...

Showing your ignorance again even on recent events like GW 1

...

Well, thank you.

This assessment of my knowledge from someone as erudite as you an only be taken as a complement.

You didn't even know the word "erudit" until 2 days ago when I called you one

At least he knows how to spell it.

I am glad you bring this up, because the information you list is why I would like him to run.

I see this as a weakness in the context it happened. It's one thing to be a man of peace, but he seemed to be very indecisive when "difficult" actions have to be taken. You can bash Bush all you want, but at least he went after the right guys (Afghanistan) after 911. He had his 15 min of glory but then he had to waste on his stupid war. Only fools followed him, and Powell was one of them. He lost my respect the day he went to the security council and presented his silly case. He is done and he knows it. The Bush family will never forgive him for leaving Junior after his first term. He won't come back. Stick a fork in that turkey.

I had better make my move if I'm gonna follow her into the White House.

...

Showing your ignorance again even on recent events like GW 1

...

Well, thank you.

This assessment of my knowledge from someone as erudite as you an only be taken as a complement.

You didn't even know the word "erudit" until 2 days ago when I called you one

At least he knows how to spell it.

Powel is a man of peace. He was very frustrated during the pre-invasion of Iraq Part Deux because he was being "used" by the Bush administration and he went as far as saying privately to representatives of the UN security council to bear with him even though he and everyone knew that the evidence he was presenting were pure bullshit.

Yet he still didn't resign. He chose instead to keep his job and make public speeches at the UN making a case for the invasion of Iraq. So I guess he either believed in it, or he didn't have the spine to stand up for his principles.

I wonder which one it was.

cv

Powel is a man of peace. He was very frustrated during the pre-invasion of Iraq Part Deux because he was being "used" by the Bush administration and he went as far as saying privately to representatives of the UN security council to bear with him even though he and everyone knew that the evidence he was presenting were pure bullshit.

Yet he still didn't resign. He chose instead to keep his job and make public speeches at the UN making a case for the invasion of Iraq. So I guess he either believed in it, or he didn't have the spine to stand up for his principles.

I wonder which one it was.

cv

He believed it 'cause they were there.

New news today: It seems Russia schlepped the WMD's into Syria for Saddam.

It's all going to come out - believe it...

Can't you raving moonbats ever admit you were wrong ? Guess not.

I assume this news you refer to is on some neocon nut job blog site. It's just been made up so it must be correct.

They are looking for excuses to wage war on Syria.

"We will be attacked if we don't go in now"?

Or Iran.

Choices choices...

Saddam is a straight up guy why doesn't Diane Sawyer or Katy Keuruc interview him and he can tell us all the truth. He wouldn't lie in front of Katy or Diane. They are much to respected in their field. It would put the matter to rest.

They are looking for excuses to wage war on Syria.

We don't need excuses.

Erudite means well informed, learned, someone who knows what he's talking about. It's a word you're supposed to learn by middle school in an english speaking country.

If all else fails type it into the seach bar of and search engine, and you will be rewarded with a definition of almost any word within the first few results.

cv

or you can go to google and type in "define:" followed by the word and you will be rewarded with several different definitions and links to where the defintions came from.

Example:

at google I typed in: "define:erudite"

and got:

"having or showing profound knowledge; "a learned jurist"; "an erudite professor"

wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn"

I'm kind of surprised that only this one definition came back...usually you get anywhere from three to 10 definitions....I guess erudite doesn't have very many contexts so one definition will sum it up.

They are looking for excuses to wage war on Syria.

We don't need excuses.

The doves will never believe you or anyone else TM. Syria never did anything wrong.

Yeah .... right ....

http://www.washtimes.com/national/20041028-122637-6257r.htm

Fact is Syria hates the Jews, the sovereign state of Israel and the USA as much or more than any other arab dictatorship.

Truth is that Syria is just a bully state that does what it wants where it thinks it can get away with it, namely Lebanon. But like all bullies Syria backs down in the face of real threat. That is why in truth they want no part of a toe to toe with Israel or the US because either could kick their ass to hel_l and back.

The only reason Syria is taking such a strong stand now is because they are riding the current tide of Islamo-wacko-ism. As soon as this wears off, Syria's balls are going to shrink so fast they might as well have jumped into ice water.

Powel is a man of peace. He was very frustrated during the pre-invasion of Iraq Part Deux because he was being "used" by the Bush administration and he went as far as saying privately to representatives of the UN security council to bear with him even though he and everyone knew that the evidence he was presenting were pure bullshit.

Yet he still didn't resign. He chose instead to keep his job and make public speeches at the UN making a case for the invasion of Iraq. So I guess he either believed in it, or he didn't have the spine to stand up for his principles.

I wonder which one it was.

cv

I don't need to guess, we all know what it was. He is an ambitious man and being a Bush "follower" means to be a loyal team player, in other words, a yes man. Like I said, Log Cabin all the way.

2003 - Bush sending thousands of young men to die on a false pretense (not to mention an illegal war, that will make the annals of history)

2007 - American troops leaving Iraq Saigon style, followed by a bloody civil war

2008 - Iran takes over Iraq and build a nuclear powerhouse with Iraq

2003 - Bush sending thousands of young men to die on a false pretense (not to mention an illegal war, that will make the annals of history)

2007 - American troops leaving Iraq Saigon style, followed by a bloody civil war

2008 - Iran takes over Iraq and build a nuclear powerhouse with Iraq

2020 - Butterfly gets out of the nuthouse and has to buy his own computer.

2004 - Porkie failed to report for duty to Iraq

Do you blame him?

No dancing teenagers agreeing to "facials" in Iraq.

Patriotism ends where everyday pleasures can't be had...

Already been discharged, boys.

Already been discharged, boys.

No problem, join again, if you have the guts or the courage of your opinions

At least in my spare time, I recruit LadyBoys in Pattaya to harrass and steal from US soldiers

Already been discharged, boys.

No problem, join again, if you have the guts or the courage of your opinions

At least in my spare time, I recruit LadyBoys in Pattaya to harrass and steal from US soldiers

Couldn't pass the physical if I wanted to, but I have no doubt that your time is spent evenly between ladyboys, stealing and trolling on the Internet.

Back on topic.... I wouldn't want them to win, but a Dean/Sharpton ticket would make for an extremely entertaining campaign, and some great Saturday Night Live skits.

cv

Back on topic.... I wouldn't want them to win, but a Dean/Sharpton ticket would make for an extremely entertaining campaign, and some great Saturday Night Live skits.

cv

That is for sure!

Back on topic.... I wouldn't want them to win, but a Dean/Sharpton ticket would make for an extremely entertaining campaign, and some great Saturday Night Live skits.

cv

I would seriouly think that a Powell/Rice could be an interesting battle. It would twist the GOP so much, that even a Dean/Sharpton could have the chance to win. I think a Jackson/Sharpton would be more appropriate though.

Whoever runs for GOP, perhaps should read this:

http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/bbartlett.htm

(and his book, "Impostor: How George W. Bush Bankrupted America and Betrayed the Reagan Legacy.")

Back on topic.... I wouldn't want them to win, but a Dean/Sharpton ticket would make for an extremely entertaining campaign, and some great Saturday Night Live skits.

cv

I would seriouly think that a Powell/Rice could be an interesting battle. ...

Join the campaign, Sweatheart.