Jump to content

Thai govt vows action if Shinawatra supporters protest


webfact

Recommended Posts

"Driving her (Yingluck) out of politics could instigate resentment among her political supporters," said Thai academic Pavin Chachavalpongpun, of Kyoto University.
"Thailand is Thailand and the rule of law can be bent to serve the power interests of the elites."

Is this academic suggesting that the rule of law should be bent to serve the purposes of the elite Shinawatra clan ?

If it is decided that Yingluck has broken the law whether it be by dereliction of duty, negligence or corruption she must be answerable to the law.

Not holding her to account will for sure instigate resentment in those who have been hurt by any illegal actions of hers.

An example needs to be set and a benchmark laid down for future politicians, engage in anything unlawful and you will be held accountable.

This is an opportunity to do just that and it must be taken.

Pavin is a Thaksin poodle - no more, no less. And he's a poor scholar to boot.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"There will be no protest, they can't protest. If they don't accept the ruling, we will take action, that's it," he told reporters.

How easy it is to govern when you are a general, a 'PM' and head of the 'NCPO' with an interim constitution that gives you total power.

whistling.gif

The great leader have done much for Thailand and his people.

Not forgetting that Thai people are happy now because the the leader have return the happiness to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Driving her (Yingluck) out of politics could instigate resentment among her political supporters," said Thai academic Pavin Chachavalpongpun, of Kyoto University.
"Thailand is Thailand and the rule of law can be bent to serve the power interests of the elites."

Is this academic suggesting that the rule of law should be bent to serve the purposes of the elite Shinawatra clan ?

If it is decided that Yingluck has broken the law whether it be by dereliction of duty, negligence or corruption she must be answerable to the law.

Not holding her to account will for sure instigate resentment in those who have been hurt by any illegal actions of hers.

An example needs to be set and a benchmark laid down for future politicians, engage in anything unlawful and you will be held accountable.

This is an opportunity to do just that and it must be taken.

Pavin is a Thaksin poodle - no more, no less. And he's a poor scholar to boot.

Interesting to read your perception that Pavin is a poor scholar. Are you able to substantiate this because my understanding he is held in high regard in the international academic community? Do you perhaps mean that he tends to take a political position that you disagree with.Perhaps this is also why you call him a Thaksin poodle, though I have read a number of articles in which he is scathingly critical of Thaksin.Don't you think it would simply be better to say that you disagree with him and articulate your reasons?

Since you set yourself up as expert on Thai scholarship, can you perhaps let me have the names of internationally recognised academics who are supportive of the current regime in Thailand and the crushing of democracy.

Pavin is no longer Thai. He will be arrested if he is still Thai.

Pavin in now Japanese, holding Japanese passport.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Army has told the farmers to grow only one rice crop this year. Typically one rice crop is to fill the family rice barn so the family has rice for the year. The true meaning of this? Its going to take time to sell off the rice mountain and the government want to sell that and don't want new rice in the market. Thus is Yingluck guilty? Of course she is; she was the PM in charge!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Driving her (Yingluck) out of politics could instigate resentment among her political supporters," said Thai academic Pavin Chachavalpongpun, of Kyoto University.

"Thailand is Thailand and the rule of law can be bent to serve the power interests of the elites."

Is this academic suggesting that the rule of law should be bent to serve the purposes of the elite Shinawatra clan ?

If it is decided that Yingluck has broken the law whether it be by dereliction of duty, negligence or corruption she must be answerable to the law.

Not holding her to account will for sure instigate resentment in those who have been hurt by any illegal actions of hers.

An example needs to be set and a benchmark laid down for future politicians, engage in anything unlawful and you will be held accountable.

This is an opportunity to do just that and it must be taken.

The Shinawatras, although very wealthy now due to Thaksin's aquisitional 'skills', don't belong to the Elite. That is made up of the so-called Forty Families, a power base that sees the nouveau riche as rather vulgar. A bit like the way the 'old money' used to view the 'new money' in the UK and probably still do.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they (the Junta) had balls enough they would have confiscated the whole Shinawatras family's fortune including drivers and maids by now and thrown them all in jail with no parole or bail possible. A deal has been struck the Juntas BS regarding "Zero Corruption" is just smoke and mirrors.

Interesting and what about all the corrupt Democrats, policemen and generals? They just get off do they?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"could stir her 'Red Shirt' supporters to protest, ending months of relative calm"

I am sure the innocent blood of over 700 spilt on the streets from the last time the red shirts came out is fresh on Prayuts mind.

Do what is right for the innocent majority Prauyut. Don't let the 7%ers turn Bangkok into a blood bath again.

My innocent family thank you in advance.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"There will be no protest, they can't protest. If they don't accept the ruling, we will take action, that's it," he told reporters.

How easy it is to govern when you are a general, a 'PM' and head of the 'NCPO' with an interim constitution that gives you total power.

whistling.gif

The great leader have done much for Thailand and his people.

Not forgetting that Thai people are happy now because the the leader have return the happiness to them.

the leader have return the happiness to them.

I'm wondering where he found it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pavin is a Thaksin poodle - no more, no less. And he's a poor scholar to boot.

Interesting to read your perception that Pavin is a poor scholar. Are you able to substantiate this because my understanding he is held in high regard in the international academic community? Do you perhaps mean that he tends to take a political position that you disagree with.Perhaps this is also why you call him a Thaksin poodle, though I have read a number of articles in which he is scathingly critical of Thaksin.Don't you think it would simply be better to say that you disagree with him and articulate your reasons?

Since you set yourself up as expert on Thai scholarship, can you perhaps let me have the names of internationally recognised academics who are supportive of the current regime in Thailand and the crushing of democracy.

Pavin is no longer Thai. He will be arrested if he is still Thai.

Pavin in now Japanese, holding Japanese passport.

If I remember correctly, Pavin has been accused of LM and so, like so many victims of this draconian law, he can no longer return to his own country without being tossed in jail for years.

All because he exercises his human right to free speech.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well what do you expect , an ill concieved piece of timing if ever there was one, the wise supporters will wait , the hot heads might protest , but if they are wise they will wait 2, I am not aligned with Yingluck , however if Thailand wants harmony it is going the wrong way about it, all this does is create more hate, this time not for the Democrats but for P.M.Prayut -o and Co fondly known as the JUNTA.coffee1.gif

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMPEACHMENT CASES
No protests: PM

The Nation

30251364-02_big.jpg

Martial law 'will be used' if there are any disturbances over impeachment decision; NLA likely bring forward date for verdicts

BANGKOK: -- Hinting at a strong reaction from the government, Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha yesterday threatened to use martial law to stop protests from either side of the political divide over the decisions of the National Legislative Assembly (NLA) in the upcoming impeachment cases involving key politicians of the previous government.


"People cannot protest and decide what is right or wrong. I am not the judge. Right or wrong is up to the law. If the NLA makes the decision and you do not accept the decision and protest, I will take action," he said.

Prayut ruled out any pardon for key politicians for the sake of national reconciliation. "The country can reconcile only when we pardon everyone first? No, it is not like that. I insist that people who commit offences must face the justice procedure. Do not come to talk to me about amnesty," he said.

The NLA will begin proceedings tomorrow in the cases against former Parliament president Somsak Kiatsuranont and his former deputy Nikom Wairatpanich over their alleged constitutional offences, while Friday's proceedings will see ex-prime minister Yingluck Shinawatra in the dock over the controversial rice-pledging programme.

Prayut rejected claims made by supporters of Pheu Thai that these politicians must be given the benefit of the doubt, as the 2007 chart had been revoked. The PM insisted that these politicians had administered the country and although the charter was revoked, its organic laws on counter corruption are still in force.

"I revoked only the charter but I did not annul the anti-corruption law," he said.

Asked if he felt an impeachment verdict could spark a new round of political conflict, Prayut said he had no idea how the NLA would decide on each case. "I am the PM, I cannot give recommendations or lead the assembly," he said. Prayut said he believed the government could control the situation as martial law, which prevents political movements, is still in force.

Asked if he felt uncomfortable about the impeachment circumstances as he had worked under Yingluck, Prayut said no. "I use the law and give justice to every side. I do not go after anyone to kill him or her. If I fully exercise my power, many people cannot survive," he said.

Meanwhile, Yingluck said she would personally answer all questions in the case over the rice-pledging scheme because she was confident she could clarify every issue and no one knew the issues better than her.

Yingluck yesterday joined her legal team to discuss defence strategies after the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) delivered its opening statement. The NACC has accused Yingluck of dereliction of duty by failing to stem corruption and inflicting Bt600 billion in losses on the country because of the scheme.

Yingluck's legal team said they would argue that the scheme was a project aimed at benefiting the public and was not aimed at making profits, so it should not be judged only in terms of profit or loss.

The lawyers said they would defend Yingluck that she had done her best and there was no dereliction of duty.

The NLA would take recourse to Article 6 of the interim charter 2014 and Article 64 of the Anti-Corruption Act, the charter's organic laws to impeach Yingluck. During the opening statement, defendants are allowed to either personally defend themselves or send a representative.

Yingluck's lawyers said the NLA would not question the ex-PM on Friday, as the assembly would first appoint an inquiry panel and the NACC would make its opening statement.

Norawit Lalaeng, Yingluck's authorised lawyer, yesterday submitted a defence statement to the NLA officials. He called for live broadcast of the impeachment proceedings on state-run Channel 11, saying Yingluck would take two hours to clarify issues related to the rice-pledging scheme.

NLA whip Jetn Sirathranont said the vote on the two impeachment cases would be brought forward to January 22-23 from January 26-27 to comply with the meeting directives that the decision must be made three days after the closing statements. NLA president Pornpetch Wichitcholchai said he would look at the possibility of broadcasting live the impeachment proceedings because there was no such precedent.

Former deputy PM Surapong Tovichakchaikul yesterday threatened to take the NLA to task if it proceeds with impeachment proceedings against key Pheu Thai politicians.

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/No-protests-PM-30251364.html

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2015-01-07

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they (the Junta) had balls enough they would have confiscated the whole Shinawatras family's fortune including drivers and maids by now and thrown them all in jail with no parole or bail possible. A deal has been struck the Juntas BS regarding "Zero Corruption" is just smoke and mirrors.

Interesting and what about all the corrupt Democrats, policemen and generals? They just get off do they?

They should all be in jail if there was a proper justice system in this country, but sadly its missing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...