Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Why does the unelected Constitutional Court getting involved when a vote of no-confidence by elected Parliament ministers might trigger a new election? 

That would be a better democratic process.

Posted
1 hour ago, ardsong said:

So what  is the PM accused of? Not that it matters that much, but just for my interest. 

Listening to dear daddy and obeying all his BS

Posted
12 hours ago, webfact said:

The Constitutional Court is set to consider a request from the Senate's Blue Party for the PM's removal and suspension next week. If the suspension occurs, Phumitham is expected to serve as caretaker PM.

The unbiased CC that we all know.... right

  • Agree 1
Posted
12 hours ago, JAG said:

 

 

So, effectively a coup - the Army and the Courts taking over.

The courts are the army's courts (CC and EC) and are in place to protect the elites and their wealth and power. Apart from he who cannot be mentioned the army wields ultimate power here.

Posted

Lawfare rules.

Which is why even if the People's Party won the next election overwhelmingly, they would in all likelihood be banned from governing. 

The present constitution needs to be changed to limit the power of the Senate and various 'independent bodies', but to their disgrace Pheu Thai dragged their feet on this, desperate to remain in favour with the authorities.

They really are a very unappealing bunch, the upper levels of PT, the very definition of insincerity.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...