https://truthout.org/articles/raskin-trump-mentioned-more-than-a-million-times-in-unredacted-epstein-files/

Raskin: Trump Mentioned “More Than a Million Times” in Unredacted Epstein Files

Raskin said a document in the files also undermines Trump’s claim that he kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago.

Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed that he had “nothing to do with” Jeffrey Epstein. But his name reportedly appears in the unredacted files at least a million times, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Maryland) said on Tuesday after being granted access to the documents.

Raskin told Axios that he searched Trump’s name in the files on Monday, and it came up “more than a million times.

“The DOJ is giving Members of Congress just four computers in a satellite office to read the unredacted Epstein File of more than 3 million documents. Working 40 hours a week on nothing else but this, it would take more than seven years for the 217 Members who signed the House discharge petition to read just the documents they’ve decided to release (and there are 3 million still being withheld),” said Raskin in a post on X.

3 hours ago, FritsSikkink said:

Then you don't have a clue.

Raped many times ir came back for more (money )Frits sounds like you do know all about it

3 hours ago, FritsSikkink said:

Then you don't have a clue.

Raped many times or came back for more (money)???

13 hours ago, JerryM said:

Got it.

It said the woman sued Epstein estate and won a settlement. It doesn't say there was a ever a case against Trump.

Funny that there never was

11 hours ago, Alan Zweibel said:

Hooray! The top 10% is prospering!

The way it should be

28 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Funny that there never was

Per Willie Nelson: Gee, ain't it funny how time slips away?

Post using derogatory names removed. @boganJoe

Respectful engagement is key. Posts with derogatory nicknames, intentional misspellings or personal remarks will be removed.

Jeffrey Epstein was a registered democrat who donated heavily to democratic causes and hosted numerous democrats on his island. Epstein's donations exceeded $100,000 to Democrats like Bill Clinton and John Kerry in the 1990s-2000s, Chuck Schumer, and others like Hakeem Jeffries soliciting donations from Epstein, with flight logs showing 26 trips by Clinton, Redi Hoffman and 100's of other democrats. Epstein hated Trump, Epstein was a democrat financier, and he was even covertly feeding lines by SMS to members of congress mid-hearing to damage Trump. Epstein was in bed with the democrats, not Trump.

Their new talking point is that Trump was mentioned 38,000+ times in the Epstein files. Yeah sure they were, because Epstein and the democrats were emailing each other all day about how they must destroy Trump. The files prove Epstein was a democrat puppeteer.

No matter what Trump does with the files it will never be good enough for the democrats and Trump deranged sufferers. In fact, what was discovered was democrats colluding with Epstein to get Trump but NO ONE is talking about that.

Jeffrey Epstein was a democrat. He donated heavily to democrats. 100’s of democrats visited his island. The democrats hoarded his files for 4 years, erased anything that incriminated themselves, and doctored the rest. The democrats blocked release of the New York files. A democrat judge blocked the release of Grand Jury Files.

Hoffman is just one of the democrats darlings. The democrats wanted these files opened and now we are all seeing who was behind the pedophilia with Epstein. It was these monsters that the democrats have been protecting all along. Were democrats blackmailing these monsters ? Fund the democrat Party or else ?

https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU08/20250227/117951/HHRG-119-JU08-20250227-SD004-U4.pdf

4 minutes ago, boganJoe said:

Jeffrey Epstein was a registered Democrat who donated heavily to Democratic causes and hosted numerous Democrats on his island. Epstein's donations exceeded $100,000 to Democrats like Bill Clinton and John Kerry in the 1990s-2000s, Chuck Schumer, and others like Hakeem Jeffries soliciting donations from Epstein, with flight logs showing 26 trips by Clinton, Redi Hoffman and 100's of other democrats. Epstein hated Trump, Epstein was a democrat financier, and he was even covertly feeding lines by SMS to members of congress mid-hearing to damage Trump. Epstein was in bed with the democrats, not Trump.

Their new talking point is that Trump was mentioned 38,000+ times in the Epstein files. Yeah sure they were, because Epstein and the democrats were emailing each other all day about how they must destroy Trump. The files prove Epstein was a Democrat puppeteer.

No matter what Trump does with the files it will never be good enough for the Democrats and Trump deranged sufferers. In fact, what was discovered was Democrats colluding with Epstein to get Trump but NO ONE is talking about that.

Jeffrey Epstein was a democrat. He donated heavily to democrats. 100’s of democrats visited his island. The democrats hoarded his files for 4 years, erased anything that incriminated themselves, and doctored the rest. The democrats blocked release of the New York files. A democrat judge blocked the release of Grand Jury Files.

Hoffman is just one of the Democrats darlings. The democrats wanted these files opened and now we are all seeing who was behind the pedophilia with Epstein. It was these monsters that the Dems have been protecting all along. Were democrats blackmailing these monsters ? Fund the Democrat Party or else ?

https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU08/20250227/117951/HHRG-119-JU08-20250227-SD004-U4.pdf

A ridiculous attempt to rewrite history! 😂

Trump was a democrat and switched side only in 2009. A large share of documents dates from the time he was still a Dem.

And no, it's not true that most mentions of Trump in the Epstein files were emails trying to destroy Trump. You are lying!

here's your pal bill relaxing.

20 minutes ago, candide said:

Trump was a democrat and switched side only in 2009. A large share of documents dates from the time he was still a Dem.

Of course he did, anyone with a normal functioning brain and sense of decency would do exactly that and divorce themselves from the party of pedophiles. If you haven't, what are you waiting for?

While the following from Gemini AI is addressing the federal indictments of former President Trump, it also suggests why there was maybe no concerted efforts to analyze or otherwise pursue the DoJ held Epstein files:

The "Has-Been" Perception

Initial Dismissiveness: According to the (NY Times) report, some senior officials in the Biden administration and within the DOJ initially viewed Trump as a diminished political figure—a "has-been" whose influence was expected to fade after his 2020 loss and the events of January 6.

The Wait-and-See Approach: This perception allegedly contributed to Attorney General Merrick Garland’s cautious, "bottom-up" approach. Rather than starting with Trump’s inner circle, investigators began with the foot soldiers who entered the Capitol, believing the political process or time would resolve the "Trump problem" without the DOJ needing to take the unprecedented step of prosecuting a former president.

Biden’s Frustration: The Times reported that President Biden was privately frustrated with Garland’s deliberate pace. Biden reportedly felt that Garland was acting more like a "ponderous judge" than an agile prosecutor and feared that the delay was allowing Trump to reclaim his political standing.

1 hour ago, boganJoe said:

here's your pal bill relaxing.

More like Trump's pal at that time! 🤣

BTW, the Clintons are asking for the release of all the files!

1 hour ago, boganJoe said:

Of course he did, anyone with a normal functioning brain and sense of decency would do exactly that and divorce themselves from the party of pedophiles. If you haven't, what are you waiting for?

Of course he did! Any conman would also have found out that there were much more scamming opportunities among Republicans voters! 🤣

BTW, you can truncate my post but you were still lying when you wrote that most mentions of Trump in the Epstein files were emails trying to destroy Trump! 😄

7 minutes ago, candide said:

Of course he did! Any conman would also have found out that there were much more scamming opportunities among Republicans voters! 🤣

BTW, you can truncate my post but you were still lying when you wrote that most mentions of Trump in the Epstein files were emails trying to destroy Trump! 😄

BTW, democrats are the party of pedophiles financially supported by Epstein, so be proud of the commonalities you share with Epstein.

4 minutes ago, boganJoe said:

BTW, democrats are the party of pedophiles financially supported by Epstein, so be proud of the commonalities you share with Epstein.

But you lied.... 😀

2 hours ago, boganJoe said:

Jeffrey Epstein was a registered democrat who donated heavily to democratic causes and hosted numerous democrats on his island. Epstein's donations exceeded $100,000 to Democrats like Bill Clinton and John Kerry in the 1990s-2000s, Chuck Schumer, and others like Hakeem Jeffries soliciting donations from Epstein, with flight logs showing 26 trips by Clinton, Redi Hoffman and 100's of other democrats. Epstein hated Trump, Epstein was a democrat financier, and he was even covertly feeding lines by SMS to members of congress mid-hearing to damage Trump. Epstein was in bed with the democrats, not Trump.

Their new talking point is that Trump was mentioned 38,000+ times in the Epstein files. Yeah sure they were, because Epstein and the democrats were emailing each other all day about how they must destroy Trump. The files prove Epstein was a democrat puppeteer.

No matter what Trump does with the files it will never be good enough for the democrats and Trump deranged sufferers. In fact, what was discovered was democrats colluding with Epstein to get Trump but NO ONE is talking about that.

Jeffrey Epstein was a democrat. He donated heavily to democrats. 100’s of democrats visited his island. The democrats hoarded his files for 4 years, erased anything that incriminated themselves, and doctored the rest. The democrats blocked release of the New York files. A democrat judge blocked the release of Grand Jury Files.

Hoffman is just one of the democrats darlings. The democrats wanted these files opened and now we are all seeing who was behind the pedophilia with Epstein. It was these monsters that the democrats have been protecting all along. Were democrats blackmailing these monsters ? Fund the democrat Party or else ?

https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU08/20250227/117951/HHRG-119-JU08-20250227-SD004-U4.pdf

You really need to be educated. Remember thhe sweetheart deal that Epstein's lawyers negotiated with the feds. Do you know who the federal prosecutor was who was in charge of the negotiations? Alex Acosta. A staunch Republican. So staunch that Donald Trump appointed him to be Secretary of Labor during his first term.

"Approval of the NPA: Acosta was the top federal prosecutor who ultimately authorized the agreement. Under this deal, the federal government agreed not to prosecute Epstein for federal sex trafficking charges in exchange for him pleading guilty to two state-level prostitution charges in Florida.

• Granting Immunity: The agreement granted immunity from all federal criminal charges not only to Epstein but also to four named co-conspirators and any "potential co-conspirators."

• Circumventing Victims: A central controversy of Acosta’s role was that the deal was kept secret from Epstein’s victims. In 2019, a federal judge ruled that this failure to notify the victims violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act.

• Leniency in Sentencing: The deal allowed Epstein to serve only 13 months in a county jail with extensive "work release" privileges, allowing him to spend up to 12 hours a day at his private office."

By the way, the deal was negotiated during the Bush administration. Maybe you know differently, but I always thought George W. Bush was a Republican.

11 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

You really need to be educated. Remember thhe sweetheart deal that Epstein's lawyers negotiated with the feds. Do you know who the federal prosecutor was who was in charge of the negotiations? Alex Acosta. A staunch Republican. So staunch that Donald Trump appointed him to be Secretary of Labor during his first term.

"Approval of the NPA: Acosta was the top federal prosecutor who ultimately authorized the agreement. Under this deal, the federal government agreed not to prosecute Epstein for federal sex trafficking charges in exchange for him pleading guilty to two state-level prostitution charges in Florida.

• Granting Immunity: The agreement granted immunity from all federal criminal charges not only to Epstein but also to four named co-conspirators and any "potential co-conspirators."

• Circumventing Victims: A central controversy of Acosta’s role was that the deal was kept secret from Epstein’s victims. In 2019, a federal judge ruled that this failure to notify the victims violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act.

• Leniency in Sentencing: The deal allowed Epstein to serve only 13 months in a county jail with extensive "work release" privileges, allowing him to spend up to 12 hours a day at his private office."

By the way, the deal was negotiated during the Bush administration. Maybe you know differently, but I always thought George W. Bush was a Republican.

Epstein is/was a democrat, just like you.

6 minutes ago, boganJoe said:

Epstein is/was a democrat, just like you.

Deflecting much? This topic is about Epstein, not about me.

17 hours ago, boganJoe said:

Do some research on your own, stop being so lazy and lets see if you can prove me wrong. Unlike democrat liars I don't need to make up, invent dumb <deleted> in the face of facts and truth. You should try buying into that concept.

EFTA01660679.pdf

https://www.justice.gov/age-verify?destination=/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01660679.pdf

and, during the present judicial committee hearings in the House of Representatives and interview with Bondi, there were 10 or so "victims" seated near Bondi and they were asked if they had tried to contact the DOJ to provide testimony but that the DOJ refused to listen to them. IMHO a total cover up by multiple administrations in order to protect no only powerful politicians but many rich and powerful business people. Will we ever see ALL of the available files - IMHO no as those rich and powerful still control too much of the government.

On 2/17/2026 at 12:24 PM, Alan Zweibel said:

Agents apparently spoke with a victim of Jeffrey Epstein who also accused Trump of sexually and violently assaulting her. It is unclear what happened with the investigation, though the government deemed her to be a “credible accuser,” according to independent journalist Roger Sollenberger.

"apparently", "unclear", "deemed to be credible" according to a journalist. Well there you go then. Solid evidence obviously.

On 2/17/2026 at 3:58 PM, boganJoe said:

The person making the claims against Trump is from an anonymous second-hand report submitted via the FBI NTOC, the National Threat Operations Center.

reference/search: see BBC

20 hours ago, boganJoe said:

Do some research on your own, stop being so lazy and lets see if you can prove me wrong. Unlike democrat liars I don't need to make up, invent dumb <deleted> in the face of facts and truth. You should try buying into that concept.

EFTA01660679.pdf

https://www.justice.gov/age-verify?destination=/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01660679.pdf

I do not need to prove you wrong. When you make a claim, the burden of proof is yours.
Ad hominem attacks are unnecessary if you have facts and truth to support your argument.
Are you claiming that all allegations against Trump originate from ‘unverified tips’ and were ‘made without supporting evidence’?

20 hours ago, Jim Blue said:

Raped many times ir came back for more (money )Frits sounds like you do know all about it

Raped many times or came back for more (money)???

Get a grip, don't insult raped women by your ignorance.

On 2/17/2026 at 5:24 AM, Alan Zweibel said:

Agents apparently spoke with a victim of Jeffrey Epstein who also accused Trump of sexually and violently assaulting her. It is unclear what happened with the investigation, though the government deemed her to be a “credible accuser,” according to independent journalist Roger Sollenberger. A woman with identical biological details sued Epstein’s estate and won a settlement in 2021.

https://newrepublic.com/post/206599/evidence-trump-epstein-pam-bondi

Here's a link to the official government report that contains this information. It can be found on page 18, first paragraph.

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01660622.pdf

So the lefts resurrection of a long expired book-keeping misdemeanor, by combining it in a bizarre novel legal moonshot with another unspecified alleged crime, which smashed the reputation of the US justice system to that of a 3rd world banana republic was completely unneccessary in the end? Because you discovered Trump doing major crimes with the democrats best buddy Epstein?

Well, that is a tragedy of Shakespearean proportion. If, and it is a big IF, if any of Alans latest anti Trump fantasy crimes were real that is.