Jump to content

Prayut blames political leaders for problems


Lite Beer

Recommended Posts

He's been in charge 18 months. It's time to own your own problems.

Stop looking back, start looking forwards.

And stop whining all the time like a spoiled kid.

the problem is that the peole he is referring to are still very much players and lets face it - they shouldn't be

very easy to point the finger at the PM and say he is not running a democracy (true) but the reality is it is the only way effective changes will ever be accomplished, past democratic elected governments have shown how ineffective they are over decades of theiving - power abuse - and corruption and have failed to do anything about it - why should they, they are all enriching themselves, although the current solution is not ideal I honestly don't see any alternative, politicians in this country cannot be trusted (fact) so the only way to ensure they do what they were elected to do is to introduce stiff boundaries, rules, agencies, and laws that hold people in office to account and for the time being restrict them until such times they can be trusted

youd have to restrict them forever though

not many thais would refuse an envelope of crispy new 1000 baht notes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

He's been in charge 18 months. It's time to own your own problems.

Stop looking back, start looking forwards.

And stop whining all the time like a spoiled kid.

the problem is that the peole he is referring to are still very much players and lets face it - they shouldn't be

very easy to point the finger at the PM and say he is not running a democracy (true) but the reality is it is the only way effective changes will ever be accomplished, past democratic elected governments have shown how ineffective they are over decades of theiving - power abuse - and corruption and have failed to do anything about it - why should they, they are all enriching themselves, although the current solution is not ideal I honestly don't see any alternative, politicians in this country cannot be trusted (fact) so the only way to ensure they do what they were elected to do is to introduce stiff boundaries, rules, agencies, and laws that hold people in office to account and for the time being restrict them until such times they can be trusted

And what are his accomplishments with absolute power and almost a year and a half in charge?

Let's see...

- reducing the price of the lottery ticket to 80 baht

- stripping a fugitive criminal ex-policeman of his rank

- err ... anyone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"A good leader takes a little more than his share of the blame, a little less than his share of the credit".

Arnold H. Glasow

"Better than a thousand hollow words, is one word that brings peace."

Lord Buddha

Someone may benefit from reading and heeded and passing it on to the numerous, bemedalled cronies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's been in charge 18 months. It's time to own your own problems.

Stop looking back, start looking forwards.

And stop whining all the time like a spoiled kid.

the problem is that the peole he is referring to are still very much players and lets face it - they shouldn't be

very easy to point the finger at the PM and say he is not running a democracy (true) but the reality is it is the only way effective changes will ever be accomplished, past democratic elected governments have shown how ineffective they are over decades of theiving - power abuse - and corruption and have failed to do anything about it - why should they, they are all enriching themselves, although the current solution is not ideal I honestly don't see any alternative, politicians in this country cannot be trusted (fact) so the only way to ensure they do what they were elected to do is to introduce stiff boundaries, rules, agencies, and laws that hold people in office to account and for the time being restrict them until such times they can be trusted

And what are his accomplishments with absolute power and almost a year and a half in charge?

Let's see...

- reducing the price of the lottery ticket to 80 baht

- stripping a fugitive criminal ex-policeman of his rank

- err ... anyone?

uhmm...

- ebola cure?

- Friday happiness chit-chats?

- early bar closures?

- attitude adjustment centres?

yes happiness all round

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Prayut blames political leaders for problems"

Then arrest those A$$$$e$$$, lock'em all up and let'em rot to hell....

But no you just give those nasty nasty kids attitude adjustments, a slap on the wrist and let them walk away with a smile in hope they will never ever dever do it again...

Edited by MaxLee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's been in charge 18 months. It's time to own your own problems.

Stop looking back, start looking forwards.

And stop whining all the time like a spoiled kid.

the problem is that the peole he is referring to are still very much players and lets face it - they shouldn't be

very easy to point the finger at the PM and say he is not running a democracy (true) but the reality is it is the only way effective changes will ever be accomplished, past democratic elected governments have shown how ineffective they are over decades of theiving - power abuse - and corruption and have failed to do anything about it - why should they, they are all enriching themselves, although the current solution is not ideal I honestly don't see any alternative, politicians in this country cannot be trusted (fact) so the only way to ensure they do what they were elected to do is to introduce stiff boundaries, rules, agencies, and laws that hold people in office to account and for the time being restrict them until such times they can be trusted

The problem is that the military is so quick to step in. Not when it comes to protests that they support, but when it comes to them regrabbing power. In the majority fo the civilized world the military's role is to support the government. In Thailand it is not. They decide whether or not they want to offer support, and then take control when they personally feel it is necessary. The military in this country is a huge part of the problem. Another large part is the fact that it is so easy to organize protests by paying protestors.

Edited by jcsmith
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's been in charge 18 months. It's time to own your own problems.

Stop looking back, start looking forwards.

And stop whining all the time like a spoiled kid.

the problem is that the peole he is referring to are still very much players and lets face it - they shouldn't be

very easy to point the finger at the PM and say he is not running a democracy (true) but the reality is it is the only way effective changes will ever be accomplished, past democratic elected governments have shown how ineffective they are over decades of theiving - power abuse - and corruption and have failed to do anything about it - why should they, they are all enriching themselves, although the current solution is not ideal I honestly don't see any alternative, politicians in this country cannot be trusted (fact) so the only way to ensure they do what they were elected to do is to introduce stiff boundaries, rules, agencies, and laws that hold people in office to account and for the time being restrict them until such times they can be trusted

And what are his accomplishments with absolute power and almost a year and a half in charge?

Let's see...

- reducing the price of the lottery ticket to 80 baht

- stripping a fugitive criminal ex-policeman of his rank

- err ... anyone?

It's not just about how little he has done in the last 18 months. His faction have been in charge of the military for many years and what progress has there been to stop corruption there? We've all seen the amazing wealth these guys have accumulated. And we still hear of military checkpoints collecting the same tea money that the police do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

far too cryptic for me, if you want to change something you have to be able to say what it is, maybe it was meant as a veiled threat to someone but its too abstract to be acted on or taken seriously in any way

I mean countries run on rule of law, not random ideas that could mean anything, unless they are dictatorships, which of course in this case its not

Edited by phycokiller
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't you also want to blame the foreigners while you're at it.

Yes of course. Since 1984 when the first "Amazing Thailand" campaign started, us foreigners started bringing our corrupting money into the country. We accidentally created the tourist industry, bringing all kinds of corruption with us. Once under the influence, successive Thai administrations adopted our own governments practices. Corruption was a new concept for Thailand. Sorry about that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"If the government uses its power in the wrong way, the act should be considered treason. It is betrayal of the people's trust. These bad individuals never want to take responsibility for their actions and they never truly want to commit to the people."

He's not wrong ... but he does need to take a long, hard look in the mirror one day ... and then see if he can say that again with a straight face ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote : "They should use the power according to the intentions of people who voted for them. The people trust them to run the country and bring an improved standard of living to the people".

He is right, it's called democracy. The problem is, it exists only on paper.

That's why i find it exasperating to read again and again the same pointless phrase, as recently happened with the diplomat who infuriated the General, and justly so, because a diplomat is not a journalist and if a diplomat doesn't understand that, then he should not do that job.

The chant goes : "he/they should restore democracy in this country", but to restore something implies that it was there before.

What was here, however, had so very little to do with democracy. The people had a right to vote, yes, but for whom ? for a self appointed 'elite' (strictly meaning rich guys, education, manners and ethics being totally optional), cynical big shots (on either side) whose agenda had nothing to do with the people's or the country's needs, and didn't care a bit. Votes were for sale, directly or indirectly (via the village heads) and corruption at all levels turned the whole system into a pathetic farce.

Restoring the right to vote in such a system would solve absolutely nothing. This Forum is full of people who are happy to lash out at the General, or at Thaksin and consorts for that matter, but no one has the faintest idea how to start mending a system that was so utterly damaged, and in such a context the expression 'restore democracy' sounds like Marie-Antoinette (allegedly) saying "the people don't have bread ? well, then they should eat croissants'.

Edited by Yann55
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote : "They should use the power according to the intentions of people who voted for them. The people trust them to run the country and bring an improved standard of living to the people".

He is right, it's called democracy. The problem is, it exists only on paper.

That's why i find it exasperating to read again and again the same pointless phrase, as recently happened with the diplomat who infuriated the General, and justly so, because a diplomat is not a journalist and if a diplomat doesn't understand that, then he should not do that job.

The chant goes : "he/they should restore democracy in this country", but to restore something implies that it was there before.

What was here, however, had so very little to do with democracy. The people had a right to vote, yes, but for whom ? for a self appointed 'elite' (strictly meaning rich guys, education, manners and ethics being totally optional), cynical big shots (on either side) whose agenda had nothing to do with the people's or the country's needs, and didn't care a bit. Votes were for sale, directly or indirectly (via the village heads) and corruption at all levels turned the whole system into a pathetic farce.

Restoring the right to vote in such a system would solve absolutely nothing. This Forum is full of people who are happy to lash out at the General, or at Thaksin and consorts for that matter, but no one has the faintest idea how to start mending a system that was so utterly damaged, and in such a context the expression 'restore democracy' sounds like Marie-Antoinette (allegedly) saying "the people don't have bread ? well, then they should eat croissants'.

Where have you been? Read the newspapers. Listen to the knowledgeable Thais in the universities. Start elections. The Thai people have tried and tried and tried but the majority keeps getting overruled by non elected special interests. You represent a non elected special interest. What, do you think no one knows?

Votes were for sale but the side who had the least amount of money won. Didn't you think that was a bit odd? Do you realize you are fooling no one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote : "They should use the power according to the intentions of people who voted for them. The people trust them to run the country and bring an improved standard of living to the people".

He is right, it's called democracy. The problem is, it exists only on paper.

That's why i find it exasperating to read again and again the same pointless phrase, as recently happened with the diplomat who infuriated the General, and justly so, because a diplomat is not a journalist and if a diplomat doesn't understand that, then he should not do that job.

The chant goes : "he/they should restore democracy in this country", but to restore something implies that it was there before.

What was here, however, had so very little to do with democracy. The people had a right to vote, yes, but for whom ? for a self appointed 'elite' (strictly meaning rich guys, education, manners and ethics being totally optional), cynical big shots (on either side) whose agenda had nothing to do with the people's or the country's needs, and didn't care a bit. Votes were for sale, directly or indirectly (via the village heads) and corruption at all levels turned the whole system into a pathetic farce.

Restoring the right to vote in such a system would solve absolutely nothing. This Forum is full of people who are happy to lash out at the General, or at Thaksin and consorts for that matter, but no one has the faintest idea how to start mending a system that was so utterly damaged, and in such a context the expression 'restore democracy' sounds like Marie-Antoinette (allegedly) saying "the people don't have bread ? well, then they should eat croissants'.

Where have you been? Read the newspapers. Listen to the knowledgeable Thais in the universities. Start elections. The Thai people have tried and tried and tried but the majority keeps getting overruled by non elected special interests. You represent a non elected special interest. What, do you think no one knows?

Votes were for sale but the side who had the least amount of money won. Didn't you think that was a bit odd? Do you realize you are fooling no one?

What a remarkably paranoid and ill-informed rant involving, typically, an attack against the person rather than well thought out arguments.

FYI I've been in this country for 14 years, I do read the newspapers and I even read TV threads, even though they're often invaded by rude and aggressive people such as yourself, Sir.

Edited by Yann55
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's been in charge 18 months. It's time to own your own problems.

Stop looking back, start looking forwards.

And stop whining all the time like a spoiled kid.

the problem is that the peole he is referring to are still very much players and lets face it - they shouldn't be

very easy to point the finger at the PM and say he is not running a democracy (true) but the reality is it is the only way effective changes will ever be accomplished, past democratic elected governments have shown how ineffective they are over decades of theiving - power abuse - and corruption and have failed to do anything about it - why should they, they are all enriching themselves, although the current solution is not ideal I honestly don't see any alternative, politicians in this country cannot be trusted (fact) so the only way to ensure they do what they were elected to do is to introduce stiff boundaries, rules, agencies, and laws that hold people in office to account and for the time being restrict them until such times they can be trusted

And what are his accomplishments with absolute power and almost a year and a half in charge?

Let's see...

- reducing the price of the lottery ticket to 80 baht

- stripping a fugitive criminal ex-policeman of his rank

- err ... anyone?

yeeees....cheap petrol...........clap2.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"saying that their abuse of power and betrayal of the voters' trust led to dissatisfaction and conflict". I thought that his attack dog Suthep was responsible for the conflict and the main dissatisfaction was emanating from their paymasters. It's like a feudal country from another era..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's been in charge 18 months. It's time to own your own problems.

Stop looking back, start looking forwards.

And stop whining all the time like a spoiled kid.

the problem hes facing is unsolveable , good luck

it will continue for generations until thai mentality changes (as if )

Not unsolvable but very, very difficult and obviously not something the present government is willing or able to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"If the government uses its power in the wrong way, the act should be considered treason. It is betrayal of the people's trust. These bad individuals never want to take responsibility for their actions and they never truly want to commit to the people."

Applying this litmus test for politicians...around the world...most of them would windup in prison...where IMHO most of them belong...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe I'm just naive, but from my calculations the military have been in power for at least 50% of the last 40 years. Now I've posted this graph before, but can someone please help me to explain what difference exactly military vs politicians vs any Joe on The Street has had an this 'Asian Tiger'?

Until this country actually wakes up to modernity and accepts some rational view of itself, it's future, and what to do, the past is destined to repeat itself ad nauseam

Now for the majority of expats living here, doesn't really matter what they do. I've lived through them all, no change. Regardless of what the TVF zealots profess, we live in a bubble, until the Thai's actually accept what their relative 'success' is, nothing changes..

post-97442-0-44351200-1442668381_thumb.j

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...