1 minute ago, HighPriority said:

Go choke on your cherries.

I feel sorry for you poor lefties. Rich lefties use massive co2 lol

They laugh at you fools

18 minutes ago, HighPriority said:

It’s too late, the lead has done its work on him and his ilk

Strange that. Unlike many posters on here i am much younger. So that lead you speak of was gone before my time.

For example, the average billionaire emits a million times more greenhouse gases annually than a person in the poorest 90% of the world’s population.

55555

Poor lefties still dont get it

10 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

Poor lefties still dont get it

Please define what a "poor leftie" is in your mind, not what AI says please!

7 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

For example, the average billionaire emits a million times more greenhouse gases annually than a person in the poorest 90% of the world’s population.

55555

Poor lefties still dont get it

Katy perry took a rocket into orbit and champions reducing carbon footprints. Leonardo prances around in private jets telling everyone to cut back.

Al gore had or still has a 12000 square foot mansion that ooozes carbon emissions. Then had the nerve to talk shhh about bush who at the time had a much more environmentally friendly place.

I could go on and on about rich people barking about how poor need to stop doing this or that. In one of the epstien files bill gates was asked how do we get rid of all poor people.

I still think Bush is a clown before the you're a maga crowd froths in.

6 minutes ago, blaze master said:

Katy perry took a rocket into orbit and champions reducing carbon footprints. Leonardo prances around in private jets telling everyone to cut back.

Al gore had or still has a 12000 square foot mansion that ooozes carbon emissions. Then had the nerve to talk shhh about bush who at the time had a much more environmentally friendly place.

I could go on and on about rich people barking about how poor need to stop doing this or that. In one of the epstien files bill gates was asked how do we get rid of all poor people.

I still think Bush is a clown before the you're a maga crowd froths in.

Yep only dumb poor lefties bought the scam lol

2 hours ago, blaze master said:

Strange that. Unlike many posters on here i am much younger. So that lead you speak of was gone before my time.

In many countries like Canada, Thailand, Malaysia etc. there was no lead remediation plan and the risk continued. Contaminated soil was often left where it was, lead paint was left on walls. Some children would eat the paint chips and flakes. Others would eat mudpies.

2 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

In many countries like Canada, Thailand, Malaysia etc. there was no lead remediation plan and the risk continued. Contaminated soil was often left where it was, lead paint was left on walls. Some children would eat the paint chips and flakes. Others would eat mudpies.

How much did you eat?

4 hours ago, HighPriority said:

You forgot to mention that they are reptiles… 🙄

Yeah, the amphibians didn't make it...

Me pants are hot every time I stroll on Walking street. Did not wait for any scientist to show up.

20 hours ago, Bday Prang said:

based on common sense and the fact that all on here will be dead within 30 or so years

Without the benefit of peer reviewed studies i am going to assert that 30 years is the equivalent of a fraction of a millisecond when discussing "climate change" or "global warming" or whatever its called these days. in fact 1000 years is again to short a time span to be meaningful.

Don't have a panic attack but I noticed my thermometer has risen a few degrees since last night,

The rest of humanity will carry on living life and enjoying themselves whilst the likes of you will worry yourselves into an early grave , and for what?

Cheers.

I'm stuck between.....

"Wot? Me Worry?", or

"Heavy, Dude".

Oh hell, the ice in my JD just melted....

I'm now at the crossroads of (what's left of) my meaningless life.

Cold Beer O'Clock.

11 hours ago, scottiejohn said:

Please define what a "poor leftie" is in your mind, not what AI says please!

You!

I only need the one word, but need to type more to make a worthwhile post.

On 2/16/2026 at 7:07 AM, BritManToo said:

They should name each scientist involved, make them give an end date.

Then when that end date arrives, and nothing has happened, shoot them in the head.

End date for running out of food and the world starving was 1990s

End date for 'Peak oil' and us all ending up in the stone age was 2000s

"on at least 41 occasions, these so-called experts have predicted some terrible environmental catastrophe was imminent … and it never happened. And not once — not even once! — have these alarmists had one of their predictions come true."

By 2050, conservative climate models are predicting the flows from the Himalayan Plateau to the Ganges, Brahmaputra and Mekong will be halved, and that's without the Chinese building 2000 dams, with more being constructed every decade. 1 billion people depend on those rivers.

Let me suggest there should be a quid pro quo. When these events come to pass, scientists should have the right to shoot every politician who dragged their feet, was bribed by the fossil fuel industry, or sought popularity by denying global warming and climate change existed. Which are inevitable consequences of the laws of thermodynamics.

If we extended the executions to climate deniers in general, IMO the IQ of the human race would increase by at least 20 points. However, we need dumbasses to sustain the world's economies.

Gaia moves in mysterious ways to protect herself.

There are simply too many people in the world. Strategy one: get them to stop breeding. (doesn't work)

Strategy two: kill off as many as possible with a pandemic (didn't work)

Strategy three: get them to destroy themselves (it's probably going to work)

Strategy four: Cook the lot of them (it's working, but awfully slow oven)

On 2/15/2026 at 11:22 AM, bannork said:

Scientists are warning that Earth may be dangerously close to entering an irreversible “hothouse” climate state

On 2/15/2026 at 11:22 AM, bannork said:

Christopher Wolf added that current temperatures may be the highest in at least 125,000 years

That the temperatures are the highest in 125k years indicates that the World has been hotter in the past and yet it then cooled, so the "irreversible" statement could be questionable?

It's all nonsense! Ask Donald

On 2/16/2026 at 9:41 AM, JAG said:

Confusing, were I a bear of very little brain, in that you and other enthusiasts condemn me as a "lefty" whereas others here, of recorded and accepted "left wing views" have on occasions dismissed me as irredeemable right wing!

By pissing off both left and right, in my book that means you're doing something right.

Well with the Data Centers, Bitcoin miners requiring large amounts of air conditioning and some reports indicating a 5° to 8° F increase in a 5 km surrounding area for large data centers I don't see it getting better.

Don't worry the Robots will eliminate the cause of rising temperatures and problem will be solved.

8 minutes ago, J Branche said:

Well with the Data Centers, Bitcoin miners requiring large amounts of air conditioning and some reports indicating a 5° to 8° F increase in a 5 km surrounding area for large data centers I don't see it getting better.

Don't worry the Robots will eliminate the cause of rising temperatures and problem will be solved.

Data centers and btc should be done in the Arctic.

Scientists warn earth near irreversible “hothouse” state

Here they are ,scaremongering Again ,will they ever stop that .

So they say irreversible hothouse .

Known Fact is that ain't the truth climate change is a natural Phenomenon

Believe that or not .up to you. Just my opinion .

look at the Facts in history of climate change.

The climate changes ,sometimes quicker then other times that has been going on for many thousands of years it gets warmer or cooler no matter what .

Facts vs. Truth: Scientists rarely claim to know the "absolute truth." While facts are seen as data points or observations of the natural world, science is about using those facts to build theories that explain how the world works.

See ,they are Building Theories and Trying to Fool people with what

They think what is going to happen.

If you listen to Governments and Government sponsored articles you will always hear of the doom and gloom. What would you expect? You pay to get a result and you will get the result you paid to get.

1 hour ago, digger70 said:

Scientists warn earth near irreversible “hothouse” state

Here they are ,scaremongering Again ,will they ever stop that .

So they say irreversible hothouse .

Known Fact is that ain't the truth climate change is a natural Phenomenon

Believe that or not .up to you. Just my opinion .

look at the Facts in history of climate change.

The climate changes ,sometimes quicker then other times that has been going on for many thousands of years it gets warmer or cooler no matter what .

Facts vs. Truth: Scientists rarely claim to know the "absolute truth." While facts are seen as data points or observations of the natural world, science is about using those facts to build theories that explain how the world works.

See ,they are Building Theories and Trying to Fool people with what

They think what is going to happen.

Fact 1. The average sea level rise on the east coast of America since 1920 has been 10-12 inches. It's accelerating.

Fact 2. The Greenland ice cap has lost 250 billion tonnes of ice per year over the last decade.

Fact 3. CO2 levels since the Industrial Revolution have increased by 53%. Prior to that, the CO2 level was stable for 10,000 years.

Fact 4. Events of mass coral bleaching are increasing in frequency, intensity and geographic extent.

Fact 5. Coral bleaching occurs because sea temperatures are rising.

Fact 6.. No-one can beat the laws of thermodynamics, not even AI.

Perhaps you have a problem connecting the dots.

1 hour ago, Photoguy21 said:

If you listen to Governments and Government sponsored articles you will always hear of the doom and gloom. What would you expect? You pay to get a result and you will get the result you paid to get.

Be of good cheer, the world's most powerful political leader is a climate denier.

When he said he would take $1 billion from the oil industry in exchange for deregulation of environmental laws, he wasn't kidding.

Nobody pays me for the facts and opinions I post.

5 hours ago, Lacessit said:

By 2050, conservative climate models are predicting the flows from the Himalayan Plateau to the Ganges, Brahmaputra and Mekong will be halved, and that's without the Chinese building 2000 dams, with more being constructed every decade. 1 billion people depend on those rivers.

Let me suggest there should be a quid pro quo. When these events come to pass, scientists should have the right to shoot every politician who dragged their feet, was bribed by the fossil fuel industry, or sought popularity by denying global warming and climate change existed. Which are inevitable consequences of the laws of thermodynamics.

If we extended the executions to climate deniers in general, IMO the IQ of the human race would increase by at least 20 points. However, we need dumbasses to sustain the world's economies.

How many flights have you taken in 20 years?????

13 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Be of good cheer, the world's most powerful political leader is a climate denier.

When he said he would take $1 billion from the oil industry in exchange for deregulation of environmental laws, he wasn't kidding.

Nobody pays me for the facts and opinions I post.

You are a hypocrite sir. Flying to and from Thailand preaching co2 stuff.

Plus Id believe your forecasts as much as silver.

23 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Fact 1. The average sea level rise on the east coast of America since 1920 has been 10-12 inches. It's accelerating.

Fact 2. The Greenland ice cap has lost 250 billion tonnes of ice per year over the last decade.

Fact 3. CO2 levels since the Industrial Revolution have increased by 53%. Prior to that, the CO2 level was stable for 10,000 years.

Fact 4. Events of mass coral bleaching are increasing in frequency, intensity and geographic extent.

Fact 5. Coral bleaching occurs because sea temperatures are rising.

Fact 6.. No-one can beat the laws of thermodynamics, not even AI.

Perhaps you have a problem connecting the dots.

The Great Barrier Reef has shown signs of recovery from recent coral bleaching events, particularly in its northern and central regions, where coral cover reached record levels in 2022

The 1901 eastern United States heat wave was one of the deadliest weather disasters in U.S. history, resulting in an estimated 9,500 heat-related deaths nationwide. It affected a vast region from the Midwest to the East Coast, with extreme heat lasting from late June through July. July 1901 remains the hottest month on record in Kentucky and West Virginia, and temperatures exceeded 100°F (38°C) in major cities like New York City, Philadelphia, and Louisville, where the mercury reached 107°F (42°C) on July 22.

I bet lefties in 1901 said the end was nigh

This is all very interesting. However certain questions must be raised.

Analyses of core samples of polar ice show that there are found to be much higher levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide during certain periods of Ice Age. Were these samples wrongly dated? (it's possible)

Atmospheric CO2 during the period preceding the Industrial Revolution is considered, by some, to have been approaching the lower limit for supporting plant growth, i.e. all higher forms of life, including carnivores.

Current levels are apparently still below sub-optimal. The reason why some greenhouse-growers purchase cylinders of compressed CO2 to enrich the air in their greenhouses.

The "greenhouse effect" of CO2 is minor compared to that of methane now bubbling up in huge volume from the bottom of the warming Arctic Ocean (which puts to shame the effect of cow-farts).

Annual average temperature measurements at world-wide weather stations are claimed by some to be deceptive because such facilities, commonly established close to major cities, are now often surrounded by urban sprawl; where surface temperatures tend to be higher.

Temperatures of the upper atmosphere, recorded by NASA, are said to show cooling over the past quarter of a century.

Astrophysicists tell us that the Sun is entering a cooling cycle likely to last several decades. The Sun is our principal source of warmth and light, essential for life.

We know that pack-ice over the Arctic Ocean is melting fast. If global temperatures are not rising, how can this be so?

I am not a climatologist. But it is well known that there is an accelerating drop in the Earth's magnetic field which is disrupting the ionosphere and in so doing exposing us to particulate radiation from the Sun (potentially opening a pandora's box of problems).

The Jet Stream is changing, and with it so are the ocean currents. Winds are strengthening, although not much as yet. Earthquakes and volcanic activity are said to be increasing. The oceans are warming. These changes have been linked to the weakening of our ionosphere, our protective envelope.

Antarctica is a continent, not an ocean as in the Arctic. Is the kilometres-thick inland ice there (less affected by ocean temperatures) melting the same way as at the opposite pole?

We must be careful not to imitate the supposed bahaviour of lemmings.

Ok, that's it....10 more booster jabs per person in order to be immune from the heat wave.