.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png.8488ab72b8bb2e508209bfe3211b6e08.png)
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
-
Latest posts...
-
192
Cheap Charlies blocked my review
I had no idea there was such a scheme . You have opened up a Pandora's box ,a saying I heard recently. I have no origins of where that actually comes from,I guess Pandora ? Thankyou for your service -
62
-
0
MP Mike Amesbury Admits to Assault, Will Remain Suspended from Labour Party
Runcorn and Helsby MP Mike Amesbury has admitted to assaulting a man in Cheshire, an incident captured on CCTV footage that surfaced in late October. The footage shows Amesbury punching 45-year-old Paul Fellows to the ground and then continuing to strike him as members of the public intervened. Following the initial strike, Amesbury reportedly hit Mr. Fellows at least five more times while he was on the ground. Witnesses recounted hearing Amesbury say, “You won’t threaten your MP again, will you?” The incident, reported to police later that day, led to Amesbury being voluntarily interviewed under caution and subsequently charged with common assault on November 7. Amesbury, who has represented his constituency since 2017, was suspended from the Labour Party following the emergence of the footage and currently serves as an independent MP. The Labour Party has confirmed that his suspension will remain in place. Reform UK has called for Amesbury to resign, arguing that he should "do the honourable thing" and allow a by-election. The Prime Minister's spokesperson declined to comment on whether Amesbury should step down. Amesbury is scheduled to be sentenced next month. If he receives a prison term or a suspended sentence, he may face losing his seat in the House of Commons under parliamentary rules. Reflecting on the case, Amesbury acknowledged the seriousness of his actions, stating that the incident was "deeply regrettable" and affirming his cooperation with authorities. Based on a report by Sky News 2024-01-17 -
0
Hamas Leader Declares October 7 Attacks a Source of Pride, Touts Ceasefire as a Victory
A senior Hamas leader, Khalil al-Hayya, proclaimed that Israel had failed to achieve its objectives in Gaza and described a recently announced ceasefire-hostage deal as a “historic moment.” Speaking to the German news agency DPA, al-Hayya stated, “Our people have thwarted the declared and hidden goals of the occupation. Today we prove that the occupation will never defeat our people and their resistance.” In his remarks, al-Hayya praised the October 7, 2023, attacks that resulted in the deaths of approximately 1,200 Israelis, describing the events as a “military accomplishment” and “a source of pride for our people.” These attacks, characterized by widespread atrocities, were the deadliest massacre of Jews in a single day since the Holocaust. He further declared that the operation would be remembered as a defining moment to be celebrated by future generations of Palestinians. Full speech with English subs Al-Hayya, who serves as the deputy chairman of Hamas’s political bureau and the group’s chief negotiator in ceasefire and hostage talks, reiterated Hamas’s commitment to the destruction of Israel. He described Jerusalem and the Al-Aqsa Mosque as central to their mission, stating, “Our people will expel the occupation from our land and from Jerusalem at the earliest time possible.” He also asserted, “Our enemy will never see a moment of weakness from us.” The leader extended his praise to Hamas’s allies, including Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthi rebels in Yemen, for their coordinated attacks on Israel. He emphasized the solidarity among groups aligned against Israel and underscored the continuing resistance movement. Hamas remains in possession of two Israeli civilians who entered Gaza in 2014 and 2015, as well as the bodies of two Israeli soldiers killed in 2014. Despite engaging in negotiations for the ceasefire, al-Hayya insisted that Hamas would not waver in its objectives and celebrated the ceasefire deal as an achievement that reflects their resolve. Based on a report by NYT | TOI 2024-01-17 -
0
Hostages to Return Amid Cease-Fire Deal: But Hamas Must Still be Defeated
A cease-fire agreement in Gaza has paved the way for the release of 33 hostages from the clutches of Hamas, marking a significant and heartening development. The first group is expected to be freed within days, with additional releases to follow in the initial phase of the deal. This news is a source of immense relief and joy for the hostages, their families, and the entire nation. It also stands as a notable achievement for Donald Trump, the incoming U.S. president, whose stern warnings that "all hell will break out" if the hostages weren't released seem to have played a crucial role in finalizing the agreement. Appreciation is also due to the diplomatic efforts of both Trump's and Biden's teams, who worked together to secure this outcome. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's steadfast military pressure on Hamas, despite calls for de-escalation, was another key factor in compelling the terrorist group to agree. The deal, however, is not without its risks. Israel's withdrawal from populated areas of Gaza as part of the agreement could potentially embolden Hamas by alleviating immediate military threats. Furthermore, the release of over 1,000 Palestinian prisoners, some of whom are convicted killers, could lead to renewed attacks, as seen with Yahya Sinwar, who orchestrated the October 7 massacre after being released in a prior hostage deal. Despite being weakened, Hamas still wields considerable influence in Gaza and has been actively recruiting new fighters to replace its losses. Secretary of State Antony Blinken has acknowledged that these recruits have nearly replenished Hamas's ranks. The most concerning aspect of the deal's second phase involves the complete withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza to secure the release of the remaining hostages, raising fears of a permanent cease-fire that could leave Hamas in control. President Biden has expressed hope that the cease-fire will persist even if Phase 2 negotiations stall, provided discussions continue. However, this scenario could allow Hamas to prolong the talks and rebuild its infrastructure. Fortunately, the resolution of these issues will likely fall to Trump and Netanyahu, who are expected to adopt a firmer stance. In essence, the cease-fire is a temporary measure, dependent on Israel's agreement to a permanent arrangement. If Hamas complies and refrains from reneging on its commitments, this deal could lead to the liberation of roughly half of the remaining hostages—a significant accomplishment in itself. Israel's control over Gaza's southern border remains intact, limiting Hamas's ability to resupply and offering a glimmer of hope that the remaining hostages can be rescued soon. Israel retains the right to resume military actions if Hamas refuses to capitulate. As we celebrate the imminent return of the innocent hostages, let us also pray for a lasting resolution that ensures peace for the Israeli people and triumph over those who have caused such suffering. Based on a report by NYP 2024-01-17 -
0
Rachel Reeves: Quit Now the Tipping Point for Britain’s Economy is Here
Under the stewardship of Rachel Reeves, Britain's first female Chancellor of the Exchequer, the country has indeed seen growth—a grim kind of growth. Businesses are shuttering, inflation is climbing, and a pervasive gloom is spreading across the nation. As Reeves embarked on her journey to China, seeking financial aid, it seemed her only firm grip on the situation was her meticulously manicured nails. Reeves is clinging to her position by the slimmest margin, while the bond markets show little tolerance for her financial strategies. The self-proclaimed champion of "fully funded and fully costed" budgets has delivered a fiscal plan so dire that it risks stifling economic growth entirely. Her approach, perceived as generous handouts to an underperforming public sector, failed to win the confidence of financial markets, pushing Britain to the brink of financial instability. The once-celebrated mantra "security is the change" has ironically devolved into mounting insecurity, with the country now viewed as less credit-worthy than Greece. Reports of Reeves feeling "very depressed" due to the bleak economic outlook have surfaced. However, her empathy might be too little, too late for those facing the real-world consequences of her policies—farmers fearing the loss of their land, pensioners unable to afford heating, and small businesses forced to close. These struggles are the direct fallout of what critics label as Reeves’s brand of misguided, ideological politics. The true impact of her tax policies will only be felt in the coming months, potentially resulting in significant job losses and a further exodus of wealth from the country. Despite Sir Keir Starmer’s public backing of Reeves, doubts linger about her long-term tenure. The Prime Minister's assurances have done little to quell market fears, and the comparison to the infamous lettuce outlasting Liz Truss in office has resurfaced in media commentary, suggesting that Reeves's tenure might not extend much beyond the immediate future. Economist Liam Halligan’s prediction that Reeves’s tax-heavy approach would draw the ire of the bond markets has come true with startling speed. The economic strategy, or lack thereof, has not only unnerved markets but also left Reeves visibly strained and fatigued, as evident during her recent appearances. The notion that Reeves’s tenure represents a landmark achievement for women in politics has lost its sheen, overshadowed by her perceived incompetence. Her early promises of pro-business policies have given way to tax hikes that disillusioned her once-supportive business community. Her inability to navigate the complex economic landscape has led to suggestions that her resignation would be in the country’s best interest. The media response to Reeves's financial missteps has been relatively muted compared to the uproar following Liz Truss's mini-budget debacle. However, the looming economic calamity under Reeves’s leadership presents a more severe threat. If the International Monetary Fund were to intervene, one wonders if it would even capture significant media attention. Reeves’s self-congratulatory celebrations of breaking the glass ceiling appear tragically ironic as the consequences of her policies threaten to shatter the livelihoods of many. The growth she has fostered is not the kind the nation hoped for—it is a growth in closures, inflation, and despair. In light of the resignation of anti-corruption minister Tulip Siddiq, which could undermine the government's stability, Reeves might retain her position a bit longer. However, this reprieve should not be mistaken for a vote of confidence in her abilities. Her tenure has demonstrated a troubling lack of capacity to manage the country’s economy, making her departure a necessary step for the nation's recovery. For the sake of Britain’s future, a change in leadership at the Treasury is imperative. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2024-01-17
-
-
Popular in The Pub
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now