1 minute ago, Yagoda said:

Great. Glad you accept that possibility. So do you think that accusing someone of being a paedophile based on a "possibility" is libelous? How about this possibility: folks accusing Trump of being a paedophile are projecting their own fantasies? Is that possible? How about John Weaver from the Lincoln Project?

Possibilities, possibilities....

Are you trying to be a comedian?

Epstein pleaded guilty to soliciting prostitution from a person under 18. What would his defense be? In cat years she was 96?

12 hours ago, Presnock said:

Until all the files have been unredacted except for the victims identities and released to the public there is no way to confirm whether Trump is guilty or not but IMHO the amount of time he spent being Epstein's best buddy and why he continues having the DOJ refuse to release all the files for the public to see.

Sounds like you agree with my assessment.

14 hours ago, gargamon said:

Pointless as you would have changed your name again many times by then.

I assume that you understand I am right.

48 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

Are you trying to be a comedian?

Epstein pleaded guilty to soliciting prostitution from a person under 18. What would his defense be? In cat years she was 96?

Soliciting someone under 18 is not classified as paedophilia unless the person is under 13 years old.

Paedophile refers to an individual who experiences a persistent sexual attraction to prepubescent children, typically defined as those under the age of 13. This condition is clinically recognized as pedophilic disorder in diagnostic systems like the DSM-5 and ICD-11, which require the attraction to be present for at least six months and accompanied by distress or harmful behavior to qualify as a mental disorder. Importantly, having a sexual attraction to children is not illegal—only acting on that attraction is criminalized.

18 hours ago, Alan Zweibel said:

All you have is empty insults unbacked by reasoning or evidence.

Someone says, "In the end, you still have nothing."

8 minutes ago, Fact said:

Soliciting someone under 18 is not classified as paedophilia unless the person is under 13 years old.

Paedophile refers to an individual who experiences a persistent sexual attraction to prepubescent children, typically defined as those under the age of 13. This condition is clinically recognized as pedophilic disorder in diagnostic systems like the DSM-5 and ICD-11, which require the attraction to be present for at least six months and accompanied by distress or harmful behavior to qualify as a mental disorder. Importantly, having a sexual attraction to children is not illegal—only acting on that attraction is criminalized.

Thanks for the corrections. However, Epstein still would have trouble pursuing a libel suit:

Unredacted Jeffrey Epstein files reveal sickening revelation about 9-year-old — as GOP lawmaker threatens to expose names

https://nypost.com/2026/02/10/us-news/unredacted-jeffrey-epstein-files-reveal-sickening-revelation-about-9-year-old-as-gop-lawmaker-threatens-to-expose-names/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

14 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

Thanks for the corrections. However, Epstein still would have trouble pursuing a libel suit:

Unredacted Jeffrey Epstein files reveal sickening revelation about 9-year-old — as GOP lawmaker threatens to expose names

https://nypost.com/2026/02/10/us-news/unredacted-jeffrey-epstein-files-reveal-sickening-revelation-about-9-year-old-as-gop-lawmaker-threatens-to-expose-names/?utm_source=chatgpt.

Epstein is dead; he can't pursue anything.

A post with a screen shot of a news item has been removed as there was no valid link provided to the source of information.

3 hours ago, Alan Zweibel said:

Epstein pleaded guilty to soliciting prostitution from a person under 18. What would his defense be? In cat years she was 96

Nice spin and deflection . We were talking about trump.Do you think it's libelous to accuse somebody of being a pedophile based on a possibility?

4 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Nice spin and deflection . We were talking about trump.Do you think it's libelous to accuse somebody of being a pedophile based on a possibility?

If it was, Trump and Attorney Brito would already be suing for $10 billion.

1 hour ago, JerryM said:

If it was, Trump and Attorney Brito would already be suing for $10 billion.

Who would they sue?

7 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Who would they sue?

The hypothetical person and the hypothetical media in your hypothetical query.

In one of the released Epstein files, a woman reported to the FBI that she had been raped by Epstein and Trump "in a fancy hotel". This document was raised during the Hearing this week with AG Bondi by Rep Ted Lieu, where he asked why Bondi had signed off on the entire Epstein case as "Closed" at the end of July 2025, rather than pursuing such evidence as the FBI report of the alleged rape.

Bondi had said earlier in the Hearing that there was no evidence against Trump for any wrongdoing, though when Lieu reminded her of the FBI document noting an alleged rape, rather than answer as to why that charge had never been pursued---just to be sure---she verbally attacked Lieu.

The woman alleging the rape, whose name was redacted, was later found in Kiefer, Oklahoma with her "head blown off" (in the Epstein file document). Police who investigated said it was a criminal act, as she could not possibly have done it to herself. The coroner somehow concluded it was suicide.

Despite having the documents detailing this alleged rape and the subsequent "head blown off", AG Bondi determined "nothing to see here".

On 2/12/2026 at 2:14 AM, Yagoda said:

Spinning like a whirling dervish

Better than nonsense you're trying to peddle as fact, more holes than a sieve.

Hypothetically,

if someone was accused of having sex with goats by over 30 different people and regularly denied it, but also dropped very public hints about how much he liked to have sex with goats for decades

and

ran a goat pageant to find the best looking goats

and

was best friends with someone who got convicted of banging goats and trafficking goats to his friends all over the world who also like to screw goats

and

his name was in the classified goat banging Chronicles 5,000 times

and

he wished other goat bangers well in prison.

What do you think the odds are that person is also a goat banging?

A post with nothing other than a trolling meme has been removed:

Low-Value Posts - Posts that add no written contribution are not allowed.

This includes emoji-only replies, very short comments, memes, GIFs, screenshots, or embedded social media posts without explanation or opinion.

43 minutes ago, Sully_ said:

What do you think the odds are that person is also a goat banging?

At least in Florida, unless the goat kept a DNA sample or was underage, not much if anything criminal.

7 minutes ago, JerryM said:

At least in Florida, unless the goat kept a DNA sample or was underage, not much if anything criminal.

I asked what the odds were

3 minutes ago, Sully_ said:

I asked what the odds were

I don't know. Next time I meet a goat, I'll ask.

On 2/11/2026 at 10:13 PM, Tug said:

Trying to make a raft out of those straws you are clutching?gathering forage for the horses?dude face it Donnie’s desperately trying to cover his ass and you are carrying water for him…..sad

I have a difficult time thinking of any innocent person who has invested more time effort money into trying to suppress any and all files which according to him would prove beyond doubt that trump and his cronies are clean as new fallen snow.

Only a true cult member would never think "what are you hiding"?

16 minutes ago, Sully_ said:

I asked what the odds were

Well to give you a serious answer, I posted this 20 JAN 26:

To me this is the most significant outcome so far on the Epstein files: Trump has (figuratively) sworn on a stack of bibles that he NEVER flew on Epstein's jet. The flight logs go to show that Trump has no problem making a false statement and, maybe in his various litigations, that should be stipulated.

Trump flew on Epstein jet eight times in the '90s, according to prosecutor email

2 hours ago, Wingate said:

In one of the released Epstein files, a woman reported to the FBI that she had been raped by Epstein and Trump "in a fancy hotel". This document was raised during the Hearing this week with AG Bondi by Rep Ted Lieu, where he asked why Bondi had signed off on the entire Epstein case as "Closed" at the end of July 2025, rather than pursuing such evidence as the FBI report of the alleged rape.

Bondi had said earlier in the Hearing that there was no evidence against Trump for any wrongdoing, though when Lieu reminded her of the FBI document noting an alleged rape, rather than answer as to why that charge had never been pursued---just to be sure---she verbally attacked Lieu.

The woman alleging the rape, whose name was redacted, was later found in Kiefer, Oklahoma with her "head blown off" (in the Epstein file document). Police who investigated said it was a criminal act, as she could not possibly have done it to herself. The coroner somehow concluded it was suicide.

Despite having the documents detailing this alleged rape and the subsequent "head blown off", AG Bondi determined "nothing to see here".

Sounds like a Hillary Clinton Scenario

2 hours ago, Artisi said:

Better than nonsense you're trying to peddle as fact, more holes than a sieve.

What nonsense? Are you saying the Biden administration was complicit in a cover up?

On 2/11/2026 at 8:38 PM, Yagoda said:

Spin away kiddies I noticed that this subject hasn't been raised yet. Meanwhile Bill Clinton was getting his fake charity pots sweetened by Epstein and his enablers.

The wheels of justice grind slowly, but exceedingly fine.

I am sure both Trump and Clinton will never suffer in this life for their indiscretions.

Mods edit - trolling video removed

Three low value posts removed

Low-Value Posts - Posts that add no written contribution are not allowed.

This includes emoji-only replies, very short comments, memes, GIFs, screenshots, or embedded social media posts without explanation or opinion.

23 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Yep, you use AI selectively and bury the important stuff to mislead. Here is a bit of reading material for folks interested.

https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/online-archive/small-world-after-all-extending-martindell-standard-block-grand-jury-access-sealed

So you are saying the Biden admin just decided, well we cant win this one, so lets just not do it?

You lose again. The Biden admin didnt prosecute Trump because:

They had Nothing

If they had anything on him, 2020 -2024 would of reared it up, . They threw the kitchen sink at him , tried to kill him, take him off the ballot, the lefty;s indicted him 4x. The left manufactures a crisis , they never let it go to waste. No one does propaganda better then the far left. Fact of the matter as all of the lefty's hero's are being Epsteined, Trump is clean .

On 2/12/2026 at 10:38 AM, Yagoda said:

Let us know when you get a formal response.

You are aware of how inmates are classified, right? You are further aware of the low number of female sex offenders in Federal Prison, right? So that sort of hurts your argument that reclassification is rare. You are well aware that lawyers seek reclassificiation on a regular basis for their clients right, and there are even services that advocate for changes? What points would you have given her for classification purposes. By my count, she could be less than 7

Enjoy tilting at windmills. You dont care about the truth, you only care about your all encompassing Trump hate. I can only imagine how much time you have on your hands. A lot of this stuff reminds me of flat earthers. I hope you find some meaning.

The response was that it would take nine months to reply.

Senators also filed requests without receiving timely replies. So people are suing to get the information. Smells like a cover up, doesn't it?

On 2/12/2026 at 10:38 AM, Yagoda said:

In November, a whistleblower notified Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee that at Camp Bryan Maxwell was receiving preferential treatment that included customized meals brought to her cell, private meetings with visitors (who were permitted to bring in computers), email services through the warden’s office, after-hours use of the prison gym, and access to a puppy (that was being trained as a service dog).

Tell me, as you purport to know all about these things, is this all part of the reclassification process?

11 minutes ago, riclag said:

If they had anything on him, 2020 -2024 would of reared it up, . They threw the kitchen sink at him , tried to kill him, take him off the ballot, the lefty;s indicted him 4x. The left manufactures a crisis , they never let it go to waste. No one does propaganda better then the far left. Fact of the matter as all of the lefty's hero's are being Epsteined, Trump is clean .

Your post appears just to be a form of derangement. If Trump is clean, then why go to such lengths to cover his tracks and to lie about it? Do you have a cogent reply to that simple question? Why is he claiming to have banned Epstein from Mar a Lago in 2007, for something that happened in 2000? Secondly, why would he have banned him at all, if it were Maxwell who was recruiting the girls? His story is full of holes, as as yours.

Far Left? Who are they? You appear to be ranting like a madman.

1 hour ago, IsmeUno said:

response was that it would take nine months to reply.

Senators also filed requests without receiving timely replies. So people are suing to get the information. Smells like a cover up, doesn't it?

I couldn't tell you, what's the average time for response to an FOI request from the bureau of prisons.? How many FOI requests have you ever filed with the government?

1 hour ago, IsmeUno said:

Tell me, as you purport to know all about these things, is this all part of the reclassification process?

I couldn't tell you, because I don't know what the whistleblower testified to and, I don't know what the results of any investigation of his claims were. I do know that attorneys are permitted to bring computers, and that training of service dogs is routine and many federal institutions. Furthermore I know that special meals are regularly available under certain circumstances. I don't know anything about the rules of the institution where she was, nor do I know anything about her personal health, the requests for a special diet, what program she was eligible for, etc. So rather than just automatically assume that evil Trump is up to something, I look for information. Maybe you could find all that stuff out for us

57 minutes ago, IsmeUno said:

If Trump is clean, then why go to such lengths to cover his tracks and to lie about it?

What tracks is he covering? Again, you ignore the bottom line that the Biden justice department, with full access to all the materials, did nothing. It's not like they cared much about the facts and the law in the other indictments they laid on him.