Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Trump Rejects Iran Proposal as "Totally Unacceptable"

Featured Replies

So. It was rejected as part of the deal by the regime because they wanted to hide what they were doing. It's incredible that people believe a fundamentalist, Jihadist mob of terrorists and murderers that wants a global caliphate.

  • Replies 127
  • Views 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

3 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

So. It was rejected as part of the deal by the regime because they wanted to hide what they were doing. It's incredible that people believe a fundamentalist, Jihadist mob of terrorists and murderers that wants a global caliphate.

Again you are posting rubbish !! where is ur proof ! because there is none !! just assumptions

2 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

Again you are posting rubbish !! where is ur proof ! because there is none !! just assumptions

Well you believe what you want. The IRGC and Bajis are a bunch of murderous terrorists that as I have said before would have zero qualms about putting a bullet in your head. These guys are Islamic fundamentalist nutters who want nuclear weapons, ICBMs and total control of the Strait of Hormuz. If you support this then that's your right.

3 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Well you believe what you want. The IRGC and Bajis are a bunch of murderous terrorists that as I have said before would have zero qualms about putting a bullet in your head. These guys are Islamic fundamentalist nutters who want nuclear weapons, ICBMs and total control of the Strait of Hormuz. If you support this then that's your right.

Yes i have the right to believe what i want, like anybody else, so do you ! i don't think anybody on this forum support Iran's jihadist dictatorship i might be wrong, but i do not support it, same as i do not support your inaccurate posts or assumptions and IMHO you just post rubbish !!

25 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

AI Overview

No, "anytime, anywhere" inspections were not part of the final Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) signed in 2015. [1, 2]

While some US officials, including Secretary of Energy Ernie Moniz, initially mentioned expecting "anywhere, anytime access" in early 2015, this standard was not adopted in the final text. [1, 2]

  • Final Inspection Process: Instead of "anytime, anywhere," the deal created a "managed access" process for suspicious, undeclared sites.

  • The 24-Day Rule: If Iran denied a request for access, a joint commission would review it. This process could take up to 24 days or longer, allowing for a delay that critics argued gave time to hide evidence of covert nuclear activity.

  • Access Limitations: The deal did not give inspectors unrestricted access to military sites.

So the facts are:

1) 'Anytime, anywhere" inspections were not part of the final Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) signed in 2015 and 2) The independent inspectors did not find any breaches of JCPOA by Iran.

3) The only 'evidence' supporting the contention that Iran broke the terms of JCPOA is that evoking the '24-day rule' contained within the Agreement gave Iran time to hide enriched uranium.

Motion to dismiss, m'lud. "Granted"

6 minutes ago, RayC said:

So the facts are:

1) 'Anytime, anywhere" inspections were not part of the final Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) signed in 2015 and 2) The independent inspectors did not find any breaches of JCPOA by Iran.

3) The only 'evidence' supporting the contention that Iran broke the terms of JCPOA is that evoking the '24-day rule' contained within the Agreement gave Iran time to hide enriched uranium.

Motion to dismiss, m'lud. "Granted"

The question is When did iran start the enrichment !! before or after Trump tore up the agreement ???

10 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

Yes i have the right to believe what i want, like anybody else, so do you ! i don't think anybody on this forum support Iran's jihadist dictatorship i might be wrong, but i do not support it, same as i do not support your inaccurate posts or assumptions and IMHO you just post rubbish !!

So the regime doesn't want nukes, doesn't want a missile shield, doesn't want ICBM's and doesn't want total control of the strait of Hormuz? This is what they want and if you think these are simply assumptions you have lost touch with reality. These guys are religious maniacs hell bent on maintaining power and spreading their fundamentalist Islamist ideology world wide.

30 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

The question is When did iran start the enrichment !! before or after Trump tore up the agreement ???

That may be a question but as I said previously, the only evidence - if you can call it that - that Iran broke the terms of JCPOA before the US withdrew from the Agreement is circumstantial at best.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.