sjaak327 Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 1 minute ago, Baerboxer said: Do you understand the word hypocrite? For your scurrilous and defamatory comment to be true you would have to know what comment I made regarding former President Bush's election. Do you know that? Or just making it up as you go along? I responded to your remark that the democrats are clutching at straws. That seem to imply you don't approve. If you disapproved of the way Bush II got elected I deeply apologize, but somehow I doubt that to be the case. by the way, why mention people that didn't vote ? Those votes cannot possibly be counted. If there are voting irregularities in some key states (and this electoral college system is designed that this does matter) then I for one would support a recount, and so should any real democrat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baerboxer Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 8 minutes ago, jaidam said: Take away the dead voters, and the illegal voters, Trump won the popular vote also. This looks to be heading the same way as Brexit, ie the elite changing the rules because they lost. It seems that way. Democracy only counts when the "right" choice is made. Bexit is a bit different because we have a government trying desperately to ignore parliamentary procedure and implement something following a referendum that was described as "advisory" in the legislation passed to implement it. So yes, the Tory party are trying to change the rules (and ignore the law in doing so) and set a very dangerous precedent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonclark Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Baerboxer said: Fact - the POTUS is not and never has been elected on the popular vote. The electoral college has always been the system. Fact - this is the 5th time that a POTUS has been elected by this process whilst not receiving the most voters in the popular vote. Fact - Hilary lost, Trump won based on the voting system used by the USA to elect it's POTUS. Fact - it doesn't matter, change the result, or mean Hilary won. I completely agree - especially the bit about her losing - see the first two words of my previous post! But 2 million more Americans would prefer her to be president than Trump - Fact! Edited November 24, 2016 by jonclark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baerboxer Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 5 minutes ago, sjaak327 said: I responded to your remark that the democrats are clutching at straws. That seem to imply you don't approve. If you disapproved of the way Bush II got elected I deeply apologize, but somehow I doubt that to be the case. by the way, why mention people that didn't vote ? Those votes cannot possibly be counted. If there are voting irregularities in some key states (and this electoral college system is designed that this does matter) then I for one would support a recount, and so should any real democrat. Bush's victory was dubious, but accepted. Claiming recounts seems more about discrediting the whole system and trying to cast a veil on legitimacy. Fine, if they have real evidence that there were issues that should be produced and if necessary a recount should be carried out. The people who didn't vote haven't endorsed Hilary or Trump. Nor have they expressed a view that the EC system is o k or not. They either couldn't be bothered and don't care; or found both candidates distasteful. Saying however, as some like to, that "the majority voted for Hilary, or that the majority want the system changed" are not statements based on fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonclark Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Baerboxer said: . Saying however, as some like to, that "the majority voted for Hilary..............are not statements based on fact. So who did the majority of voters vote for?? Please illuminate me?? Or do you think the 62 million votes for her are because those voters secretly want Trump to be president, ergo he got the majority? Edited November 24, 2016 by jonclark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mania Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 Quote Hillary Clinton's lead over Donald Trump in the popular count Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaibeachlovers Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 (edited) 3 hours ago, DriveByTrucker said: 3 hours ago, DriveByTrucker said: Not disputing that at all (actually she lost in more ways than one), just wonder what you think that she lost with 2 million (or 1.5%) more votes than the actual winner. What you think this means to the democracy of a country. And try to reflect it from an objective point of view, like when "your" choice was the one who lost this way.... Not disputing that at all (actually she lost in more ways than one), just wonder what you think that she lost with 2 million (or 1.5%) more votes than the actual winner. What you think this means to the democracy of a country. And try to reflect it from an objective point of view, like when "your" choice was the one who lost this way.... The EC system did exactly what it was intended to do and prevented the liberals in California dictating to the rest of the country. Edited November 24, 2016 by thaibeachlovers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JHolmesJr Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 50 minutes ago, jonclark said: Correct she lost. But two million more Americans want her to be president than Mr. Trump - agreed? 300 million people want free healthcare...whats your point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaibeachlovers Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 11 minutes ago, jonclark said: I completely agree - especially the bit about her losing - see the first two words of my previous post! But 2 million more Americans would prefer her to be president than Trump - Fact! But being in a minority of states, those 2 million have zero chance of changing the electoral system. A majority of states wanted Trump, and that is the only thing that counts with the EC. Good thing that Trump has such a large majority of EC votes, or the ones that will vote for her in contravention of their responsibility would be able to give it to her, and then this would happen BIG TIME Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DriveByTrucker Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 8 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said: The EC system did exactly what it was intended to do and prevented the liberals in California dictating to the rest of the country. LoL, the intention of the electoral college system is to prevent Californian liberals from dictating the rest of the country. If that is the intention of the EC, then I full heartedly have to agree with Trump, then the system is indeed rigged to the core and absolutely not democratic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMGImInPattaya Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 (edited) Wow...Hillary almost won; a few more votes in the deplorable states and she would have been Pres...too bad winning Los Angeles and New York City doesn't get one the Presidency Edited November 24, 2016 by OMGImInPattaya Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeilSA1 Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 Trump was correct when he said elections were 'unfair'. Imagine how he would behave if he lost due to the electoral system but was ahead in the popular vote. Ironic... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 1 hour ago, 55Jay said: Would you say the same thing if the situation was reversed? Yes. Yes I would. The night before November 9 (Thai Time) I had personally accepted a "Hill" win. It wasn't until I woke up that morning that I was so pleasantly surprised. Never crossed my mind to contest or revolt or cry like a little biatch. 1 hour ago, Andaman Al said: You just made my day with that little Gem! Thanks. Can I ask you something? Whats your infatuation with US politics and the USA in general? Also - who gives a shiiiiit what Jill Stein wants. Nothing is gonna change. She's just digging her own grave with that nonsense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scorpio1945 Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 The Electorial College was designed to prevent "Mob Rule". After the election, it has been easy to figure out who the MOB is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMGImInPattaya Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 4 hours ago, geriatrickid said: That is not the issue. It is the fact that Mrs. Clinton received 2 millon more votes than Trump. So what...take your 2M votes and try to buy a cup of Starbucks coffee with them to see what they're worth! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saraburi121 Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 2 hours ago, JackThompson said: Personally, I'd like to see less Federal-govt overreach and power, given such a large country, so that local communities had more control. Jack you summed it up and particularly agree with you last quoted point. Well said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMGImInPattaya Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 1 hour ago, Silurian said: Yeah, I think it is funny that the Donald supporters love bringing out the red maps as if land mass itself voted for DT. How about a map that shows how it looks by population? A little closer...hmm? Too bad for you's guys the states aren't actually shaped like that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dunroaming Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 4 hours ago, JHolmesJr said: Why even bother counting votes since he won legally? Yes I don't get it either. The damage is done now so there is no point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 (edited) 7 minutes ago, dunroaming said: Yes I don't get it either. The damage is done now so there is no point Damage eh? The majority of states and counties will heartily disagree. Edited November 24, 2016 by Strange Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 11 minutes ago, Saraburi121 said: 3 hours ago, JackThompson said: Personally, I'd like to see less Federal-govt overreach and power, given such a large country, so that local communities had more control. Jack you summed it up and particularly agree with you last quoted point. Well said. Agreed as well and I'm noting that the "Hill" approach was vastly against this ideal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dunroaming Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 Just now, Strange said: Damage eh? I vast majority of states and counties will heartily disagree. And time will prove you right and me wrong, or will it be the other way round? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 Just now, dunroaming said: And time will prove you right and me wrong, or will it be the other way round? No idea. Im not gonna speculate. I will however tell you and anyone else that is reading that I fully support whatever the outcome. I will not, however, cry like a little biatch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
55Jay Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 15 minutes ago, Strange said: Yes. Yes I would. The night before November 9 (Thai Time) I had personally accepted a "Hill" win. It wasn't until I woke up that morning that I was so pleasantly surprised. Never crossed my mind to contest or revolt or cry like a little biatch. About the same for me. Thought she was going to win but not by much. I was pretty shocked when I turned on the 'puter with a cup of coffee next morning and saw Trump was ahead. I wasn't pleased, just resigned to it if, indeed, that was to be the outcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atyclb Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 reportedly millions voted that included illegals and the deceased. it would make sense that illegals would vote for hillary since trump is outspoken about deporting illegals. the trump rallies were standing room only and usually very long queues outside and 10-20,00 people stadiums were full. the media that panned around at many hillary rallies showed dismally low turnouts. its also been alleged that in some locals the outcomes were manipulated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 1 hour ago, DriveByTrucker said: Thats a statement based on your (completely unfounded) assumptions only. The stupidity of the statement is actually really funny. Let me ask you, how many millions of Americans do you personally know? And how many of these millions discussed their voting decision with you? Can I also conclude that you dont read any media, because that influences the perception you have on the voting decision of Americans? If you dont know millions of Americans, and you do read media, that would mean according to your own rules that you know absolutely nothing about America! Lmao. Straight up - you, as a foreigner, know more about American life and the reasoning behind the votes cast, than an American? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dunroaming Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Strange said: No idea. Im not gonna speculate. I will however tell you and anyone else that is reading that I fully support whatever the outcome. I will not, however, cry like a little biatch. I suspect you wil bel too busy kicking the dog! Ha! Ha! Edited November 24, 2016 by dunroaming Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silurian Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 7 minutes ago, Strange said: The majority of states and counties will heartily disagree. Keep on telling yourself that land mass votes, huh? The power of Gaia at work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dunroaming Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 10 minutes ago, Strange said: Damage eh? The majority of states and counties will heartily disagree. I think you will find that 2 million more will agree with me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 9 minutes ago, dunroaming said: I suspect you wil bel too busy kicking the dog! Ha! Ha! 7 minutes ago, Silurian said: Keep on telling yourself that land mass votes, huh? The power of Gaia at work. 4 minutes ago, dunroaming said: I think you will find that 2 million more will agree with me Slapped-Ass syndrome at work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silurian Posted November 24, 2016 Share Posted November 24, 2016 6 minutes ago, Strange said: Slapped-Ass syndrome at work. Yeah, pretty much the exact response I expected...sigh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now