Jump to content

Swift Police Response to Liverpool Incident Signals Shift After Southport Tragedy


Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png

 

Swift Police Response to Liverpool Incident Signals Shift After Southport Tragedy

 

In the immediate aftermath of a disturbing crash in Liverpool, authorities acted swiftly to release information about the suspect, a move that reflects lessons learned from last year's tragic Southport case. Within two hours of a people carrier striking a group of pedestrians, Merseyside Police confirmed the suspect as a 53-year-old white British man from Liverpool.

 

image.png

Live: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/05/26/car-ploughs-into-crowd-during-liverpool-title-parade/

 

This rapid disclosure stood in stark contrast to the events that followed the murders of three young girls in Southport, just miles from the city. In that earlier case, police delayed releasing information about the perpetrator for two days—a silence that allowed misinformation to take root and spiral out of control.

 

At the time, social media platforms were flooded with false claims and speculation about the attacker’s background. Debates raged about the individual’s ethnicity and asylum status, particularly among right-wing commentators and conspiracy theorists. The absence of verified details led to confusion and anger, which ultimately helped fuel riots across parts of the UK.

 

Image

 

Officials at Merseyside Police now acknowledge that their failure to promptly communicate with the public following the Southport murders contributed to the chaos. Their response to Monday’s attack marks a clear departure from that earlier misstep.

 

By releasing the identity and ethnicity of the alleged assailant so quickly, the police appear to be taking deliberate steps to avoid a repeat of last year's unrest. While the motive behind the latest incident remains unclear, this transparency is aimed at defusing tension and preventing speculation from taking hold.

 

Still, many questions remain unanswered. Why someone would deliberately drive into a crowd is not yet known, and police have stated that this is a matter for the prosecution to establish in due course. For an act to be classified as terrorism under UK law, it must be driven by a political, religious, racial, or ideological motive.

 

In the Southport case, investigators concluded they could not identify a clear ideological motivation, saying the killer’s only apparent intent was to take lives. As a result, the crime was not labeled as terrorism. That distinction is guided by Section 1 of the Terrorism Act 2000, which specifies that an act must be aimed at influencing government policy or intimidating the public or a section of the public.

 

So far, Merseyside Police have not suggested that Monday’s incident meets that threshold. But by sharing early details about the suspect, the force is signaling a more transparent and proactive approach. While the public still does not know why this attack occurred, the police are attempting to communicate openly, even as many facts remain uncertain.

 

Ultimately, this early disclosure is less about declaring motives and more about maintaining public trust. It shows a force that has reflected on past failings and is now trying to chart a better course in the face of crisis.

 

image.png  Adapted by ASEAN Now from The Telegraph  2025-05-27

 

 

newsletter-banner-1.png

Posted
6 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Why wouldn't they release the info it was a 53yo white man?

They only cover up for non-whites/Muslims/Immigrants.

 

This is just another example of two tier policing!

You’ve just given us a perfect example of grievance mongering while simultaneously demonstrating how easily misinformation and conspiracies are posted on the internet.

 

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Agree 1
  • Love It 1
  • Thumbs Down 15
  • Thanks 3
Posted
2 hours ago, BritManToo said:

Why wouldn't they release the info it was a 53yo white man?

They only cover up for non-whites/Muslims/Immigrants.

 

This is just another example of two tier policing!

Perhaps re-read the op as your question is clearly answered before conspiracy theorists like yourself jump on the band wagon - again.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 8
  • Thanks 5
Posted
4 minutes ago, Hamus Yaigh said:

Perhaps re-read the op as your question is clearly answered before conspiracy theorists like yourself jump on the band wagon - again.

Shame on white people. Conspiracy theorists the lot of them

  • Love It 1
  • Thumbs Down 4
  • Haha 3
Posted

If the videos I've seen on X are legit, it's starting to look/sound like he got stuck in the crowd accidentally, possibly after taking a wrong turn, then the car started to get attacked and he's panicked and floored it.

 

Look forward to hearing more details about this, which we should - seeing as he's a white guy and all. I'm sure they're looking for some "far right" looking pics as we speak, possibly including some tats or a shaved head. If not, maybe some evidence of him attending a Brexit rally or reading a Douglas Murray book should suffice. 

  • Like 3
  • Thumbs Up 4
  • Thumbs Down 5
Posted
6 hours ago, Hamus Yaigh said:

Perhaps re-read the op as your question is clearly answered before conspiracy theorists like yourself jump on the band wagon - again.

We are not theorists: in modern Britain terrible things are really happening; the latest being the imprisonment of Lucy Connolly compared to the release of violent pedophiles and house breakers.

The police raiding people's houses looking for evidence of of supporting Brexit; and reading the works of right wing authors who publish articles in the Daily Telegraph. You don't have to be a conspiracy theorist to see what is happening in Britain these days.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 2
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
10 hours ago, Social Media said:

the suspect as a 53-year-old white British man


Note that "white" had to be included.  Had the perp been non-white, the media would be all hush-hush.  In reality ethnicity doesn't have anything to do with anything other then it stirs the chaos pot that the media loves to keep cooking.

  • Like 1
  • Love It 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 3
Posted
2 hours ago, RayC said:

Woe is me! 

 

The intolerable load borne by white, male Brits living in the UK. How do we manage to carry on?

I moved to another country to escape the oppression!

  • Like 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, coolcarer said:

Why did the police immediately reveal that it was a white man yet fail to do so in previous cases as in the OP. An admission that they were wrong?
 

Simple question, no need to make things up about woe is me rubbish. 

Because they didn't want the usual rightwing nuts jumping to conclusions, rioting and trying to burn down asylum seeker hotels, like they did after Southport.

  • Agree 2
  • Thumbs Down 4
Posted
5 minutes ago, brewsterbudgen said:

Because they didn't want the usual rightwing nuts jumping to conclusions, rioting and trying to burn down asylum seeker hotels, like they did after Southport.

So an admission that they were wrong then……..

 

14 minutes ago, coolcarer said:

Why did the police immediately reveal that it was a white man yet fail to do so in previous cases as in the OP. An admission that they were wrong?
 

Simple question, no need to make things up about woe is me rubbish. 

 

Posted
4 hours ago, JonnyF said:

If the videos I've seen on X are legit, it's starting to look/sound like he got stuck in the crowd accidentally, possibly after taking a wrong turn, then the car started to get attacked and he's panicked and floored it.

 

Look forward to hearing more details about this, which we should - seeing as he's a white guy and all. I'm sure they're looking for some "far right" looking pics as we speak, possibly including some tats or a shaved head. If not, maybe some evidence of him attending a Brexit rally or reading a Douglas Murray book should suffice. 

Rather a sympathetic take on things.

  • Thumbs Down 3
Posted
40 minutes ago, coolcarer said:

Why did the police immediately reveal that it was a white man yet fail to do so in previous cases as in the OP. An admission that they were wrong?
 

Simple question, no need to make things up about woe is me rubbish. 

You did read the OP?

  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, coolcarer said:

Yes why do you ask? 

You obviously missed this part, then:

 

"So far, Merseyside Police have not suggested that Monday’s incident meets that threshold. But by sharing early details about the suspect, the force is signaling a more transparent and proactive approach. While the public still does not know why this attack occurred, the police are attempting to communicate openly, even as many facts remain uncertain."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...