Jump to content

Thai court acquits Santika nightclub owner after deadly inferno


Lite Beer

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 133
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I wasn't in the Appeals Court when they made this decision, but the job of these judges is to consider the evidence put before them. They obviously considered that the conviction in the lower court was erroneous and therefore was quashed. Why do we have to assume that there was bias or any sort of corruption involved in their decision? They had the full facts; we don't. We only have newspaper reports.

Why do we have to assume that there was bias or any sort of corruption involved

Because this is Thailand, nuff said

Then, to follow this logically, we can assume that the conviction of the man from Dubai was biased and corrupt.

Very good chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In some countries the statue depicting Justitia - Lady justice is a blindfolded lady holding scales in one hand and a sword in the other

I get the impression that in Thailand it's a blindfolded lady holding a brush in one hand and the corner of a carpet in the other.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As the club owner of such a big establishment I doubt he was aware of every little thing going on in there. Sure he would be liable in a civil court but to bring criminal charges against him are a little much. And the appeals court has reacted accordingly. The pyro experts on the other hand are " experts" and it is their fault what happened that night. They should do time and have their license revoked.

So he wasn't aware of the licences he should have had, the payments he made to senior police officers after the premises were raided and that there were inadequate fire exits? Of course, he thought it was being used as a noodle shop! Money talks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All extremely emotive indeed, but who was actually in charge of the pyrotechnics, and actually physically set them off?

It was posted earlier; the boss of the pyrotechnic company. Thy also filed charges against a band member for allegedly triggering the pyrotechnics, such was the rush to lay blame (and cover <deleted>).

However, the appeals judge wasn't even about to debate a major contributory factor, ie. barred windows, locked fire exits, overcrowding and no emergency lighting, all of which would normally be the responsibility of the owner. The appeals judge may just have easily said that the victims all went their of their own accord and nobody, least of all the owner, forced them to go inside the club. In fact he may have said exactly that but it has all got lost in the translation.

You have to apply Thai logic to get your head around this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All extremely emotive indeed, but who was actually in charge of the pyrotechnics, and actually physically set them off?

Who never had a proper license to operate? Who never adhered to safety regulations to protect those in his club? Who allowed the pyrotechnic show to take place? Who paid bribes on a weekly basis to the police to operate an illegal venue? Who doesn't care that a whole bunch of people died? Who only cares about money?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As the club owner of such a big establishment I doubt he was aware of every little thing going on in there. Sure he would be liable in a civil court but to bring criminal charges against him are a little much. And the appeals court has reacted accordingly. The pyro experts on the other hand are " experts" and it is their fault what happened that night. They should do time and have their license revoked.

The owner of the light and sound company responsible for the fireworks got three years, a fine and a multi-million baht compensation order against him.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As the club owner of such a big establishment I doubt he was aware of every little thing going on in there. Sure he would be liable in a civil court but to bring criminal charges against him are a little much. And the appeals court has reacted accordingly. The pyro experts on the other hand are " experts" and it is their fault what happened that night. They should do time and have their license revoked.

The place had no licence and was paying bribes. The buck stops somewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This scumbag might have avoided prison for killing scores of people but he will be poorer for the experience.

Alot of money must have changed hands over the years to get this result.

Don't overlook the fact that the owner of the light and sound company got three years, a fine and a multi-million baht compensation order against him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can`t get my head around this bit,

However, the verdict also upheld a lower court decision, reached in September 2011, which sentenced Bunchoo Laoseehanart, executive of Focus Light Sound System, to a three-year imprisonment term without suspension.

Then the next sentence,

The court ordered Bunchoon and the company to pay a total of Bt8.7 million to families of some fire victims. Bunchoo has been released on a Bt500,000 bail guarantee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Can`t get my head around this bit,

However, the verdict also upheld a lower court decision, reached in September 2011, which sentenced Bunchoo Laoseehanart, executive of Focus Light Sound System, to a three-year imprisonment term without suspension.

Then the next sentence,

The court ordered Bunchoon and the company to pay a total of Bt8.7 million to families of some fire victims. Bunchoo has been released on a Bt500,000 bail guarantee.

 

It's all very simple really. If they don't allow him bail then how else can he go to Singapore and get the flu...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As the club owner of such a big establishment I doubt he was aware of every little thing going on in there. Sure he would be liable in a civil court but to bring criminal charges against him are a little much. And the appeals court has reacted accordingly. The pyro experts on the other hand are " experts" and it is their fault what happened that night. They should do time and have their license revoked.

The place had no licence and was paying bribes. The buck stops somewhere.

"The buck stops somewhere". You are right. With the people taking the bribes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely disgusting.

I'd like to see what the judge's justification was for acquitting the 'owner'. I know one can't mention the possibility of lunch boxes but it just doesn't make sense to ignore the condition of Santika and the lack of an operating licence. Did the prosecutors do their job or have Red Bull-itis?

It's often hard to make sense of the justice system here with even convicted murderers given bail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...