Friday at 08:59 PM3 days 24 minutes ago, kwilco said:"Billions are funnelled into these programmes. " - to what end? It makes no senseI agree. Yet those billions are spent nonetheless. Google 'NASA budget', then check whether I am correct or not in my assertion that most of this money comes from the taxpayer.
Friday at 09:00 PM3 days 3 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:Oh there definitely are contraptions lifting off and travelling beyond visual range.So where do they go and why?Most moon landing deniers concentrate on the images from the moon – but you are saying the launches arereal? so the fake begins at what point?
Friday at 09:32 PM3 days 31 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:I agree. Yet those billions are spent nonetheless. Google 'NASA budget', then check whether I am correct or not in my assertion that most of this money comes from the taxpayer.Well, I believe you are not – hilarious, yes; correct, no!You have supplied no logical reason for the hypothesis.
Friday at 09:36 PM3 days 3 minutes ago, kwilco said:Well, I believe you are not – hilarious, yes; correct, no!You have supplied no logical reason for the hypothesis.What you believe is irrelevant.
Friday at 09:39 PM3 days 3 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:What you believe is irrelevant.so I guess the same applies to you?
Friday at 09:40 PM3 days 38 minutes ago, kwilco said:So where do they go and why?Most moon landing deniers concentrate on the images from the moon – but you are saying the launches arereal? so the fake begins at what point?They follow an arc and land in the ocean. No rocket launch has ever followed a vertical trajectory.
Friday at 09:43 PM3 days Just now, kwilco said:so I guess the same applies to you?Absolutely, but for the purpose of this exchange, I have provided you with a fact, i.e. billions of taxpayer money are used for the so-called 'NASA programmes' (at least $250 billion for the 'Apollo missions' alone).
Friday at 11:07 PM2 days 1 hour ago, rattlesnake said:provided you with a fact,as soon as you use the word "fact", your credibility (or whatever was left) dissolves
Saturday at 08:47 AM2 days 9 hours ago, kwilco said:as soon as you use the word "fact", your credibility (or whatever was left) dissolvesThe megablockbuster Artemis II hits screens this April, featuring a more diverse cast designed to resonate with every viewer.
22 hours ago22 hr On 3/20/2026 at 8:55 PM, rattlesnake said:travelling beyond visual range.So other ranges of detection don't work? Like a magician, it's a bit difficult to hide a "contraption" that size, or do they rely on trompe l'oeil?
Create an account or sign in to comment