brewsterbudgen

I take statins (10mg) and blood pressure meds for mild hypertension. I declared this to my insurer and it's shown on the certificate. I've been assured I am covered for related illnesses... Time will tell!

No they didn't.

Starmer was doing his job at the time; no doubt the father was granted asylum because he would have been killed in Rwanda? If true, I really don't see why it needs to be covered up. Why can't people just be truthful, even if it upsets some?

Eat two whole unpeeled kiwi fruit every day. Guaranteed to work.

Who did you go with in the end, and how much was your premium?

They might be harmless, but they poop everywhere and make me jump. I have some anti-lizard spray which seems to slow them down so they can be swept up and chucked outside where they belong.

Surely a bargirl marries a customer for security and a better life? Same the world over.

No, no claims small or large. I doubt there is any Health Insurance company that has a 100% record of meeting every claim. Your situation with April sounds horrible and I sympathise. No, I haven't made any claims.

Sure, it's possible. As I said, I don't take internet reviews very seriously. The OP just wanted to know how much people are paying. He can do his own due diligence.

I'm well aware they have their detractors on this Forum - check out the threads! However, I've been with them for 3 years now and have no complaints. To be honest, I take internet reviews, both positive and negative, with a pinch of salt. My broker has many clients who use them and, thus far, nothing to make him recommend I switch.

Yes, inpatient only. Serenity Package with WRLife. https://www.wrlife.org/

WRLife

I mostly watch CNN. Abby Philip's show at 10am Thai time is worth watching. She has a mixed panel covering all sides and they go for it! CNN provide a good balance to Fox News.

Entertaining and good for Iron Mike. Not really sport though. Glad I already have Netflix as wouldn't have wanted to pay extra for it.

I'm 64 and pay £2,200 a year for myself, wife and 9-year-old son. Cover $400,000.

Call it "East Pattaya" then.

There's no smoke without fire. In 2020, Gaetz was accused of child sex trafficking and statutory rape after allegedly having a sexual relationship with a 17-year-old. The Justice Department investigated the claims but did not charge him. The investigation into Gaetz was related to a larger inquiry into his longtime associate Joel Greenberg. Greenberg later pled guilty in 2021 to six felony counts of sex trafficking, wire fraud, conspiracy, identity theft and stalking. CBS News reported that investigators were specifically looking at whether Gaetz sex-trafficked a minor, if he violated the Mann Act which bars the transportation of “any woman or girl for the purpose of prostitution or debauchery, or for any other immoral purpose” across state lines and if he obstructed justice. But in September 2022, prosecutors declined to press charges against him. The Washington Post reported that prosecutors were concerned over the credibility of two key witnesses and whether they could secure a conviction if they did bring charges. The case was formally closed in February 2023.

Because he's a scumbag.

Yes, that's the general assumption. Trump's nomination allowed him to resign from the House, thus preventing the report coming out. He has no hope of being confirmed by the Senate, so hopefully he will just disappear into the criminal, trafficking underworld.

I'll start getting mine in 2027 and like everyone here I deplore that fact there will be no 'triple lock' if I remain living in Thailand. However, I have no issue with, and am glad to see, those who are defrauding the system getting penalised.

Nothing new. Thailand has always been open to diversity. It's one of the reasons that many choose to live here.

Underage girls too; not that that will bother Epstein's chum, Trump!

That was the point I was making. 'Legacy' media should be balanced; cable already. The thread is about CNN.

Maybe he was referring to Boris?

True, the first-past-the-post system is indefensible. But it suits both Tories and Labour. Reducing the Labour majority from 156 to 155 will not worry them.