? I knew you couldnt so its no surprise. 

 

Where is he granted the authority to ignore the constitution, existing laws or judges rulings in legal cases? He cant and he doesnt have that authority does he? Just sit quietly hiding behind your keyboard being duped by a conman.

 

He was elected to be the President and serve the people by upholding the constitution and laws of America correct?  Its in he sworn oath and he isnt doing the duties he was elected to do by ignoring laws, judges orders and the constitution is he? No answer will be forthcoming Im sure,

 

If he wants to deport people for valid reason the courts have been crystal clear, give them due process first. He's too stupid to follow the rules because he thinks they dont apply and I guess you are in his same camp. 

[ThreeCardMonte]

3 minutes ago, Dan O said:

Seems you cant answer the question asked can you? I knew you couldnt so its no surprise. 

 

Where is he granted the authority to ignore the constitution, existing laws or judges rulings in legal cases? He cant and he doesnt have that authority does he? Just sit quietly hiding behind your keyboard being duped by a conman.

 

He was elected to be the President and serve the people by upholding the constitution and laws of America correct?  Its in he sworn oath and he isnt doing the duties he was elected to do by ignoring laws, judges orders and the constitution is he? No answer will be forthcoming Im sure,

 

If he wants to deport people for valid reason the courts have been crystal clear, give them due process first. He's too stupid to follow the rules because he thinks they dont apply and I guess you are in his same camp. 

I’m still waiting on the conditions of the “so called” bribe over an airplane.

[Dan O]

4 minutes ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

Did the victims of the illegal alien murderers, rapists get their due process?

 

Was due process followed the legal way to apply for entry into the USA when they illegally entered the country?  Did Biden follow due process when he flew them at taxpayer expense directly into the USA?

 

Of course not.  So Fuc/ them

 

Get off high horse “follow the law” BS.

Show us the facts where biden flew any of them in. Facts not bs vomit from you trumpettes. Biden isnt  part of the discussion its about the illegal actions of trump.  

 

Why dont you look up those deported illegally to see the cases they were convicted on and the outcome of sentencing and you wont find much as they are no available records on most all of them and the ones that are available show the sentences were completed, vacated or overturned.

 

If they were in the valid deportation category the facts would be available under due process and they could be deported easily, no questions and no objections. But when you have no clear facts to support that you lie and cheat and ignore your duty as president and thats not legal. You arent worth the discussion any longer as your head is too far up to see the truth. you have a great day. 

[ThreeCardMonte]

5 hours ago, jerrymahoney said:

NY Times headline today:

 

Official Pushed to Rewrite Intelligence So It Could Not Be ‘Used Against’ Trump
An assessment contradicted a presidential proclamation. A political appointee demanded a redo, then pushed for changes to the new analysis, too.

__________

 

Simple explanation:

 

Some of Mr. Trump's immigration orders require the declaration of an invasion on behest of the Venezuelan government.

 

Analysts said that there was no such invasion.

 

Analysts are fired.

Mr Mahoney,

 

Why did Biden allow them to enter the USA in the first place?

 

 

[Dan O]

4 minutes ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

I’m still waiting on the conditions of the “so called” bribe over an airplane.

no idea what your talking about but its not surprising as you are coherent in your postings. 

[ThreeCardMonte]

2 minutes ago, Dan O said:

Show us the facts where biden flew any of them in. Facts not bs vomit from you trumpettes. Biden isnt  part of the discussion its about the illegal actions of trump.  

 

Why dont you look up those deported illegally to see the cases they were convicted on and the outcome of sentencing and you wont find much as they are no available records on most all of them and the ones that are available show the sentences were completed, vacated or overturned.

 

If they were in the valid deportation category the facts would be available under due process and they could be deported easily, no questions and no objections. But when you have no clear facts to support that you lie and cheat and ignore your duty as president and thats not legal. You arent worth the discussion any longer as your head is too far up to see the truth. you have a great day. 

Nice try at cop out but it’s all related. 
 

The law of physics.

[ThreeCardMonte]

2 minutes ago, Dan O said:

no idea what your talking about but its not surprising as you are coherent in your postings. 

That wasn’t you in an earlier thread, post?

[ThreeCardMonte]

1 hour ago, Dan O said:

no idea what your talking about but its not surprising as you are coherent in your postings. 

My bad.  It was Eric Loh.  I get you two mixed up.

 

Like twins.

[jerrymahoney]

3 hours ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

Mr Mahoney,

 

Why did Biden allow them to enter the USA in the first place?

 

 

NYTimes headline Updated May 19, 2025

 

Supreme Court Retains Block on Using Wartime Law to Deport Venezuelans
The justices sent the case back to a lower court to consider whether the Alien Enemies Act can be used to deport immigrants accused of being members of the Venezuelan gang.