Pfizer Drags Myocarditis Study to 2030: I’m Bloody Furious!

[Red Phoenix]

Pfizer’s just kicked the can down the road again, extending their COVID vaccine-induced myocarditis study by a whopping five years. Yep, you heard that right—it’s now set to wrap up in November 2030, up from the original 2025 finish line.

Check the study yourself here: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05295290

 

 

10 years from the vaccine’s launch to figure out if it’s torching people’s hearts?

Are you kidding me?

[Red Phoenix]

And it's Aussie17 on his PharmaFiles substack that is bloody furious.

Let’s put this in perspective. Operation Warp Speed—the big, flashy U.S. government push—had vaccines developed, tested, and rolled out in under a year. Pfizer’s “safe and effective” trial for the jab was done and dusted by late 2020, with emergency approval by December (with 44,000+ participants no less!). Less than 12 months, and they were slapping it into arms worldwide, telling us it was all good. So why, oh why, do they need 10 years—from 2021 to 2030—to tell us if this thing is causing myocarditis, a nasty heart inflammation that’s been popping up in young blokes especially? And this study only enrolled 300 participants!!

It’s like they sprinted to get the jab out, then decided to crawl when it came to checking the damage. Something stinks here, and I’m not buying the excuses.

I reckon Pfizer’s dragging this out because by 2030, the bigwigs like Bourla and his mates will be retired, living it up in some cushy, lawsuit-proof hidey-hole. With only 300 participants in this study, it’s a tiny sample to stretch over such a long haul—sounds more like a cover-up than a proper investigation. I’m gobsmacked that they can push a product on millions, rake in billions, and then say, “Oh, we’ll get back to you in nearly a decade on whether it’s wrecking hearts.” Fair dinkum, it’s a slap in the face to everyone who trusted them!

Let’s dig into some real data, because I’m not just ranting for the sake of it.

There’s a massive study out of Israel by Tuvali et al. < https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35456309/  > (which was already out in 2022!) with 196,000 cases and 590,000 controls. They found no excess rate of ICD-10-coded myocarditis in unvaccinated folks who had natural COVID infections. Zero. Zilch. Nada. Yet, we’re supposed to believe the vaccine’s the safe bet?

What about this Oxford preprint that looked at over 800k kids in England who got the Pfizer jab < https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.20.24306810v1  >. They found a higher incidence of myocarditis and pericarditis linked to the vaccine, especially in boys, with rates jumping after the second dose (up to 27 cases per million doses). Healthy kids getting heart trouble? That’s a bloody wake-up call!

Why the Long Delay?

So, why the ten-year wait with only 300 participants?? If they could smash out a vaccine trial in under a year, why can’t they nail down myocarditis risks faster? My guess—and it’s not a pretty one—is that they’re stalling. Maybe the data’s not looking good, and they’re hoping people forget, move on, or worse, that the statute of limitations kicks in. With only 300 participants, this study’s a joke compared to the millions who’ve had the jab. It’s like testing a new car model on three drivers and calling it road-ready. I reckon they’re buying time to protect their profits and their necks.

 

Source: https://www.aussie17.com/p/pfizer-drags-myocarditis-study-to

[Stiddle Mump]

Another very valid Topic. Well done Red.

 

However, I can't help thinking that as important as these revelations are, they are only a small part of a much bigger picture.

 

My take is that the whole pandemic was planned some years earlier than 2019. Probably in 20i6/17. But go to early 2020. Governments throughout the world, although concerned, were not giving the covid virus, that much attention. In the UK, it was said to be a disease of little significance in the first week of March. By the third week in March, it was a major world-wide health event. What happened after that is pretty well documented.

 

So, what did happen in those first few weeks in March. Two things. One was that the WHO put out a directive, that stated the pandemic was of the highest order. And secondly, and IMO, the main driving force. The US suspended parts of the constitution, and marshal/military law came into effect. This had the result of putting into action measures without any evidence. The US Military virtually took control of the White House. 

 

Thinking now, is that The Don was fooled at first. But later, for some unexplained reason he fully endorsed all the actions, and has not back-tracked significantly during his second term.

 

 

It was never about the health of the nation. It was about establishing precedents with the view of future control.