USA How many wars has President Trump really ended?

[CharlieH]

 

 

US President Donald Trump's grand claims of ending conflicts draw mixed reactions.

 

As President Donald Trump seeks to broker an end to the Russia-Ukraine conflict, he's been highlighting his track record in peace negotiations during his second term. Speaking at the White House on 18 August, Trump boasted, "I've ended six wars… all of these deals I made without even the mention of the word 'ceasefire'."

 

The next day, the count mysteriously rose to "seven wars."

The Trump administration is lobbying for a Nobel Peace Prize, dubbing Trump the "peacemaker-in-chief" for these achievements. However, the conflicts he claims to have ended were often brief, with some peace deals under strain—raising questions about the true effectiveness and permanence of these resolutions.

BBC Verify Investigates

 

Israel and Iran

A brief 12-day standoff erupted following Israeli strikes on Iranian targets. The US joined in, targeting Iran's nuclear sites in a move that was pivotal in de-escalating tensions. Trump took to his platform, Truth Social, to declare a ceasefire, although Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, touted a "decisive victory" without acknowledging any ceasefire. Michael O'Hanlon from the Brookings Institution criticised the absence of a permanent peace framework or a plan for monitoring Iran's nuclear activities, suggesting the outcome is more of a temporary pause.

 

 

Pakistan and India

Flares of violence sparked in May over the Kashmir region, lasting four tense days until Trump announced a ceasefire. Pakistan praised Trump’s "decisive diplomatic intervention," even recommending him for the Nobel Peace Prize. India, however, downplayed US involvement, stating that the ceasefire was achieved through direct communication between its own and Pakistan’s military leadership, independent of US mediation.

• Kashmir: Why India and Pakistan fight over it

 

Rwanda and DR Congo

Long-standing tensions intensified earlier in the year due to the M23 rebel group claiming mineral-rich territories in eastern DR Congo. A peace agreement signed in Washington aimed to halt decades of conflict, yet accusations of ceasefire violations continue. Margaret MacMillan from Oxford University highlighted the ongoing skirmishes, questioning the effectiveness of the ceasefire and pointing to underlying issues that remain unaddressed.

• What's the fighting in DR Congo all about?

 

Thailand and Cambodia

A brief altercation between Thailand and Cambodia concluded after Trump intervened, leveraging potential trade sanctions as a tool for influence. While an "immediate and unconditional ceasefire" was reached, this was primarily facilitated by Malaysia. The economic reliance on US trade by both nations played a significant role in reaching the agreement, indicating that Trump's economic threats may have been the real driving force.

 

Armenia and Azerbaijan

The leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan credited Trump for pushing through a peace deal concerning the long-disputed region of Nagorno-Karabakh. Though praised, it’s noted that both countries had indicated a willingness to resolve the conflict independently prior to Trump’s efforts, suggesting his involvement may not have been the decisive factor.

• Nagorno-Karabakh: Conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenians explained

 

Egypt and Ethiopia

While there was no war here, tensions over Ethiopia’s Grand Renaissance Dam heightened fears of conflict with Egypt. Trump promised swift US intervention, but no formal deal has been brokered, leaving the underlying water-sharing disputes unresolved. Ethiopian officials warned that Trump’s comments risked escalating the situation further.

 

Serbia and Kosovo

Claiming to have forestalled war between Serbia and Kosovo, Trump credited himself with maintaining peace, though experts noted that there was no active conflict when economic agreements were signed in the White House. Historical animosities continue to simmer, with no formal peace treaty in place to resolve them fully.

 

Conclusion

President Trump's claims of ending wars and securing peace deals have sparked wide-ranging debate. Critics assert that while some efforts are commendable, his achievements are often overstated, lacking enduring impact or prior concessions from involved parties. Trump's approach, characterised by bold pronouncements, has nonetheless drawn praise from certain quarters, even as it invites further scrutiny over its substantive merits.

 

 

  Adapted by ASEAN Now from The BBC 2025-08-20

 

 

[Hummin]

Its hilarious what that man and his followers believes or manage to proclaim 

[theshu25]

The village idiot cannot even tie up his own shoelaces.

[Will B Good]

 

 

Got to be in the low hundreds by now.

[Eric Loh]

Shameless using his position to claim for the noble peace award. Egotism and narcissism at its worst. None of the above ceasefires was directly due to him and in the case of Rwanda/Congo ceasefire has stalled. But his worst attempt for the noble peace price are that he pussyfooted on Putin and Natanyahu that resulted in the continuing deaths of civilians and children.