Jump to content

Six people wounded, three seriously, as Red Shirts and anti-govt protesters clash


webfact

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Is there any news source carrying report of what happened? The OPs do lack detail.

The Bangkok Post seems to be saying that a PCAD march encountered a UDD group and violence broke out. Still not much detail though.

Edited by Bluespunk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to those who got shot ... but if you are red shirt and you go near a PDRC rally you are asking for a gun fight

Guess the PDRC were faster to draw their guns .. newcastle 1 - 0 sunderland

PDRC have no rally in Phatum Thani. Clearly a group has gone there to cause loss of life. Question is were they ordered there or are they a renegade bunch of out of control thugs?

Edited by NCFC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now you know where some of those missing weapons are.

That appears to be an extremely well thought-out assumption, based on what -- and seems to confirm that you know jack-sh1t about Thailand and the availability of firearms.

Wow your so smart. Now pat yourself on the back for being so clever.

well it isn't rocket science - so no need to be complimentary.

Weapons stolen from police vehicles by protesters at the Thai - Japanese Center. So you know what you can do with your rocket science and your vast knowledge of Thailand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I know is it seems that the protesters were protesting the protester's right to protest their protesting, and so demonstrated against the counter-demonstration demonstratively, demonstrating that demonstrations were only demonstrating the demonstrations of everyone except those demonstrating countering views about the counter-protestor's counter-protestations.

.

It finally happened! I have absorbed Thainess by osmosis!

cheesy.gif

That's the most logical description I've ever read of this mess clap2.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From this it seems like the reds tried to attack PDRC and chase them out of the neighbourhood and PDRC supporters responded with gun shots.

http://www.khaosod.co.th/en/view_newsonline.php?newsid=TVRNNE9UTTFOamN3TkE9PQ==&sectionid=TURFd01BPT0=

Thanks for that.

Also a report in the Post. Says much the same except doesn't say who started the clash, just says the two groups 'encountered' each other. Four injured, two possibly red shirts and one student caught in the crossfire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to those who got shot ... but if you are red shirt and you go near a PDRC rally you are asking for a gun fight

Guess the PDRC were faster to draw their guns .. newcastle 1 - 0 sunderland

Nice fishing, but I only recall a handful of Sunderland wins in the whole of 2013. One was Newcastle 0-3 Sunderland and another was Sunderland 2-1 Newcastle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Myself, wife and child will be in BKK late next week and I feel a little bit apprehensive, If worse comes to worse maybe better to stay outside then make the dash to Swampy, anybody got suggestions.?

Monitor the situation but I would suggest yes, stay outside and get to the airport from a different approach. Aside from the danger issue, it is going to be very difficult to access BKK...if these events continue/worsen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe the majority of people in the area in and around where this happened, would favor the government and/or the red shirt side of politics. For PDRC supporters to march in this area seeking support, well it's hardly surprising it didn't go down to well with some of the locals, but then I suppose that was the point of being there...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe the majority of people in the area in and around where this happened, would favor the government and/or the red shirt side of politics. For PDRC supporters to march in this area seeking support, well it's hardly surprising it didn't go down to well with some of the locals, but then I suppose that was the point of being there...

Maybe, but it wouldn't justify the attack. I read in the Post the other day that PDRC supporters tried to block reds in Ratchaburi, but police eventually escorted them through. Shouldn't the police be escorting PDRC, or are they already?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to the Khaosod report the redshirts were actively seeking the confrontation.

The worrying part of the story is that the PCAD protestors were apparently anticipating trouble and came well prepared and armed.

edit: typo, as usual

Edited by MikeOboe57
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to those who got shot ... but if you are red shirt and you go near a PDRC rally you are asking for a gun fight

Guess the PDRC were faster to draw their guns .. newcastle 1 - 0 sunderland

PDRC have no rally in Phatum Thani. Clearly a group has gone there to cause loss of life. Question is were they ordered there or are they a renegade bunch of out of control thugs?

"Clearly a group has gone there to cause loss of life."

A bit too presumptious .. who started the melee? were shots fired in self defence?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to those who got shot ... but if you are red shirt and you go near a PDRC rally you are asking for a gun fight

Guess the PDRC were faster to draw their guns .. newcastle 1 - 0 sunderland

PDRC have no rally in Phatum Thani. Clearly a group has gone there to cause loss of life. Question is were they ordered there or are they a renegade bunch of out of control thugs?

"Clearly a group has gone there to cause loss of life."

A bit too presumptious .. who started the melee? were shots fired in self defence?

Presumptious! I hardly think you are the ideal person to be discussing whether a group has gone "to cause loss of life" or not after your crass post

"but if you are red shirt and you go near a PDRC rally you are asking for a gun fight"

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the history of red shirt attacks in the past 10 years against their opposite numbers

has always been more Clockwork Orange than a simple dustup fistfight. And after the

grenades thrown at PAD outside Gov house in 2006, that side has learned that

not being armed, is closer to suicide than practical. No surprise they are armed.

So, supposing if the reds did, predictably, go looking to attack as the Kaosod report states,

and used large fireworks, logically the other side would not just turn the other cheek

and let them keep on firing at them. Would you?

If the PDRC was static, in place, and the UDD guys came to them and attacked,

then we know which side provoked it. Just because it is not coming from the barrel of a gun

doesn't mean it is not a deadly weapon.

Is shooting back to repel a violent attack justified?

Well in most cases yes, but there are some to argue that were the PDRC

not trying to bring down the Shin Clan Machine, then there is no reason for them to be attacked,

and thus it is their fault. The other side can argue this is their duty and repelling attacks is part of their duty.

So as we can see, no possible middle ground will be found.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...