Middle East Israel’s Strikes on Iran’s Nuclear Program Is a Necessary Defense Against a Global Threat

[Social Media]

 

Israel’s Strike on Iran’s Nuclear Program Is a Necessary Defense Against a Global Threat

 

Whatever one’s opinion of Israel, its actions against Iran’s nuclear program mark a pivotal and necessary intervention that serves the global interest. For more than two decades, Iran’s regime has sowed chaos throughout the Middle East, destabilizing governments, empowering extremists, and bringing misery to millions. Now, as the regime edges closer to developing a nuclear arsenal, Israel’s preemptive response is not only justified—it is essential.

 

Iran’s destabilizing influence in the region has been unmistakable. After the fall of Saddam Hussein in 2003, it was Iranian militias that ignited the insurgency in Iraq, paving the way for the rise of Islamic State. Iran’s most loyal proxy, Hezbollah, has sustained Bashar al-Assad’s grip on power in Syria, enabling a reign of terror that resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians. Firsthand, I witnessed Hezbollah’s brutal presence in Syria for over a decade, and this year, I saw Syrians celebrating as Iran’s militia was finally expelled. It was a moment of liberation for people long oppressed by Tehran’s far-reaching influence.

 

Iran’s disruptive hand can be seen far beyond Syria. It has orchestrated Houthi attacks that have crippled global shipping lanes and continues to fund and arm Hamas, whose methods are defined by bloodshed and terror. But above all, Iran's central objective has remained the same: to develop nuclear weapons. Such an arsenal would not only threaten Israel but pose a grave danger to other nations viewed as enemies by the Iranian regime—including Britain and the United States.

 

President Donald Trump was ultimately unable to halt Iran’s nuclear ambitions, and it is now undeniable that Tehran’s leaders have no intention of abandoning their quest for the bomb. This is not just a regional concern. Iranian nuclear weapons would menace London and Washington as surely as they would Tel Aviv. Much like Vladimir Putin in Moscow, Iran’s Supreme Leader is indifferent to the well-being of his own citizens, showing a willingness to sacrifice them in pursuit of power.

 

Given that reality, Israel’s actions deserve the support of the free world. Concerns over escalation are valid, but we must not lose sight of the fact that Iran—not Israel—is the aggressor. Iran has supported Putin’s illegal war in Ukraine, yet Putin has offered Tehran little in return. In truth, he harbors contempt for the entire Middle East and would never act in Iran’s favor without material gain.

 

The silence of Iran’s traditional allies speaks volumes. Any potential escalation would be Iran’s doing—unless the world chooses to ignore the threat. For Britain, this confrontation is a wake-up call. It is clearer than ever that we must commit at least 3 percent of our GDP to defense. Current budget figures are misleading, with intelligence, diplomacy, and even pensions being folded into the defense category. What we need is real investment in real military capability—not accounting tricks.

 

Even the so-called “wokerati,” who often seem to champion groups with openly anti-Western values, must eventually face reality. Their solidarity won’t protect them from a regime that would gladly see feminists, LGBTQ people, and all others who oppose theocratic rule eradicated.

 

In the meantime, we are taking some correct steps. The deployment of RAF jets to the region is commendable. When it comes to Iran, force is the only language that carries weight. Israel is acting not just in its own defense but in ours as well. If assistance becomes necessary, we must be prepared—though the UK's military capabilities may fall short in certain areas.

 

Iran’s underground nuclear facilities at Natanz may require weapons beyond Israel’s reach, such as the U.S.-made Massive Ordnance Penetrator. Only American heavy bombers can deploy such weapons, making the ultimate decision one for a U.S. president. Alternatively, Israel could rely on its intelligence services for a daring special operation—something Mossad has repeatedly proven capable of executing.

 

Yes, many in Britain fear a broader war across the Middle East. Having served there twice as a soldier, I understand their concern. Yet I firmly believe that neutralizing Iran’s nuclear ambitions now will prevent a far greater catastrophe later. Better to confront danger before it becomes unmanageable—than to wait and regret inaction.

 

Hamish de Bretton-Gordon

 

  Adapted by ASEAN Now from The Telegraph  2025-06-17

 

 

[FlorC]

And here comes the narrative.

[Bkk Brian]

 

"15,000 centrifuges operating at Iran's biggest uranium enrichment plant at Natanz were badly damaged or destroyed"

 

Set back years...............

 

Likely all machines at Iran's main enrichment plant 'severely damaged', IAEA chief says

 It is very likely all the roughly 15,000 centrifuges operating at Iran's biggest uranium enrichment plant at Natanz were badly damaged or destroyed because of a power cut caused by an Israeli strike, the U.N. nuclear watchdog chief told the BBC on Monday.
The International Atomic Energy Agency and its Director General Rafael Grossi had previously said the centrifuges at the underground enrichment plant at Natanz may have been damaged as a result of an airstrike on its power supply, even though the hall housing the plant itself did not seem to have been hit.

"Our assessment is that with this sudden loss of external power, in great probability the centrifuges have been severely damaged if not destroyed altogether," Grossi said in an interview with the BBC.

https://www.reuters.com/world/china/iaea-chief-says-no-further-damage-iranian-enrichment-facilities-2025-06-16/

[johng]

55 minutes ago, FlorC said:

And here comes the narrative.

same as he old one.

 

 

[johng]

more of the narrative.

 

 

[Hakuna Matata]

A classic example of Western double standards and liberal democratic hypocrisy!

[Chomper Higgot]

3 hours ago, FlorC said:

And here comes the narrative.

The OP is the narrative.

 

[frank83628]

Who exactly are Iran a threat to outside of those usual interferring western countries & israhell ?

Same old BS like before with saddam, Assad, western hegemony and Israili control

[hotsun]

Israel doing gods work. Very underappreciated

[transam]

1 minute ago, frank83628 said:

Who exactly are Iran a threat to outside of those usual interferring western countries & israhell ?

You really should do your homework regarding the Iranian regime, though you won't, because your man supplies munitions and support fir Iran....................

[coolcarer]

8 hours ago, Social Media said:

Even the so-called “wokerati,” who often seem to champion groups with openly anti-Western values, must eventually face reality. Their solidarity won’t protect them from a regime that would gladly see feminists, LGBTQ people, and all others who oppose theocratic rule eradicated.

They were out in London at the weekend, waving their Iranian flags. Confirming their support fora state sponsor of terrorism. Pathetic

[hotsun]

When europe has a muslim problem they will come to israel for help. Europe doesnt deserve it but its up to the US

[FlorC]

11 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Who exactly are Iran a threat to outside of those usual interferring western countries & israhell ?

Same old BS like before with saddam, Assad, western hegemony and Israili control

Don't forget Muammar Gaddafi. 

[John Drake]

Don't like Trump's declarations? Wait a day or two and they'll change. I don't remember who it was who wrote it, but I remember someone saying that Trump doesn't have policies, he has moods.

[frank83628]

5 minutes ago, FlorC said:

Don't forget Muammar Gaddafi. 

Yep, silence in the msm that syria is now being run by Al-Queda, same group that were on us & wests 'terrorism'  list, but now fully backed by the west & israel.

I doubt the sheeple even know anything about it

[Hawaiian]

45 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

A grave miscalulation by warhawk Natanyahu. Was he promised such weapons that emboldened him to launch the unprovoke attack and subsequently someone did a TACO?  Seem the new strategy is regime change by targeting Tehran and have the people turn on their leaders. That wouldn't work also. Back to serious diplomacy only chance. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I don't think attacking Iran was a grave mistake.  Although Israel may not have physically destroyed the underground facilities, they most likely severely damaged the centrifuges which cannot be repaired or replaced overnight or at all.  Killing key military leaders and top scientists will certainly take it's toll.  Once the Iranian population continues to suffer from the lack of electricity and food shortages the dissatisfaction with the mullahs will intensify.  Israel needs to continue to take down Iran's ability to defend itself and retaliate with drones and missiles.

 

[Eric Loh]

9 minutes ago, Hawaiian said:

I don't think attacking Iran was a grave mistake.  Although Israel may not have physically destroyed the underground facilities, they most likely severely damaged the centrifuges which cannot be repaired or replaced overnight or at all.  Killing key military leaders and top scientists will certainly take it's toll.  Once the Iranian population continues to suffer from the lack of electricity and food shortages the dissatisfaction with the mullahs will intensify.  Israel needs to continue to take down Iran's ability to defend itself and retaliate with drones and missiles.

 

Agree that there were extensive damages to centrifuges above by the bombings and the central chambers centrifuges by power cuts. The Fordow nuclear site deep in the mountains was not severely hit. Key military leaders and scientists were also killed. Unless Israel able to totally eliminate  all the nuclear facilities, Iran will still have the ability for new leaders and scientists and enrich their uranium. This attack will enhance their determination to obtain the nuclear weapons as a deterrent. The future is still threatening and bleak. Only a serious negotiation with the assistance from allies on both sides can bring lasting and to this nuclear threat. Maybe Israel can contribute to this lasting peace by joining the nuclear nonproliferation agreement. 

[transam]

30 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Why do you think Iran risks all to get a nuke...?

 

Take your time now....🤔

[johng]

4 minutes ago, transam said:

Why do you think Iran risks all to get a nuke...?

 

Take your time now....🤔

Why do you think Israel already has nukes..take your time now...

[Hawaiian]

17 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Agree that there were extensive damages to centrifuges above by the bombings and the central chambers centrifuges by power cuts. The Fordow nuclear site deep in the mountains was not severely hit. Key military leaders and scientists were also killed. Unless Israel able to totally eliminate  all the nuclear facilities, Iran will still have the ability for new leaders and scientists and enrich their uranium. This attack will enhance their determination to obtain the nuclear weapons as a deterrent. The future is still threatening and bleak. Only a serious negotiation with the assistance from allies on both sides can bring lasting and to this nuclear threat. Maybe Israel can contribute to this lasting peace by joining the nuclear nonproliferation agreement. 

Iran's idea of negotiation is "my way or the highway."  Having the ability to do damage control is growing slimmer every day.  This is why Israel will not let up.  A neutered Iran will not only benefit Israel, but the Middle East and most of the world.  And it certainly will cutoff Russia from Iranian drones.

[transam]

1 minute ago, johng said:

Why do you think Israel already has nukes..take your time now...

Iran............Easy-peasy chap.........😋

[johng]

1 hour ago, hotsun said:

When europe has a muslim problem they will come to israel for help

The ultimate solution ?

[johng]

6 minutes ago, transam said:

Iran............Easy-peasy chap.........😋

And Iraq before them...and Syria  and Egypt  and here we go  Hitler !

[transam]

1 minute ago, johng said:

And Iraq before them...and Syria  and Egypt  and here we go  Hitler !

Eeeeeeer, I could be wrong, but I don't think Israel has used a nuke in any of those meetings..........🤭

[Hawaiian]

7 minutes ago, johng said:

Iran has been trying to achieve nuclear electricity power generation

as is its sovereign right ,it has adhered to the NPT  and IAEA inspections for more than 20 years

Israel has been trying to scupper any progress for years ,while at the same time having it's own undeclared and uninspected nuclear program ....hypocrisy much ?

 

They do not need highly enriched uranium for power generation.

Over the years, Israel has not vowed to wipe Iran off the face of the earth. 

[Hawaiian]

2 minutes ago, johng said:

Yes that's correct...there where discusions planed for Sunday but Israel scuppered that.

The time for negotiations has long past.  Iran has never bargained in good faith.  The mullahs continue to call for the complete destruction of Israel.

[Bannoi]

Trump ripped up the Iran Nucear Deal in2018 why? perhaps because it was Obama who negotiated it same as the Paris agreement canceling agreements when a new President is elected make America a very untrustworthy partner their word means nothing.

 

Wasn't  Iraq supposed to have WMD that turned out well didnt it.

 

 

[Social Media]

A number of posts making specific claims that are false have been removed along with a couple of pure troll posts

 

5. You will not use ASEAN NOW to post any material which is knowingly or can be reasonably construed as false, inaccurate, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise in violation of any law. Topics or posts deemed to be scaremongering, deliberately misleading or which deliberately distort information will be removed. In factual areas such as news forums and current affairs topics member content that is claimed or portrayed as a fact should be supported by a link to a relevant reputable source.