Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Pam Bondi Diagnosed With Cancer Before Epstein Hearing

Featured Replies

6 hours ago, LosLobo said:

Pam Bondi is scheduled to appear before the House Oversight Committee tomorrow for her Epstein deposition. The committee has subpoenaed her, but the deposition will be transcribed and will not be under oath or videotaped — the same procedure used for Howard Lutnick. Like with Lutnick and Bondi’s last two appearances before the committee, the exercise will be pointless unless under a videotaped oath.

I asked this of AI:

are the repercussions greater for lying to congress under oath as opposed to not under oath

The repercussions are generally equivalent. Under federal law, lying to Congress carries the exact same maximum penalty of up to five years in prison, whether you are under oath or not.

The distinction comes down to the specific statutes applied by the Department of Justice.

  • Replies 36
  • Views 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1 hour ago, gamb00ler said:

I asked this of AI:

are the repercussions greater for lying to congress under oath as opposed to not under oath

The repercussions are generally equivalent. Under federal law, lying to Congress carries the exact same maximum penalty of up to five years in prison, whether you are under oath or not.

The distinction comes down to the specific statutes applied by the Department of Justice.

Agreed there is no difference in penalties.
The real difference isn't the law—it's the politics.

No video means the media gets no short clips of a witness under pressure, showing body language, or contradicting themselves.
No oath allows a witness to later argue they thought it was an informal setting or minimize the seriousness of the exchange if challenged later.

The legal teeth are the same, but doing it without cameras and without an oath gives a witness a significant layer of protection against public accountability.

7 hours ago, LosLobo said:


Victim blaming — classy.

Allegations of girls as young as 9–10 years old, and you’re calling them 'hookers'?

And maybe ask why Trump’s name comes up alongside allegations involving 13- and 14-year-olds but none for Clinton.

Knowing how morally depraved Don is, it's extremely likely that he participated in alot of underage sex, and it's very possible that he committed multiple statutory rapes. The fact that he was best friends with Jeffrey for 20 years doesn't exactly help his defense.

14 hours ago, Tug said:

She made a mockery of our judicial system she covered up for a pedo + all his rich pals sorry but I DONT CARE DO YOU?….to quote one of Epsteins freelancers……..

The Biden DOJ had the unredacted Epstein files for four years, per you, Merrick Garland made a mockery of our judicial system he covered up for a pedo + all his rich pals, yes?

6 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

Knowing how morally depraved Don is, it's extremely likely that he participated in alot of underage sex, and it's very possible that he committed multiple statutory rapes. The fact that he was best friends with Jeffrey for 20 years doesn't exactly help his defense.

Do you never get tired of lying?

26 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

Knowing how morally depraved Don is, it's extremely likely that he participated in alot of underage sex, and it's very possible that he committed multiple statutory rapes. The fact that he was best friends with Jeffrey for 20 years doesn't exactly help his defense.

Never in history has such a totally innocent man gone to such lengths to block the release of millions of files that would no doubt prove to the world how bigly innocent he and his billionaire buddies certainly are....why anyone with an IQ higher than a bucket of mud might ask WHY would anyone not DEMAND that all the files be released immediately. Even hardcore Maga cult members demand that he prove to all the world that he barely even knew Epstein and certainly never ever would do anything the least inappropriate with very young girls. Must be Biden or Obama or even Bill and Hillary that somehow magically are manipulating the FBI and DOJ to keep everything secret.

10 hours ago, pomchop said:

Never in history has such a totally innocent man gone to such lengths to block the release of millions of files that would no doubt prove to the world how bigly innocent he and his billionaire buddies certainly are....why anyone with an IQ higher than a bucket of mud might ask WHY would anyone not DEMAND that all the files be released immediately. Even hardcore Maga cult members demand that he prove to all the world that he barely even knew Epstein and certainly never ever would do anything the least inappropriate with very young girls. Must be Biden or Obama or even Bill and Hillary that somehow magically are manipulating the FBI and DOJ to keep everything secret.

The Biden DOJ had the unredacted files for four years and was not able to find anything on Trump. Why is that?

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.