Donald Trump Seems A Sure Thing For a Nobel Peace Prize!

[UWEB]

Why not, other Terrorists like Begin and Arafat have got one as well.

[NanLaew]

11 hours ago, illisdean said:

Indubitably, no better candidate. 

 

 

 

But aren't those just a pair of those awful "s**thole" African countries? What's he trying to do here, encourage immigration?

[LosLobo]

27 minutes ago, UWEB said:

Why not, other Terrorists like Begin and Arafat have got one as well.

Trump's nomination makes the Nobel Peace Prize bar seem so low that even a moldy ham sandwich could be nominated—after all Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini—and, more recently, Putin—have already been floated.

[BangkokReady]

20 minutes ago, theshu25 said:

If there was a prize for lying, scamming and conning people. ,Trump would be the world champion

 

You can't really mix these two concepts.

 

"If there was a prize for..., Trump would win."

 

Or:

 

"If there was a competition for..., Trump would be the world champion."

[khunJam]

1 hour ago, LosLobo said:

 

Calling it “myopic” doesn’t make your deflection any smarter.
 

You dodged the topic, dragged in Obama/Biden, twisted a lawful cash-return for medicine into “funding terror,” and capped it with a cheap smear about who I supposedly support.
 

Logic clearly isn’t your forte:

• Red Herring – The topic was Trump’s actions; you sprinted to Obama to dodge it.

• Straw Man – Humanitarian funds ≠ terror financing. That’s deliberate spin.

• Ad Hominem – Accusing me of backing terrorists isn’t debate—just desperation.

• Whataboutism – If “But Obama!” is all you’ve got, you’re not defending Trump—just flailing.

Try again—stick to the topic and bring a real argument, not a pile of nonsense.

No, you can’t handle the fact that you mentioned the Iran deal and it bugs and burns the hell out of you that Obama/Biden are directly/indirectly responsible so it’s easier for you to not admit it and get yourself all flustered up and discombobulated. Typical lie-to-self liberal.

[BangkokReady]

15 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

Trump's nomination makes the Nobel Peace Prize bar seem so low that even a moldy ham sandwich could be nominated

 

Why does a president who has done so much to increase world peace being nominated for a Nobel Peace prize lower the bar for said prize? 

 

Significantly increase world peace = get nominated for peace prize.  Is there a fault in that logic?

[Cameroni]

He'll never get it.

 

The Scandis hate Trump, they hate America, and all that is good in the world. They bow down to their feminist politicians and kiss their feet for taxing them at 85%.

 

Scandis are crazy. It's only normal, 2 hours of daylight and dark forrests everywhere. How do you think cross country skiing became a thing? These people are not normal.

[jacnl2000]

14 hours ago, BangkokReady said:

Apparently he has multiple nominations, possibly with more to come.

 

Isn't it great news?  Trump keeps ending wars and bringing peace to the globe.  Even at home, he's working hard to make the streets safer and the country more prosperous.

 

It's so great to see.

 

Appreciate satire. 😄

As for the Nobel Peace Prize — Trump hasn’t won it, but he has been nominated several times, mostly by political allies.

Will he win?
Hard to say. It’s theoretically possible — if he somehow ends a war or pulls off a major peace deal. But let’s be honest: he’s unlikely to sweep the Nobel categories.

• Economics? His trade wars and ballooning debt don’t exactly scream Stockholm.

• Chemistry? Unless he formulates a miracle hair product, unlikely.

So yes — Peace is the only plausible one. And even that’s a big maybe.

[LosLobo]

30 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

Why does a president who has done so much to increase world peace being nominated for a Nobel Peace prize lower the bar for said prize? 

 

Significantly increase world peace = get nominated for peace prize.  Is there a fault in that logic?

Here’s why “Nomination = Peace” collapses on contact with logic.....

Significantly increase world peace ⇒ may get nominated.

But nomination ⇒ significantly increase world peace? That’s a logic misfire:
 

• Non Sequitur – “Nomination ⇒ peace” doesn’t logically connect.

• Affirming the Consequent – If peace brings a nomination, it doesn’t follow that every nominee brought peace.

• Cherry-Picking – From my post you skipped Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, Putin: all nominated, none paragons of peace.
 

A Nobel nomination proves only that an eligible nominator filled out a form; it says nothing about real-world outcomes.

[xylophone]

3 minutes ago, jacnl2000 said:

 

Appreciate satire. 😄

As for the Nobel Peace Prize — Trump hasn’t won it, but he has been nominated several times, mostly by political allies.

Will he win?
Hard to say. It’s theoretically possible — if he somehow ends a war or pulls off a major peace deal. But let’s be honest: he’s unlikely to sweep the Nobel categories.

• Economics? His trade wars and ballooning debt don’t exactly scream Stockholm.

• Chemistry? Unless he formulates a miracle hair product, unlikely.

So yes — Peace is the only plausible one. And even that’s a big maybe.

He could win a special award for the record number of lies told by a US president!

 

 

[transam]

9 minutes ago, xylophone said:

He could win a special award for the record number of lies told by a US president!

 

 

There's a few on here that will need resuscitation over that.............😲...............🤭

[BangkokReady]

1 hour ago, LosLobo said:

Here’s why “Nomination = Peace” collapses on contact with logic.....

Significantly increase world peace ⇒ may get nominated.

But nomination ⇒ significantly increase world peace? That’s a logic misfire:

 

Here's why what you have said immediately falls down:

 

I didn't say that nomination indicated that Trump had significantly increase world peace, I said that he had significantly increased world peace, which is why he was nominated.  Increasing peace leading to nomination = bar not lowered.

 

If you have to change what someone says to argue against it, your argument immediately falls apart.

 

It's so weird that you wrote all that stuff that makes you sound smart, but missed that very basic step at the start.

 

So thank you for confirming the lack of faut in my logic.  

 

1 hour ago, LosLobo said:

Cherry-Picking – From my post you skipped Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, Putin: all nominated, none paragons of peace.

 

Not even slightly.  If you reread what you actually wrote, those other figures have nothing to do with your claim that the bar is low.

[BangkokReady]

1 hour ago, xylophone said:

He could win a special award for the record number of lies told by a US president!

 

And the left/MSM would win a very special award for the most lies told about a US president!

[bubblegum]

Lol Trump and Nobel price in 1 sentence. 🚾

[xylophone]

11 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

And the left/MSM would win a very special award for the most lies told about a US president!

Ah, I see the cult is strong within you!!

[BangkokReady]

Just now, xylophone said:

Ah, I see the cult is strong within you!!

 

What cult?  The truth cult?  The fact cult?  The honesty cult?  I guess I am pretty keen on those.

[BarraMarra]

11 hours ago, Hummin said:

Usa is world champions in American football, so anything is possible 

Is that the game where they have to wear Crash helmets and wear an armchair on there shoulders ?

[transam]

1 minute ago, BarraMarra said:

Is that the game where they have to wear Crash helmets and wear an armchair on there shoulders ?

Should be called "Crash Ball".....🤭

[BarraMarra]

4 hours ago, BangkokReady said:

 

Why would that preclude him from getting credit for the wars that he has ended?

So tell us what Wars he Ended Bangkok ???

[CallumWK]

11 hours ago, Hummin said:

Usa is world champions in American football, so anything is possible 

 

Isn't the US the only country in the world practicing that silly game?

[Yagoda]

2 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

 

Isn't the US the only country in the world practicing that silly game?

Of course, we're the only country Tough Enough. The Australians have their Rules football though.

 

Funny how the silly game sells out every time they play in one of the less manly countries in Europe

[Yagoda]

The fun will be not so much Trump winning the Nobel prize, but all of you haters just having an insane spit slobbering screaming fit over it

[BarraMarra]

3 hours ago, BangkokReady said:

 

Iran vs Israel, India vs Pakistan, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) vs Rwanda, there was the North Korea de-escalation during his first term.  He's working on multiple others also.

 

Don't you think it's appropriate that he gets the recognition he deserves?

They were not wars Bangkok. They could have Escalated into a full Blown out War between country's.

[StandardIssue]

16 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

For sure its a done deal. I'd advise him to change his middle name to Peace. Donald Peace Trump. He tamped the crazy mullahs down effortlessly as tapping a filterless lucky strike. What a guy!

 

 

I can hear it now. He'll be trying to get the prize and talking about peace at all his rallies.

It will go something like this:

 

Let me tell you, nobody loves peace more than me. We're talking about tremendous peace, the best peace, everybody agrees. We had peace, the greatest peace, really, with the Abraham Accords, nobody thought it was possible, but we did it, we got it done, beautiful. Now, some people, they don't want peace, they want to fight, it's terrible, very bad people, but we're going to have peace, believe me, total peace, the most beautiful peace, and it's going to be so great, you're all going to be so happy, it's going to be tremendous.

[CallumWK]

2 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Funny how the silly game sells out every time they play in one of the less manly countries in Europe

 

When are the NFL games played in a EU country?

 

3 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

The Australians have their Rules football though.

 

AFL a completely different game The play 4 quarters of 20 minutes, without much body protection.

 

NFL are body armoured like a bomb disposal guy, and they pause every 30 seconds, so a supposed 60 minutes game easily can take 3 1/2 hours to complete

[bubblegum]

American football a game that is played by using your hands on the ball 90 % of the time. Weird.

 

[transam]

5 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

The fun will be not so much Trump winning the Nobel prize, but all of you haters just having an insane spit slobbering screaming fit over it

You mean, laughing fit, surely, because the press will have a field day.............😆

[BarraMarra]

11 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

 

Isn't the US the only country in the world practicing that silly game?

No Callum they play rounders but call it Baseball with silly clothing and the Necessity is the obligatory baseball Cap.

[CallumWK]

3 minutes ago, bubblegum said:

American football a game that is played by using your hands on the ball 90 % of the time. Weird.

 

 

From AI. Average NFL game is 3 hours and 12 minutes, lol

 

Actual Play Time:

Despite the game length, the actual time of gameplay (with the ball in play) is estimated to be around 11 minutes

 

[spidermike007]

He could use some of those billions he has made from his corrupt crypto schemes to try to buy the prize. He sure won't get it based on any merit.