If you, like numerous prosecutors believe that the case against Letitia James is weak, you ain't seen nothin' yet. This whole affair should be called the Prosecution That Couldn't Shoot Straight. As Andrew McCarthy, a very right wing legal commentator and a former high profile prosecutor for the US government notes, the case against Comey is based on demonstrable lies by the government. The government's case is based on testimony that Comey gave to Senator Ted Cruz. The government claims that Comey lied when he said in reply to a question from Cruz that  he didn't authorize Daniel Richman to leak information. The thing is, Cruz never asked Comey about Daniel Richman. He asked about Andrew McCabe. It also claimed Comey lied about questions in relation to the Clinton Foundation. Once again, Comey was never asked by Cruz about the Clinton Foundation. He was asked about the Clinton Administration.

It's a pity Peter Sellers isn't alive. He should be cast as Halligan, the prosecutor whose previous legal experience was in the field of insurance. This is the kind of case that should lead to her being disbarred.

"Quite apart from the questions of whether Comey’s prosecution is unconstitutionally selective and vindictive, and of Halligan’s statutory qualification to serve as interim U.S. attorney, the indictment wholly fails to state a crime. With the government’s concession that Person 1 is Clinton and Person 2 is Richman, neither of whom makes sense in the designated role given the substance of Cruz’s questions, the indictment should be dismissed because (a) it fails to state a crime and (b) Comey’s testimony was true."

https://archive.ph/YUiFa

Case Against Comey is Based on Prosecution Lies

 

Presumably, very presumably this is correct - which it is not

 

It will all shake out in the court system as it did for Trump. 

 

Our political institutions are ruined, the lower courts full of activist judges, but appeals and SCOTUS are still the glue holding the republic together.

 

The criminal will have a fair trial then hopefully taken out back of Congress and hanged like the treasonous dog he is

 

Great job on the copy paste and subsequent analysis 🤡

Just now, KhaoHom said:

Case Against Comey is Based on Prosecution Lies

 

Presumably, very presumably this is correct - which it is not

 

It will all shake out in the court system as it did for Trump. 

 

Our political institutions are ruined, the lower courts full of activist judges, but appeals and SCOTUS are still the glue holding the republic together.

 

The criminal will have a fair trial then hopefully taken out back of Congress and hanged like the treasonous dog he is

Because Andrew McCarthy, who has a history of being an extreme right wing partisan, is lying? You have any actual facts to offer to counter what is in his article? So far, all you've offered is empty claims.

40 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

Because Andrew McCarthy, who has a history of being an extreme right wing partisan, is lying? You have any actual facts to offer to counter what is in his article? So far, all you've offered is empty claims.

 

As I stated, he will have his day in court.

 

You joined up here and all I see is Leftist pot stirring non stop. You're a one man propaganda machine. Unsurprisingly. 

 

Obviously, a multi account user. No question about it

3 minutes ago, KhaoHom said:

 

As I stated, he will have his day in court.

 

You joined up here and all I see is Leftist pot stirring non stop. You're a one man propaganda machine. Unsurprisingly. 

 

Obviously, a multi account user. No question about it

In other words, you have no facts to offer. Just an irrelevant assertion about my identity.

11 minutes ago, KhaoHom said:

As I stated, he will have his day in court.

If it gets that far.

 

From the Comey motion to dismiss based upon vindictive prosecution:

A day later, President Trump posted a statement on social media that provides smoking gun evidence that this prosecution would not have occurred but for the President’s animus
toward Mr. Comey.

 

(this)

 

Now wait just a gosh darned minute.

Is the opening post to this thread implying that The President of the United States of America is involved with some kind of gosh darned dishonesty?

 

Well my stars, what a fine kettle of fish.

What is this world coming to?

9 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

If it gets that far.

 

From the Comey motion to dismiss based upon vindictive prosecution:

A day later, President Trump posted a statement on social media that provides smoking gun evidence that this prosecution would not have occurred but for the President’s animus
toward Mr. Comey.

 

(this)

 

 

Like much of everything Trump does it probably doesn't help the case, but I don't believe it supports dismissal. It's a generic, blanket statement about a number of bad actors all of which deserve to see a courtroom.

 

Personally, as long as the charges are based on factual evidently I don't care about potential appearance of retribution. He was so wronged - political miscarriage of justice at absolutely every level. He almost lost everything, ruined and jailed and it was all entirely BS. The system really, really failed. Funny, once he was cleared of everything the noise just stopped immediately. 

 

How would any human not feel the same? 

 

They'll bring additional charges if it does. He's a very bad apple. I want to see Schift jailed as well

3 minutes ago, KhaoHom said:

 

Like much of everything Trump does it probably doesn't help the case, but I don't believe it supports dismissal. It's a generic, blanket statement about a number of bad actors all of which deserve to see a courtroom.

 

Personally, as long as the charges are based on factual evidently I don't care about potential appearance of retribution. He was so wronged - political miscarriage of justice at absolutely every level. He almost lost everything, ruined and jailed and it was all entirely BS. The system really, really failed. Funny, once he was cleared of everything the noise just stopped immediately. 

 

How would any human not feel the same? 

 

They'll bring additional charges if it does. He's a very bad apple. I want to see Schift jailed as well

He was not wronged in any way. He was very lucky to get elected again, was he not he'd be in jail right now.

8 minutes ago, KhaoHom said:

Like much of everything Trump does it probably doesn't help the case, but I don't believe it supports dismissal. It's a generic, blanket statement about a number of bad actors all of which deserve to see a courtroom.

That's just Trump-being-Trump (TM)

2 minutes ago, bubblegum said:

He was not wronged in any way. He was very lucky to get elected again, was he not he'd be in jail right now.

 

You're a farce. He wasn't lucky, the man won in 2020 and set out to win again in 2024. He had an entire game plan on back burner to put in place day one. He won most votes and every swing state. The thing about AN these days is allows these lies and delusion to exist simultaneously with the truth as if both deserve equal expression 

 

The vast majority of Americans are either solidly or tacitly behind Trump. You're absolutely lost 

 

Finally, Trump had his days in court and beat all the raps. He was found innocent of the corrupt , political charges levied against him by the highest courts. 

 

Go find another hole to bury your head in

2 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

That's just Trump-being-Trump (TM)

 

Agreed. He definitely has his issues. Even his most ardent supporters (which I am not)  would agree 

33 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

In other words, you have no facts to offer. Just an irrelevant assertion about my identity.

 

The case will be adjudicated accordingly. My speculation as yours matters for nothing here. 

 

As I stated you simply did a copy and paste to stir the pot. All your OPs are precisely like that. 

 

You offered no analysis or opinion then decry me for not weighing in. You're lost

6 minutes ago, KhaoHom said:

The case will be adjudicated accordingly.

Take 2: If it ever gets that far.

14 minutes ago, KhaoHom said:

 

You're a farce. He wasn't lucky, the man won in 2020 and set out to win again in 2024. He had an entire game plan on back burner to put in place day one. He won most votes and every swing state. The thing about AN these days is allows these lies and delusion to exist simultaneously with the truth as if both deserve equal expression 

 

The vast majority of Americans are either solidly or tacitly behind Trump. You're absolutely lost 

 

Finally, Trump had his days in court and beat all the raps. He was found innocent of the corrupt , political charges levied against him by the highest courts. 

 

Go find another hole to bury your head in

You are besides a election denier also delusional. I won't be talking to you again that's for sure.

12 minutes ago, bubblegum said:

You are besides a election denier also delusional. I won't be talking to you again that's for sure.

 

I'm perfectly ok with that JT.

 

YOU are CLEARLY an election denier AND delusional. Here is your quote I'd already responded to previously. Previously, again, again  🙄

 

26 minutes ago, KhaoHom said:

He was very lucky to get elected again,

 

14 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

Take 2: If it ever gets that far.

 

Right, our opinions differ. Let's move on and see how it shakes out shall we? 

1 minute ago, KhaoHom said:

 

Right, our opinions differ. Let's move on and see how it shakes out shall we? 

So your opinion is both pre-trial motions on the Comey court will fail. They might but I would say at this stage it's too early to make an informed opinion on either of them.

1 hour ago, Alan Zweibel said:

Because Andrew McCarthy, who has a history of being an extreme right wing partisan, is lying? You have any actual facts to offer to counter what is in his article? So far, all you've offered is empty claims.

 

This moron is part of the blob. What are you talking about ffs?!

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_C._McCarthy

Just now, jerrymahoney said:

So your opinion is both pre-trial motions on the Comey court will fail. They might but I would say at this stage it's too early to make an informed opinion on either of them.

 

Yes, too early. My gut says yes, will fail. Grasping at straws. 

 

They will bring new charges anyway. He's a bad actor that has a lifetime accumulation of skeletons in his closet. A total shi+bag. Chickens come home... To use crass double metaphor 

30 minutes ago, KhaoHom said:

 

The case will be adjudicated accordingly. My speculation as yours matters for nothing here. 

 

As I stated you simply did a copy and paste to stir the pot. All your OPs are precisely like that. 

 

You offered no analysis or opinion then decry me for not weighing in. You're lost

All I offer is expert opinion based on facts. and given that I have used facts and reason to refuted your claims, your characterization is ridiculous.

6 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

All I offer is expert opinion based on facts. and given that I have used facts and reason to refuted your claims, your characterization is ridiculous.

 

What is ridiculous is someone so toxic as they use Soros as their avatar.

 

This thread is BS.

16 minutes ago, KhaoHom said:

They will bring new charges anyway.

The current 2 charges were brought 2 days before the 5-year statute of limitations expired.

 

But anytime you are bucking up against federal criminal charges you're playing against the house.

14 minutes ago, KhaoHom said:

 

What is ridiculous is someone so toxic as they use Soros as their avatar.

 

This thread is BS.

I guess you have to invoke something personal since you've got nothing relevant to offer.

9 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

The current 2 charges were brought 2 days before the 5-year statute of limitations expired.

 

But anytime you are bucking up against federal criminal charges you're playing against the house.

 

They have their sites on him. Some blob kingpins must go down. Brennan is another spooky fkwit I'd love to see hanged. 

 

No shortage of charges from a lifetime of skullduggery much of it against the American people 

26 minutes ago, KhaoHom said:

 

Yes, too early. My gut says yes, will fail. Grasping at straws. 

 

They will bring new charges anyway. He's a bad actor that has a lifetime accumulation of skeletons in his closet. A total shi+bag. Chickens come home... To use crass double metaphor 

are you barking mad, or just a silly boy. ? you just posted your opinion, which is a plagarization of what COMEY wrote ...about TRUMP 555. Go read the op-ed article Comey wrote for the New York Times, (published on April 15, 2020). Here is the exact quote from the article:

"Accumulating a lifetime of skeletons in a giant, walk-in closet"

The context was Comey arguing that President Trump was unfit for office and that his leadership posed a danger to the country. The "skeletons in the closet" metaphor was used to describe what Comey saw as Trump's vulnerability to manipulation and compromise due to his past personal and financial conduct.

 

1 minute ago, Alan Zweibel said:

I guess you have to invoke something personal since you've got nothing relevant to offer.

 

You are trite and tiresome. Here you are simply baiting me again. 

 

It was a shi+ thread to start. AN members don't read. What's more it was just rubbish copy paste. No one read this, no one follows real news. It's all yt shorts, FB and Instagram.

 

Start another rubbish thread. Use hyperbolic language and title maybe even some bombastic picture to stir the pot. Maybe call the board a bunch of anti semites too 🙄🤣

 

Your hero - George Soros lol. Not a good look but doesn't seem like clear thinking a strong suit of yours 🤮

 

Your days have come and gone. Our time has come and we coming like a freight train.. 

8 minutes ago, paddypower said:

are you barking mad, or just a silly boy. ? you just posted your opinion, which is a plagarization of what COMEY wrote ...about TRUMP 555. Go read the op-ed article Comey wrote for the New York Times, (published on April 15, 2020). Here is the exact quote from the article:

"Accumulating a lifetime of skeletons in a giant, walk-in closet"

The context was Comey arguing that President Trump was unfit for office and that his leadership posed a danger to the country. The "skeletons in the closet" metaphor was used to describe what Comey saw as Trump's vulnerability to manipulation and compromise due to his past personal and financial conduct.

 

 

Are you wholly ignorant of the English language? It's an extremely common idiom / collocation. If you went to university please don't admit it. 

1 minute ago, KhaoHom said:

 

You are trite and tiresome. Here you are simply baiting me again. 

 

It was a shi+ thread to start. AN members don't read. What's more it was just rubbish copy paste. No one read this, no one follows real news. It's all yt shorts, FB and Instagram.

 

Start another rubbish thread. Use hyperbolic language and title maybe even some bombastic picture to stir the pot. Maybe call the board a bunch of anti semites too 🙄🤣

 

Your hero - George Soros lol. Not a good look but doesn't seem like clear thinking a strong suit of yours 🤮

 

Your days have come and gone. Our time has come and we coming like a freight train.. 

More empty assertions and personal comments. 

13 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

I guess you have to invoke something personal since you've got nothing relevant to offer.

He never ever has anything to offer,only gets very very angry if people not agree with his rubbish.