Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Iran to be bombed back to the Stone Age says Don

Featured Replies

6 minutes ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

5 power plants provide most of the power for Israel - all the eggs are in one basket. So yes Trump just do it . Iran can go down in a blaze of glory.

Dead are only glorious if they are on the winning side. Thats not your lot

  • Replies 176
  • Views 3.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • unblocktheplanet
    unblocktheplanet

    At least they'll have company. The US has already regressed to the Stone Age.

  • animalmagic
    animalmagic

    The only difference between Vietnam and Iran is that Trump knew how to get out of Vietnam!

  • johng
    johng

    Go read some history !!! 🤯

Posted Images

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

Got it. Run like you guys did from the Germans and Iranians

Good to know you are back on your medication! Nobody is home I understand

32 minutes ago, Hummin said:

Good to know you are back on your medication! Nobody is home I understand

Got it. what a brilliant riposte. Im devastated

6 hours ago, Roadsternut said:

At this time of year, remember the Good Friday Agreement as a model. Also can include talks between the Apartheid South African Government and ANC. And the Basque Seperatists and the Spanish Government. You might also also reflect how the British dealt with the Irgun and Stern Gang terrorists, who were intent on attacking the British, soldiers and civilians alike.

Ultimately what caused the British government to evacuate their troops was the so-called Sergeant's Affair. The British had in custody 3 terrorists, who had been charged, tried and sentenced to death. The terrorists kidnapped Sergeant Clifford Martin and Sergeant Mervyn Paice, and threatened to hang them if the British carried out the sentence. The sentence was carried out. The terrorists then hanged the British soldiers, moved their bodies to a grove, hung the corpses and booby trapped them.

As a result, the British withdrew from Palestine, and terrorist attacks on British soldiers stopped. So there is another approach, since you are not a fan of jaw Jaw, and prefer war war.

6 hours ago, Roadsternut said:

Who said i prefer war war? I would like to see world peace, but that comes at a price, as many don't care for peace and want death .

7 hours ago, BusyB said:

Does your (and others) knowledge of history stretch as far as 1953 in Iran? That might give you pause for thought.

The US has only ever been a destructive force and enemy of Iran. The only reason we got the ayatollahs is because of US (and UK) action to sequester and siphon off Iranian oil for Britain. And then the US desperate attempts to keep the murderous torturer Rehza Pahlevi in power as it satrap. Forgotten all that eh?

The US supplied Saddam's Iraq with chemical (the hypocrisy) and other weapons and funded a decade long war of attrition against Iran that cost almost a whole generation of youths their lives. Do you think the rest grew up with friendly feelings towards Uncle Sam? Are you utterly unable to learn from your mistakes?

Just bloody stop! That's all. Stop! Let go! Who the hell do you think you are?

There was a working nuclear agreement with Iran which was functioning and the highly enriched uranium was being downgraded rapidly. Stockpiles had shrunk to virtually useless. Nuclear infrastructure demolished. All other countries involved and international organizations monitored it and said it was working.

The US (Trump) canceled the whole shebang, upon which Tehran began developing nuclear stockpiles again. They had seen Trump grovel to Little Rocket Boy and Putin. What else did you expect. Feeling proud now cos you can bomb their schools? Ah, yeah, OK, accidents do happen in special military operations aka wars don't they? Didn't mean to. That's OK then innit?

Just bloody stop it! Stop it!

Just step back. Take a deep breath. Admit responsibility. Maybe if you promise restitution you might win some friends there. Rebuild, like after WWII in Europe. Good for US firms and the economy as well. Win-win. Do something decent to Iran for the first time in history. How about that eh? Novel idea that.

And realize you stop this kind of war with peace not by bombing 90 million people back into the Stone Age. Ninety. Bloody. Million. Condemned to misery and death by a barely literate boganprole felon and sex offender with cash - think about that. Back into the Stone Age. Which I believe is a Nixon or Kissinger quote about your relations with Vietnam some time back. You simply don't want to learn do you?

The US (like the UK) is a deeply sick country still stuck in a mythical past, that can't handle the changing world and how it's developed since the fall of the Iron Curtain. Trump is but a symptom.

Time to get a bloody grip! The whole sodding lot of you!

American citizens aren't to blame for any wars. American's government is who initiated them, no matter what the reasons were, good or bad. People vote in a leader they think will help them, but as history has shown, some do things unexpected.

Some here hate Americans because of those actions, and that's been what I've been saying all along, but it seems to be missed, along with hatred for Trump, which I do understand for some reasons. Yes, I did mention about 1953 in an earlier post, and I know what's been happening all along, as I'm into history and being an American, hear about it daily.

7 hours ago, Roadsternut said:

I explained to you in Northern Ireland in another thread, in the end that it wasn't necessay to "eliminate all terrorists", unless you don't view the IRA/INLA as terrorists. You do view the Provisional Irish Republican Army as a terrorist organisation right? I just remembered, you're part Irish, so who knows. Maybe you were shaking the Noraid tin.

Yes, I'm half Irish and know what was going on there also. Much of it a disgrace to the Irish, and can be explained pretty well by this poster a little herehttps://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/ncj6i6/whats_the_current_academic_consensus_on_the/.......and here.........https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provisional_Irish_Republican_Army

9 hours ago, Roadsternut said:

Ultimately what caused the British government to evacuate their troops was the so-called Sergeant's Affair.

You are implying that the "Seargants affair" was the sole/primary cause of UK withdrawal. It was not.

Consequences

The Sergeants Affair had significant political and military repercussions:

It intensified British public outrage and anti-Jewish sentiment in the UK, contributing to calls for ending the Mandate.

2

The incident weakened British control in Palestine, accelerating the decision to withdraw forces and police, creating a power vacuum that led to the 1948 Arab–Israeli War

I remember the USA making a similar comment in the late 1960s about the Viet Nam war, and look what happened to the USA that time.

On 4/4/2026 at 6:47 PM, Yagoda said:

Sounds like the Politburo mandated by your personal philosophy

..... which is shared by just about all and sundry around the globe - except the MAGA-King and his devoted followers

10 hours ago, traveller101 said:

..... which is shared by just about all and sundry around the globe - except the MAGA-King and his devoted followers

The world is Socialist? 55555555555555

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

The world is Socialist? 55555555555555

Just a wild guess ..... most of the world would likely prefer living in a Social democracy as opposed to a Plutocracy.

Free or at the very least affordable healthcare, 4 weeks of paid holidays for employees and a decent safety net for the underpriviledged embedded in Social Security anyone?

3 minutes ago, traveller101 said:

Just a wild guess ..... most of the world would likely prefer living in a Social democracy as opposed to a Plutocracy.

Free or at the very least affordable healthcare, 4 weeks of paid holidays for employees and a decent safety net for the underpriviledged embedded in Social Security anyone?

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2025/11/08/imfo-n08.html

The enormous costs of rearmament, the consequences of the international trade war and the profit demands of banks and companies are incompatible with the welfare state, as it emerged in Europe after the Second World War. Pensions, healthcare and many other government services can no longer be financed in their current form. Rigorous austerity measures and further deregulation of the economy are inevitable.

Just now, TedG said:

Just a wild guess ..... most of the world would likely prefer living in a Social democracy as opposed to a Plutocracy.

The EU leaders act like a Plutocracy.

44 minutes ago, traveller101 said:

Free or at the very least affordable healthcare, 4 weeks of paid holidays for employees and a decent safety net for the underpriviledged embedded in Social Security anyone?

Real easy when someone else is paying for your defense.

6 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Real easy when someone else is paying for your defense.

The US only contributes 16% to the overall NATO budget......it does not pay for Europe's defence.

11 minutes ago, MIke B Bad said:

The US only contributes 16% to the overall NATO budget......it does not pay for Europes defence.

Got it. Im sure you guys will make it up

On 4/5/2026 at 6:16 AM, fredwiggy said:

Forgive what?

You don't get it! :-)

Oh well now we will see how big Trumps balls are. Iran has rejected Trumps ceasefie deal and said if America carries out its threat we the iranian has said we will devastate and cause a widespread response.

  • Author
On 4/3/2026 at 12:01 PM, Roadsternut said:

How did North Vietnam do it then? They didn't really have a Navy, and after Linebacker II, the VPAF all but ceased to exist as a combat force. But blokes in pyjamas beat America. NATO wasn't involved in that either. Neither did NATO help in the Falklands.

On 4/3/2026 at 12:01 PM, Roadsternut said:

They didn’t have very accurate intel from drones and spy planes in the 70s

And precision gps bombs

On Al Jazeera "live guest" just said that Israel is preparing to use a tactical nuclear weapon against Iran... after stating US has no word in what's happening and it's Israel calling all the shots, merely informing US what they would do before doing it... Didn't catch his name but he's from Gulf International Forum... the guy in the middle of the screenshot below.

image.png

Nn aljazeera.com main page in top left corner...

3 minutes ago, tomazbodner said:

On Al Jazeera "live guest" just said that Israel is preparing to use a tactical nuclear weapon against Iran... after stating US has no word in what's happening and it's Israel calling all the shots, merely informing US what they would do before doing it... Didn't catch his name but he's from Gulf International Forum... the guy in the middle of the screenshot below.

image.png

Nn aljazeera.com main page in top left corner...

A.I says

There is no confirmed evidence or official reporting to support claims that Israel is preparing to use tactical nuclear weapons against Iran. Claims made by guests during live broadcasts should be verified against official statements and established international news agencies. For verified updates, check major news outlets.

2 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

A.I says

There is no confirmed evidence or official reporting to support claims that Israel is preparing to use tactical nuclear weapons against Iran. Claims made by guests during live broadcasts should be verified against official statements and established international news agencies. For verified updates, check major news outlets.

And AI is the holy grail for everything Israeli stooges want to deny.

2 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

A.I says

There is no confirmed evidence or official reporting to support claims that Israel is preparing to use tactical nuclear weapons against Iran. Claims made by guests during live broadcasts should be verified against official statements and established international news agencies. For verified updates, check major news outlets.

Agree what AI says... I just stated what was said live on air. I don't know if Al Jazeera puts recordings of their news shows anywhere, but the statements made were alarming. No idea where that guy got his information.

13 minutes ago, tomazbodner said:

Agree what AI says... I just stated what was said live on air. I don't know if Al Jazeera puts recordings of their news shows anywhere, but the statements made were alarming. No idea where that guy got his information.

Well this is what the same AI tells me.

Based on search results from early 2026, there are no credible public reports indicating that Israel is currently preparing a tactical nuclear attack. [1]

However, reports from 2025 and early 2026 highlight intense preparations for conventional military strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities, with some analysts raising concerns about potential nuclear escalation if Israel feels its existence is threatened.

  1. "Samson Option" Concerns: While Israel has never formally acknowledged its nuclear arsenal, experts estimate it has around 90 warheads. Some analysts refer to the "Samson Option"—a strategy that could, in theory, see Israel use its nuclear weapons if faced with an existential threat, such as an imminent defeat in a conventional war.

  2. Concerns Over Escalation: Experts from the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) have warned of the dangerous risks associated with military strikes near nuclear sites, particularly amid reports of "interceptor shortages" in Israel's conventional defense systems, which some worry could lead to nuclear escalation.

15 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

Well this is what the same AI tells me.

Based on search results from early 2026, there are no credible public reports indicating that Israel is currently preparing a tactical nuclear attack. [1]

However, reports from 2025 and early 2026 highlight intense preparations for conventional military strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities, with some analysts raising concerns about potential nuclear escalation if Israel feels its existence is threatened.

  1. "Samson Option" Concerns: While Israel has never formally acknowledged its nuclear arsenal, experts estimate it has around 90 warheads. Some analysts refer to the "Samson Option"—a strategy that could, in theory, see Israel use its nuclear weapons if faced with an existential threat, such as an imminent defeat in a conventional war.

  2. Concerns Over Escalation: Experts from the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) have warned of the dangerous risks associated with military strikes near nuclear sites, particularly amid reports of "interceptor shortages" in Israel's conventional defense systems, which some worry could lead to nuclear escalation.

I tuned in, hoping for a replay, but so far no luck. On the flip side, this lady, reporting from White House, said while Democrats, led by Chuck Schumer called the "posts coming from a sick man," the Republicans support the genocide because "Iran was harming America for a long time and they are happy there is someone willing to work for American people"...

image.png

Seems we're a few hours from something massive...

A TIMELINE OF T***** "DEFEATING" IRAN:

Mar 3: "We won the war."
Mar 7: "We defeated Iran."
Mar 9: "We must attack Iran."
Mar 9: "The war is ending almost completely, and very beautifully."
Mar 11: You never like to say too ?early you won. We won. In ?the first hour it was over.

Mar 12: "We did win, but we haven't won completely yet."
Mar 13: "We won the war."
Mar 14: "Please help us."
Mar 15: "If you don't help us, I will certainly remember it."
Mar 16: "Actually, we don't need any help at all."
Mar 16: "I was just testing to see who's listening to me."
Mar 16: "If NATO doesn't help, they will suffer something very bad."
Mar 17: "We neither need nor want NATO's help."
Mar 17: "I don't need Congressional approval to withdraw from NATO."
Mar 18: "Our allies must cooperate in reopening the Strait of Hormuz."
Mar 19: "US allies need to get a grip - step up and help open the Strait of Hormuz."
Mar 20: "NATO are cowards."
Mar 21: "The Strait of Hormuz must be protected by the countries that use it. We don't use it, we don't need to open it."
Mar 22: "This is the last time. I will give Iran 48 hours. Open the strait"
Mar 22: "Iran is Dead"
Mar 23: "We had very good and productive talks with Iran."
Mar 24: "We re making progress."
Mar 25: They gave us a present and the present arrived today. And it was a very big present worth a tremendous amount of money. I m not going to tell you what that present is, but it was a very significant prize.
Mar 26: "Make a deal, or we ll just keep blowing them away."
Mar 27: "We don t have to be there for NATO."
Mar 28: No major quote
Mar 29: Claimed talks were progressing
Mar 30: "Open the Strait of Hormuz immediately, or face devastating consequences."
Mar 31: Claimed a deal was "very close" and that Iran would "do the right thing"
Apr 1: "We ll see what happens very soon."
Apr 2: Repeated that a deal was likely, while warning of continued strikes if not
Apr 3: "Something big is going to happen."
Apr 4: Said Iran must comply "immediately" or face further consequences.
Apr 5: "Open the f*ckin' Strait, you crazy bastards, or you'll be living in Hell - JUST WATCH! Praise be to Allah."

Apr 7: "A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again. I don’t want that to happen, but it probably will."

Lunatic.

6 hours ago, CallumWK said:

And AI is the holy grail for everything Israeli stooges want to deny.

I was just pointing out that the Al Jazzera report wasn't factual.

"A stooge" would be the poster posting Al Jazeera's untrue reports .

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.