On 10/18/2025 at 2:45 PM, candide said:

Under paywall. I cannot read it.

 

Can you quote what she said (a real quote, this time)? 🙂

During the campaign, James, a Democrat, said she intends to aggressively investigate Trump’s businesses and finances. On the night of her victory, she stood in front of supporters in Brooklyn and all but declared a war against Trump: “I will be shining a bright light into every dark corner of his real estate dealings, and every dealing, demanding truthfulness at every turn.”
 

 

4 hours ago, MadAtMatrix said:

During the campaign, James, a Democrat, said she intends to aggressively investigate Trump’s businesses and finances. On the night of her victory, she stood in front of supporters in Brooklyn and all but declared a war against Trump: “I will be shining a bright light into every dark corner of his real estate dealings, and every dealing, demanding truthfulness at every turn.”
 

 

So she did not say: "lock him up". She said she would investigate.

 

It's Trump who chanted "lock her up"! The irony being that he is now targeting Comer for allegedly allowing leaks about Clinton's email case! 🤣

18 hours ago, candide said:

So she did not say: "lock him up". She said she would investigate.

 

It's Trump who chanted "lock her up"! The irony being that he is now targeting Comer for allegedly allowing leaks about Clinton's email case! 🤣

What comes around goes around. Bolton too. I hope there are several more. Maybe bath house Barry will end up there too. 

This was a mistake on many levels. I admire the party loyalty Trump has shown, but freeing a homosexual fraudster of this calibre, this was a mistake.

1 minute ago, Cameroni said:

This was a mistake on many levels. I admire the party loyalty Trump has shown, but freeing a homosexual fraudster of this calibre, this was a mistake.

Trump is loyal to trump this is a distraction and a troll against decent people no more than that.

3 minutes ago, Tug said:

Trump is loyal to trump this is a distraction and a troll against decent people no more than that.

 

No, there can only be one rational explanation, Santos must have voted in favour of Trump consistently in the past. So now Trump is repaying this favour.

 

Again, admirable loyalty in a way, but to free Santos is repugnant on many levels. Kind of unbelievable.

 

 

26 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

Kind of unbelievable.

Acting decently would be kind of unbelievable.