webfact Posted May 11, 2017 Posted May 11, 2017 Architectural Digest names Elephant Building one of the ugliest skyscrapers in the world By Coconuts Bangkok Photo: Wikimedia Commons BANGKOK: -- Architectural Digest, the most respected magazine covering global architecture, included Bangkok’s iconic Elephant Building in its list of the 24 ugliest skyscrapers in the world last week, alongside Trump Tower. The article, written by the magazine’s associate editor Nick Mafi, described the Bangkok landmark by saying, “while playful in design, the structure does little to push the integrity of Thai architecture.” Ouch. In their description, the magazine also does little to credit Ong-at Sattraphan, Thailand’s national artist and the architect of the Elephant Building, but instead said the landmark was created by another famous architect, Sumet Jumsai. Full story: https://coconuts.co/bangkok/news/architectural-digest-names-elephant-building-one-ugliest-skyscrapers-world/ -- © Copyright Coconuts Bangkok 2017-05-11
ExpatOilWorker Posted May 11, 2017 Posted May 11, 2017 ...and in second place the UOB Robot building.
edwinchester Posted May 11, 2017 Posted May 11, 2017 Was that the thud of a defamation suit hitting the editorial desk I just heard?
ExpatOilWorker Posted May 11, 2017 Posted May 11, 2017 Bangkok can also offer an alternative shopping experience to the many upscale shopping centers around town. Unfortunately most of the fish are now gone.
PatOngo Posted May 11, 2017 Posted May 11, 2017 32 minutes ago, edwinchester said: Was that the thud of a defamation suit hitting the editorial desk I just heard? No, it was concrete elephant $h!t.
fruitman Posted May 11, 2017 Posted May 11, 2017 One day i had to visit a shop near the Elephant building but could never find it because the building doesn't like like an elephant. It needs a trunk, ears and tail. But since traffic is so messed up and dangerous i rarely have time to watch around, i prefer to see the motobikes coming against me instead of the scenery.
Dexlowe Posted May 11, 2017 Posted May 11, 2017 The Nation Tower on Bangna highway? (Renamed now, I think)
trogers Posted May 11, 2017 Posted May 11, 2017 Perhaps the reason is that this building was designed by an Engineer, and not an Architect...
worgeordie Posted May 11, 2017 Posted May 11, 2017 19 minutes ago, trogers said: Perhaps the reason is that this building was designed by an Engineer, and not an Architect... Or a committee ! regards worgeordie
theguyfromanotherforum Posted May 11, 2017 Posted May 11, 2017 I think it's a bit unfair to be honest. I like both the Elephant and Robot building.... both of them added character to Bangkok when they were built. Unfortunately, I think Elephant building suffers from poor maintenance as do many structures here. I think condo can be had cheap there.
ratcatcher Posted May 11, 2017 Posted May 11, 2017 They must have been judging buildings that are presently occupied. There are a couple of high rise towers, one known locally as "The Ghost Tower" , that are architectural offerings designed when the architect was on LSD or equivalent. Note the Parthenon like decoration. This monstrosity (Sathorn Unique) reminiscent of Miss Havisham's wedding cake (Great Expectations) apparently was "designed" to house people. It is now an urban blight and can sometimes be explored for a fee.
theguyfromanotherforum Posted May 11, 2017 Posted May 11, 2017 You realize that Sathirn unique and Lebua was built by the same developer. I'm sure the finished product would have been nice.Sent from my Lenovo A7020a48 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
ratcatcher Posted May 11, 2017 Posted May 11, 2017 2 minutes ago, theguyfromanotherforum said: You realize that Sathirn unique and Lebua was built by the same developer. I'm sure the finished product would have been nice. Sent from my Lenovo A7020a48 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app Well, perhaps Rangsan Torsuwan, a prominent architect and real estate developer who also designed Sathorn Unique's sister building, the State Tower.was having a bad week when he designed that confection, still looks like a wedding cake with half a peach on top. OTOH Deepak Ohri is a hotel/resort developer with Lebua as part of his portfolio.
blix99 Posted May 11, 2017 Posted May 11, 2017 Sadly, for a major world city Bangkok has some of the ugliest, most ungainly, sadly conceived architecture on the planet. Love the city but the architecture really sucks...
phantomfiddler Posted May 12, 2017 Posted May 12, 2017 15 hours ago, trogers said: Perhaps the reason is that this building was designed by an Engineer, and not an Architect... Engineers do not design buildings. Architects design them and engineers make sure they do not (in most cases) fall down when full of people jumping up and down ! The building in question looks like the headquarters of the McDonald,s Corporation.
pmarlin Posted May 12, 2017 Posted May 12, 2017 No. 24 is a political pick. That building is tame compared to most of the others in Las Vegas.
Bluespunk Posted May 12, 2017 Posted May 12, 2017 17 hours ago, webfact said: Architectural Digest names Elephant Building one of the ugliest skyscrapers in the world They're not wrong.
Bluespunk Posted May 12, 2017 Posted May 12, 2017 17 minutes ago, pmarlin said: No. 24 is a political pick. That building is tame compared to most of the others in Las Vegas. Nah. Trymp tower was picked because it is an ugly piece of shit.
pmarlin Posted May 12, 2017 Posted May 12, 2017 10 minutes ago, Bluespunk said: Nah. Trymp tower was picked because it is an ugly piece of shit. Man, that is one intelligent reply.
Bluespunk Posted May 12, 2017 Posted May 12, 2017 Just now, pmarlin said: Man, that is one intelligent reply. It matched your bizarre claim it was picked because of politics.
Classic Ray Posted May 12, 2017 Posted May 12, 2017 I think the designs reflect the architectural courses available at universities here where the main teaching aid appears to be Lego!
Lupatria Posted May 12, 2017 Posted May 12, 2017 In a step to avoid leading next years ranking, they'll start copying the pyramids as there were no complaints about them for thousands of years.
sanukjim Posted May 12, 2017 Posted May 12, 2017 18 hours ago, edwinchester said: Was that the thud of a defamation suit hitting the editorial desk I just heard? OH YES, You have been warned to not "LIKE" this on FB.
CLW Posted May 12, 2017 Posted May 12, 2017 ...and in second place the UOB Robot building.Hey it's cute, isn't it [emoji13] And I've learned everything that is cute is okay in Thailand.Waiting for a hello kitty building [emoji23]
Prbkk Posted May 12, 2017 Posted May 12, 2017 1 hour ago, Bluespunk said: Nah. Trymp tower was picked because it is an ugly piece of shit. It is a monstrosity...and the building it replaced , a department store the name of which I forget, did have architectural merit; in particular some highly stylised stonework panels. After the battle to save the building had been lost, The Met offered to take those panels but Trump sent in the demolition teams and they were destroyed...." we couldn't delay, time is money".
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now