The CDC Has Updated Its “Autism and Vaccines” Page

This is a start to what honest science looks like

Source: https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/bombshell-the-cdc-has-updated-its

= = = 

And as Steve Kirsch commented on Aaron Siri's article: 

> It's finally happened. The CDC has started to tell the truth. The advice to do the opposite of what the CDC says is no longer applicable.

 

> https://www.cdc.gov/vaccine-safety/about/autism.html

 

You can read the full article - including the CDC's extensive Mea Culpa - here:  https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/bombshell-the-cdc-has-updated-its

This seems to be Kennedy's input for sure. A couple of the biggest con-artists have gone from both the CDC and FDA. Is the new broom sweeping fast and hard enough? We will see.

 

If The Don don't throw a wobble, and allows Kennedy to complete his term, all the health agencies will undergo big changes. As they change, there will be a knock-on effect in the west; especially in the UK. Where the health system (NHS) and regulation authority (MHRA) is truly abysmal.

 

Del Bigtree and his ICAN organisation have been fighting for years for this and are finally getting recognition.

 

 

 

2 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

 

 

The whole modern medicine mantra could fall; and maybe sooner than we think. People are awake like never before in the west. And once awake, they will not go back to sleep.

 

The mould has to be broken. It is a massive job for sure; just in the US alone. World-wide, the WHO rules the roost. IMO, it is an abomination, and should be chucked in the bin ASAP

 

However, these little changes in the US medicine policy, will not go unnoticed.

 

The education system. Hospital procedures. Teaching hospitals. Rules on Big Pharma products. Educating white-coats. It all has to change.

 

However, where there is integrity there is hope for humanity.

 

16 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

> It's finally happened. The CDC has started to tell the truth. The advice to do the opposite of what the CDC says is no longer applicable.

 

But still, you're blaming Big Pharma 100% and shifting all responsibility away from the individual. 

 

Here's my theory. After decades of shoveling garbage foods down our skulls, we are degrading our DNA. 

 

Then was pass on this degraded DNA to our children.

 

The chidlren then NEED vaccines because their DNA is weakened by our decades of shoveling garbage foods down our throats.

 

Then, the vaccine may "trigger" autism ... but the vaccine didn't start the process or was not the only culprit.

 

The process maybe started with the mother who was drinking alcohol during the pregnancy and who was diabetic and obese. 

 

 

 

4 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

 

But still, you're blaming Big Pharma 100% and shifting all responsibility away from the individual. 

 

Here's my theory. After decades of shoveling garbage foods down our skulls, we are degrading our DNA. 

 

Then was pass on this degraded DNA to our children.

 

The chidlren then NEED vaccines because their DNA is weakened by our decades of shoveling garbage foods down our throats.

 

Then, the vaccine may "trigger" autism ... but the vaccine didn't start the process or was not the only culprit.

 

The process maybe started with the mother who was drinking alcohol during the pregnancy and who was diabetic and obese. 

 

 

 

 

That's why MAHA encompasses all aspects of health, including the processed food industry which is, for all intents and purposes, a poisoning industry. But vaccination is the elephant in the room.

9 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

 

The whole modern medicine mantra could fall; and maybe sooner than we think. People are awake like never before in the west. And once awake, they will not go back to sleep.

 

The mould has to be broken. It is a massive job for sure; just in the US alone. World-wide, the WHO rules the roost. IMO, it is an abomination, and should be chucked in the bin ASAP

 

However, these little changes in the US medicine policy, will not go unnoticed.

 

The education system. Hospital procedures. Teaching hospitals. Rules on Big Pharma products. Educating white-coats. It all has to change.

 

However, where there is integrity there is hope for humanity.

 

 

Can't stop the crack from widening now. This is really great news.

10 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

The chidlren then NEED vaccines because their DNA is weakened by our decades of shoveling garbage foods down our throats.

Who says the children NEED vaccines? The $$$ preaching to the already brainwashed.

 

Medical treatments generally, and vaccines specifically, cause more suffering and ill health, in the west, than anything else.

 

We are what we eat. Eat what? Nutritious food; not junk.

18 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Who says the children NEED vaccines?

 

The authors of this book, for one. Even though they are highly critical of vaccines, they don't claim as you do that all vaccines are totally useless and unnecessary.

 

 

Though credit is due to some vaccines for reducing infectious disease morbidity and mortality, their contribution to public health in developed nations has been grossly exaggerated by propagandists. Dramatic improvements in nutrition and sanitation were the primary drivers of this trend. The authors do not dismiss the concept of vaccination but seek to promote a more informed and less dogmatic discussion about its risks and benefits. Critical evaluation can only make the technology safer and more effective.

 

 

 

 

52 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

 

Well…you really don’t need science because it’s already settled.  Autism is caused by climate change.

32 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Who says the children NEED vaccines? The $$$ preaching to the already brainwashed.

 

Medical treatments generally, and vaccines specifically, cause more suffering and ill health, in the west, than anything else.

 

We are what we eat. Eat what? Nutritious food; not junk.

Why are we now living longer than those who actually lived on 100% natures produce and cures for thousands of years........?   🤫

 

https://ourworldindata.org/life-expectancy

OMG. The lunies are at it again

1 minute ago, bubblegum said:

OMG. The lunies are at it again

Indeed, they are, I can't wait for an answer to my question tomorrow....🤫

42 minutes ago, transam said:

Why are we now living longer than those who actually lived on 100% natures produce and cures for thousands of years........?   🤫

 

https://ourworldindata.org/life-expectancy

There are people that live to 150 years old. Probably even now. Some communities have both men and women sexually active at 120.

 

In the not too distant past, millions, all over the western world, lived in absolute squaller. Child deaths were a much higher than nowadays. Why; and what changes took place during the next 50 years? Pipes, rubbish collections, water treatment plants. Better nutrition. More hygienic hospital practices. Back in the 1870s in London, if you went into hospital, there was only a 1 in three chance that you would come out alive. Let alone be cured. All these figures went into the data bank. Don't tell the proper story though.

37 minutes ago, transam said:

Why are we now living longer than those who actually lived on 100% natures produce and cures for thousands of years........?   🤫

 

https://ourworldindata.org/life-expectancy

 

Thanks to sanitation developments, essentially.

And the question isn't so much about how long people live, but how healthy they are during their lives. More young kids are taking heavy, long-term meds than ever before and are set on a path of lifelong dependence on chemicals.

49 minutes ago, transam said:

Why are we now living longer than those who actually lived on 100% natures produce and cures for thousands of years........?   🤫

 

https://ourworldindata.org/life-expectancy

 

Now you're just being silly.

 

We have documented proof, in the Big Book of Fairy Tales, that humans once lived up to a thousand years.

 

Why, there's one fellow who build a wooden boat bigly'er than the Titanic and loaded it full of all the world's critters, including dinosaurs, when he was a sprightly 600 year old whippersnapper!

5 hours ago, bubblegum said:

OMG. The lunies are at it again

 

It's called 'the truth'.

15 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

There are people that live to 150 years old. Probably even now. Some communities have both men and women sexually active at 120.

 

In the not too distant past, millions, all over the western world, lived in absolute squaller. Child deaths were a much higher than nowadays. Why; and what changes took place during the next 50 years? Pipes, rubbish collections, water treatment plants. Better nutrition. More hygienic hospital practices. Back in the 1870s in London, if you went into hospital, there was only a 1 in three chance that you would come out alive. Let alone be cured. All these figures went into the data bank. Don't tell the proper story though.

🤣..........Sooooo funny,  and I knew you would come back with a very weak answer, in other words, B.S.............🤣

 

Time for you to read up on the real facts, chap, on the rise in human longevity over the years, not you're blaming big pharma for killing us all off, which is really funny..........🤣

 

Have a read of this, taking special notice of VACCINES.............🤣

 

https://ourworldindata.org/data-insights/global-average-life-expectancy-has-more-than-doubled-since-1900

 

24 minutes ago, transam said:

🤣..........Sooooo funny,  and I knew you would come back with a very weak answer, in other words, B.S.............🤣

Why is it BS Sir? You are so quick to criticise those you don't agree with or understand.

 

There is a well respected journal dedicated to longevity just a couple of years back.

 

Please see below:

 

 

 

Just now, Stiddle Mump said:

Why is it BS Sir? You are so quick to criticise those you don't gree with or understand..

 

There was a well respected journal dedicated to longevity just a couple of years back.

 

Please see below:

 

 

 

Where is that, Clacton-on-Sea...........😃

 

Now come on, you are struggling, I have shown you a few facts regarding human longevity, including the one thing a few of you here say are killing us off for money, VACCINES, when the facts are, vaccines are paramount in the human longevity increase.

 

But you lot with an agenda, a very weird agenda can only come up with dodges, but, it is very funny from where I am sitting watching the few of you..........😂

 

Yes, humans have become cleaner, how, big business, producing stuff to keep you clean and make MONEY, but oh, you don't like people making money, do you, you probably want to remain dirty, eh....😂

14 minutes ago, transam said:

when the facts are, vaccines are paramount in the human longevity increase.

Dr Suzy Humphries goes through every vaccine in history. Her findings are that vaccines HAVE NOT, and DO NOT, contribute to any decline, what so ever, with the illnesses they were concocted and promoted for. Not one!

 

https://www.disolvingillusions.com

 

1 minute ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Dr Suzy Humphries goes through every vaccine in history. Her findings are that vaccines HAVE NOT, and DO NOT contributed to any decline, what so ever, with the illnesses they were concocted and promoted for. Not one!

 

https://www.disolvingillusions.com

 

And what do the other MILLION + doctors say.................🤣

 

Sunbeam, you are either daft, or have a weird agenda, plus, you dodge the fact that one BIG factor on human longevity is medical science, that ends up making money...😆

 

Now don't tell me, you don't use soap because someone makes money, instead you give yourself a good thrashing with a wet leafy birch tree branch............😁

16 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

Thanks to sanitation developments, essentially.

But ... sanitation is not natural. Are you saying that human inventions actually can prolong human life?

37 minutes ago, transam said:

Sunbeam, you are either daft, or have a weird agenda, plus, you dodge the fact that one BIG factor on human longevity is medical science, that ends up making money.

I agree that medical science makes money. The whole medical industry is run on $$$.

 

There is a lot to look at regarding longevity. City dwellers 150 years ago, in the west, lived in squalor. Child deaths were extremely high. When research was done much later, average death figures, were all the death ages clumped together and divided by the deaths. Of course this gave a lopsided view. In some cities, during certain periods, the age of life was less than 30 years. Although just outside of the cities where fresh water was available, and people could grow their own food, living to 100 was not uncommon.

 

There is also a correlation between the poor and the wealthy. The poor in some cities, according to averages, would die 20 years before their more wealthy neighbors. Then there is the child labour aspect. When a child died at work, at 8 years old, caught up in some machinery, this brought the average crashing down.

 

I note Sir, that when I post some well researched links, (recently) as in Dr Humphries or National Geographic, you want to shoot them down without a second thought. 

 

The truth is out there. Just have to look Trans buddy.

 

1 hour ago, Stiddle Mump said:

I agree that medical science makes money. The whole medical industry is run on $$$.

 

There is a lot to look at regarding longevity. City dwellers 150 years ago, in the west, lived in squalor. Child deaths were extremely high. When research was done much later, average death figures, were all the death ages clumped together and divided by the deaths. Of course this gave a lopsided view. In some cities, during certain periods, the age of life was less than 30 years. Although just outside of the cities where fresh water was available, and people could grow their own food, living to 100 was not uncommon.

 

There is also a correlation between the poor and the wealthy. The poor in some cities, according to averages, would die 20 years before their more wealthy neighbors. Then there is the child labour aspect. When a child died at work, at 8 years old, caught up in some machinery, this brought the average crashing down.

 

I note Sir, that when I post some well researched links, (recently) as in Dr Humphries or National Geographic, you want to shoot them down without a second thought. 

 

The truth is out there. Just have to look Trans buddy.

 

🤣.........You dodged, what do the other million + doctors think.....🤣

 

My grandparents were poor, lived into their 80's, my parents were not wealthy, lived to near 90, so YOU, think again.

Humans have been on Earth for thousands of years, developing into what we are today, living longer via scientific exploration into everything, but you want to trash those doing their best to save lives because they are doing it to make money..........🤣

 

I suspect you prefer living in your cave, grazing in grassy fields for lunch.............😁

 

You should also remember, us humans are not born equal, many things can confront us during our life, medical science, which you don't like, has helped multi-millions of folk get past those problems to live longer, but YOU want them to DIE because businesses might or do make money from saving them...........😒

 

That is weird, you are weird..........😒

1 hour ago, transam said:

🤣.........You dodged, what do the other million + doctors think.....🤣

 

My grandparents were poor, lived into their 80's, my parents were not wealthy, lived to near 90, so YOU, think again.

Humans have been on Earth for thousands of years, developing into what we are today, living longer via scientific exploration into everything, but you want to trash those doing their best to save lives because they are doing it to make money..........🤣

 

I suspect you prefer living in your cave, grazing in grassy fields for lunch.............😁

 

You should also remember, us humans are not born equal, many things can confront us during our life, medical science, which you don't like, has helped multi-millions of folk get past those problems to live longer, but YOU want them to DIE because businesses might or do make money from saving them...........😒

 

That is weird, you are weird..........😒

That's the longest, and most fruitful, post I've ever seen from you Trans Sir. Thank you. It deserves a decent reply.

 

The millions of white-coats you refer to have indeed got it wrong. They are coming at the body from the wrong perspective. It's not that they are all stupid. No! Some of them are simply echoing their Big Pharma training. Others know the truth, but their pay cheque, living standards and status would be at risk it they spoke out.

 

My take! In a nutshell.

 

Only the body can heal. It not only don't make mistakes, and everything it does is for a reason. What is that? Protection, and survival, in order to reproduce. and then even more protection for mum. After all; no point in having babes if they all die. 

 

You know Trans, as you have read many of my posts on medicine, there is a time and place for hospitals, clinics and doctors. If I have an arrow in me back, I get to A & E, where hopefully a nice looking nurse can wash the wound with a splash of alcohol and call over the doctor. He will assess the situation and shake his head. Then send me to a surgeon who will hopefully yank it out. Of course I'll have a stick of bamboo between me teeth, so as not to yell and scare others.

 

The body is a self-contained marvel of organs, chemicals, minerals and bio-electrical energy. And lots of special water also. All encased in a bit of tissue we call skin. We have a heart, and although it don't pump blood, but but rather regulates the flow of the red stuff, it is linked to emotion in times past. More on this another time perhaps. We have the most wonderful digestive system. Often abused, but always trying to keep us stable. Our body adapts to the stresses put upon it. Our muscles grow so that they can better cope next time the weight is lifted. Why do we breathe? Three reasons, all inextricably linked and essential to life. What is instinct? Is it linked to our reactions?

 

And so it goes on.

 

I don't mind if you call me weird. I'd rather you called me inquisitive though.

5 hours ago, farang51 said:

But ... sanitation is not natural. Are you saying that human inventions actually can prolong human life?

 

Of course.

1 hour ago, Stiddle Mump said:

don't mind if you call me weird. I'd rather you called me inquisitive though.

Sorry... I wouldn't want to lie about you, so I won't call you what you wish.

 

You don't enquire to seek knowledge.... you confine your search to articles and authors that confirm your ill-informed opinions.

1 hour ago, gamb00ler said:

Sorry... I wouldn't want to lie about you, so I won't call you what you wish.

 

You don't enquire to seek knowledge.... you confine your search to articles and authors that confirm your ill-informed opinions.

That's OK Sir. Just call me Mr Mump; my proper name.

 

I'm reading a book at the present time going over the 1800s and early 1900s, in the west. Living conditions, medical practices and white-coat thinking. Yes! Even back then they had white-coats.

 

Interesting to see how medical thinking was challenged, and what resulted from those challenges. The decade nefore and the two after 1900s is where the big changes began. How medicine gradually changed as the $$$ gradually infiltrated. Fascinating read

 

Nature is constant. It don't care about the $$$. it only cares about survival and reproduction. And we are part of it.