Jump to content

Thai Government warned there may be no election if….


Recommended Posts

Posted

Government warned there may be no election if….

4-14-2014-10-21-33-AM-wpcf_728x413.jpg

BANGKOK: -- The Election Commission has warned the government that the next election will be further delayed or may never be staged if the government fails to come up with an agreement with the commission on the election date and the issuance of a Royal decree.

Commissioner on electoral affairs Somchai Srisutthiyakorn said Sunday that the EC had summoned a meeting with 70 parties to send their representatives to a meeting on April 22 for discussion on political situation before the EC will decide to set the date for the fresh election.

He cited the government’s persistence to stage the February 2 election despite strong opposition from the EC that the poll could be disrupted. The Constitutional Court finally ruled the February 2 election unconstitutional on the ground that it was not held on the same day across the country, he said.

“But if this time, the government does not agree with the EC’s suggestion, the situation will be different – that is there will be no election unless a common agreement is reached,” said Mr Somchai.

The EC, he disclosed, is set to issue a new regulation about application of candidacy by allowing candidates to apply by mails for list MPs or by internet for constituency MPs in case they are blocked by protesters.

Source: http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/government-warned-may-election/

thaipbs_logo.jpg
-- Thai PBS 2014-04-14

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted

Mr Somchai, please don't bother them now.

They are all resting, after the hard job they did for the past 3 years for this country.

Anyway, what elections are you referring too?

First reforms and then elections.

Do try to understand that.

  • Like 1
Posted

Mr Somchai, please don't bother them now.

They are all resting, after the hard job they did for the past 3 years for this country.

Anyway, what elections are you referring too?

First reforms and then elections.

Do try to understand that.

It won't happen...

Posted

It is time for all good people to come to the aid of King and country. It is time to relinquish ties to political parties influential people and families. Think about your children and your children's children.

They will be the ones paying the taxes to cover the greed of politicians. wai.gif

They would have to pay their fair share of taxes first.

Posted

It is time for all good people to come to the aid of King and country. It is time to relinquish ties to political parties influential people and families. Think about your children and your children's children.

They will be the ones paying the taxes to cover the greed of politicians. wai.gif

It's a nice thought but this IS Thailand.

Posted

It is time for all good people to come to the aid of King and country. It is time to relinquish ties to political parties influential people and families. Think about your children and your children's children.

They will be the ones paying the taxes to cover the greed of politicians. wai.gif

... and in cloud cuckoo land everyone lived happily ever after... whistling.gif

Posted

I need your help.

When people talk about reforms before election. What does this mean?

Does anyone have knowledge about concrete reforms. (for example election law) ?

Who decides what reform has to happen?

Why the Election Commission has the power to delay or suspend an election ?

How is this Election Commission created. Who are the members of this commission ?

Thanks in advance for bringing light into my darkness. facepalm.gif

Tom

Posted

Another great statement from the EC to PT (Thaksin) . . . work WITH us or you will never even get close to having an election any time soon as we're the ones who run it and without our help and some compromise on PT's side of things, there will be NO elections.

The EC is attempting to dictate the applicability of the law. Look at what the EC is saying; there will be no election.

The EC is not supposed to dictate whether or not there will be an election. It's job is carry out the election. Again this is the EC interfering and it is the EC who are derelict in their duty.

Spin and misdirection! EC is not saying there will be no election. They are saying there will be no election IF..... If. If. Get it?

Try to understand what that IF is.

Unless you do understand but believe the big "IF" will never happen? You believe PT will prevaricate and refuse to do what's right? You may be right. But that is not EC's fault.

They are "IF" blind ( or incredibly stupid). They missed out all the "IFS" in Suthep's speech a week ago too. Kinda changes the tone of everything when you deliberately ignore things.

Posted

Another great statement from the EC to PT (Thaksin) . . . work WITH us or you will never even get close to having an election any time soon as we're the ones who run it and without our help and some compromise on PT's side of things, there will be NO elections.

The EC is attempting to dictate the applicability of the law. Look at what the EC is saying; there will be no election.

The EC is not supposed to dictate whether or not there will be an election. It's job is carry out the election. Again this is the EC interfering and it is the EC who are derelict in their duty.

Kid.. i thought you were educated.. probably a bit redsighted that you cant read good anymore.

They are saying we need to come to agreement so we don't have the same problems as last time. So please listen to us and come to discuss things instead of dictating like last time. If you don't we might not be able to hold election.

Seems to me they are asking from cooperation from the government instead of being dictated of what to do.. last time they were bullied into it and look what happened.

I never knew that the reds were that fast with rewriting history, last time the EC said its not a good idea... government bullied them pushed them so they did.. result.. invalid election.

Well.if they are going to not have an election because anyone says there maybe disruption, then there will never be an election.

It is the ECs job to get in whatever protection and law enforcement it needs to get the job done, not to preemptively cancel because someone says they won't let it happen.

Essentially every one attempting to block the election should have been arrested. They were illegally blocking an election. So now, everyone needs a.powwow to agree a date.

What difference is that going to make if Suthep threatens to block it. The proven solution now when he threatens it will be to cancel. Great job.

The NON Election Commissions.

Perhaps if the Police had worked with the EC properly ( instead of doing as the Govt instructed - very little to nothing as usual ), things might just have been different.

Posted

Another great statement from the EC to PT (Thaksin) . . . work WITH us or you will never even get close to having an election any time soon as we're the ones who run it and without our help and some compromise on PT's side of things, there will be NO elections.

The EC is attempting to dictate the applicability of the law. Look at what the EC is saying; there will be no election.

The EC is not supposed to dictate whether or not there will be an election. It's job is carry out the election. Again this is the EC interfering and it is the EC who are derelict in their duty.

Kid.. i thought you were educated.. probably a bit redsighted that you cant read good anymore.

They are saying we need to come to agreement so we don't have the same problems as last time. So please listen to us and come to discuss things instead of dictating like last time. If you don't we might not be able to hold election.

Seems to me they are asking from cooperation from the government instead of being dictated of what to do.. last time they were bullied into it and look what happened.

I never knew that the reds were that fast with rewriting history, last time the EC said its not a good idea... government bullied them pushed them so they did.. result.. invalid election.

Well.if they are going to not have an election because anyone says there maybe disruption, then there will never be an election.

It is the ECs job to get in whatever protection and law enforcement it needs to get the job done, not to preemptively cancel because someone says they won't let it happen.

Essentially every one attempting to block the election should have been arrested. They were illegally blocking an election. So now, everyone needs a.powwow to agree a date.

What difference is that going to make if Suthep threatens to block it. The proven solution now when he threatens it will be to cancel. Great job.

The NON Election Commissions.

Perhaps if the Police had worked with the EC properly ( instead of doing as the Govt instructed - very little to nothing as usual ), things might just have been different.

All possible. Ifs and buts.

The only sure thing, is it isn't the ECs job to recommend delaying.

Imagine the outcry if the government said,*we don't fancy this date, how about in a months time"

They would stay in forever.

Posted
Another great statement from the EC to PT (Thaksin) . . . work WITH us or you will never even get close to having an election any time soon as we're the ones who run it and without our help and some compromise on PT's side of things, there will be NO elections.

The EC is attempting to dictate the applicability of the law. Look at what the EC is saying; there will be no election.

The EC is not supposed to dictate whether or not there will be an election. It's job is carry out the election. Again this is the EC interfering and it is the EC who are derelict in their duty.

Kid.. i thought you were educated.. probably a bit redsighted that you cant read good anymore.

They are saying we need to come to agreement so we don't have the same problems as last time. So please listen to us and come to discuss things instead of dictating like last time. If you don't we might not be able to hold election.

Seems to me they are asking from cooperation from the government instead of being dictated of what to do.. last time they were bullied into it and look what happened.

I never knew that the reds were that fast with rewriting history, last time the EC said its not a good idea... government bullied them pushed them so they did.. result.. invalid election.

Well.if they are going to not have an election because anyone says there maybe disruption, then there will never be an election.

It is the ECs job to get in whatever protection and law enforcement it needs to get the job done, not to preemptively cancel because someone says they won't let it happen.

Essentially every one attempting to block the election should have been arrested. They were illegally blocking an election. So now, everyone needs a.powwow to agree a date.

What difference is that going to make if Suthep threatens to block it. The proven solution now when he threatens it will be to cancel. Great job.

The NON Election Commissions.

Perhaps if the Police had worked with the EC properly ( instead of doing as the Govt instructed - very little to nothing as usual ), things might just have been different.

I think the police were itching to stop the disruptions, but were prevented from doing so by court rulings and fear of a military coup.

Anyway, why should elections be held hostage by unelectable thugs?

Sent from my IS11T using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

Posted

Another great statement from the EC to PT (Thaksin) . . . work WITH us or you will never even get close to having an election any time soon as we're the ones who run it and without our help and some compromise on PT's side of things, there will be NO elections.

The EC is attempting to dictate the applicability of the law. Look at what the EC is saying; there will be no election.

The EC is not supposed to dictate whether or not there will be an election. It's job is carry out the election. Again this is the EC interfering and it is the EC who are derelict in their duty.

Ha ha, ok gk, if you say so.

I think the rest of us in the real world see the EC advising Thaksin on how to follow the law/constitution so that things are done correctly and legally rather than PT dictating to them how "they" want things to run regardless of the legalities.

The EC has a duty to ensure that an election is held within the time frame set out in the law. The EC has the authority to manage that aspect of the election. The government has no control over how the EC will manage that process. Why is the EC focused solely on the government? Was it the government that threatened voters, that disrupted polling stations, that blocked candidate registrations etc.? The EC officials in several areas refused to carry out their duties and yet, not one of the implicated officials was sacked.

The Govt has a duty to follow and uphold the law and constitution and to follow the principles of democracy. They chose instead to continue to break laws whenever it suited them yet none of those implicated have been sacked or arrested.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...