Trump's shocking crude comments on women leave him reeling

[Tawan Dok Krating Daeng]

1 hour ago, dcutman said:

A sexual assault report with the police would be ideal. But they all claim they told family, friends, coworkers and even said unrelated persons witnessed these incidences. Unless I have missed something, none of these people have come forward to corroborate  these allegations.

I find odd that none of these women, not one, has came forward prior to this point, just as Wikileaks starts dumping thousands of emails daily about Clinton. As we all know, these sexual assault allegations have completely dominated MSM reporting.

I also find it odd that most or all these women claim they became enraged after watching the last debate, and thats the reason they are making these claims now.

 

 

No doubt a male wrote this.

 

I doubt such types will ever get a clue.

[dcutman]

59 minutes ago, Publicus said:

 

I find odd that none of these women, not one, has came forward prior to this point, just as Wikileaks starts dumping thousands of emails daily about Clinton. As we all know, these sexual assault allegations have completely dominated MSM reporting.

 

 

That's WikiLeaks, Putin, Trump to the rest of us.

So you are into that conspiracy theory,  Russians are sabotaging the American election?

I didnt think you were into those.

[Tawan Dok Krating Daeng]

27 minutes ago, Boon Mee said:

Trump is "Reeling" so badly that he's in a statistical tie with Clinton? 

 

Yep, those college-educated women have put Hillary into a double digit lead. So much for ignoring the bimbos eh.

 

Hillary Clinton Picks Up Support From Women, Swing Voters to Build Lead

http://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-clinton-extends-lead-over-donald-trump-to-11-points-1476622801

 

Trump is being schooled by the lady.

[CaptHaddock]

5 minutes ago, Ulysses G. said:

 

Wishful thinking. He lied to the American people. He pushed unconstitutional executive orders. He made America look foolish with his fake red line. His color is not the reason he is hated.

 

It's possible that you yourself don't hate him for being black, but you can hardly deny that a large part of Trump's followers do.  The birther movement is nothing but a transparent cover for racism.  If you're not willing to admit that, then no discussion is possible.

 

I don't know which lies you are referring to, but I am sure that Obama did lie to the American people about something.  All politicians do lie.  He never told a lie of the scale of the lie about weapons of mass destruction to bring the US into a war that cost up to $3 trillion dollars with no benefit for the USA.  So, are some lies more important to you than other lies or are all lies completely morally equal?

 

If you hate lies so much how could you possibly support Trump?  No candidate has lied as much as he has.  What's more interesting is that during the primaries when the fact-checking websites were scoring all the Repub and Dem candidates for lying, it became clear that all the Republican candidates lied more than all the Democrat candidates.   So, despite your claim that it is only a love of truth that guides your voting I can only believe that something else is going on.

 

This kind of discussion is the reason we lefties can't take Trump supporters like yourself seriously.

[Boon Mee]

2 minutes ago, CaptHaddock said:

.  The birther movement is nothing but a transparent cover for racism. 

And the Birther Movement was started by whom? 

[Publicus]

7 hours ago, Strange said:

 

lol your pseudo-intellectual sarcasm is almost, almost, funny. 

 

"Truly Stunning" - I wouldn't go that far..... But ill take it. 

 

Ahh, but my organic half-decaf latte is very tasty.

 

Methinks Trump is going to give himself a category Alpha heart attack. 

 

This last debate will indeed be the final meltdown.

[Pimay1]

1 minute ago, Boon Mee said:

And the Birther Movement was started by whom? 

Of course we all know who started the birther movement but the left wing Hillary supports don't want to go there.

[dcutman]

1 hour ago, Tawan Dok Krating Daeng said:

 

I doubt such types will ever get a clue.

A clue about what?

Weather or Not I should believe these women or the fact the the media is pounding on this so hard with no evidence?

I recall the media hammering the news non stop for weeks about WMD's in Iraq and we need to go to war. I also remember the media's non stop reporting on Benghazi and and Americans got killed because of a youtube video. How did all that work out?

If you believe what the media is ramming into your head without evidence, one should be considered an idiot.

 

 

[KarenBravo]

Just curious, but, does the USA have some policy whereby a minimum percentage of the voting population must vote for the result to stand?

If US citizens decided not to vote enmass as a protest at the quality of the two candidates.

 

Just to take this to an extreme; if nobody voted in the election except for one citizen, would the result stand?

[keemapoot]

1 hour ago, dcutman said:

A sexual assault report with the police would be ideal. But they all claim they told family, friends, coworkers and even said unrelated persons witnessed these incidences. Unless I have missed something, none of these people have come forward to corroborate  these allegations.

I find odd that none of these women, not one, has came forward prior to this point, just as Wikileaks starts dumping thousands of emails daily about Clinton. As we all know, these sexual assault allegations have completely dominated MSM reporting.

I also find it odd that most or all these women claim they became enraged after watching the last debate, and thats the reason they are making these claims now.

 

 

I guess until someone like you has ever faced an awesomely fierce, terribly rich,, deep-pocketed litigant who can and will bury you in lawsuits until you are bankrupt; who can make it so you do indeed "never again work in this town," will you ever understand how a young, vulnerable, honest working woman or beauty contestant would not just rush out and bring charges. 

 

You are perfectly aligned with Trump. He has you in the diminutive palms of his hands.  I hope you never get on the wrong side of someone like him, you will be crying uncle.

[KarenBravo]

9 hours ago, Strange said:

 

This should be under your username, Pub. 

 

You just pop in here now and again, huh?

Yeah......right.

[Tawan Dok Krating Daeng]

14 minutes ago, Boon Mee said:

And the Birther Movement was started by whom? 

 

Illinois senate candidate Jack Ryan in 2004.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers/ap.asp

[Publicus]

4 minutes ago, dcutman said:

So you are into that conspiracy theory,  Russians are sabotaging the American election?

I didnt think you were into those.

 

You're missing a lot.

 

And misrepresenting a lot.

 

U.S. Says Russia Directed Hacks to Influence Elections

 

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration on Friday formally accused the Russian government of stealing and disclosing emails from the Democratic National Committee and a range of other institutions and prominent individuals, immediately raising the issue of whether President Obama would seek sanctions or other retaliation.
 

www.nytimes.com/2016/10/08/us/politics/us-formally-accuses-russia-of-stealing-dnc-emails.html?_r=0

 

 

VP Biden said the other day cyber retaliation is the USA response of choice in this one. 

 

Trump meanwhile continues to pour gasoline onto the fire he himself lit that the election is rigged. The point Trump and the fanboyz also miss is that the Constitution was written to preclude tyrants getting themselves elected. Rigged is the word of choice by The Ignoramus. 

 

So it is no surprise that Trump and the Despicables have nothing left except to go off on wild and crackpot turkey running. Chickens with their heads cut off they are.

[Andaman Al]

Having read a few pages of a few threads, I am now unsure what I find most exhausting and mind sapping, the utter inane disingenuous drivel spouted by Trump or the same spouted by a few key members on this forum. Thank God this part of the election process is over soon, I would rather eat worms than go through another two months of this. 

[KarenBravo]

53 minutes ago, Boon Mee said:

Trump is "Reeling" so badly that he's in a statistical tie with Clinton? 

 

Still living on a different planet, I see..........

[Publicus]

3 minutes ago, KarenBravo said:

Just curious, but, does the USA have some policy whereby a minimum percentage of the voting population must vote for the result to stand?

If US citizens decided not to vote enmass as a protest at the quality of the two candidates.

 

Just to take this to an extreme; if nobody voted in the election except for one citizen, would the result stand?

 

The Electoral College votes no matter what. 

 

Surely there is a point of some sort to this orbital speculation. 

[keemapoot]

1 minute ago, Andaman Al said:

Having read a few pages of a few threads, I am now unsure what I find most exhausting and mind sapping, the utter inane disingenuous drivel spouted by Trump or the same spouted by a few key members on this forum. Thank God this part of the election process is over soon, I would rather eat worms than go through another two months of this. 

 

Just think of it this way. You will never again read a post by any of those people and give it much credence whatsoever, so it makes your day more efficient.

[dcutman]

56 minutes ago, keemapoot said:

 

I guess until someone like you has ever faced an awesomely fierce, terribly rich,, deep-pocketed litigant who can and will bury you in lawsuits until you are bankrupt; who can make it so you do indeed "never again work in this town," will you ever understand how a young, vulnerable, honest working woman or beauty contestant would not just rush out and bring charges. 

 

You are perfectly aligned with Trump. He has you in the diminutive palms of his hands.  I hope you never get on the wrong side of someone like him, you will be crying uncle.

Your reply make no sense at all. If they were worried about a law suit why did they come out with these allegations, especially with no proof?

[Tawan Dok Krating Daeng]

7 minutes ago, dcutman said:

A clue about what?

Weather or Not I should believe these women or the fact the the media is pounding on this so hard with no evidence?

I recall the media hammering the news non stop for weeks about WMD's in Iraq and we need to go to war. I also remember the media's non stop reporting on Benghazi and and Americans got killed because of a youtube video. How did all that work out?

If you believe what the media is ramming into your head without evidence, one should be considered an idiot.

 

 

 

You were not attacking the media. You were attacking the women and their stories.

 

Attacking the media is an entirely different matter. There is no connection between what the victims of Trump's sexual abuse and assault are saying and Iraq or Benghazi.

 

Any person relating personal experience of sexual assault should be treated with respect and dignity.

[KarenBravo]

Just now, Publicus said:

 

The Electoral College votes no matter what. 

 

Surely there is a point of some sort to this orbital speculation. 

 

Yes, there is a point to my question.

Both candidates are utter crap. Is there any way that neither candidate could win by people not voting?

If so, then the course of action would be obvious.

You have already answered my question. The world is going to be lumbered with a terrible president, no matter what happens.

[Publicus]

17 minutes ago, Boon Mee said:

And the Birther Movement was started by whom? 

 

The desperation intensifies.

 

And the Birther origination lie of the rightwhinge continues.

 

Thanks are in order however as the post brings us full circle as the finish line finally comes into view.

[keemapoot]

1 minute ago, dcutman said:

Your reply make no sense at all. If they were worried about a law suit why did they come out with these allegations, especially with no proof?

 

Try to follow along. Trump has admitted this behavior, which establishes a legal admission of reputation for purposes of a defamation lawsuit. It's now harder for Trump to sue them as he will face pre-trial motions for summary judgment and other dismissal motions. At the same time, media companies are probably indemnifying these women against suit from Trump for coming forward now as they also know defending these suits just got easier.

[dcutman]

1 hour ago, Publicus said:

 

You're missing a lot.

 

And misrepresenting a lot.

 

U.S. Says Russia Directed Hacks to Influence Elections

 

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration on Friday formally accused the Russian government of stealing and disclosing emails from the Democratic National Committee and a range of other institutions and prominent individuals, immediately raising the issue of whether President Obama would seek sanctions or other retaliation.
 

www.nytimes.com/2016/10/08/us/politics/us-formally-accuses-russia-of-stealing-dnc-emails.html?_r=0

 

 

VP Biden said the other day cyber retaliation is the USA response of choice in this one. 

 

Trump meanwhile continues to pour gasoline onto the fire he himself lit that the election is rigged. The point Trump and the fanboyz also miss is that the Constitution was written to preclude tyrants getting themselves elected. Rigged is the word of choice by The Ignoramus. 

 

So it is no surprise that Trump and the Despicables have nothing left except to go off on wild and crackpot turkey running. Chickens with their heads cut off they are.

Seems you are the one missing a lot, unless you can show a link that the the president, the vice president or anyone else in the US govt has any proof the Russians have anything to do with this.

 

This is a serious allegation and even more serious, threats to retaliate against the Russians with zero proof. Now wouldnt it be a catastrophe if this went as far as a military conflict and people died?

 

[Ulysses G.]

15 minutes ago, keemapoot said:

 

Just think of it this way. You will never again read a post by any of those people and give it much credence whatsoever, so it makes your day more efficient.

 

This is a definite case of pot, kettle black. I can't believe the lies and distortions coming from the Hillary enablers. 

[Ulysses G.]

22 minutes ago, Tawan Dok Krating Daeng said:

 

Illinois senate candidate Jack Ryan in 2004.

 

And made popular by Hillary's supporters in the 2008 race.

[Publicus]

4 minutes ago, keemapoot said:

 

Just think of it this way. You will never again read a post by any of those people and give it much credence whatsoever, so it makes your day more efficient.

 

Point well recognised.

 

Been doing that for several years already. 

 

My take-away from Trump being nominated and running in the general election is that the national general electorate gets the final and definitive say.

 

The national general electorate is in the most welcome final stage to officially stamp Trump, everything he says, and everything about his fanboyz as the reject right wingnuts they'd always been.

 

The national general electorate, finally getting a high visibility and intense exposure to the rightwhinge nutcakes of the USA, is about to dismiss 'em outright and decisively. Which is what this poster has been doing for some considerable time -- with the added ingredients of contempt and ridicule.

[keemapoot]

2 minutes ago, Publicus said:

 

Point well recognised.

 

Been doing that for several years already. 

 

My take-away from Trump being nominated and running in the general election is that the national general electorate gets the final and definitive say.

 

The national general electorate is in the most welcome final stage to officially stamp Trump, everything he says, and everything about his fanboyz as the reject right wingnuts they'd always been.

 

The national general electorate, finally getting a high visibility and intense exposure to the rightwhinge nutcakes of the USA, is about to dismiss 'em outright and decisively. Which is what this poster has been doing for some considerable time -- with the added ingredients of contempt and ridicule.

 

Yeah, I have some sympathy for the party regulars, the party loyal and party faithful. But the rest of the guys I see who turned into Trumpsters so easily and who don't have those bona fides, well they are just kinda desperate dullards in my book. I will never look at them again in the same light, and that is just my personal feeling.

[Boon Mee]

27 minutes ago, KarenBravo said:

 

Still living on a different planet, I see..........

Seen the latest WaPo Poll have you? 

[dcutman]

1 hour ago, Tawan Dok Krating Daeng said:

 

Any person relating personal experience of sexual assault should be treated with respect and dignity.

So you believe the accused should should be found guilty in the court of public opinion though a 24 hour a day 7 day a week media blitz with not one shred evidence, not even a character witness that all these women claim to have?

 

[stander]

15 hours ago, keemapoot said:

Haha, the latest hilarious and outrageous conspiracy theory Trump is shouting is that Clinton used illegal performance-enhancing drugs prior to the last debate. He is demanding a drug test before the next debate. 

 

I read that Clinton is seriously considering demanding a sanity test before the next debate, and that Bill Maher has called her to suggest demanding a DNA test prior to the debate to ensure Trump is not the offspring of lesser primates.   

No one knows what drugs Trump is suggesting Hillary might be taking to "pump her up" but they have ruled out truth serum.