Why isnt Trumps approval rating 80%?

[Yellowtail]

6 minutes ago, simple1 said:

 

<video snipped for brevity>. No hero of mine - don't worship politicians like you obviously do so. One of the uglier posts I've seen from MAGA world, but no surprise. I do hope someone you know doesn't suffer from any degenerative disease  as your empathy would leave them stone cold.

Oh, so now we're all in agreement that Biden was suffering from a degenerative disease while in office, and the left tried to cover for him. 

[illisdean]

3 hours ago, simple1 said:

 

<video snipped for brevity>. No hero of mine - don't worship politicians like you obviously do so. One of the uglier posts I've seen from MAGA world, but no surprise. I do hope someone you know doesn't suffer from any degenerative disease  as your empathy would leave them stone cold.

you're nothing more than a Trump hater and Biden luvin loser struggling to find their way amongst the proliferation of failure induced butt-hurt common place with liberal losers of your ilk. U should wake up, stay off MSNBC and make a rudimentary, desperate attempt to keep up. Say hello to your future with AOC and Jasmine.....HA HA HA...

 

And another big Ha ha ha......must suck to be a brainwashed liberal loser. Care to chime in how much it really hurts to be a liberal loser who bet the farm on Kamala....and before I forgot....on stolen valor Tim, the tampon pushing moron!

 

LOL.

 

[illisdean]

3 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Oh, so now we're all in agreement that Biden was suffering from a degenerative disease while in office, and the left tried to cover for him. 

But he (Biden), finally beat medicare.....LOL (moron-itis Biden-itis)

 

Ha ha ha 

 

 

[illisdean]

3 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Oh, so now we're all in agreement that Biden was suffering from a degenerative disease while in office, and the left tried to cover for him. 

They tried....but......only the blue haired brainwashed liberals did not see his decomposing brain, probably cuz its endemic amongst the liberal/democrat sub-set of morons and imbeciles.

 

 

[illisdean]

3 hours ago, simple1 said:

 

<video snipped for brevity>. No hero of mine - don't worship politicians like you obviously do so. One of the uglier posts I've seen from MAGA world, but no surprise. I do hope someone you know doesn't suffer from any degenerative disease  as your empathy would leave them stone cold.

Classic Biden, your very on muppet singing your tune.....lol.....ha ha ha

 

 

[illisdean]

3 hours ago, simple1 said:

 

<video snipped for brevity>. No hero of mine - don't worship politicians like you obviously do so. One of the uglier posts I've seen from MAGA world, but no surprise. I do hope someone you know doesn't suffer from any degenerative disease  as your empathy would leave them stone cold.

Your hero Biden getting totally nuked in the CNN debate June 2024.... LOL ...Spelled the end of auto-pen Joe and soon after his own party ditched him, tossed him to the has-been trash heap of failure.

 

 

 

[WDSmart]

14 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Sorry, the border was not open, they just let illegals flood into the county through the closed border. 

 

I seem to remember you telling me you were a reader, and that you did not watch CNN. 

 

But that's okay, you're a leftist, I knew you were lying 

No, again, you have the typical rightist black-or-white view that the border is either "open" or "closed." That's the same erroneous view you have of genders. A border can certainly be one of the extremes, but it also can be slightly or widely open, or slightly or tightly closed, just like genders.

I do read a lot of posts here and on other social media sites. I may have said that before, but I believe considerably less than 50% of what I read there. I get most of my news from CNN, and I believe about 95% of what I see there.

Yes, leftists do lie sometimes. Rightists do, too, of course. And then sometimes both state something they believe to be true, but later turns out not to be. I don't consider that a lie; I consider that an error in judgment of believing the source, and something they must consider in the future when hearing things from that same source. The biggest problem we (both leftists and rightists) have now is Trump. I'd say about 75% of what he says is a lie, not just an error in judgment, and, unfortunately, most rightists believe him 100%. 😒

[simple1]

15 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Oh, so now we're all in agreement that Biden was suffering from a degenerative disease while in office, and the left tried to cover for him. 

 

No. What I posted was objection to the language of  the member - to my mind disgraceful behaviour

[simple1]

12 hours ago, illisdean said:

you're nothing more than a Trump hater and Biden luvin loser struggling to find their way amongst the proliferation of failure induced butt-hurt common place with liberal losers of your ilk. U should wake up, stay off MSNBC and make a rudimentary, desperate attempt to keep up. Say hello to your future with AOC and Jasmine.....HA HA HA...

 

And another big Ha ha ha......must suck to be a brainwashed liberal loser. Care to chime in how much it really hurts to be a liberal loser who bet the farm on Kamala....and before I forgot....on stolen valor Tim, the tampon pushing moron!

 

LOL.

 

 

Your hate filled commentary is disgusting as well as totally inaccurate regards myself. Well past due for you to take a long look in the mirror and take some time out before posting again. Get well soon...

[Yellowtail]

1 hour ago, WDSmart said:

No, again, you have the typical rightist black-or-white view that the border is either "open" or "closed." That's the same erroneous view you have of genders. A border can certainly be one of the extremes, but it also can be slightly or widely open, or slightly or tightly closed, just like genders.

I do read a lot of posts here and on other social media sites. I may have said that before, but I believe considerably less than 50% of what I read there. I get most of my news from CNN, and I believe about 95% of what I see there.

Yes, leftists do lie sometimes. Rightists do, too, of course. And then sometimes both state something they believe to be true, but later turns out not to be. I don't consider that a lie; I consider that an error in judgment of believing the source, and something they must consider in the future when hearing things from that same source. The biggest problem we (both leftists and rightists) have now is Trump. I'd say about 75% of what he says is a lie, not just an error in judgment, and, unfortunately, most rightists believe him 100%. 😒

The law is supposed to be black and white, not subjective. 

 

So, if "open" is not the correct term for a border that lets millions of people flood into the country unchecked a year, what might the correct term be? I know your CNN likes to use "secure", but I don't think that's quite right either. Please tell me. 

 

The biggest threat to the left is Trump, but Trump is the right's greatest hope. 

 

You are so out of touch and condescending that you believe that over 25% of people in the country believe 100% of what Trump say. I do not think anyone on the planet believes 100% of what Trump say. 

 

 

[Yellowtail]

16 minutes ago, simple1 said:

 

No. What I posted was objection to the language of  the member - to my mind disgraceful behaviour

Okay, so you do not believe Biden was suffering from a degenerative disease while in office, and that the left tried to cover for him. 

 

Thank you for your honesty. 

[Hawaiian]

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

The law is supposed to be black and white, not subjective. 

 

So, if "open" is not the correct term for a border that lets millions of people flood into the country unchecked a year, what might the correct term be? I know your CNN likes to use "secure", but I don't think that's quite right either. Please tell me. 

 

The biggest threat to the left is Trump, but Trump is the right's greatest hope. 

 

You are so out of touch and condescending that you believe that over 25% of people in the country believe 100% of what Trump say. I do not think anyone on the planet believes 100% of what Trump say. 

 

 

If the law were black and white then we wouldn't need SCOTUS.  If IRS rules and regulations are black and white why do we need a tax court?  So in reality, our laws are full of holes and often successfully challenged.

[Yellowtail]

12 minutes ago, Hawaiian said:

If the law were black and white then we wouldn't need SCOTUS.  If IRS rules and regulations are black and white why do we need a tax court?  So in reality, our laws are full of holes and often successfully challenged.

I said the law was supposed to be black and white, and we need the Supreme Court to make it so. 

 

 

[WDSmart]

3 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

The law is supposed to be black and white, not subjective. 

 

So, if "open" is not the correct term for a border that lets millions of people flood into the country unchecked a year, what might the correct term be? I know your CNN likes to use "secure", but I don't think that's quite right either. Please tell me. 

 

The biggest threat to the left is Trump, but Trump is the right's greatest hope. 

 

You are so out of touch and condescending that you believe that over 25% of people in the country believe 100% of what Trump say. I do not think anyone on the planet believes 100% of what Trump say. 

 

 

 

3 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

The law is supposed to be black and white, not subjective. 

 

So, if "open" is not the correct term for a border that lets millions of people flood into the country unchecked a year, what might the correct term be? I know your CNN likes to use "secure", but I don't think that's quite right either. Please tell me. 

 

The biggest threat to the left is Trump, but Trump is the right's greatest hope. 

 

You are so out of touch and condescending that you believe that over 25% of people in the country believe 100% of what Trump say. I do not think anyone on the planet believes 100% of what Trump say. 

 

 

The law is indeed "black and white." You're either guilty or not guilty. The determination of guilt or innocence io an accused, however, is a combination of objective and subjective judgments. A judge would be mostly objective but a jury's verdict would have some to a lot of subjectivity in it.

As far as the term "open borders" go, I'd recommend the use of some adjective before the classification of "open" that more accurately describes your opinion of them. Something like "partially," "dangerously," or "welcomely," but not "completely." The same with Trump's "closed" borders. I'd recommend "mostly," "protectively," or "obstructionally," but not "completely."

No, the biggest threat to the left  (I'd say "left, moderates, and moderate right)" is not Trump but the number of his ardent  supporters; but I agree that Trump, right now, is the right's  (I'd say "far right's") greatest hope.

I don't believe I am "out of touch" but just have different values than you (and MAGA  supporters in general). I do believe that about 25% of the voting public in the USA (my home country) believe virtually 100% of what Trump says. Okay, 100% might be a little much, but I'd say at least 95%, and the other 5% that they don't believe, they don't care about because they have the same values as Trump.

Then there's an additional 20% of current Trump supporters that, although they might not believe much of what Trump says, support him because they agree with the goals they think he's trying to achieve and don't care how he goes about achieving them.

The former group, the 25%, I detest. The latter group, the 20%, I pity and hope they will wake up soon and realize Trump is just conning/deceiving them.

Which of those groups are you in? 

And, just FYI, I am far-far-left and woke. (And I know I've written that before on other forums. 😉 )

[Hawaiian]

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

I said the law was supposed to be black and white, and we need the Supreme Court to make it so. 

 

 

SCOTUS sometimes makes decisions that are not completely decisive.

[Yellowtail]

14 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

 

The law is indeed "black and white." You're either guilty or not guilty. The determination of guilt or innocence io an accused, however, is a combination of objective and subjective judgments. A judge would be mostly objective but a jury's verdict would have some to a lot of subjectivity in it.

As far as the term "open borders" go, I'd recommend the use of some adjective before the classification of "open" that more accurately describes your opinion of them. Something like "partially," "dangerously," or "welcomely," but not "completely." The same with Trump's "closed" borders. I'd recommend "mostly," "protectively," or "obstructionally," but not "completely."

No, the biggest threat to the left  (I'd say "left, moderates, and moderate right)" is not Trump but the number of his ardent  supporters; but I agree that Trump, right now, is the right's  (I'd say "far right's") greatest hope.

I don't believe I am "out of touch" but just have different values than you (and MAGA  supporters in general). I do believe that about 25% of the voting public in the USA (my home country) believe virtually 100% of what Trump says. Okay, 100% might be a little much, but I'd say at least 95%, and the other 5% that they don't believe, they don't care about because they have the same values as Trump.

Then there's an additional 20% of current Trump supporters that, although they might not believe much of what Trump says, support him because they agree with the goals they think he's trying to achieve and don't care how he goes about achieving them.

The former group, the 25%, I detest. The latter group, the 20%, I pity and hope they will wake up soon and realize Trump is just conning/deceiving them.

Which of those groups are you in? 

And, just FYI, I am far-far-left and woke. (And I know I've written that before on other forums. 😉 )

I am not in any of those groups. 

[Yellowtail]

2 minutes ago, Hawaiian said:

SCOTUS sometimes makes decisions that are not completely decisive.

For example? 

[nauseus]

On 6/3/2025 at 8:20 AM, pegman said:

tariffs 

Bless you.

[nauseus]

On 6/3/2025 at 8:46 AM, Hamus Yaigh said:

Sarcasm?

 

The guy is a perfect example of an a-hole leader and an embarrassment in the eyes of most nations. His rhetoric is never anything but inflammatory, his policies are regressive or chaotic more suited to a previous age, and his behavior is massively self-serving and authoritarian.

 

Not a fan then?

[Hawaiian]

27 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

For example? 

Refusing to hear gun-control challenges is one example.

[simple1]

6 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Okay, so you do not believe Biden was suffering from a degenerative disease while in office, and that the left tried to cover for him. 

 

Thank you for your honesty. 

 

Playing assumptive games again - whatever gets you through the day

[Yellowtail]

3 hours ago, simple1 said:

 

Playing assumptive games again - whatever gets you through the day

It is amusing how you never seem to want to answer a simple question. 

 

You either agree with 90% of the country that Biden was suffering from a degenerative disease while in office, and the left tried to cover for him, or you agree with the 9% Biden was not suffering from a degenerative disease while in office, or you are part of the 1% that pretends they have no idea. 

 

Weak

[Yellowtail]

4 hours ago, Hawaiian said:

Refusing to hear gun-control challenges is one example.

Your claim was: "SCOTUS sometimes makes decisions that are not completely decisive."

 

Refusing to hear gun-control challenges, or refusing to hear anything for that matter, is not a decision as I think we both understand a decision to be.

 

Gun control is a slippery slope. I believe the left wants to ban guns, and I think they should be honest about that and push that through the court or amend the Constitution. No nitpick trying to stupidly outlaw assault rifles or clips or whatnot. 

 

I'm surprised you did not select reversing affirmative action, I think that would have been an easy case to make. 

 

 

 

[illisdean]

Approval rating is likely 100% at UFC 316. Now do a comparison to Biden...ha ha ha.

 

 

[illisdean]

12 hours ago, simple1 said:

 

Your hate filled commentary is disgusting as well as totally inaccurate regards myself. Well past due for you to take a long look in the mirror and take some time out before posting again. Get well soon...

Stop being a biden luvin Trump hating moron and cure your butt-hurt, get well soon, ditch your affiliations with the woke losing side, if not, cry harder and go tell someone who cares. 

[candide]

3 hours ago, illisdean said:

Approval rating is likely 100% at UFC 316. Now do a comparison to Biden...ha ha ha.

 

 

And that's a reference! 

[ElwoodP]

Troll post and reply removed.

[Yellowtail]

16 hours ago, candide said:

And that's a reference! 

No doubt you "White Dudes for Harris" that get together to watch "Desperate Housewives" and listen to show tunes disagree.