Politics Ex-Thai PM Yingluck Condemns 10 Billion Baht Court Order, Calls It "Deeply Unjust"

[snoop1130]

File photo for reference only

 

In a striking declaration on social media, former Thai Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra has launched a powerful critique against a recent ruling by Thailand's Supreme Administrative Court. The court has ordered her to recompense approximately 10 billion baht (£228 million) as damages related to her administration’s controversial rice-pledging scheme. Yingluck vehemently contests the decision, emphasising that she has never been formally named a defendant in the case.

 

The judgement arrives amid the backdrop of deep-seated political tensions in Thailand, casting a long shadow over the country’s judiciary independence, as cited by critics. Yingluck’s statement, shared via her official Facebook page, coincided with the 11th anniversary of the 2014 military coup, which not only removed her from office but has also left prolonged impacts on her political and personal life.

 

Yingluck's Facebook post described the court’s decision as "deeply unjust," voicing disbelief over her liability for losses attributed to agencies she asserts were beyond her control. She highlighted a previous ruling from a lower court, which found her not financially liable, contrasting sharply with the current verdict that places the full burden on her.

 

The rice-pledging scheme, a cornerstone policy during Yingluck’s administration, was designed to elevate the income of rice farmers by purchasing their crops at above-market prices, thereby improving livelihoods at the grassroots level. However, the programme reportedly incurred substantial financial losses, triggering intense scrutiny and controversy. Critics blamed the scheme for distorting market practices and ballooning public debt.

 

Yingluck, however, staunchly defends the initiative, asserting its aim was to stimulate the economy and lift millions of farming families from poverty. She argued the decision-making and implementation followed proper bureaucratic procedures and dismissed allegations of personal mismanagement.

 

In addition to refuting the court's ruling, Yingluck questioned why alleged mismanagement of rice stocks post-coup, leading to significant losses when quality rice was declared rotten, has not been thoroughly probed. This inconsistency, in her view, indicates selective justice practices within the country's legal system.

 

Her extensive critique also addressed the broader context of political and legal challenges she’s faced since the coup, noting efforts to freeze her assets and pursue politically charged lawsuits. Yingluck expressed concern over what she sees as a weaponisation of legal processes against democratically elected officials, warning of dire consequences for the principle of fairness in Thai law.

 

The case has reignited debates about judicial impartiality and political persecution in Thailand. Observers note that such legal battles reflect deeper fractures within Thai society, impacting governance, economic stability, and civil rights. Yingluck’s case is emblematic of the ongoing struggle between Thailand’s entrenched political establishments and reformist movements seeking change.

 

In closing, Yingluck's message on her social media underscored a plea for equitable treatment under the law, not just for leaders but for all Thai citizens, as a fundamental cornerstone of a just and democratic society. The resolution of this case could have lasting implications for Thailand's political landscape and its international reputation regarding judicial fairness.

 

  Adapted by ASEAN Now from Bangkok Post 2025-05-23

 

 

[Pouatchee]

"not fair, not fair!" she cried in a hissy fit rage stomping her Gucci alligator skin shoes...

 

                                                        

[Artisi]

Yes it is a bit unfair considering it was instigated and controlled by the current psuedo PM. Yinluck, like the current pretend PM just do as they are instructed while the guilty one is free to roam around all squeaky clean and hailed by some as the saviour of Thailand. 

 

[ikke1959]

The richest family of Thailand will always claim it is unfair, but they suck every penny out of this country and its people... She must pay and the whole family banned from the country 

[KhunLA]

39 minutes ago, ikke1959 said:

The richest family of Thailand will always claim it is unfair, but they suck every penny out of this country and its people... She must pay and the whole family banned from the country 

Not even close  

 

[daveAustin]

She’s being scapegoated here. There are darker forces in Thailand than the Shins and Yingluck is a delicate little flower compared to her numpty brother. Cut her some slack, ay. 🙂

[motdaeng]

15 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

In closing, Yingluck's message on her social media underscored a plea for equitable treatment under the law, not just for leaders but for all Thai citizens, as a fundamental cornerstone of a just and democratic society. 

before she made that statement, i saw her as nothing more than a foolish puppet.

 

what a hypocritical and worthless person ... she only demands equal treatment when it benefits her ...

 

btw. maybe she should ask the farmers who took their own lives because of her corrupt policies ..

[Bert got kinky]

 

If it's unjust, why not come back and fight it in the courts.

The worst that could happen is that you could find yourself imprisoned in a luxury police facility.

 

[thesetat]

The Op leaves out some important information.

Like te fact that this 10b is 27b less than what was originally been ordered to pay in a previous court hearing. She expected that this appeal would cancel that. This is the highest court setting the fines now. She must pay it which is why she is whining about it. 

Surely there is information the average person do not know about that made all but the lower courts make her liable for such amounts. The lower courts that did nothing could have easily been controlled by the Thaksin family. 

These higher courts are not so easily ( or cheaply ) controlled. 

[newbee2022]

15 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

File photo for reference only

 

In a striking declaration on social media, former Thai Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra has launched a powerful critique against a recent ruling by Thailand's Supreme Administrative Court. The court has ordered her to recompense approximately 10 billion baht (£228 million) as damages related to her administration’s controversial rice-pledging scheme. Yingluck vehemently contests the decision, emphasising that she has never been formally named a defendant in the case.

 

The judgement arrives amid the backdrop of deep-seated political tensions in Thailand, casting a long shadow over the country’s judiciary independence, as cited by critics. Yingluck’s statement, shared via her official Facebook page, coincided with the 11th anniversary of the 2014 military coup, which not only removed her from office but has also left prolonged impacts on her political and personal life.

 

Yingluck's Facebook post described the court’s decision as "deeply unjust," voicing disbelief over her liability for losses attributed to agencies she asserts were beyond her control. She highlighted a previous ruling from a lower court, which found her not financially liable, contrasting sharply with the current verdict that places the full burden on her.

 

The rice-pledging scheme, a cornerstone policy during Yingluck’s administration, was designed to elevate the income of rice farmers by purchasing their crops at above-market prices, thereby improving livelihoods at the grassroots level. However, the programme reportedly incurred substantial financial losses, triggering intense scrutiny and controversy. Critics blamed the scheme for distorting market practices and ballooning public debt.

 

Yingluck, however, staunchly defends the initiative, asserting its aim was to stimulate the economy and lift millions of farming families from poverty. She argued the decision-making and implementation followed proper bureaucratic procedures and dismissed allegations of personal mismanagement.

 

In addition to refuting the court's ruling, Yingluck questioned why alleged mismanagement of rice stocks post-coup, leading to significant losses when quality rice was declared rotten, has not been thoroughly probed. This inconsistency, in her view, indicates selective justice practices within the country's legal system.

 

Her extensive critique also addressed the broader context of political and legal challenges she’s faced since the coup, noting efforts to freeze her assets and pursue politically charged lawsuits. Yingluck expressed concern over what she sees as a weaponisation of legal processes against democratically elected officials, warning of dire consequences for the principle of fairness in Thai law.

 

The case has reignited debates about judicial impartiality and political persecution in Thailand. Observers note that such legal battles reflect deeper fractures within Thai society, impacting governance, economic stability, and civil rights. Yingluck’s case is emblematic of the ongoing struggle between Thailand’s entrenched political establishments and reformist movements seeking change.

 

In closing, Yingluck's message on her social media underscored a plea for equitable treatment under the law, not just for leaders but for all Thai citizens, as a fundamental cornerstone of a just and democratic society. The resolution of this case could have lasting implications for Thailand's political landscape and its international reputation regarding judicial fairness.

 

  Adapted by ASEAN Now from Bangkok Post 2025-05-23

 

 

10 B for freedom to fill the family's pockets.

What a nice trio...Yingluck, Paetongtarn and old Thaksin...😂

[hotchilli]

2 hours ago, ikke1959 said:

The richest family of Thailand will always claim it is unfair, but they suck every penny out of this country and its people... She must pay and the whole family banned from the country 

Is Thailand finally becoming tired of the Shin clan?

[Kasset Tak]

Well, she should really blame her brother as she was just his puppet...

[pacovl46]

Oh please! Buying rice above market price was ALWAYS gping to incur a loss! Duh! How was that in any way, shape or form not forseeable?!

[JAG]

2 hours ago, KhunLA said:

Not even close  

 

1) don't let facts get in the way of a good rant.

 

2) the first 5 on the list were not responsible for closing the bars at 2am!

[klauskunkel]

16 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

indicates selective justice practices within the country's legal system.

No doubt about that. Sometimes in your favor, sometimes not.

Depends on..., but you know that simply from growing up here, Yingluck.

[Grumpy one]

2 hours ago, Bert got kinky said:

 

If it's unjust, why not come back and fight it in the courts.

The worst that could happen is that you could find yourself imprisoned in a luxury police facility.

 

Or in a cell with 30 others, if she is lucky