Pjs Touchscreen Question
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
-
Latest posts...
-
24
Crime Actress Gets 2 Months Suspended Sentence for Drink-Driving
Why suspend the jail sentence?! Especially for the guy who behaved like a pig?! Pathetic! -
136
Report Dream Crushed: British Expats’ Thai Retirement Nightmare
Some others who have never been rich may well just get that amount? -
20
People stuck in the past using ancient Windows computers
https://archive.org/details/win95sounds/mssound.wav -
92
so, i got my first "clap" 🙄
What do you care? Have a chip on your shoulder for compassionate and smart people? Personally guys that wind up getting the clap these days are 1)too stupid to understand they can get or 2) just don't care, which is far worse. What do you care about what I'm saying? This topic hit close to home cowboy? -
1
USA Trump's Defence Renaming Sparks Fears of WW3 Conflict
Trump campaigning as the 'peace president' promised 'no more endless wars' And now he wants the Department of War back. Another TACO, served with the usual side of hypocrisy. -
47
Middle East Israel Launches Massive Gaza Strikes Ahead of Major Offensive
Not true, and the UN said Gaza was still under Occupation. It was 2005, and the 21 settlements they dismantled were in Gaza illegally. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_disengagement_from_the_Gaza_Strip In 2005, Israel disengaged from the Gaza Strip by dismantling all 21 Israeli settlements there.[1] As part of this process, four Israeli settlements in the West Bank were dismantled as well. The disengagement was executed unilaterally by Israel and without coordination with the Palestinian National Authority (PNA).[2] Since then, the United Nations, many other international humanitarian and legal organizations, and most academic commentators have continued to regard the Gaza Strip as being under Israeli occupation due to Israel's active control over the territory's external affairs, as affirmed by the 2024 International Court of Justice advisory opinion.[3] Historically, according to Article 42 of the Hague Regulations and precedent in international law, it has been generally understood that a territory remains effectively occupied so long as a belligerent's authority is established and exercised over it, even if said belligerent does not have ground forces deployed in the area.
-
-
Popular in The Pub
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now